The Bloc Québécois strikes again to protect supply management
OTTAWA — First there was Bill C-216, then C-282, and now C-202. The Bloc Québécois has, once again, introduced a private member's bill aimed at ensuring 'full protection for supply management' in trade agreements.
The text of the bill has not yet been released, but the objective that was underlined in previous bills was to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act to prevent the minister from 'making a commitment' that would increase the tariff rate quota for dairy, poultry, or eggs in trade negotiations.
It would also prevent tariff reductions on these products when they are imported in excess.
Bloc Leader Yves-François Blanchet said Bill C-202 was 'similar' and believes the House of Commons could agree very quickly to send it back to the Senate, where two influential senators effectively blocked its passage in the last Parliament using parliamentary procedures.
'We can send it to the Senate before summer break. That's clear. Could the Senate dispose of it before the summer break? My optimism is more cautious,' Blanchet said.
Bill C-282 made headlines last fall when the Bloc threatened to bring down the government if it wasn't passed alongside another bill. It was ultimately passed by nearly 80 per cent of the House of Commons in June 2023, despite opposition from some Conservative MPs.
However, the Senate never passed it, thanks to Senators Peter Boehm and Peter Harder.
'I don't think it's in Canada's national interest to pass this bill because it divides the agricultural community … and it will impact future trade negotiations,' Sen. Peter Boehm said at the time. Neither senator commented Thursday.
At one point, the Bloc said it was facing 'hostility' in the upper house.
Supporters of the bill say it would protect farmers and local communities across the country, particularly in Quebec, while opponents argue it would tie the hands of Canadian negotiators in trade talks.
The Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance (CAFTA) is among its opponents, saying such a bill 'will hurt the 90 per cent of farmers who depend on trade.'
CAFTA's executive director Michael Harvey told the National Post that 'every time (the bill was introduced) it's been a bad idea' and 'it's still a bad idea.'
Harvey stated that his organization does not oppose supply management and does not claim it should be affected by future trade negotiations.
'What we're saying is there's no reason to legislate that negotiators take one sector of the Canadian economy off the table and leave all other sectors on the table,' he said.
Blanchet introduced the bill early in the session because he wants it passed before Canada negotiates a 'formal agreement' with the United States. Under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), a review of the agreement is scheduled for 2026.
However, Prime Minister Mark Carney has stated that he wants a new 'economic and security deal' with the United States. Blanchet indicated that he would meet with the Prime Minister in the coming days and that the bill would be discussed.
After all, Carney expressed some interest in the bill and did not reject it during the election campaign. In the speech from the throne read by King Charles III earlier this week, the government stated that it would 'protect supply management.'
On Thursday, in the House of Commons, the prime minister declared that 'supply management will never be on the agenda of negotiations with the Americans' and that he 'will protect supply management.'
'We will closely consider the Bloc Québécois bill,' he said.
Now, Harvey hopes Carney won't 'handcuff' the government's negotiators by supporting the bill.
'I think it would be an indication of a lack of confidence in our negotiators to do so,' he said.
National Post atrepanier@postmedia.com
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers Sign up here.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
15 minutes ago
- Politico
Thune stares down ‘Medicaid moderates'
IN TODAY'S EDITION:— The Senate megabill talks to watch this week— Appropriations season ramps up— Chris Murphy launches PAC It's megabill crunch time in the Senate. Arm-twisting over what to change in the House-passed version of the 'big, beautiful' bill will largely play out behind closed doors the next few days. Strategy huddles include Senate Finance's meeting tonight and Wednesday's 'Big Six' confab between Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Speaker Mike Johnson, their tax committee chairs and lead administration officials, as we previewed last week. One of Thune's biggest challenges to passing the bill by July 4 will be winning over the 'Medicaid moderates' — an ideological cross-section of members who are aligned against the cuts passed by the House and have the numbers to force changes, our Jordain Carney reports this morning. Among them: Sens. Josh Hawley, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins. Thune can only lose three GOP senators to pass the megabill. Thune and Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo, who is juggling Medicaid and tax conflicts in the bill, are talking to key members in anticipation of difficult negotiations. Crapo told Jordain he personally backs the House's Medicaid work requirements, which some GOP senators wary of benefit cuts say they could also support. But beyond that, they're steering clear of public commitments. One potentially major sticking point: The House-passed freeze on provider taxes, which most states use to help finance their share of