logo
The Indianapolis Star Subscription Offers, Specials, and Discounts

The Indianapolis Star Subscription Offers, Specials, and Discounts

As Indiana officials try to rein in spending in the face of a predicted revenue shortfall, advocates fear a behind-the-scenes move to privatize the state's Adult Protective Services program could prevent elderly and at-risk Hoosiers from receiving the help they need.
Indiana Family and Social Services Administration confirmed to IndyStar that it has awarded PCG-Indiana Inc. a 3-year contract, estimated at more than $19 million, for the firm to staff and operate Adult Protective Services starting July 1. An award letter released April 30 greenlighted contract negotiations with the company. The contract could contain an option for the state to add three one-year extensions, potentially lengthening the deal to six years.
Indiana's Adult Protective Services is responsible for investigating reports of neglect, abuse and exploitation of vulnerable adults and coordinating a response to protect them. Traditionally, FSSA has contracted with the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council 's hub prosecutor offices to operate the program, but those contracts expire on June 30.
The new contract takes Adult Protective Services out of the hands of local prosecutors, who for years have complained that Indiana underfunded the program, and puts the program under a subsidiary of Boston-based Public Consulting Group. The parent company, with offices in nearly a dozen states, works with public-sector health, human services and education agencies. PCG-Indiana, the subsidiary, has contracted with Indiana since 2010, providing consulting services related to education, children and social services, and workforce development, according to public records.
"Over the next two months, the Division of Aging, will work with PCG-Indiana and the current APS units to establish an APS model for Indiana that is in line with new federal requirements and best practice recommendations," FSSA said in an emailed statement. Public Consulting Group did not respond to a request for comment.
Meanwhile, prosecutors and advocates say FSSA hasn't been transparent about the procurement process and what the APS model would look like under a private contractor with a motive to make a profit.
"It's been a very opaque discussion that's been going on the state level with regard to what's going on with APS," said H. Kennard Bennett, executive director and senior counsel for the Center for At-Risk Elders, Inc., a lawyer-led nonprofit that provides guardianship and advocacy for endangered adults in Marion County.
"They've not sought any input from any stakeholders."
Adult Protective Services fields 20,000 calls a year
A report is made to Adult Protective Services whenever an individual 18 years or older is suspected of being deprived of food and water, improperly clothed, neglected medically, exploited financially, or in other ways.
In 2023, Adult Protective Services received more than 20,000 calls for service, according to the FSSA Division of Aging Adult Protective Services 2024 Annual Report. Of those, 11,653 cases resulted from the calls. Vulnerable adults can include individuals unable to care for themselves due to age, mental or developmental disabilities, incapacitating injuries, mental illness, or those suffering from isolation or neglect.
The program, which resides in FSSA's Division of Aging, is funded through state appropriations. Indiana operates Adult Protective Services within the county-based criminal justice system and contracts with 17 prosecutors to administer it through a hub model. Most hubs service multiple counties.
Prosecutors say the program repeatedly had funding issues.
"For multiple budget cycles, the State and the Family and Social Services Administration (FSSA) declined to provide sufficient financial resources to the Adult Protective Services (APS) program, leaving prosecutors concerned that the standard of care to Indiana's increasing elder population and vulnerable adults could not be maintained," Whitney Riggs, spokeswoman for the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council, said via email.
A 2016 IndyStar investigation revealed that Indiana Adult Protective Services was too understaffed, underfunded and ill-equipped to handle the deluge of calls requesting assistance for at-risk adults. At the time, Indiana had budgeted roughly $3.5 million for the program — significantly less than other states.
The lack of support left adults who could not protect themselves exposed to abuse and neglect, and well-intentioned investigators overwhelmed by caseloads. Shortly after the investigation was published, Indiana lawmakers pledged an additional $1.1 million to hire more full-time investigators for adult protective services.
But, advocates say funding shortfalls did not cease. The situation is becoming more dire as the state's population ages.
"The hope was that there would be an approach taken to reorganizing the APS model into a better, more efficient agency and to fund it appropriately," Bennett said. "There was some more funds dedicated following that series of articles.... but, I don't think it has been sufficient by any means."
Riggs said there have been times when county governments subsidized budgetary shortfalls, leaving residents of some counties to finance services for residents of other counties.
"This was unsustainable long term," she said.
According to the Adult Protective Services 2024 annual report, the APS Unit Contract was $5.6 million in 2023. The majority of the funding — $4.4 million — was from a state appropriation. The remaining $1.2 million was from federal Medicaid dollars. Acting on continued funding concerns, Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Committee notified FSSA in late 2023 that the majority of hub prosecutors did not intend to renew their contractual relationship again.
FSSA, in turn, issued in September 2024 a request for proposals soliciting vendors interested in administering the program.
Prosecutors bid to keep providing services
Riggs said the Adult Protective Services Hub Prosecutors Committee submitted a bid for the new contract. It was "at an amount of money that nearly forty years of experience doing this work told us would be the minimal amount of state money that should be allocated for a successful program, and in the same amount previously requested," she said.
For months, the council heard nothing.
It's unclear how the model for Adult Protective Services could change under PCG-Indiana. Neither the state nor the company responded to IndyStar questions about the for-profit company's plans for the program or what the transition would entail.
IndyStar has requested copies of the state's initial request for proposal and the responses to it.
According to the award letter recommending PCG-Indiana for the contract, the Massachusetts company will subcontract with three partners. Marion Edward Associates Inc., a Boston-based staffing firm, will get 9% of the contract value. Local consulting company Briljent LLC will get approximately 12% of the contract value while Axon Advisors LLC, a market research firm also based in Indianapolis, will receive about 4%.
PCG-Indiana beat out IPAC's Adult Protective Service Hub Prosecutor Committee and Community Care Hub of Indiana for the contract. The proposals were evaluated by FSSA and the Indiana Department of Administration, which oversaw the procurement process. According to the letter, the agencies were made aware of updates that were part of the state's budget process and limited the maximum amount of funding available.
Respondents were invited to withdraw or revise their proposals to align with the changes and new budget cap. "Only one of the three respondents updated their technical and cost proposals to align with a reduced scope of services within the new budget maximum. This Respondent was PCG," the letter reads.
Said Riggs: "Prosecutors were hopeful they could persuade the state to provide adequate resources for this important mission."
2-month transition window causes concern
Prosecutors, investigators and advocates who reached out to IndyStar have expressed concern about the lack of communication regarding the procurement process from FSSA and state officials.
"We're very concerned about what will happen and I know the courts are very concerned about what will happen with APS," said Bennett, who wasn't familiar with PCG Indiana or Public Consulting Group. "I'm hoping that whomever takes on the contract provides good services to be able to respond to complaints that APS might receive, but I think I may have to take a wait and see attitude on that.
He said FSSA has not sought input from stakeholders.
Prosecutors will focus on a smooth transition and handover of the program, Riggs said, though advocates wonder if there's enough time to transition the program.
The state awarded PCG-Indiana the Adult Protective Services contract just two months before the expiration of the current contracts on June 30, leaving some investigators to wind down active cases without a resolution and advocates wondering where they should turn to report suspected cases of abuse and neglect.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US consulates to resume processing visas for Harvard students, report says
US consulates to resume processing visas for Harvard students, report says

