logo
Giving children phones is the same as giving them cigarettes - they must be banned in schools, warns top Tory

Giving children phones is the same as giving them cigarettes - they must be banned in schools, warns top Tory

Daily Mail​8 hours ago

Giving children smartphones is the same as giving them cigarettes, shadow education secretary Laura Trott has said.
Renewing her call for ministers to ban phones in schools, she said they were just as inappropriate for pupils as tobacco.
And she also criticised the Government over plans to have screen-based testing for Reception children, saying it 'normalises' tablets.
Mrs Trott has forbidden her own three children from owning a smartphone until they are 16, and believes other parents should do the same.
Yesterday, she said schools implementing blanket bans would make it easier for families to follow suit at home.
She said: 'Giving children smartphones is the equivalent of giving them cigarettes.
'Children are increasingly glued to their phones, often at the cost of real social interactions, their well-being and attainment.
'Countries around the world have woken up to the damage phones are doing to young people, but Labour are still dragging their feet.'
Mrs Trott, MP for Sevenoaks, has previously said it is her 'mission' to get ministers to legislate for mobile phones to be banned in schools.
Non-statutory guidance was issued to this effect under the Tories in 2024 - but schools were not legally obliged to follow it.
Earlier this year, the Tories tabled an amendment to the Schools Bill which would have made phone bans in classrooms the law, but it was defeated by Labour MPs.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has previously branded the proposal a 'headline-grabbing gimmick'.
Yesterday, Mrs Trott said this was 'wrong' and added: 'Even the Department for Education's own evidence shows half of GCSE classes are disrupted daily by phones.
'Another U-turn from this Government is inevitable, so they should act now: ban smartphones in schools, shift homework off screens, and reset the norm on when children get their first phone, before it's too late.'
She added in comments to Politics Home: 'One of the best things we can do for pupils' mental health in schools is to take out the phones.'
Last week, it was revealed the Department for Education (DfE) had written new guidelines requiring schools to assess Reception-age pupils using screens.
Grilling ministers in the Commons yesterday, Mrs Trott said: 'The Secretary of State may have dismissed banning smartphones in schools as a gimmick but teachers, health professionals and parents are all calling for action to reduce children's screentime.
'Every day, we have new evidence of the harm screens are doing.
'So why is the Education Secretary ignoring this and still pressing ahead with screen-based assessments for children as young as four from September?
'Does she accept that this is normalising screentime for young people, which is the opposite of what we should be doing?'
Education minister Stephen Morgan ducked the testing question and replied: 'There's guidance already in place for schools, the majority of schools already have a ban in place on mobile phone use.'
According to the Government, 97 per cent of schools restrict mobile phone use in some way.
It comes after the Government's National Behaviour Survey found 46 per cent of GCSE pupils reported phones causing disruption in most or all lessons.
In addition, a Canadian study found teenagers who spend more than two hours a day scrolling on their phones double their risk of developing anxiety and quadruple their chances of depression.
Meanwhile, a separate poll found a quarter of 11 to 18-year-olds in the UK now spend the majority of their free time outside school scrolling on their phones.
The poll by the charity OnSide, found half of these - 52 per cent - want to break their addiction and reduce their screen time, but do not know how.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Wargame - episode four: Ultimatum
The Wargame - episode four: Ultimatum

Sky News

time21 minutes ago

  • Sky News

The Wargame - episode four: Ultimatum

👉 Click here to listen to The Wargame on your podcast app 👈 A city is on fire. The UK fights back. Russia and Britain both have nuclear weapons. Will either country use them? A major five-part series from Sky News and Tortoise imagines how a Russian attack on the UK could play out - and invites real-life former ministers, military chiefs and other experts to figure out how to defend the country. Written and presented by Sky News' security and defence editor, Deborah Haynes.

MPs to debate and vote on decriminalising abortion
MPs to debate and vote on decriminalising abortion