Medicaid costs. Sen. Jim Justice, the former West Virginia governor, called it a 'real issue' and Hawley has also raised concerns. But other GOP senators, including Kevin Cramer, want to go even further in reducing, not just freezing, the provider tax. Republicans got a glimpse of the political minefield surrounding Medicaid while back home last week. Sen. Joni Ernst's 'we're all going to die' response to town hall pushback about the cuts — and her decision to double down on the comments — generated days of negative headlines and ad fodder for Democrats. Mehmet Oz, the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, told our Dasha Burns in the debut episode of her podcast 'The Conversation' that the Medicaid work requirements in the bill would 'future proof' the program. Then there are the deficit hawks. President Donald Trump over the weekend warned Sen. Rand Paul to get behind the megabill, with Paul vowing to vote against it over an included debt-limit hike. But it's not just Paul making noise. Sen. Ron Johnson is calling for a line-by-line budget review to find places to slash more spending, and Sens. Mike Lee and Rick Scott are also pushing for more cuts. Paul hinted at hard-liners' leverage Sunday on CBS' 'Face the Nation,' saying: 'I would be very surprised if the bill at least is not modified in a good direction.' GOOD MONDAY MORNING. Welcome back. Follow our live coverage at the Inside Congress blog at and email your Inside Congress scribes at lkashinsky@ mmccarthy@ and bleonard@ THE SKED The House is out. The Senate is in session and voting to end debate on Michael Duffey's nomination to be an undersecretary of Defense at 5:30 p.m. — Pennsylvania Sens. John Fetterman and David McCormick will have a live discussion, moderated by Fox News' Shannon Bream, at the Kennedy Institute in Boston at 9 a.m. — Senate Republican and Democratic leadership will hold separate private meetings shortly before evening votes. The rest of the week: The House will return on Tuesday. The Senate will continue working through Trump's nominees, including Allison Hooker to be an undersecretary of State. THE LEADERSHIP SUITE Thune's to-do list on Russia sanctions, crypto Internal pressure is growing on the Senate majority leader to take up Sen. Lindsey Graham's bipartisan Russia sanctions bill without waiting for the White House to weigh in. Graham, fresh off a Friday trip to Kyiv with Sen. Richard Blumenthal, told our Josh Berlinger and other reporters in Paris that he expects the bill will 'start moving' soon. He talked up a House discharge petition that could hit the floor this week and a plan that would put the bill on the Senate calendar for potential action 'hopefully the following week.' Graham and Blumenthal are pushing to bypass Senate Banking, which has jurisdiction over sanctions legislation, to speed up the process. Also on Thune's radar this week: GOP leaders need to finalize a deal on amendments for stablecoin legislation that's pending a floor vote. It may slip into next week. No longer on Thune's radar: Jared Isaacman's nomination to lead NASA, which Trump said over the weekend he was withdrawing. Contributions to prominent Democrats may have doomed him, per the New York Times. Schumer plots more megabill pushback Senate Democrats are preparing to challenge parts of the GOP megabill with the parliamentarian, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer wrote in a 'Dear Colleague' letter Sunday. He highlighted a specific House provision that critics say would weaken judges' power to enforce contempt orders. Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries spoke Sunday as the two step up coordination around the bill. Top House Democrats on three key committees are also briefing Senate colleagues on GOP fault lines. POLICY RUNDOWN APPROPRIATIONS ON THE AGENDA — Work on funding the government is ramping up this week with key committee votes and a round of pitches from Trump administration officials on the Hill. Here's what's coming: — House Appropriations will begin marking up the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs and Agriculture bills on Thursday. — Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick — the face of Trump's tariff agenda — will testify before Senate and House appropriations subcommittees on Wednesday and Thursday, respectively, on his agency's budget. — Education Secretary Linda McMahon will testify on Tuesday and will likely be pressed about the education programs the Trump administration plans to cut, including federal grants that support preschools and education services for homeless children. — Acting FAA Administrator Chris Rocheleau is set to testify Wednesday before a House Appropriations subcommittee and is poised to face questions about the nation's air traffic control system. — OMB Director Russ Vought will testify on Wednesday. Trump's budget chief has already faced backlash for the sweeping federal funding cuts. The Trump administration Friday sent the nitty-gritty details of his fiscal 2026 budget request to Congress, including a 22 percent cut in non-defense spending, our Jennifer Scholtes reports. ROBOTICS CAUCUS RELAUNCHES — A bipartisan group of House lawmakers is relaunching the Congressional Robotics Caucus. Reps. Jim McGovern, Haley Stevens, Bob Latta and Jay Obernolte will co-chair. Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: CAMPAIGN STOP FIRST IN INSIDE CONGRESS: MURPHY'S NEW PAC — Sen. Chris Murphy is launching a PAC aimed at mobilizing voters against Trump and Republican lawmakers' agenda, our Holly Otterbein reports. The American Mobilization Project will start by doling out $400,000 to groups registering voters and opposing Medicaid cuts, and it plans to spend upwards of $2 million during the midterms. Murphy insists his PAC play isn't a sign of presidential ambitions. The Connecticut Democrat told Holly, 'I'm a believer that the only thing that is ultimately going to stop Trump's corruption and his destruction of democracy is mass mobilization.' MAXINE WATERS' CAMPAIGN FACES FINE — Rep. Maxine Waters' congressional campaign agreed to pay a $68,000 fine after a FEC investigation found it violated campaign finance laws, Dave Levinthal writes at OpenSecrets. Waters' 2020 campaign committee understated contributions and expenditures by hundreds of thousands of dollars, per the FEC's findings. THE BEST OF THE REST Aide to Rep. Nadler Is Handcuffed Amid Confrontation With Federal Agents, from Christopher Maag at The New York Times Republicans see Darin LaHood as 'best chance' for Senate flip in blue Illinois, from Rachel Schilke at the Washington Examiner CAPITOL HILL INFLUENCE BURR LOBBYING FOR TOBACCO COALITION — Former North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr has continued to add new lobbying clients since his cooling-off period to lobby the Hill ended at the beginning of the year, our POLITICO Influence reports. Among the newest clients for the former Senate HELP ranking member is the Coalition for Smarter Regulation of Nicotine. Though the group has a barebones online presence, lobbying disclosures show it is backed by tobacco giants Altria, Japan Tobacco International, Reynolds American and Reynolds parent company British American Tobacco. Burr and a pair of former staffers who have joined him at DLA Piper began lobbying last month on FDA regulation and enforcement policy on behalf of the coalition, according to a disclosure filing. Molly Fromm is now VP and general counsel at the Nickles Group. She previously was general counsel and parliamentarian for House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith. Kim Trzeciak, who served as the FDA's deputy commissioner for policy, legislation and international affairs during the Biden administration, has joined Capitol Hill Consulting Group as a senior vice president. She previously worked on the Hill as a top aide on the House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee and for the late Rep. John Dingell, with stints at Glover Park Group (now FGS Global) and Mylan in between. Growth Energy has added Emma Keiser as director of government affairs. She was most recently a legislative assistant for Sen. Joni Ernst. JOB BOARD Sam Somogye is now press secretary for Sen. Katie Britt. He was most recently communications director for Rep. Diana Harshbarger and is a Ted Cruz campaign alum. Elisabeth Conklin is now legislative director for Rep. Tom Barrett. She previously was a senior professional staff member on the House Small Business Committee. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Rep. Delia Ramirez … former Rep. Mike Rogers … Mia Heck ... Mike Lynch … Jeanine Pirro … Crooked Media's Jon Favreau … Rich Ashooh … Ben Cassidy of the BLC Group … Vanessa Day … Zach Isakowitz of the Semiconductor Industry Association … Darby McQueen-Dever of Rep. Michael Cloud's office … Hannah Botelho of Kieloch Consulting … Edgar Barrios … Jane Meyer of Sen. Amy Klobuchar's office TRIVIA FRIDAY'S ANSWER: Don Lowe correctly answered that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by 3/4 of the total states (38 for 50 states). TODAY'S QUESTION, from Mia: What percentage of the 119th Congress are four-year college graduates? The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@
Politico
22 minutes ago
- Politico
The ‘Medicaid moderates' are the senators to watch on the megabill
The Senate's deficit hawks might be raising the loudest hue and cry over the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill.' But another group of Republicans is poised to have a bigger impact on the final legislative product. Call them the 'Medicaid moderates.' They're actually an ideologically diverse bunch — ranging from conservative Josh Hawley of Missouri to centrist Susan Collins of Maine. Yet they have found rare alignment over concerns about what the House-passed version of the GOP domestic-policy megabill does to the national safety-net health program, and they have the leverage to force significant changes in the Senate. 'I would hope that we would elect not to do anything that would endanger Medicaid benefits as a conference,' Hawley said in an interview. 'I've made that clear to my leadership. I think others share that perspective.' Besides Hawley and Collins, other GOP senators including Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Jerry Moran of Kansas and Jim Justice of West Virginia have also drawn public red lines over health care — and they have some rhetorical backing from President Donald Trump, who has urged congressional Republicans to spare the program as much as possible. Based on early estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, 10.3 million people would lose coverage under Medicaid if the House-passed bill were to become law — many, if not most, in red states. That could spell trouble for Majority Leader John Thune's whip count: He can only lose three GOP senators on the expected party-line vote and still have Vice President JD Vance break a tie. Republicans already have one all-but-guaranteed opponent in Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky so long as they stick to their plan to raise