South Korea's center-left leader Lee wins presidency
South Korea's center-left leader Lee Jae-myung hailed voters' 'great decision' as he was declared the winner of a snap presidential election early Wednesday, capping months of political chaos.
Six months to the day after ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol plunged the country into crisis with his disastrous declaration of martial law, official results from the National Election Commission showed Lee had defeated conservative rival Kim Moon-soo, who had earlier conceded the race.
Voter turnout was the highest in nearly three decades.
'I will humbly accept the choice of the people. Congratulations to the elected candidate Lee Jae-myung,' Kim said as the last ballots were still being counted.
Lee had earlier thanked voters for placing their trust in him, saying he would do his 'utmost to fulfil the great responsibility and mission entrusted to me, so as not to disappoint the expectations of our people.'
In a nod to South Korea's growing partisan divide, exacerbated by the chaos after Yoon's martial law bid, Lee said those that did not support him remained 'fellow citizens' and promised to 'move forward with hope and make a fresh start from this moment on.'
He also promised to 'pursue dialogue, communication, and cooperation' between Seoul and its arch-enemy Pyongyang, with which relations plunged to their lowest level in years under Yoon's hawkish approach.
Lee will take office almost immediately, as soon as the commission validates the tally, likely early Wednesday.
With 96.74 percent of the total ballots counted overnight it was mathematically impossible for Kim to catch him, the official figures showed.
Lee will face a bulging in-tray, including global trade vicissitudes chafing the export-driven economy, some of the world's lowest birth rates and an emboldened North Korea rapidly expanding its arsenal.
Voter turnout was 79.4 percent – the highest since 1997.
An exit poll by the three major broadcasters had earlier projected a victory for Lee, prompting his supporters to break into cheers outside the National Assembly, as party officials watching from inside the parliament started a chant of 'Lee Jae-myung.'
For weeks, major polls had put Lee well ahead of Kim – Yoon's labor minister – who struggled with party infighting and failed to convince a third party candidate to unify and avoid splitting the right-wing vote.
After months of turmoil and a revolving door of lame-duck acting leaders, many South Koreans said they were eager for the country to move forward.
The fallout from Yoon's martial law declaration, which has left South Korea effectively leaderless for the first months of US President Donald Trump's tumultuous second term, was the decisive factor in the election, experts said.
The vote was 'largely viewed as a referendum on the previous administration,' Kang Joo-hyun, a political science professor at Sookmyung Women's University, told AFP.
Yoon's impeachment over his martial law bid, which saw armed soldiers deployed to parliament, made him the second straight conservative president to be stripped of office after Park Geun-hye in 2017.
'Lee's victory signals that the Korean public rejects illiberal and undemocratic measures such as martial law,' Gi-Wook Shin, a sociology professor at Stanford University, told AFP.
'This moment will likely be remembered as a peculiar and consequential turning point in South Korea's political history.'
But Lee's success is due as much to his rivals' failings as his own strengths, said Minseon Ku, a postdoctoral researcher at the William & Mary Global Research Institute.
'Lee has a criminal record and was involved in several political and personal scandals,' Ku said.
His rise to the presidency is 'a reflection of the deep political turmoil South Korea has been experiencing'.
South Korean presidents serve a single five-year term.
Police issued the highest level of alert and deployed thousands of officers to ensure the election plus the upcoming inauguration Wednesday proceed smoothly.
