
Badenoch to advocate putting British interests first in foreign policy speech
Kemi Badenoch will advocate putting British interests first and say it is 'not a selfish objective' to want to 'strengthen our country and to look after ourselves', as she delivers a speech on foreign policy.
The Conservative leader will also warn that there will be 'painful decisions on government spending' when it comes to funding defence.
In the address on Tuesday, Mrs Badenoch will also advocate a 'need to disengage' from international bodies if they are 'taken over by activists or by autocratic regimes like China or Russia'.
Her speech comes with diplomacy high on the agenda as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer heads to Washington this week, where he is expected to discuss Russia's war in Ukraine while also hoping to contain a growing transatlantic rift.
Mrs Badenoch will say that 'our foreign policy should seek to support our national interest' and 'sovereignty must be at the core of our foreign policy'.
'A nation state's primary purpose is to defend its borders, its values and its people,' she is expected to say.
'Our national interest is first and foremost to protect our country, to strengthen our country, and to look after ourselves. That means a strong military and a strong economy.
'That is not a selfish objective, it is realism – because you cannot help others if you cannot help yourself. Strengthening Britain must be the principal objective at the heart of everything we do.'
She is also expected to say: 'International law should not become a tool for NGOs (non-governmental organisations) and other critics to seek to advance an activist political agenda through international bodies and our domestic courts.
'And if international bodies are taken over by activists, or by autocratic regimes like China or Russia, we must use our influence to stop them. And if that fails, we will need to disengage.'
The speech – due to be delivered a day after the third anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine – will also touch on defence, as Mrs Badenoch will say 'we must do what it takes to protect Britain'.
'That means not just our independent nuclear deterrent, but also the ability to protect our critical national infrastructure – at home and under the sea. It means having the capability required to contribute meaningfully to Nato-led deterrence in Europe, and the new technologies for the battles of tomorrow.'
US President Donald Trump has been putting pressure on European Nato allies to increase their defence spending and shoulder more of the burden of security on the continent.
However, Mrs Badenonch is to warn that voters will not back plans if they are seen to be pitching public services against defence spending.
'If we approach this challenge as a zero-sum game – as a simple choice between defence spending and public services – we will struggle to persuade the public to back it,' the Tory leader will say.
'And there will be painful decisions on government spending. Any country that spends more interest on its debt than on defence, as the UK does today, is destined for weakness.'
Sir Keir, on his trip to Washington, is expected to discuss his calls for a US 'backstop' to a peace agreement in Ukraine, as well as defence spending.
The visit will mark a critical moment for his leadership as he seeks to balance support for Kyiv with keeping the White House on side, and the Prime Minister is under pressure to use the trip to confirm a timeline to raise UK defence spending to 2.5% of national income.
Labour accused Mrs Badenoch of being 'part of a Conservative government which hollowed out our armed forces, made us more reliant on Putin for our energy needs and diminished Britain's standing on the world stage'.
A spokesperson added: 'We will always work constructively with opposition parties in the national interest but the Conservatives must take responsibility for their record over 14 years of government.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
21 minutes ago
- The National
Independent Scotland would break ties with Israel, says Stephen Flynn
Speaking to The News Agents podcast, the SNP Westminster leader also said he does not believe it would "wise" for SNP MPs to visit Israel, but he would be "amazed" if they decided to as they are "not daft". He said the UK's position on the atrocities being committed by Israel in Gaza has been "so weak for far too long". Asked if an independent Scotland under the SNP would close embassies in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv and if it would break off diplomatic relations with Israel, Flynn replied "yes" to both questions. On whether he would advise SNP MPs to not visit Israel, Flynn said: "I don't think they'd be wise to visit Israel. READ MORE: UK sanctions Israeli ministers Ben-Gvir and Smotrich over Gaza "I imagine they would probably get the same response that the couple of Labour MPs did at the airport a few months ago, which was where they got taken aside and turned back home." He went on: "It's up to them to decide what they want to do. I'd be amazed if any of them did, because they're not daft, and they probably know that they would get turned around and stuck on a plane right back out Israel. "Look, I'm deeply, deeply upset and angry about what's happened in Gaza and what continues to happen in Gaza, and the fact that the UK position has been so weak for far too long in respect of this. And I think it's important that you convey your views to people who are rational actors." In April, Labour MPs were denied entry to the occupied West Bank. Abtisam Mohamed and Yuan Yang said they were "astounded at the unprecedented step taken by the Israeli authorities" to refuse British MPs entry. (Image: News Agents) A statement from the pair said they had 'spoken out in Parliament in recent months' on Israel's war on Gaza and parliamentarians "should feel free to speak truthfully in the House of Commons without fear of being targeted'. Flynn's comments come after the UK Government sanctioned two far-right Israeli ministers over their comments about Gaza. Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel's security minister, and Bezalel Smotrich, finance minister, will have their assets frozen and travel bans imposed. Smotrich approved the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank. He also campaigned against allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza. Ben-Gvir has advocated for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, and said that the Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem should be replaced with a synagogue. Later on in the podcast, Flynn was asked about whether he intends to contest the leadership of the SNP in the future. READ MORE: Freedom Flotilla Coalition gives update on Madleen crew detained by Israel While he is going to campaign to become an MSP, he stressed he backs John Swinney as SNP leader and believes he can "make sure we're fighting fit to go on and win the election" at Holyrood next year. Flynn said: "It is my intention to stand for Holyrood, I'm seeking to be a candidate for the Scottish Parliament elections next year, in an area that's probably similar to the seat I hold at Westminster." He went on: "When Humza Yousaf stood down as First Minister, the first person I called to take over was John Swinney. When Nicola Sturgeon, prior to that, announced that she was standing down again, the first person I called to take over was John Swinney. Now that's a wee bit of an insight into my thinking. "And my thinking is very clear that John Swinney is by far the best person for the job. I think he's the best politician in Scotland. I think he displays that in Holyrood with acumen on a weekly basis. "And I'm pretty confident over the course of next 11 months, he can make sure we're fighting fit to go on and win the election. The polls would indicate that we are going to win the election. "But it can't be about polls. It has to be about policies and people. And when the SNP is focused on that and our ultimate goal of independence, we tend to do well."