the debt limit as part of the bill. They also view Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson as increasingly likely to oppose the package after spending weeks blasting the bill on fiscal grounds. Meeting either senator's demands could be enormously difficult given the tight fiscal parameters through which House leaders have to squeeze the bill to advance it in their own chamber. That in turn is empowering the senators elsewhere in the GOP conference to make changes — and the Medicaid group is emerging as the key bloc to watch because of its size and its overlapping, relatively workable demands. Heeding those asks won't be easy. Republicans are counting on savings from Medicaid changes to offset hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts, and rolling that back is likely to create political pain elsewhere for Thune & Co., who already want to cut more than the House to assuage a sizable group of spending hawks. At the same time, Speaker Mike Johnson is insisting the Senate make only minor changes to the bill so as to maintain the delicate balance in his own narrowly divided chamber. Thune and Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) have already acknowledged that Medicaid, covering nearly 80 million low-income Americans, will be one of the biggest sticking points as they embark this month on a rewrite of the megabill. They are talking with key members in anticipation of difficult negotiations and being careful not to draw red lines publicly. 'We want to do things that are meaningful in terms of reforming programs, strengthening programs, without affecting beneficiaries,' Thune said, echoing language used by some of the concerned senators. Crapo voiced support in an interview for one pillar of the House bill — broad new work requirements for Medicaid beneficiaries — but rushed to add that he's 'still working with a 53-member caucus to get answers' to how the program can be overhauled: 'I can only speak for myself.' Complicating their task is the fact that some in the group — namely Collins and Murkowski — have a proven history of bucking their party even amid intense public pressure. The pair, in fact, helped tank the GOP's last party-line effort on health care, in 2017. Leaders view them as unlikely to be moved by the type of arm-twisting Republicans are planning to deploy to bring enough of the fiscal hawks on board. And then there's Hawley, who is playing up Trump's own warnings to congressional Republicans about keeping their hands off Medicaid. Hawley and Trump spoke shortly before the House passed its bill, with the senator recounting that the president said 'absolutely categorically, 'Do not touch Medicaid. No Medicaid benefit cuts, none.'' Hawley, like Crapo, has indicated he is comfortable with work requirements, but he is pushing for two major tweaks to the House language: undoing a freeze on provider taxes, which most states use to help finance their share of Medicaid costs, and new co-payment requirements for some beneficiaries that he has been calling a 'sick tax.' The provider tax changes would present an issue with multiple senators, who fear it would exacerbate the bill's impact on state budgets and slash funding that helps keep rural hospitals afloat. Justice, a former governor, called it a 'real issue.' 'They haven't done anything to really cut into the bone except that one thing,' Justice added. 'That's gonna put a big burden on the states.' Moran grabbed the attention of his colleagues when he warned in a pointed April floor speech that making changes to Medicaid would hurt rural hospitals. A 'significant portion' of his focus, he said, 'is to make sure the hospitals have the capability and the revenues necessary to provide the services the community needs — Medicaid is a component of that.' Collins, who is up for reelection in 2026, has also left the door open to supporting work requirements, depending on how they are crafted. She has also raised concerns about the provider tax provision, noting that 'rural hospitals in my state and across the country are really teetering.' Murkowski, meanwhile, isn't as concerned about the provider tax, because Alaska is the only state that doesn't use it to help cover its share of Medicaid spending. But she has expressed alarm over the House's approach to work requirements, including a decision to speed up the implementation deadline to appease House hard-liners. She said it would be 'very challenging if not impossible' for her state to implement. As it is, any effort to water down the House's Medicaid language will face steep resistance in other corners of the GOP-controlled Senate, where lawmakers are pushing to amp up spending cuts, not scale them back. Some senators, in fact, want to further tighten the House's work requirements or reduce, not just freeze, the provider tax. 'I'd be damned disappointed if a Republican majority with a Republican president didn't make some reforms,' said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.). 'The provider tax is a money laundering machine. … If we don't go after that, we're not doing our jobs.' Ron Johnson and a few others are continuing to push to change the cost split for those Medicaid beneficiaries made eligible under the Affordable Care Act. The federal government now picks up 90 percent of the cost, and House centrists nixed an effort by conservatives to reduce it. One idea under discussion by conservatives is to phase in the change to appease skittish colleagues and state governments, but that is still likely to be a nonstarter for 50 GOP senators. Hawley warned that 'there will be no Senate bill if that is on the table.' Adam Cancryn contributed to this report.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