Lee – who survived an assassination attempt last year – has been campaigning in a bullet-proof vest and delivering speeches behind a glass protective shield.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
33 minutes ago
- Arab News
Afghan women UN staff forced to work from home after threats
UNAMA confirmed that UN staff had been threatened'Several United Nations female national staff members in the Afghan capital Kabul have been subjected to threats,' it saidKABUL: Afghan women working for the United Nations in Kabul have been threatened by unidentified men because of their jobs, the organization and several women told AFP on women working for various UN agencies told AFP on condition of anonymity they had been threatened on the street and over the phone by men warning them to 'stay home.'UN staffer Huda — not her real name — said that for weeks she has been bombarded with messages abusing her for 'working with foreigners.''The messages keep coming and they are always harassing us... saying, 'Don't let me see you again, or else',' the young woman told said her office had advised her to work from home until further United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) confirmed that UN staff had been threatened.'Several United Nations female national staff members in the Afghan capital Kabul have been subjected to threats by unidentified individuals related to their work with the UN,' it said in a the threats 'extremely serious,' the UN has taken 'interim' measures 'to ensure the safety and security of staff members,' it Taliban government, accused by the UN of imposing a 'gender apartheid' against women since returning to power in 2021, has denied any ministry spokesman Abdul Mateen Qani said such threats were a 'crime' and that police would take said the authorities had opened an seizing power in 2021, the Taliban authorities have severely restricted Afghan women from working and it is the only country in the world where women are banned from education beyond primary government in 2022 banned women from working for domestic and international NGOs, which was extended to include the UN's offices in the country the following policy has some exceptions including for women working in health care and education, and has not been consistently UN has previously called the policy 'deeply discriminatory.'Selsela, in her 30s, said while returning from the office last week she was approached by unknown men who told her she should be 'ashamed' and that she must 'stay home.''They said, 'We told you nicely this time, but next time you'll have another thing coming',' she told AFP.'I was very scared,' she said, explaining how she struggles to work efficiently from home in a country where electricity and Internet are unreliable.'The situation for women is getting worse every day.'Another woman, Rahila, said she and two other women colleagues were stopped by men while traveling home in a UN vehicle and told not to go to the office anymore.'They said, 'Don't you know that you are not allowed?',' Rahila said, adding that she has also received threatening messages from unknown numbers.'I am very worried, I need my job and my salary,' she of Afghanistan's population of some 45 million people struggle to meet their daily needs, according to the UN, with the country facing one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.


Arab News
33 minutes ago
- Arab News
Washington says Pakistan needs to address barriers to American exports, companies
KARACHI: Pakistan's government needs to address its tariff and non-tariff barriers against American exports and companies, a spokesperson at the US consulate general in Karachi said on Thursday as both nations seek to forge closer trade ties through negotiations. Reva Gupta, the spokesperson at the US consulate general in Karachi, made the comments a week after Pakistan and the US started what the official described as 'dynamic' negotiations with Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb on Washington's imposition of tariffs. The talks take place as US President Donald Trump imposed steep tariffs on a number of countries earlier this year, a move widely viewed as a setback for the global economy still recovering from the coronavirus pandemic. Pakistan faces a potential 29 percent tariff, currently under a 90-day pause announced in April, on its exports to the US due to a $3 billion trade surplus with the world's biggest economy. 'In our bilateral engagements with Pakistan, we always message the need to jointly tackle challenges to our trade relationship, including the need for Pakistan to address its longstanding tariff and non-tariff barriers against US exports and companies,' Gupta told Arab News. The tariffs could be a setback to Islamabad's hectic efforts aimed at navigating a tricky path to economic recovery. Pakistan hopes to achieve sustainable economic growth driven by exports. The US is Pakistan's largest export destination. American exports to Pakistan were valued at $2.1 billion in 2024, up 4.4 percent ($90.9 million) from 2023, according to US government data. The import of goods from Pakistan to the US totaled $5.1 billion in 2024, up 4.9 percent ($238.7 million) from 2023. 'The United States and Pakistan share a robust economic relationship going back decades, of which trade and investment are key elements,' Gupta said. 'That the United States remains Pakistan's largest export market globally is a testament to this strong partnership'. Gupta, however, referred to US Trade Representative's (USTR) National Trade Estimate Report which highlights significant foreign barriers to US exports in various countries, including Pakistan. The USTR details tariff and non-tariff hurdles ranging from Pakistan charging higher tariffs to US businesses to the closure of Internet services, imposing a ban on US beef imports and 'perceived politicization' of the anti-graft National Accountability Bureau body. 'US companies have cited concerns that Pakistan has been imposing high tariff rates and, in some cases, additional duties, on products such as automobiles and finished goods,' the report said. Some prominent American companies operating in Pakistan include Pepsi-Cola, General Electric International, Procter and Gamble, Pfizer and DuPont, according to the International Trade Administration, a US government agency. Experts have warned the tariffs could harm Pakistan's competitiveness in the global market, especially if regional exporters such as China, Bangladesh and Vietnam redirect more goods to Europe, intensifying competition in alternative markets. 'LIKELY TO SAIL THROUGH' However, economist Shankar Talreja, who is also the director of research at Topline Securities Ltd. brokerage form, said talks between Washington and Islamabad are likely to 'sail through.' 'Pak-US trade talks are likely to sail through as Pakistan exports are primarily based on labor-intensive industry such as textile,' Talreja told Arab News. He said Pakistan is likely to increase its import of agricultural commodities such as cotton and petroleum products from the US to fill the trade deficit. But if talks fail, Pakistani textile exports may be adversely affected, he said. 'If talks are not successful, Pakistan textile exports may get hurt in future assuming other countries will successfully negotiate with the US,' the analyst warned. The textile industry attracts the largest amount of foreign exchange for Pakistan, fetching an impressive $17 billion for the cash-strapped nation in FY2024.


Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
New Trump ban puts thousands of Afghans in US resettlement limbo
KABUL: A new US travel ban, which lists Afghans among nationals of 12 affected countries, has put on hold the lives of thousands of refugees who fled Afghanistan after the withdrawal of American-led troops in 2021. US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday banning nationals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the country — part of a broader immigration crackdown launched by his administration earlier this year at the start of his second term. The move has placed in a state of indefinite waiting some 25,000 Afghans who have been approved for relocation to the US and are awaiting departure in Pakistan. One of them, Mohammad Iqbal, a 35-year-old former government employee, told Arab News that his refugee resettlement application has been active for the past two years. Having completed two interviews with the UN refugee agency and the necessary medical check-ups, he was waiting for his final visa appointment. He is not allowed to work in Pakistan, and he also cannot go back to Afghanistan — both for safety reasons and since that would halt the refugee process. 'I am running out of money and there is no work for Afghans here in Pakistan. We are also facing an increasing risk of deportation. My passport will expire if I don't make it to the US in a few months. It will be very difficult to go back to Afghanistan. I won't be safe there,' Iqbal said. 'I have done my master's degree abroad and worked in some highly technical positions before 2021 ... The current decision by the US president is very unfair and is against the promises made to us by the US government.' Besides those in Pakistan, thousands more Afghans are in the same situation stranded in Qatar and in the UAE, and another few hundred have been kept waiting at Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo — the largest US military base in the Balkans. The US travel ban will be in effect from June 9, according to a presidential proclamation released by the White House, which said that it was needed to protect the US from 'from terrorist attacks and other national security or public-safety threats.' Justifying the decision on Afghanistan, Trump cited its lack of a 'competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents' and screening and vetting capabilities. Another reason was that the Taliban, 'a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) group,' controls Afghanistan. The Taliban took over Afghanistan in August 2021, when its Western-backed administration collapsed as American-led international forces withdrew after two decades of occupation that started with the US invasion of the country in 2001. The troop withdrawal was followed by an exodus of hundreds of thousands of Afghans — many of whom had worked as translators or local staff for foreign governments, organizations or for the previous administration, and feared potential retribution by the Taliban. 'The US played a direct role in creating this situation. As a result of the 20-year US occupation, Afghan society was divided into hostile groups that turned against each other,' said Nasir Ahmad Nawidy, political science professor at Salam University in Kabul. 'Because of the improper policy of the US — without an agreement and peace being reached — the country collapsed, and the systems and order were destroyed. As a result, many people who were prominent figures or experts in the previous regime, or other people who had held important positions in this country, were forced to leave Afghanistan.' He was still hopeful that the US justice system would challenge Trump's decision. 'The US has a commitment to these people,' he said. 'They have been promised it, and their visas are in process. Ignoring these commitments and halting or delaying ongoing processes is against all humanitarian laws.'