Puska family trial: jury to continue deliberations on Friday
A
Central Criminal Court
jury will continue their deliberations on Friday in the trial of four family members charged with offences relating to obstructing the arrest of the man who murdered schoolteacher
Ashling Murphy
.
Jozef Puska murdered 23-year-old Ms Murphy by stabbing and slashing her neck after attacking her while she exercised along the canal towpath outside Tullamore on the afternoon of January 12th, 2022. A jury later
convicted him of that murder
and he is serving a life sentence.
His brothers, Lubomir Puska jnr (38) and Marek Puska (36) are charged with withholding information.
Their wives, Viera Gaziova (40) and Jozefina Grundzova (32) are charged with impeding the apprehension or prosecution of Jozef Puska by burning his clothes.
READ MORE
All the accused were living with Jozef Puska, his wife Lucia, and 14 children at Lynally Grove, Mucklagh, Co Offaly, when the offences are alleged to have occurred in January 2022.
All accused have pleaded not guilty to all charges.
The jury originally began its deliberations on Wednesday, but an amendment was made to the indictment on Thursday.
The amendment relates to the charge that the accused knew that Jozef Puska had committed the offence of murder or some other arrestable offence. The amended indictment now reads that they knew he had committed the murder of Ashling Murphy or some other arrestable offence.
In her closing speech earlier this week, prosecutor Anne-Marie Lawlor SC told the jury that Marek and Lubomir jnr knew what Jozef had done shortly after 9.30pm on the night of the murder because Jozef told Marek. Despite this, Ms Lawlor said Marek and Lubomir jnr failed to disclose vital information when they spoke to gardaí. Their wives burned Jozef's clothes to impede his arrest or prosecution, she said.
The jury had previously heard from defence counsel Karl Finnegan SC, who said in his closing speech that Marek Puska was entitled to remain silent to avoid incriminating himself. Mr Finnegan said there was a real risk that the information his client had could implicate him in an offence of assisting his brother after the murder.
He said the legislation regarding withholding information was introduced following the Omagh bombing to force people with knowledge of that atrocity to come forward.
However, Mr Finnegan said, the legislation does not remove a person's right to remain silent if they believe that they could incriminate themselves. At the time, Mr Finnegan said, there was a real risk that his client would be arrested for assisting Puska after the murder by arranging to get him out of Tullamore or because he knew of the plan to burn Jozef's clothes.
The jury of seven men and five women will continue their deliberations on Friday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Jury in trial of Jozef Puska's relatives to resume deliberations on Monday
Jurors in the trial of family members of Jozef Puska, who are charged with offences relating to obstructing his arrest for the murder of schoolteacher Ashling Murphy, have ceased their deliberations for the weekend and will return to the Central Criminal Court on Monday. Jozef Puska murdered Ms Murphy (23) on January 12th, 2022, by repeatedly stabbing her in the neck after attacking her while she exercised along the canal towpath outside Tullamore, Co Offaly. He was later convicted of murder and is serving a life sentence. His brothers, Lubomir Puska Jnr (38) and Marek Puska (36) are charged with withholding information from gardaí. Their wives, Viera Gaziova (40) and Jozefina Grundzova (32) are charged with impeding the apprehension or prosecution of Jozef Puska by burning his clothes. READ MORE All the accused were living with Jozef Puska, his wife Lucia, and 14 children at Lynally Grove, Mucklagh, Co Offaly, when the offences are alleged to have occurred in January 2022. All accused have pleaded not guilty to all charges. After originally beginning their deliberations on Wednesday, the jury on Friday returned to court shortly before 12.30pm with three questions. The jurors first asked whether the four accused 'need to know that they are doing something unlawful at the time they do it to be guilty of a crime', to which Ms Justice Caroline Biggs said they did not. The jury then said they understood that protection of Jozef Puska is not a reasonable excuse in and of itself, but asked if the motivation was the protection of the wider family, particularly the children, and protection of Jozef Puska was the means to achieve this, does this qualify as a reasonable excuse. They gave the example of protection from harassment. In response, Ms Justice Biggs said it had already been indicated that the issue of self-incrimination can amount to a reasonable excuse. She said beyond that, the issue of reasonable excuse was entirely a matter for them to decide on the evidence. She said if there was some evidence, it was for the prosecution to disprove it to a standard of beyond reasonable doubt. Ashling Murphy. Photograph: In his closing speech, defence counsel Karl Finnegan SC said that Marek Puska was entitled to remain silent to avoid incriminating himself. Mr Finnegan said there was a real risk that the information his client had could implicate him in an offence of assisting his brother after the murder. Kathleen Leader SC, for Lubomir Jnr, said her client delayed but did not withhold information. She said he had a reasonable excuse for the delay and asked the jury to consider the 'natural sense of protection for his younger brother'. She said it is understandable that Lubomir Jnr was reluctant to accept that his brother had 'committed a truly horrific murder'. The third and final question posed by the jury was whether they should consider only the written statements and other evidence presented or if they could take into account wider circumstances or family dynamics. 