Boston Globe

time3 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

US consulates to resume processing visas for Harvard students, report says

'I don't think anyone who's overseas studying in America is feeling secure at this point,' said Boston-based immigration attorney Annelise Araujo. 'If I'm a student, I'm thinking twice about whether I want to go through this.' Advertisement On Wednesday, Trump dramatically escalated his attempts to punish the university when he announced a directive to deny visas to all Also on Thursday, Harvard filed an opposition in court to Trump's move and, late that night, won a temporary stay from a federal judge in Boston, preventing the president from moving ahead with his plan. Advertisement Then came Friday night's cable, rescinding the one sent out Thursday, according to the Post. The news organization reported that the latest cable, sent at 7:55 p.m., said the consulates 'must resume processing of Harvard University student and exchange visitor visas.' On Saturday, Harvard and the State Department both declined to comment or confirm the Post's reporting. 'It's a step in the right direction,' Araujo, the immigration attorney, told the Globe of the news about the latest cable. 'I don't think students should be a pawn between the administration and Harvard.' Still, Araujo and others who work with international students say uncertainty and negative headlines are sowing uncertainty and worry among foreigners considering studying in the US, leading many to consider continuing their studies elsewhere. Both Harvard and the Trump administration are next due in court on June 16 as the legal battle moves ahead. Dan Berger, an immigration attorney from Northampton who works with colleges and people seeking student visas, said the constant changes in policy cause as much concern as anything. 'I'm sure this will impact the number of foreign students,' he said. 'If the goal is to discourage people from coming to the US to study, that's probably what's going to happen.' Globe staff reporter Brooke Hauser contributed. Sean Cotter can be reached at

