
Tibetans face up to uncertain future as Dalai Lama turns 90
DEHRADUN: Tibetans in exile celebrate the 90th birthday of spiritual leader the Dalai Lama next week, an occasion overshadowed by uncertainty about the future of the role and what it means for their movement.
The charismatic Nobel Peace Prize-winning Buddhist -- who Tibetans say is the 14th reincarnation of the 600-year-old post -- will reveal if there will be another Dalai Lama after him.
The inevitable change ahead brings wider concerns for Tibetans over the struggle to keep their identity alive after generations in exile, following a failed 1959 uprising against Chinese rule.
There is widespread support among Tibetans in exile for the Dalai Lama role to remain, said Dawa Tashi, once jailed in Tibet for his criticism of Beijing.
The Dalai Lama has said the institution will continue only if there is popular demand. "I strongly believe the reincarnation of the 14th Dalai Lama will continue," said Tashi, of the India-based Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy.
"This hope is not only shared by Tibetans inside and outside Tibet, but by thousands who are connected to the Dalai Lama across the world," he told AFP.
The leader, who turns 90 on July 6, and thousands of other Tibetans have lived in exile in India since Chinese troops crushed the uprising in the Tibetan capital Lhasa.
The Dalai Lama has been lauded by his followers for his tireless campaign for greater autonomy for Tibet, a vast high-altitude plateau in China about the size of South Africa.
'Vested political interests'
The Dalai Lama handed over political authority in 2011 to an exiled government chosen democratically by 130,000 Tibetans globally. At the same time, he warned that the future of his spiritual post faced an "obvious risk of vested political interests misusing the reincarnation system."
Many Tibetans in exile fear China will name a successor to bolster its control over Tibet.
The Dalai Lama has said that if there is a successor it will come from the "free world" outside China's control.
The Dalai Lama has long said he does not seek full independence for Tibet.
Beijing says the territory is an integral part of China and that the Dalai Lama "has no right to represent the Tibetan people".
Whatever the Dalai Lama decides about his role, "the freedom movement must continue regardless", said Kunga Tashi, a 23-year-old Tibetan software engineer in India's tech hub Bengaluru.
"The Chinese government and even Tibetans still equate the Dalai Lama with the freedom struggle," he said. "And that is why his reincarnation feels like a turning point."
'Continuity of the institution'
The Dalai Lama, recognised worldwide in his red robes and wide smile, lives an austere monastic life in India's Himalayan hill town of McLeod Ganj. He has said he wants to live until 113.
Penpa Tsering, the sikyong or head of the government which is also based in McLeod Ganj, said that senior Buddhist elders, or lamas, will meet the Dalai Lama on July 2.
The same day they will open the grand meeting of religious leaders, during which a video message by the Dalai Lama will be broadcast.
No details of its message have been released.
The Dalai Lama's translator of nearly four decades, Thupten Jinpa, believes that "the continuity of the institution will remain", meaning that, in time, there "will be a new Dalai Lama".
"Today, many young Tibetans prioritise personal success over collective struggle," said Geshema Tenzin Kunsel, a nun in her 50s from Dolma Ling Nunnery, near McLeod Ganj.
"In his absence, I fear what our future might look like."
'Shape our own destiny'
Tibetans who spoke to AFP say they will keep up their campaign no matter what happens in the coming weeks.
"While we haven't yet achieved our goal of returning to a free Tibet, we've come further than anyone could have imagined -- and that's because of His Holiness (the Dalai Lama)," said Sonam Topgyal, 26, a university student in New Delhi.
Nepal-based Sakina Batt, 35, a former civil servant with the Tibetan administration, is part of Tibet's minority Muslim population.
She too believes that the reincarnation process should "continue as it has for generations, preserving its sacred tradition without interruption".
But she also said that it depended on the people, not just one leader.
