logo
Boston police had 70 Tasers. The department is spending millions on 1,500 more.

Boston police had 70 Tasers. The department is spending millions on 1,500 more.

Boston Globe16-04-2025

'The successful use and de-escalation by those units, particularly when responding to mental health related calls, highlighted the need to provide access to these tools to our front line officers,' Cox said. 'We want to equip our personnel with additional options to handle the many complex situations they face on a daily basis without causing serious harm whenever possible.'
Advertisement
The Boston Police Department did not respond to specific questions about the budget implications of the contract. Boston City Council President Ruthzee Louijeune and Councilor Henry Santana, chair of the city's public safety committee, were asked about the cost and use of the equipment, but their offices said they were not available for comment due to ongoing budget hearings.
Advertisement
Of the 1,500, the department has already acquired 260 new Tasers, with the eventual goal of equipping all its officers.
The rollout places Boston in step with most municipal police departments, which have already made Tasers part of their standard kit, said Bruce Champagne, a Utah-based retired police officer and use of force instructor who works as an expert witness on police procedure in federal court cases.
'They've only grown more accepted as time goes on,' Champagne said. 'Boston is maybe a little behind the national trend.'
One factor driving Taser adoption is their perceived utility for officers confronting people in emotional crisis — a scenario that all too often ends in tragedy. In Massachusetts, more than half the people shot by police since 2016 were mentally ill, a
Officers have grown to value Tasers as a useful tool for resolving those kind of unpredictable encounters, said Michael Bradley, executive director of the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association.
'They can be particularly effective in reducing injuries to both officers and subjects, especially in cases where physical confrontation might otherwise escalate,' he said.
Axon has long touted studies that have found Tasers
But civil liberties groups and advocates for the mentally ill have questioned those claims, particularly for people who are already in poor health. In 2019,
Advertisement
'We know that when mental health is managed through policing, sometimes it can be very dangerous and lead to escalation,' said Ivy Moody, a staff attorney at the Quincy-based Mental Health Legal Advisors Committee. 'A Taser isn't a gun, but it can be a lethal weapon when it comes to folks who have comorbidities.'
Carlton Williams, a Boston-based attorney and police reform advocate, said he is skeptical that equipping officers with Tasers will make police encounters safer for mentally ill people. He called the suggestion that Tasers are safer 'a great theory in the abstract.' The more officers that have Tasers, he argued, the more that will use them.
'In practice, in almost every jurisdiction people have looked into, people use it as an increase in force,' Williams said. 'Are people going to step down force they would have used, or are they going to step it up?'
In 2021, Boston police issued
The agency's
Advertisement
Overall, Taser use by police in Massachusetts, including warnings and actual stuns, declined each year from 2018 through 2021, according to
The Boston Police Department is purchasing the Taser 10, Axon's latest version of the stun gun. The new model, released in 2023, features an increased range of 45 feet, a 10-probe magazine, and digital tracking of deployments, according to the company.
Tasers have become ubiquitous in police arsenals since 1999, when Axon, then named Taser International, introduced its first advanced model — capable of shocking a target's muscles into immobility.
'Most major police departments in the country have adopted Tasers,' said Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank.
At the turn of the millennium, 500 law enforcement agencies used Tasers, The
Boston police have used Tasers in two incidents this year, Detective Sergeant John Boyle wrote in an email.
On the evening of March 28, officers responded to a report of a man acting erratically on a corner across the street from the Forest Hills bus terminal. He did not appear to be armed, but he shoved officers who approached and said they'd have to 'shoot him' to get him to move, according to a police report.
Advertisement
Four officers stood around him, one carrying an application to hospitalize the man against his will. An ambulance was waiting, but the man wouldn't get in. After 15 minutes of de-escalation attempts, one officer unholstered his Taser, gave two warnings and fired, according to the police.
The incident is being investigated by the police Firearm Discharge Investigation Team, in accordance with department policy.
Another incident took place on April 8, when officers attempted to break up a fight between two dogs in Hyde Park. Minnie, a pit bull, had her jaws around the neck of Lolita, a French pocket bully; an officer tased Minnie 'to save Lolita's life,' according to the police report. Both dogs were taken to an animal hospital.
Dan Glaun can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program
Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program