See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises
See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises

Over the next 50 years, Purdue University plans to transform its downtown Indianapolis campus into an urban hub with high-rise buildings hosting up to 15,000 students, according to a new master plan. Today, Purdue's 28-acre sliver of land wedged between Indiana Avenue and Michigan Street on downtown's west side — roughly the same acreage as the parcel on which Lucas Oil Stadium and its south parking lot sit — is home to three parking garages and five expansive parking lots. A conceptual master plan approved by Purdue's Board of Trustees June 6 envisions 16 new buildings on that site, featuring 4.5 million square feet and about 3,500 student beds. With leasing agreements at nearby apartments, Purdue expects to offer students more than 5,300 beds downtown. The plan foresees an increase in Purdue's student enrollment in Indianapolis from about 2,800 in fall 2024 to 15,000 by fall 2075. Despite the dense development, the plan sets aside about 60% of the downtown acreage for open spaces where students can gather and walk, according to Maryland-based architecture firm Ayers Saint Gross, which designed the 50-year master plan. Construction on the campus' main building, the 15-story Academic Success Building near the intersection of West and Michigan streets, began this April. The $187 million facility with classrooms, lab space, dining halls and student housing will be complete around May 2027. The long-term plan comes as Purdue and Indiana University in Indianapolis jostle for position on the west side of downtown following the 2024 split of the two schools' joint urban campus, IUPUI. As Purdue updates its plans, IU has allotted hundreds of millions of dollars to build multiple major facilities, including an 11-story School of Medicine building and a 4,500-seat athletics center, on its downtown campus in the next few years. IUPUI split: Indiana Ave. fell as IUPUI rose. After Purdue and IU split, can they help renew the Avenue? After the IUPUI division, IU retains most of the 536-acre downtown campus and enrolled more than 25,000 students in fall 2024. IU also owns the 28-acre wedge of land where Purdue will expand between Indiana Avenue to the north, Michigan Street to the south and Blake Street to the west. Purdue has signed a 100-year lease to use the property. Purdue is expanding into Indiana's capital city in part to ease the strain on housing and other facilities at the West Lafayette campus, which now enrolls an all-time high of more than 55,000 students. University leaders have also announced partnerships with Indianapolis-based science and engineering firms like animal health company Elanco and race car manufacturer Dallara. 'Rather than a single hub, Purdue is weaving into the fabric of the city's innovation and industry corridors," David Umulis, Purdue's senior vice provost for Indianapolis, said in a statement, "expanding from downtown all the way to the northwest side of Indianapolis." Email IndyStar Reporter Jordan Smith at JTsmith@ Follow him on X: @jordantsmith09 This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: What's in Purdue's 50-year plan for downtown Indianapolis campus

Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward
Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward

The Maryland Department of the Environment has made a final determination to approve permits for Baltimore-based US Wind Inc. to build the first large-scale offshore wind project near Ocean City. According to MDE, 'The proposed construction and commissioning of the offshore wind project would not cause violations of any applicable air pollution control regulations.' The decision, issued Friday, is the latest move in a multi-year, controversial effort to bring the plan to fruition. U.S. Wind has proposed 114 turbines that would be about 11 miles from shore at their closest, according to documents filed by the company with the Maryland Public Service Commission. The project would deliver 1,710 megawatts with turbines about 10 miles from Ocean City, according to its Maryland PSC application. The build-out would occur in several phases, with the first turbines intended for operation in 2028, according to the commission document. Opponents of the project, who include Ocean City Mayor Richard Meehan, argue that the wind farms could harm the environment and wildlife, degrade air quality and damage the region's tourism economy by marring the beach view. 'It is unconscionable to believe that the Maryland Department of Environment is ignoring pre-established permitting deadlines and fundamentally ignoring every shred of feedback offered by those who will be directly involved if this poorly conceived and potentially disastrous offshore wind project is allowed to move forward,' Meehan said in a statement Friday, following the MDE decision. 'The entire economy of our coastal resort town is dependent on tourism, our eco system, and commercial fishing, all of which will be significantly impacted if hundreds of these giant eyesores are constructed 10 miles from our beaches.' In October, the town of Ocean City filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the wind farm that is closest to beginning construction along its shoreline. The ongoing suit alleges that the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management violated federal law when it approved the construction plan for US Wind's project. There are several groups circulating petitions against the wind farms, including nonprofit Save Ocean City and Indian River High School Engineering Students Class Of 2025 & 2026. Ocean City resident Spencer Rowe said he is concerned about the environmental impact of the wind farms. 'In my experience, more and more people are starting to question the proposed wind farms, although many of them are not motivated enough to sign [petitions],' Rowe said in an email to The Baltimore Sun. 'Traveling [around] town, one sees a lot of bumper stickers and restaurant signs displaying opposition messages. I talk to a lot of people about this, and nearly everyone is opposed now that they are learning more about all the detrimental impacts, both to the offshore environment and to our priceless viewshed.' Maryland has made significant investments in wind energy in recent years. The US Wind project is projected to create 13,000 jobs and net more than $6 billion in economic benefits. For fiscal year 2025 alone, $5 million was allocated to build a wind energy workforce and supply chain. Under state law, Maryland must reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2045. The state also aims to develop up to 8,500 megawatts of offshore wind energy by 2031. Despite some expressing environmental and economic concerns, others continue to support the development of offshore wind farms. In a letter to The Sun, Berlin resident Larry Austin Ryan outlined 10 reasons why people should not sign a petition recently sponsored by the Town of Ocean City to push wind turbines more than 26 miles off Maryland's coast. 'Wind power is the fastest growing energy industry in the world! Jobs in wind turbine technology are also one of the fastest growing areas of employment in living wage jobs,' Ryan wrote. 'The Ocean City area is guaranteed 60 jobs and there will be many more jobs in Salisbury and Baltimore in the manufacture and distribution of wind turbines and their components. With the addition of this many jobs, more visitors will have more discretionary income allowing them to enjoy the fruits of their labor in Ocean City.' 'Electricity produced by offshore wind will supply more than 750,000 homes and businesses on the Eastern shore,' Ryan added. 'It will ensure a large-scale improvement of our already inadequate electrical grid here on the shore and avoid a surcharge to Maryland ratepayers for having to import electricity from out of state. This will allow continued economic growth for all the shore in the 21 st century.' A petition to review MDE's decision must be filed by July 14 in the circuit court for the county where the permit application indicates the proposed activity will occur. 'The permits were issued after a thorough review of US Wind's application and following a public process,' an MDE spokesperson said in an email Saturday. 'Due to significant public interest, the Department of the Environment extended the time for the public to provide input. All feedback was carefully reviewed.' Aside from public debate, US Wind's project is facing legal and political hurdles. On May 5, Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown sued President Donald Trump's administration for freezing the development of offshore wind energy projects. Brown and a coalition of 17 attorneys general allege that the executive order threatens states' abilities to secure affordable energy sources, meet the increasing electricity demand, meet climate goals and disrupt billions of dollars in infrastructure and supply chain investments, according to the lawsuit. 'The president's actions violate federal law and will make it harder for us to help Marylanders keep the money they make. One of the best strategies for driving down utility costs is ramping up clean energy production through wind power,' Gov. Wes Moore said in a statement at the time. 'At a moment when families are feeling the strain of high energy bills, we should focus on cutting red tape, not halting critical infrastructure projects.' Have a news tip? Contact Todd Karpovich at tkarpovich@ or on X as @ToddKarpovich.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store