'For example, if a person is perceived to be influenced by family dynamics when committing an act, can this be considered a reasonable excuse or is it only relevant to sentence,' they said. Ms Justice Biggs said in relation to that, and in relation to the issue of reasonable excuse, she would go back to what would not be a reasonable excuse, which was the protection of Jozef Puska. Ms Justice Biggs told the jury that they could take into account more than the witness statements and other evidence. 'You can take into account whatever you deem appropriate if it is founded on the evidence or if you can infer it from the evidence,' she said, before warning the jury to be careful not stray 'into the territory of speculation or guesswork'. The 12 jurors originally began considering their verdicts on Wednesday. However, a change was made to the indictment on Thursday and since then the panel has spent seven hours and 18 minutes deliberating. Prosecutor Anne Marie Lawlor SC told the jury in her closing speech earlier this week that Marek and Lubomir Jnr knew what Jozef had done shortly after 9.30pm on the night of the murder because Jozef told Marek. Despite this, Ms Lawlor said Marek and Lubomir Jnr failed to disclose vital information when they spoke to gardaí. Their wives burned Jozef's clothes to impede his arrest or prosecution, she said. In his closing address, Paul Murray SC, for Ms Grundzova, told the jury that when his client burned Puska's clothes, she did not have any of the evidence that would later prove Jozef's guilt. Damien Colgan SC, for Ms Gaziova, told the jury that his client's view at that time was that Jozef had been the victim of an assault.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Croatian football fans accused of Ryanair flight disruption go free as trial collapses
Four Croatian football supporters accused of a disturbance on a plane which delayed a Ryanair flight at Dublin Airport have walked free from court after the trial collapsed on Friday. Marco Bajzec (41) of Beechwood Park, Ballyboe, Glencar, Co Donegal, and Zvonimir Prkacin (40), Luis Buic (38), and Tomislav Zajec (39), all of the same address at Confey, Leixlip, Co Kildare, were arrested on January 22nd. The four had hoped to fly to London that morning for the Dinamo Zagreb versus Arsenal FC Champions League match at the Emirates Stadium that evening. Instead, they were charged with offensive behaviour on the aircraft but were granted bail that afternoon and pleaded not guilty. READ MORE The four contested the case, which went to a non-jury hearing at Dublin District Court on Friday. Judge Susan Fay heard evidence from a cabin crew member alleging that they boarded normally. But just before take-off, one stood, asking to use the toilet. The court heard he was advised it was not possible at that time. The captain was notified that the unspecified passenger was on his feet at the back galley. The plane could not take off, and he was advised several times, and that man was eventually given permission to use the toilet. Then his friends also wanted to go to the toilet, with one allegedly saying, 'If you don't let me go to the toilet, I can urinate at the back galley,' the court heard. The witness could not remember which of the four made that remark. The captain was told they were not complying with the safety regulations and it was not possible to proceed. A decision was made to offload them from the aircraft. However, the defence made legal submissions about lawyers for the four men not being furnished with the prosecution witness's statement before the hearing. The men's barristers opposed an adjournment, saying that one of the accused had been put on Ryanair's no-fly list, affecting his ability to travel. Barristers applied for a dismissal. Judge Fay described the disclosure issue as a 'genuine oversight'. She said the statement in question should have been disclosed, particularly where the issue had been ventilated before the hearing. However, she refused to grant a full dismissal of the charges and struck out the case. At their first appearance in January, Gda Emmet O'Byrne and Gda Conor O'Neill told Judge Kelly they arrested the men at 9.15am at stand 107L in Terminal 1. The four were brought to the airport and Ballymun Garda stations to be charged under the Air Navigation and Transport Act. The judge noted that Mr Bajzec and Mr Buic made no reply while Mr Prkacin answered, 'I feel sorry for the passengers on the flight and the staff; they were delayed because of us'. Mr Zajec stated to gardaí: 'I have done nothing wrong'
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Annie McCarrick case: Man (60s) who was arrested on suspicion of murder released without charge
The man arrested on suspicion of the murder of Annie McCarrick in 1993 has been released from Garda custody without charge. He was released on Friday afternoon after being questioned since his arrest on Thursday morning. 'The male aged in his 60s who was arrested on the morning of 12th June, 2025 and detained under the provisions of Section 4 of the Criminal Justice Act 1984 has been released without charge,' the Garda confirmed in a statement. The suspect's home in the east of the country was also searched as part of the operation over the past two days while a search, and excavation, at a house in Clondalkin, Dublin, linked to the suspect in the early 1990s has also been carried out. The search at the Clondalkin property was prompted by new information received by the Garda investigation team. A cadaver dog, supplied by the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) , was brought in to aid the search there on Friday afternoon. READ MORE Heavy machinery, including a digger, 'Kango hammer' and consaw have been used in the excavation, which has involved digging up some built features at the rear of the property. An invasive search was also being carried out inside some parts of the house. The man arrested for questioning on suspicion of the murder was flagged to gardaí as a possible suspect in the case in the immediate aftermath of the New Yorker vanishing from Sandymount , South Dublin, in 1993. Friends of Ms McCarrick were concerned about the man, and the nature of his contacts with the 26-year-old in Dublin. They