SCRANTON — A national anti-DEI group has targeted the Geisinger College of Health Sciences with recent filings of discrimination complaints. Virginia-based Do No Harm purported in news releases in March and June that it filed separate complaints with two federal agencies against the college, citing as discriminatory its federally funded Center of Excellence for Diversity and Inclusion and a summer program that aimed to help students from Black, Hispanic or Native American communities that are underrepresented in the medical field transition into medical school. The Do No Harm discrimination complaints come amid President Donald Trump's efforts to dismantle DEI, or diversity, equity and inclusion, programs in the public and private sectors. Trump issued executive orders in the first week of his second term targeting DEI initiatives. 'Geisinger College of Health Sciences did a thorough review of our programs after the presidential executive orders were issued to ensure compliance. The pre-matriculation program referenced in the (Do No Harm) complaint ended in 2024 and is no longer active,' Geisinger CHS said in a statement. Do No Harm is labeled by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an 'anti-LGBTQ+ hate group.' Critics of the SPLC say it's politically biased and its definition of hate group is overly broad. Do No Harm first filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on March 19 against Geisinger CHS, according to a news release posted on the Do No Harm website. A member of Do No Harm then filed a similar complaint June 5 with the U.S. Department of Education, because Geisinger 'did not learn its lesson' from the initial complaint filed with HHS, the advocacy organization announced in another news release. The Times-Tribune could not verify that the complaints were filed with both departments, and whether either agency investigated the allegations or took any actions. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Education through separate representatives said they do not confirm the existence of complaints. Do No Harm, established in April 2022, claims it has 17,000 members, including doctors, nurses, physicians and concerned citizens, and cites its mission as safeguarding health care from ideological threats. 'Do No Harm seeks to highlight and counteract divisive trends in medicine, such as 'Diversity, Equity and Inclusion' and youth-focused gender ideology,' the organization's website says. According to the SPLC, Do No Harm in 2024 filed eight lawsuits challenging programs such as scholarships and fellowships for marginalized people. 'The group claims that the practice of nonprofit organizations like the American Association of University Women to provide fellowships to students of color and LGBTQ+ students — groups historically underrepresented in academia and medicine — harms patients by requiring medical schools to accept or fund unqualified candidates. According to the group, the case was dismissed 'after AAUW agreed to drop the racial criteria in the fellowship's selection process,'' the SPLC website says. According to the website of Geisinger College of Health Sciences, it is the research and education arm of the Geisinger health system. Established in 2022, the college unifies the Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger School of Nursing, Geisinger School of Graduate Education, graduate medical education, Center for Faculty and Professional Development and more. * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) Show Caption 1 of 3 Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) Expand

Trump admin approves waivers for 3 states to ban soda, other junk food from public food programs
Trump admin approves waivers for 3 states to ban soda, other junk food from public food programs

Fox News

time6 hours ago

  • Fox News

Trump admin approves waivers for 3 states to ban soda, other junk food from public food programs

Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins signed waivers with three states on Tuesday, allowing them to prohibit participants of the government's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) from buying junk food, like soda and candy, through the social welfare program. Arkansas, Idaho and Utah became the latest states to obtain waivers from the federal government to begin banning junk food within the federally administered, but state-operated, public assistance program that provides food stamps to low-income individuals. The three states have become the latest to obtain waivers from the Trump administration that allow states to restrict what type of food SNAP funds are eligible to be used on. Other mostly GOP-led states, like Nebraska, Indiana and Iowa, have also obtained waivers to reform their SNAP programs. Last month, during a Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) event at the White House, Rollins indicated that several states were lining up to get the waivers. "Since my confirmation, [the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)] has encouraged states to think differently and creatively about how to solve the many health issues facing Americans," Rollins said at a press conference announcing the new waivers Tuesday afternoon. "One way is disallowing taxpayer-funded benefits to purchase unhealthy items, like soda, candy and other junk food." Tuesday's waivers bring the total number of states that have moved to ban junk food from their SNAP programs to six. Rollins indicated several other states, including Colorado, Kansas, West Virginia, Texas, Ohio, Florida and Louisiana, are also working through procedural steps in hopes of getting waivers approved. Texas, however, may not even need the waiver after its legislature passed Senate Bill 379 during the last week of its legislative session that ended on June 2. The new bill, which prohibits SNAP participants in the state from using the public assistance program to buy junk food, is expected to be signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, especially after he wrote a letter to Rollins in May seeking a USDA waiver. "The Trump Administration is unified in improving the health of our nation. America's governors have proudly answered the call to innovate by improving nutrition programs, ensuring better choices while respecting the generosity of the American taxpayer," Rollins added Tuesday. "Each waiver submitted by the states and signed is yet another step closer to fulfilling President [Donald] Trump's promise to Make America Healthy Again." On average, 42 million low-income Americans receive food-stamp assistance each month, according to the MAHA report released last month. It added that one-in-five American children under 17 receive SNAP benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store