‘Mission impossible': Why the Bank of Canada faces ‘risky' June rate decision
OTTAWA - Few would confuse Hollywood action star Tom Cruise with Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem. But while Cruise rides a plane in tailspin to his latest box office smash, some economists say Macklem finds himself in his own high-stakes circumstances with the central bank's interest rate decision on Wednesday. Macklem's mission is to chart a path for interest rates that keeps Canada's economy afloat at a precarious moment without straying from its inflation-taming mandate. 'It really is mission impossible,' said Andrew DiCapua, principal economist at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce. The latest data show price pressures could be building up again in Canada at the same time some economists warn of a tariff-induced slowdown on the horizon, pulling monetary policy in opposite directions. 'The bank really is in a difficult position here, but they really should be resuming rate cuts to get their interest rates lower to somewhere around two per cent, again, to cushion the Canadian economy for what's to come,' DiCapua argued. The Bank of Canada's policy rate stands at 2.75 per cent following a pause at the central bank's last decision in April, snapping a streak of seven consecutive cuts. Most economists expect the central bank will hold rates again on Wednesday. In April, Macklem said the Bank of Canada would pause issuing any formal forecasts and be less forward-looking than usual until it gained more certainty on how the economy would react to ever-shifting tariff threats. President Donald Trump threw a new wrench into the gears of global trade late Friday when he announced plans to double existing tariffs on steel and aluminum entering the United States to 50 per cent starting Wednesday. After Statistics Canada reported a surprisingly strong 2.2 per cent annualized rise in real gross domestic product for the first quarter on Friday, money markets were betting overwhelmingly in favour of another rate hold this week. BMO last week firmed up its call for another hold in response to the latest economic data, now projecting a cut to instead come in July. 'The key point here is that the GDP figures are sending no obvious distress signals so far in 2025,' BMO chief economist Doug Porter said in a note to clients. But the question for some economists isn't what the economy has done — it's what comes next. The Bank of Canada's own surveys of businesses published in early April showed sentiment was 'sharply' lower amid the tariff uncertainty, with many firms putting investment and hiring plans on hold. StatCan said the main reason Canada's economy was growing in the first quarter was because many businesses were trying to rush ahead of the tariffs, ramping up exports and stockpiling inventories. Macklem said at the G7 Finance Ministers' Summit in Kananaskis, Alta., last month that the Bank of Canada was expecting a run-up in economic activity in the first quarter, but that the months that follow 'will be quite a bit weaker.' 'They're really waiting for a shoe to drop, so to speak,' said DiCapua. There were early signs of economic pain in the April jobs figures released last month, with the trade-sensitive manufacturing sector contracting by roughly 31,000 positions and the unemployment rate rising two ticks to 6.9 per cent. A slowing economy usually takes the steam out of inflation as Canadians swap spending for saving, but April inflation data showed underlying price pressures were instead heating up. Cutting interest rates can encourage businesses and consumers to spend — mitigating an economic hit — but also risks fuelling inflationary pressures. 'Outside of the current situation that we're in, I would say that the Bank of Canada should be holding interest rates,' DiCapua said. 'But the data that we are seeing come in, especially through the labour market ... is going to move the Canadian economy into a very weak position that should keep prices at bay. So it's kind of a risky balance here.' Stephen Brown, deputy chief North America economist at Capital Economics, said he expects the central bank will deliver three more quarter-point cuts at every other decision to bring the policy rate down to two per cent before the end of the year. 'Our view at Capital Economics is that it's worth cutting again in June as insurance against those downside risks and try and protect the economy a bit,' he said. There are also 'psychological' reasons for a June cut, Brown argued. Should the Bank of Canada keep rates elevated, businesses and consumers may hold back even more on their spending decisions, which can become a self-fulfilling prophecy that weakens the economy. 'If the bank doesn't cut here, because they're still very concerned about inflation, that's telling businesses and consumers that the bank doesn't necessarily have their back,' Brown said. CIBC chief economist Avery Shenfeld is among those calling for a rate hold this week. He said he sees the case for an interest rate cut too, but doesn't think the Bank of Canada's June decision is its final reckoning. 'No one interest rate decision in isolation would ever be a fatal error one way or the other, but I think the clock will start to tick louder on getting some interest rate relief if the economy remains soft,' Shenfeld said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 2, 2025.
