logo
Australian tax office whistleblower Richard Boyle may avoid jail in plea deal

Australian tax office whistleblower Richard Boyle may avoid jail in plea deal

The Guardian27-05-2025

Whistleblower Richard Boyle has been hailed a 'superhero' after striking a plea deal under which he may avoid jail.
The 49-year-old has admitted to four criminal charges linked to his exposure of unethical debt recovery practices at the Australian Taxation Office.
Boyle appeared in the Adelaide District Court on Tuesday, where he pleaded guilty to disclosing protected information to another entity, making a record of protected information, using a listening device to record a private conversation and recording other people's tax file numbers.
The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions withdrew a further 15 charges, while another five charges were dropped in March.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Outside court, Whistleblowers Justice Fund founder Rex Patrick said Boyle had 'pleaded guilty to helping all Australians by disclosing poor conduct by the tax office, who were stripping funds from businesses who were in distress'.
'He should be wearing a big S on his chest, as a superhero, instead of a conviction,' the former senator said.
All of the charges Boyle admitted were criminal offences with both financial penalties and a maximum two-year prison sentence, he said.
'I understand that in pleading guilty he will avoid a custodial sentence, but he may well still be convicted, which is something he'll have to wear very heavily around his neck every time he applies for a job,' Patrick said.
Boyle, a former ATO debt collection officer, raised concerns internally about debt recovery practices in October 2017, when he grew worried about operations in the tax office.
Believing his complaints had been ignored, he went public on the ABC's Four Corners about the tactics used against taxpayers who owed the ATO money.
'This has been eight long years for Richard and it's a disgrace,' Patrick said.
'The message being sent by the government is if you blow the whistle, we will pursue you to the end.'
Outside court, Boyle hugged supporters, including his wife, Louise Beaston.
The Human Rights Law Centre's Kieran Pender said it was a 'heartbreaking day for Richard Boyle and whistleblowers in Australia'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'He should never have been prosecuted, and his case clearly demonstrates how our laws are failing to protect people who bravely speak up,' he said.
'Prosecuting whistleblowers has a chilling effect on truth and transparency, and sends a clear message to prospective whistleblowers that if you speak up you will face punishment.
'The re-elected Albanese government must urgently reform the law to prevent a repeat of this prosecution and commit to establishing a federal Whistleblower Protection Authority.'
Patrick said the inspector-general of taxation had 'basically vindicated Richard's calls, and the laws were changed'.
'Richard has done a great service to this country,' he said.
Last year, the SA court of appeal ruled Boyle was not protected by federal whistleblowing laws – because the charges related not to his whistleblowing, but steps Boyle had taken in preparation to blow the whistle internally, including taking photos of documents and recording conversations.
Boyle returns to court for sentencing submissions on 1 August.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sydney cleric being sued for alleged antisemitism says case is an existential battle ‘between Islam and unbelievers'
Sydney cleric being sued for alleged antisemitism says case is an existential battle ‘between Islam and unbelievers'

The Guardian

time28 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Sydney cleric being sued for alleged antisemitism says case is an existential battle ‘between Islam and unbelievers'