outlined those concerns, and the specific reasons for them, in fax messages to the Garda investigation team. However, they have always believed the information they supplied was not properly handled and was not factored into the initial inquiry in any meaningful way. The suspect, who is in his 60s and originally from Dublin, was arrested on Thursday morning and remained in Garda custody early on Friday. He was detained under Section 4 of the Criminal Justice Act, on suspicion of murder, and could be questioned for up to 24 hours, though questioning was paused to allow breaks for rest. [ Annie McCarrick's best friend is 'overwhelmed with emotion, crying over my coffee' after developments in case Opens in new window ] Gardaí yesterday extended his period of detention to the maximum 24 hours of interviews permitted under law. The man has become a successful businessman and now lives outside Dublin. As well as being arrested on Thursday morning, his home was searched. And a house in Clondalkin, west Dublin, that he was linked to was sealed off for searching and excavation, in an operation continuing on Friday morning. Gardaí bring a cadaver dog into the premises, pictured on Friday morning at a house on Monastery Walk, Clondalkin, where gardaí are continueing their search in the investigation into the death of American woman, Annie McCarrick, who disappeared in 1993. Photograph: Colin Keegan, Collins Dublin. The Clondalkin property has been renovated by the current occupants, who bought the house over a decade ago. Gardaí have stressed the current occupants are completely unconnected to Ms McCarrick or the murder inquiry now under way. Some of Ms McCarrick's friends in the United States had remained in close and frequent contact with her when she moved back to Ireland in January, 1993, after first studying here. They said she felt pressured and harassed by an Irishman in her social circle in Dublin and that she told them the man struck her when he had been drinking. They flagged those concerns with gardaí in the initial stages of the investigation when she vanished. [ Annie McCarrick: Gardaí made first arrest in 32-year investigation after receiving new information Opens in new window ] However, at the time Ms McCarrick (26) went missing, there was a series of reported sightings of her getting on a bus bound for Enniskerry, Co Wicklow, and also sightings of her in the village. Other reports placed her 6km away in Johnnie Fox's Pub, Glencullen, Co Dublin. Those sightings, since discounted, all related to Friday, March 26th, the day of the last confirmed sighting of the murdered woman at her flat in Sandymount, South Dublin. Much of the Garda's attention in the first phased of investigation focused on pursuing those sightings in Enniskerry and Glencullen. Ms McCarrick knew the man arrested on Thursday, and was very close to him for a period. However, while her friends told gardaí about that man in 1993 – including Ms McCarrick saying he had harassed her and struck her – they felt their information was not actioned by detectives at the time. When none of the claimed sightings of Ms McCarrick in 1993 led to any breakaway, and her remains were never found, the case remained an unsolved missing person's inquiry until it was upgraded to a murder investigation two years ago. In recent years, after a cold case review and fresh investigation, detectives have come to focus on the arrested man as the main suspect in the case. They also have a particular interest in a close associate of his, who they went abroad to interview earlier this year. They believe the suspect and his close associate were together on the weekend Ms McCarrick vanished and detectives have sought to recheck their accounts of their movements, comparing statements taken in recent years. In March 1993 Ms McCarrick, from Long Island, New York, was living in rented accommodation at St Cathryn's Court, Sandymount, with two friends. They last spoke to her at the property on the morning of Friday, March 26th. Amid rising concerns for her safety, Ms McCarrick was reported missing to gardaí that Sunday, more than 48 hours after the last confirmed sighting of her. Meanwhile, the US lawyer hired by the father of Ms McCarrick to represent the family in the period after her disappearance has said he is 'delighted' there has been an arrest and remains hopeful the case will eventually be resolved with a conviction. Michael Griffith has criticised An Garda Síochána over its reluctance to engage with him and others working for the family in the aftermath of her disappearance in March 1993. He suggested then Director of Public Prosecutions Eamonn Barnes had been helpful to the team Mr Griffith had assembled to work on the case on behalf of the McCarrick family but that the Garda was reluctant to share information or engage. 'We met with the Garda. We tried to follow up leads at that time but nothing came of it,' he told RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland programme on Friday. 'In the States here, attorneys tend to share evidence with investigations, with the police, but even though Eamonn Barnes wanted the Garda to open up the file to us, the Garda was quite reclusive about it, and we weren't able to get into the file, although there were a couple of persons of interest, one of whom I'm told may now be in custody.' He said had a meeting with Jean Kennedy Smith, then US ambassador to Ireland, who assured him the Department of State would do everything it could to assist but said this had no impact on the level of co-operation provided by An Garda Síochána. Mr Griffith said the disappearance of their daughter took a very considerable toll on her parents, John, now deceased, and Nancy. 'Obviously there was a lot of stress that came out of this and the McCarricks got divorced.' He said he would like to know what prompted an arrest in the case after so long but he remains hopeful the case will be resolved for the family. An Garda Síochána said it did not respond on individual cases but has a policy of appointing family liaison officers in major cases.
