
Mehul Choksi takes ‘kidnapping' allegations against India to UK court; claims denied
Mehul Choksi, the businessman wanted in India to face charges in the Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud case, is suing the Indian government and five individuals in the High Court in London as conspirators for his alleged 'kidnap, torture and attempted rendition'.
The Indian authorities have denied the allegations and objected to the UK jurisdiction on the basis of 'state immunity' and also sought permission for expert evidence on Indian law and the Indian Constitution to be taken into account.
During a case management hearing listed before Justice Freedman on Monday, the court was told that Choksi claims to have been tortured back in May 2021 as part of a kidnap attempt 'orchestrated by the government of India'.
'For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in these submissions is intended to waive or should be interpreted as waiving India's state immunity,' the court was told this week by the Indian side.
Choksi was accused of making 'extremely serious allegations against India, alleging it masterminded an international plot to kidnap and harm him'.
'It is India's position that the present claim is being pursued principally with the (misguided) intention of attempting to cause embarrassment to India and obtain leverage in the Claimant's international attempts to avoid extradition,' barrister Harish Salve argued on behalf of the Indian authorities.
Choksi's lawyers, led by barrister Edward Fitzgerald, allege that there was a collusion between five individuals in the attack on him in Antigua to be forcibly taken to Dominica in the Caribbean with the purpose of being 'rendered' to India.
'The Defendants thereby entered into an unlawful means conspiracy whereby the Defendants agreed to, and then did, inflict unlawful and injurious acts on the Claimant by means of assault, battery, false imprisonment, unlawful detention, and/or unlawful restriction of liberty,' Choksi's legal claim reads.
The businessman, meanwhile, remains in custody in Belgium, fighting against his extradition to India. He is wanted in India along with his nephew, Nirav Modi, who remains behind bars in London after repeated attempts at bail have been denied by the English courts.
There are three sets of criminal proceedings against Nirav in India – the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) case of fraud on PNB, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) case relating to the alleged laundering of the proceeds of that fraud and a third set of criminal proceedings involving alleged interference with evidence and witnesses in the CBI proceedings.
In April 2021, then UK home secretary Priti Patel had ordered his extradition to face these charges in the Indian courts after a prima facie case was established against him. But recent court hearings in London have alluded to a "confidential" impediment to his extradition, believed to be an asylum application.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘We were herded like cattle by BSF towards Bangladesh in the dark…won't go to Mumbai': Bengal residents labelled as ‘illegal immigrants'
'We were herded like cattle. Wielding batons, the BSF jawans drove us towards the border with Bangladesh and asked us not to return. We ran towards Bangladesh. It was completely dark,' said Nazimuddin Mondal, a resident of Hariharpara in Murshidabad district of West Bengal, who was picked up by Maharashtra Police on suspicion of being illegal immigrants and pushed into Bangladesh in the wee hours of June 14. Nazimuddin and six others — Mehbub Sheikh of Bhagabangola in Murshidabad, Minaraul Sheikh of Beldanga in Murshidabad, Shamim Khan of Hariharpara in Murshidabad, Mostafa Kamal Sheikh of Monteshwar in Purba Bardhaman and Fazer Sheikh and his wife Taslima of Bagda in North 24 Parganas – were brought back from Bangladesh after the TMC government in West Bengal intervened and asked the Central government to bring them back. All seven hailing from West Bengal were picked up by Maharashtra Police during an anti-immigrant crackdown in Mumbai and its adjoining areas last week. 'After being detained on June 9, we were taken from one police station to another near Mumbai for three days, and we were finally handed over to the BSF in Pune. We were not allowed to have our cellphones, keys to our rooms, or any belongings. We were flown to Agartala in a BSF aircraft. There were over 130 people in the plane. From Agartala, we were taken on buses to the border. There we were divided into small groups,' said Nazimuddin Sheikh (34) after returning home to Taratipur village in Murshidabad district. 'At around 3 am, they took us to the border and gave 300 Taka, some food in a plastic packet, and a water bottle,' he added. According to him, Bangladeshi villagers helped them to make calls to their home. 'Bangladeshi villagers informed the Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) who made us sit in a field. The villagers gave us food and water. Later, they handed us over to the BSF,' added Nizamuddin, who worked as a mason in Mumbai. 'I used to make Rs 30,000 per month in Mumbai. Yet I cannot return to work. What if they hold us again and send us to Bangladesh? I have been working for the past four years in Mumbai. Before that, I worked in Kerala. But never faced such a situation,' said Nazimuddin, who lives with his father, mother, wife and a girl child, and is the only breadwinner for his family. Speaking over the phone from his home in Beldanga, Murshidabad, Minarul Sheikh said, 'It is sad how being an Indian, the Maharashtra Police branded us illegal Bangladeshi and the BSF drove us out of our own country. Some of us were beaten by batons before we were told to move towards Bangladesh.' 'I will never return to Mumbai. I worked in Delhi and Mumbai for the last 10 years, but never faced this. I earned Rs 30,000 to 40,000 per month in the wig-making business. What will I do now? I have my parents and brothers to take care of here. The state government should do something for people like us,' he said. Mehbub Sheikh, also a mason who worked in Mumbai, said returning to Mumbai for work is now out of the question. 'The experience we had there, we cannot return to work. I had to show a local doctor because I was beaten by the BSF since I refused to walk towards Bangladesh at 3 am. I am not in a physical condition to work now. I am happy to be alive and back at home,' the 36-year-old said. Meanwhile, TMC Rajya Sabha MP Samirul Islam, who as chairman of West Bengal Migrant Welfare Board played a crucial role in bringing the seven back in a post on X asked: 'I have some questions: 1. How did the Maharashtra Police hand over these migrant workers to the BSF without informing the West Bengal government? 2. Why didn't the BSF contact the local administration to verify their identities before forcibly deporting them to another country? 3. Is there a larger plan by these BJP-ruled states and the BSF to target and harass Bengali-speaking migrant workers?' 'We will not let this issue go. We will expose the dark forces behind this misdeed and ensure justice,' Islam added. Ravik Bhattacharya is the Chief of Bureau of The Indian Express, Kolkata. Over 20 years of experience in the media industry and covered politics, crime, major incidents and issues, apart from investigative stories in West Bengal, Odisha, Assam and Andaman Nicobar islands. Ravik won the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award in 2007 for political reporting. Ravik holds a bachelor degree with English Hons from Scottish Church College under Calcutta University and a PG diploma in mass communication from Jadavpur University. Ravik started his career with The Asian Age and then moved to The Statesman, The Telegraph and Hindustan Times. ... Read More
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Datanomics: Indian detentions in US surge, Phoenix accounts for half
Despite relatively smaller Indian populations in cities like Seattle and Buffalo, the proportion of Indian nationals detained in these locations remains disproportionately high Jayant Pankaj New Delhi Listen to This Article A video of an Indian student being handcuffed and pinned to the ground at Newark Airport in the United States has once again brought attention to the treatment of illegal Indian emigrants by US authorities. While the return of the Trump administration has led to the implementation of stricter immigration policies, official data indicates that the share of Indian nationals facing detention and deportation has already been rising since FY21. The share of Indians in the overall number of people detained, arrested, and deported in the US has steadily increased over this period. Interestingly, despite relatively smaller Indian populations in


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
HC closes proceedings against Shah after SC order
Bhopal: A division bench of MP high court, which had taken suo motu cognizance of the derogatory comments by tribal affairs minister Vijay Shah against Col Sofiya Qureshi, one of the two faces of Indian armed forces during ' Operation Sindoor ', and asked the DGP to register an FIR against the minister, closed the proceedings in the case following the supreme court directive to this effect. During the hearing of the case on Monday, the bench of Justice Vivek Agarwal and Justice S K Singh formally closed the case. The bench of Justice Arul Sreedharan and Justice Anuradha Shukla taking cognizance of Shah's address at a public function at Raikunda village in Mhow district on MJay 14 had asked that an FIR be lodged against the minister under sections 152 (endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India), 196 (1) (b) (promoting enmity) and 197 (a) (c) (harmful imputations or assertions about certain groups). An FIR was registered against the minister at Manpur police station in Mhow district the same night. Later, hearing a petition of the minister, the supreme court had formed a SIT of three IPS officers to probe the case and present a report to the supreme court. The court, while reprimanding the minister for use of 'shameful' language, however, restrained the police against the minister from taking any coercive action and also asked the MP high court to close the case.