"The future of Tibetans depends on unity and resilience," she said. "It's ultimately up to us to shape our own destiny."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Supreme Court nationwide injunction ruling: What are Justices Barrett and Jackson's arguements
The US Supreme Court on Friday handed President Donald Trump a major victory by ruling to curb the power of federal judges to impose nationwide rulings impeding his policies. However, the issue of whether the administration can limit birthright citizenship still remains unresolved. Trump welcomed the court's 6-3 ruling, declaring that his administration can now proceed with numerous policies such as his executive order aiming to restrict birthright citizenship. US Supreme Court ruled on nationwide injunction by federal judges on Friday(AFP) "We have so many of them. I have a whole list," Trump told reporters at the White House. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who authored the ruling, directed lower courts that blocked Trump's order on birthright citizenship to reconsider. She and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had completely different arguments in their opinions. Jackson and other liberal justices wrote a joint dissent. The Biden-nominee, in her solo dissent, said 'disaster was looming'. 'It gives the Executive the go-ahead to sometimes wield the kind of unchecked, arbitrary power the Founders crafted our Constitution to eradicate,' she wrote. Barrett quickly rebuked her colleague. 'We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary. No one disputes that the Executive has a duty to follow the law. But the Judiciary does not have unbridled authority to enforce this obligation—in fact, sometimes the law prohibits the Judiciary from doing so," Barrett wrote. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a dissent, added: "The majority ignores entirely whether the President's executive order is constitutional, instead focusing only on the question whether federal courts have the equitable authority to issue universal injunctions. Yet the order's patent unlawfulness reveals the gravity of the majority's error and underscores why equity supports universal injunctions as appropriate remedies in this kind of case." Trump called the ruling a 'monumental victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers and the rule of law'. "It was a grave threat to democracy, frankly, and instead of merely ruling on the immediate cases before them, these judges have attempted to dictate the law for the entire nation," Trump said of nationwide injunctions. (With inputs from Reuters)


Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US Supreme Court allows parents to opt children out of LGBTQ-themed lessons
The US Supreme Court on Friday ruled 6-3 to let parents opt their children out of LGBTQ-themed lessons at public schools, a move critics warn threatens the future of secular education by opening the door to broad religious objections. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for majority that "for many people of faith, there are few religious acts more important than the religious education of their children".(AFP) The justices reviewed an appeal brought by Christian and Muslim parents against a Maryland public school district that, in 2022, added books tackling prejudice and exploring gender identity to its elementary curriculum. President Donald Trump, who has made fighting "woke ideology" a hallmark of his second term, hailed the outcome as a "great ruling for parents." "They lost control of the schools and they lost control of their child, and this is a tremendous victory for parents," he said at a White House press conference. The court found that the Montgomery County parents were likely to prevail in their claim that blocking them from opting out "unconstitutionally burdens" their religious freedom. "For many people of faith, there are few religious acts more important than the religious education of their children," wrote Justice Samuel Alito for the majority. He said the books in question "are designed to present certain values and beliefs as things to be celebrated, and certain contrary values and beliefs as things to be rejected." Alito cited specific texts including "Uncle Bobby's Wedding," which celebrates gay marriage, and "Born Ready: The True Story of a Boy Named Penelope," about a transgender boy. The right-wing Heritage Foundation, which authored the blueprint for Trump's second term, also praised the ruling as "a resounding victory for parents across America, affirming their fundamental right to guide their children's moral and religious upbringing." Evolution next? In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor -- joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson -- defended public schools as places where "children of all faiths and backgrounds" gain exposure to a pluralistic society. "That experience is critical to our Nation's civic vitality," she wrote. "Yet it will become a mere memory if children must be insulated from exposure to ideas and concepts that may conflict with their parents' religious beliefs." She warned of a slippery slope: "Books expressing implicit support for patriotism, women's rights, interfaith marriage, consumption of meat, immodest dress, and countless other topics may conflict with sincerely held religious beliefs and thus trigger stringent judicial review under the majority's test." The ruling could even reopen settled legal ground on how schools teach evolution and other scientific topics, said Daniel Mach, a legal expert with the American Civil Liberties Union. "The issue had come up many times in lower courts, including where parents claimed a religious right to opt out of biology lessons on evolution," he told AFP. "In each of those cases, the courts rejected the claim, but now with today's decision, the door has been bashed open to invite all manner of objections." Mach warned that schools may now choose to self-censor rather than navigate a patchwork of opt-outs in anticipation of lawsuits.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Netanyahu rejects reports of military targeting civilians at Gaza aid distribution points
The allegations followed repeated reports by eyewitnesses and local authorities over recent weeks of deadly incidents around aid distribution centres in the territory, where Israeli forces are battling Hamas militants read more Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday dismissed a report alleging that military commanders instructed soldiers to open fire on Palestinians seeking humanitarian aid in Gaza. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz, known for its left-leaning stance, cited anonymous soldiers who claimed they were told to fire at crowds near aid distribution centers to disperse them, even in the absence of an immediate threat. These claims come amid multiple reports in recent weeks from eyewitnesses and local officials about deadly incidents occurring around aid distribution points in the region, where Israeli forces are engaged in ongoing operations against Hamas. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to Haaretz, the military advocate general—the top legal authority within the Israeli military—has called for an investigation into what were described as 'suspected war crimes' at aid sites. When contacted by AFP, the Israeli military declined to comment specifically on that allegation. Netanyahu said in a joint statement with Defence Minister Israel Katz said Israel 'absolutely rejects the contemptible blood libels' and 'malicious falsehoods' in the Haaretz article. The military said in a separate statement that it 'did not instruct the forces to deliberately shoot at civilians, including those approaching the distribution centres'. It added that Israeli military 'directives prohibit deliberate attacks on civilians.' After more than 20 months of devastating conflict, rights groups say Gaza's population of more than two million faces famine-like conditions. The health ministry in Hamas-ruled Gaza says more than 500 people have been killed near aid centres since late May, when a new US- and Israeli-backed foundation began distributing aid. The privately run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation denies that deadly incidents have occurred in the immediate vicinity of its aid points. Netanyahu and Katz added in their statement: 'The soldiers of the (Israeli military) receive clear orders to avoid harming innocents – and operate accordingly.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD