Deporting migrant would ‘stress' him out, judge rules

Yahoo

11-04-2025

A Somali criminal seeking asylum in the UK has avoided deportation after a judge ruled that returning him to his home country would cause him too much 'stress'.
The court found that the unnamed asylum seeker, who has been dependent on alcohol since 2006, would suffer stress if deported to his homeland, which would worsen his mental health.
Judges in the upper immigration tribunal ruled that this would amount to a breach of article three of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which protects against persecution and inhumane treatment.
His appeal was granted despite the Home Office arguing that the man, who had been jailed for unspecified crimes, would be able to secure the medication and treatment that he needed in Somali for his schizophrenia and auditory hallucinations, backed by funding from the department.
The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example exposed by The Telegraph where failed asylum seekers or convicted foreign criminals have attempted to halt their deportations, often by claiming breaches of their human rights.
There are a record 41,987 outstanding immigration appeals, largely on human rights grounds, which threaten to hamper Labour's efforts to fast-track removal of illegal migrants.
The Upper Tier Tribunal (UTT) of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber was told the man – who was granted anonymity – moved to the UK in 1999 when he was 29. He told the tribunal that his family previously faced persecution as a result of their membership in a clan.
The man, who was accompanied by his support worker during the hearing, was said to have a 'high level of vulnerability' and 'complex needs' having experienced long-standing health problems. He has been 'significantly dependent' on alcohol since 2006 and has served time in prison.
'The severity of his mental health problems is closely linked to his stress levels and use of alcohol,' the tribunal said.
Lawyers representing the asylum seeker said he would have 'no real prospect' of returning to Mogadishu and making a living for himself. They emphasised that the financial support he would receive would be 'limited', and in any event, the man had a 'history of being financially exploited'.
This related to a time in his accommodation when he was 'targeted for money' by other residents after it became known that he was receiving disability benefits.
It was further argued that the assistance the man might receive from his clan would not constitute the kind of '24-hour support and monitoring' that he requires in order to meet his 'core vulnerabilities.' They said he would have to 'pay for his antipsychotic medication'.
Overall, they said his mental health would 'very quickly decline' if he were to return to Somalia, so much so that he would 'fall into destitution.' He said the man would likely end up in an internally displaced person camp featuring 'dire conditions' and the potential for violence.
Lawyers representing the Home Office argued that the humanitarian conditions in Somalia did not reach the threshold of serious harm. They said it would be rare for a person of his clan to be compelled to reside in the Internally Displaced Person [IDR] camp.
They said that schizophrenia is recognised as a mental health disorder in Somalia, which has 'some psychiatrists'. Ultimately, they argued the man would be able to access his medication and relevant psychiatric healthcare in his home country.
They said that this, coupled with the financial package offered through the Facilitated Return Scheme, believed to be of a sum of £750, meant the man would be able to access the required medication and support scheme.
The scheme encourages the early departure of foreign national offenders from the UK, by providing financial support for reintegration in their origin countries. Evidence from doctors suggested the man could 'become well' if he abstained from alcohol and complied with his medication.
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Ian Jarvis said: 'I conclude that the weight of the evidence before the Tribunal indicates that the [man] will very quickly become noncompliant with his medication.. without the 24/7 support and monitoring which he currently receives in the United Kingdom.'
Upholding his appeal, the judge ruled his mental health would 'seriously deteriorate' if he were to return to Somalia.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.