The National
30 minutes ago
- The National
UK's paternal leave system 'one of the worst in developed world'
THE UK's paternal leave system is 'one of the worst in the developed world', a parliamentary report has warned. The Women and Equalities Committee (WEC), a cross-party group in the House of Commons, says that the system 'entrenches outdated gender stereotypes' and requires 'substantial change'. Introduced in 2003, statutory paternal leave allows new fathers to take up to two weeks of paid leave, with those eligible receiving £187.18 a week or 90% of their average earnings, whichever is lower. The report states that it is 'completely out of kilter with the cost of living', as this comes to below half of the National Living Wage and real Living Wage, in addition to being below rates in other European countries. READ MORE:Woman jailed in Scotland for sharing 'monkey torture' videos online The committee has called the two weeks' leave 'completely out of step with how most couples want to share their parenting responsibilities'. In comparison, Sweden entitles parents to 480 days of parental leave, which can be split into 240 days each if it's a parental team of two. Ninety days are reserved exclusively for fathers. Fathers in the UK do not have day-one right to paternity leave, unlike mothers. Collette Stevenson, MSP for East Kilbride, called current paternity entitlement in the UK 'woefully insufficient and outdated'. (Image:) 'I would urge the UK government to overhaul statutory leave to 4-6 weeks and increase the statutory pay of £187.18/week or 90%, which should be more comparative with the increase in the cost of living and energy costs.' she said. 'Paternity Pay has to reflect modern family challenges yet it seems out of touch. Increasing paternity pay would be one way to incentivise couples to have bigger families as fertility rates have declined in recent years.' The SNP MSP, who also serves as convener of the Social Justice and Social Security Committee in Holyrood, noted that the Scottish government provides a baby box for parents with new babies. The report suggests several recommendations, including calling on parliament to pave the way towards increasing paid statutory paternity leave to six weeks, which it calls a 'medium-term objective'. It recommends a phased introduction of increases to statutory pay across the system to bring rates for all working parents up to 80% or more of average earnings or the real Living Wage. The WEC's report also looks at reforming shared parental leave, which allows up to 50 weeks of a mother's statutory leave and 37 weeks of her pay entitlement to be transferred to the father/co-parent within the first year. While beneficial to those who can access it, it is not universal, with the report urging that the scheme be made accessible to self-employed fathers. It also calls the shared parental leave system 'extremely difficult for most parents and their employees to understand.' Campaigners from The Dad Shift, who call for improved paternity leave in the UK, are set to picket outside Holyrood and in London on Wednesday afternoon.

The National
36 minutes ago
- The National
Scottish Government demands release of Madleen aid ship crew
The Madleen was boarded and seized by Israeli forces in international waters early on Monday morning, after crews sounded an alarm after seeing multiple vessels approach and reporting drones spraying a white "irritant" substance on board. The boat arrived in Ashdod port in Israel late on Monday evening, with Israel's foreign ministry attempting to depict the mission as a publicity stunt, branding the Madleen a "celebrity yacht". READ MORE: 20 more Palestinians killed and hundreds injured by Israel near aid points On Tuesday, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) – the humanitarian organisation behind the Madleen – reiterated that four of the 12 activists have been deported, while eight remain in Israeli detention. The crew members were all asked to sign documents consenting to deportation, which the coalition said was under the guise that they had entered Israel illegally. One of those still in detention is Rima Hassan, a French-Palestinian Member of the European Parliament. Following the abduction and deportation, fresh calls were made for both Westminster and Holyrood to push Israel to lift the aid blockade. Gerry Coutts of Scotland for Palestine said: 'The aid boat was seized by Israel while it sailed in international waters under the British flag and its unarmed crew have been detained. Yet, we have heard no condemnation of this from our governments in the UK. 'The abduction of the crew, the seizing of the boat, the occupation of Palestine, the mass starvation of a people and the siege and blockade are all illegal - and happening in plain sight. 'Both our governments have a legal and moral duty to push their ally, Israel, to allow in life-saving aid to starving Palestinians. They must also push for an end to the cruel siege and naval blockade and more recently a complete blockade imposed on Palestinians.'