A Sydney Islamic cleric being sued in the federal court for alleged racial discrimination of Jewish people has described his case as an existential battle 'between Islam and unbelievers'. Wissam Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, is being sued by Australia's peak Jewish body over a series of lectures he gave in November 2023, in which he is alleged to have maligned Jewish people as 'vile', 'treacherous' and cowardly. The lectures quoted ayat and hadith from the Qur'an about Jews in Medina in the 7th century and, the federal court claim alleges, made derogatory generalisations about Jewish people, including that they are 'wicked and scheming' and 'love wealth'. The claim, brought by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, alleges Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act – prohibiting offensive behaviour based on race or ethnic origin – during the sermons delivered at the Al Madina Dawah Centre (AMDC) in Bankstown in November 2023, speeches subsequently broadcast online. But, Haddad's defence case argues, his sermons were delivered in 'good faith' as religious and historical instruction. If his sermons are found to breach 18C, then, he argues, the law is unconstitutional because it restricts the free exercise of religion. On Tuesday morning, the long-running dispute, which failed to find resolution at conciliation, comes before Justice Angus Stewart in the federal court, in a case set to test the limits of religious expression and hate speech under Australian law. The court is likely to be asked to adjudicate whether Haddad's sermons, in which he quotes the Qur'an and offers interpretation of it, amount to incitement or are protected religious expression. Ahead of the trial, Haddad, argued on Instagram that the case was existential for the practice of Islam in Australia. 'What I am currently facing in the federal court is not an issue of Abu Ousayd or Al Madina Dawah Centre versus the Jewish lobby … rather, it's a battle between Islam and kuffar,' he said, using an Arabic word, usually translated as 'unbelievers'. He said the claim against him sought to criminalise Islamic scripture. 'They wish to take and make those ayat and hadith and historic accounts that speak about the Jews: to what they see as insulting, they seek to make it criminal.' Ayat are verses in the Qur'an, the Islamic holy book, while hadith are reports attributed to the Prophet Muhammad. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Two prominent members of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Peter Wertheim and Robert Goot, have sought an injunction from the court ordering the speeches still online be removed, and banning Haddad and his centre from publishing similar content online in the future. The ECAJ claim has also asked the court to order Haddad's centre to publish a 'corrective notice' on its social media pages. It has applied for the cost of its legal action to be covered, but it has not sought damages or compensation. In a statement, Wertheim said the ECAJ had attempted 'in good faith' to resolve the matter by conciliation through the Australian Human Rights Commission, but that attempts to broker a resolution failed. He said the ECAJ took the matter to court 'to defend the honour of our community, and as a warning to deter others seeking to mobilise racism in order to promote their political views'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We are all free to observe our faith and traditions within the bounds of Australian law, and that should mean we do not bring the hatreds, prejudices and bigotry of overseas conflicts and societies into Australia.' In his defence documents, Haddad argues his lectures 'were not reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish people in Australia' given their context and audience. He said his sermons were delivered in 'good faith' and 'for the genuine purpose of … delivering religious historical and educational lectures … to congregants of the AMDC'. He said he had given some of the addresses in response to requests from the Islamic community 'to provide sermons which address the Gaza War, and engaging in political commentary on the Gaza War from a religious perspective'. However, his defence states, if the court finds his sermons have breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, he argues the law is unconstitutional under section 116 of the constitution, which protects the 'free exercise of any religion'. Both Haddad and the ECAJ will rely on lay witnesses and expert testimony in the week-long court case. The ECAJ has enlisted professor of theology at Notre Dame University, Gabriel Reynolds; Haddad will call Sheikh Adel Ibrahim from the Greenacre Prayers Hall in Sydney to give evidence. Haddad has never been charged with any terrorism-related offences, but has previously boasted of his friendship with Australian Islamic State fighters Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar, and Briton Anjem Choudary, an extremist preacher jailed for life in the UK last year. A former Asio spy who infiltrated Haddad's organisation between 2016 and 2023 told the ABC's Four Corners program that young people in Haddad's prayer centre were being indoctrinated into supporting Islamic State. Section 18C is the most contested and controversial section of the Racial Discrimination Act. Several high-profile cases have seen it argued the section restricts freedom of speech and political communication in Australia.

Prison authorities know there are hanging points in cells. Prisoners keep using them
Prison authorities know there are hanging points in cells. Prisoners keep using them

The Guardian

time36 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Prison authorities know there are hanging points in cells. Prisoners keep using them

Karen and Gary's son, Luke Rich, died in an ACT prison one day after he was remanded in custody when he hung himself from a hanging point on a door in his cell. He was 27 years old. Prison authorities had been warned that point could be used for that exact purpose seven years earlier. Guardian Australia investigative reporters Chris Knaus and Ariel Bogle looked into 248 hanging deaths in every prison system in the country over more than two decades, finding at least 57 Australians were able to kill themselves using hanging points that prison authorities knew about but failed to remove

Troubled footy player set to be handed career lifeline after domestic violence charges against him were withdrawn
Troubled footy player set to be handed career lifeline after domestic violence charges against him were withdrawn

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Troubled footy player set to be handed career lifeline after domestic violence charges against him were withdrawn

Taylan May is reportedly on the cusp of being offered a deal to join up with a new NRL club and could return to play over the next month. The 23-year-old former Penrith Panthers player is, according to The Sydney Morning Herald, could resurrect his NRL career with the Wests Tigers. The move would see him join up with his older brother Terrell May. May was indefinitely stood down by Penrith under the NRL's no-fault stand-down policy in May of last year, with the club later announcing that he'd be leaving the side by mutual agreement. His exit came after he had faced serious accusations relating to an incident in April 2024 at a home in Werrington, with May being charged with domestic violence offences. He later pleaded not guilty to charges of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, two counts of stalking or intimidation intending to cause fear of harm and two counts of contravening an AVO. The charges were later withdrawn. Peter V'landys later confirmed that May could return to play following the dismissal of the charges but the former Penrith player, who made his debut in 2021, delayed any such comeback. The winger had checked into a mental health clinic earlier this year to focus on his well-being. In May, he broke his silence on admitting himself to the facility to Channel 9, stating that he felt like he was 'a whole different person now.' He also added that he could play as early as 'next week', dismissing claims that he would not be a risk to other clubs in the NRL. Now, The Sydney Morning Herald writes that the winger 'underwent a medical exam' at the Tigers on monday. The rugby league player is also understood to have snubbed a train-and-trial offer from the Rabbitohs having visited the club two weeks ago. However, the outlet adds that sources close to the deal say the footy player was drawn to the prospect of playing alongside his older brother Terrell at the Tigers. It comes as Sam Burgess had also reportedly attempted to coax May to join Super League club Warrington. But the former Penrith player has made it clear that he is set on staying in Australia so that he can play alongside his brother. 'I'll just put it out there, I honestly wanna play with my brother,' he recently told Channel 9. 'He has spoken about that in the media and it will be a dream come true, not just for us but for my family. Playing with him would light a bigger fire inside me.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store