Powys County Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

MPs to debate and vote on decriminalising abortion

Pro-choice campaigners are urging MPs to vote to decriminalise abortion, but those against a change in the law have warned 'unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away'. The issue looks likely to be debated and voted on on Tuesday, as part of amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. The latest attempt follows repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law – the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act – after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. MPs had previously been due to debate similar amendments removing the threat of prosecution against women who act in relation to their own pregnancy at any stage, but these did not take place as Parliament was dissolved last summer for the general election. Earlier this month, a debate at Westminster Hall heard calls from pro-change campaigners that women must no longer be 'dragged from hospital bed to police cell' over abortion. But opponents of decriminalisation warned against such a 'radical step'. Ahead of debate in the Commons, Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi said her amendment would result in 'removing the threat of investigation, arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. Ms Antoniazzi said the cases of women investigated by police had motivated her to advocate for a change in the law. She said: 'Police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortion in the last five years including women who've suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths. 'This is just wrong. It's a waste of taxpayers' money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest.' She said her amendment will not change time limits for abortion or the regulation of services but it 'decriminalises women accused of ending their own pregnancies', taking them out of the criminal justice system 'so they can get the help and support they need'. Her amendment is supported by abortion providers including MSI Reproductive Choices and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (Bpas) as well as the the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). A separate amendment has also been put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy and goes further by not only decriminalising abortion, but also seeks to 'lock in' the right of someone to have one and protect those who help them. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) urged MPs to vote against both amendments, saying they would bring about 'the biggest expansion of abortion since 1967'. Alithea Williams, the organisation's public policy manager, said: 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers. 'Both amendments would allow abortion up to birth, for any reason. NC20 (Ms Creasy's amendment) is only more horrifying because it removes any way of bringing men who end the life of a baby by attacking a pregnant woman to justice.' Ms Creasy rejected Spuc's claim, and urged MPs not to be 'misled'. She highlighted coercive control legislation, which would remain in place if her amendment was voted through, and which she said explicitly identifies forcing someone to have an abortion as a crime punishable by five years in jail. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. The issue has come to the fore in recent times with prominent cases such as those of Nicola Packer and Carla Foster. Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home. She told jurors during her trial, which came after more than four years of police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than 10 weeks. The case of Carla Foster, jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant, eventually saw her sentence reduced by the Court of Appeal and suspended, with senior judges saying that sending women to prison for abortion-related offences is 'unlikely' to be a 'just outcome'. A separate amendment, tabled by Conservative MP Caroline Johnson proposes mandatory in-person consultations for women seeking an abortion before being prescribed at-home medication to terminate a pregnancy. The changes being debated this week would not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands north of the border. On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines. During a Westminster Hall debate earlier this month, justice minister Alex Davies-Jones said the Government is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon. She said: 'If the will of Parliament is that the law in England and Wales should change, then the Government would not stand in the way of such change but would seek to ensure that the law is workable and enforced in the way that Parliament intended.'

MPs to debate and vote on decriminalising abortion
MPs to debate and vote on decriminalising abortion

Leader Live

time29 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

MPs to debate and vote on decriminalising abortion

The issue looks likely to be debated and voted on on Tuesday, as part of amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. The latest attempt follows repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law – the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act – after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. MPs had previously been due to debate similar amendments removing the threat of prosecution against women who act in relation to their own pregnancy at any stage, but these did not take place as Parliament was dissolved last summer for the general election. Earlier this month, a debate at Westminster Hall heard calls from pro-change campaigners that women must no longer be 'dragged from hospital bed to police cell' over abortion. But opponents of decriminalisation warned against such a 'radical step'. Ahead of debate in the Commons, Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi said her amendment would result in 'removing the threat of investigation, arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. Ms Antoniazzi said the cases of women investigated by police had motivated her to advocate for a change in the law. She said: 'Police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortion in the last five years including women who've suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths. 'This is just wrong. It's a waste of taxpayers' money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest.' She said her amendment will not change time limits for abortion or the regulation of services but it 'decriminalises women accused of ending their own pregnancies', taking them out of the criminal justice system 'so they can get the help and support they need'. Her amendment is supported by abortion providers including MSI Reproductive Choices and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (Bpas) as well as the the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). A separate amendment has also been put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy and goes further by not only decriminalising abortion, but also seeks to 'lock in' the right of someone to have one and protect those who help them. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) urged MPs to vote against both amendments, saying they would bring about 'the biggest expansion of abortion since 1967'. Alithea Williams, the organisation's public policy manager, said: 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers. 'Both amendments would allow abortion up to birth, for any reason. NC20 (Ms Creasy's amendment) is only more horrifying because it removes any way of bringing men who end the life of a baby by attacking a pregnant woman to justice.' Ms Creasy rejected Spuc's claim, and urged MPs not to be 'misled'. She highlighted coercive control legislation, which would remain in place if her amendment was voted through, and which she said explicitly identifies forcing someone to have an abortion as a crime punishable by five years in jail. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. The issue has come to the fore in recent times with prominent cases such as those of Nicola Packer and Carla Foster. Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home. She told jurors during her trial, which came after more than four years of police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than 10 weeks. The case of Carla Foster, jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant, eventually saw her sentence reduced by the Court of Appeal and suspended, with senior judges saying that sending women to prison for abortion-related offences is 'unlikely' to be a 'just outcome'. A separate amendment, tabled by Conservative MP Caroline Johnson proposes mandatory in-person consultations for women seeking an abortion before being prescribed at-home medication to terminate a pregnancy. The changes being debated this week would not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands north of the border. On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines. During a Westminster Hall debate earlier this month, justice minister Alex Davies-Jones said the Government is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon. She said: 'If the will of Parliament is that the law in England and Wales should change, then the Government would not stand in the way of such change but would seek to ensure that the law is workable and enforced in the way that Parliament intended.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store