US to give $30 million to Gaza aid operation despite violence concerns
Boxes of aid are stacked as Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said it has commenced operations to begin distribution of aid, in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, May 26, 2025. Gaza Humanitarian Foundation/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo
WASHINGTON - The United States is giving $30 million to a controversial humanitarian group delivering aid in war-torn Gaza despite concern among some U.S. officials about the month-old operation and the killing of Palestinians near food distribution sites, according to four sources and a document seen by Reuters.
Washington has long backed the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation diplomatically, but this is the first known U.S. government financial contribution to the organization, which uses private U.S. military and logistics firms to transport aid into the Palestinian enclave for distribution at so-called secure sites.
A document reviewed by Reuters showed that the $30 million U.S. Agency for International Development grant to GHF was authorized on Friday under a "priority directive" from the White House and State Department. The document showed an initial $7 million disbursement had been made.
The United States could approve additional monthly grants of $30 million for the GHF, said two of the sources, all of whom spoke on condition of anonymity.
The White House referred questions about the matter to the State Department. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation declined to comment on the U.S. funding or the concerns of some U.S. officials about the operation.
Israel's embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the $30 million U.S. grant.
In approving the U.S. funding for the GHF, the sources said the State Department exempted the foundation, which has not publicly disclosed its finances, from an audit usually required for groups receiving USAID grants for the first time.
Such an audit "would normally take many, many weeks if not months," said one source, who is a former senior U.S. official.
The GHF also was exempted from additional vetting required for groups supplying aid to Gaza - ruled by Iran-backed Hamas militants - to ensure that there are no links to extremism, the sources said.
The GHF is working in Gaza with a for-profit logistics firm, Safe Reach Solutions, headed by a former CIA officer, and its security contractor, UG Solutions, which employs armed U.S. military veterans.
VIOLENCE CONCERNS
Reuters reported this month that U.S. ally Israel had asked President Donald Trump's administration to give $500 million to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Sources said the money would come from the U.S. Agency for International Development, which is being folded into the State Department.
Some U.S. officials opposed giving any U.S. funds to the foundation over concerns about violence near aid distribution sites, the GHF's inexperience and the involvement of the for-profit U.S. logistics and private military firms, said the four sources.
Since Israel lifted an 11-week aid blockade on Gaza on May 19, allowing limited U.N. deliveries to resume, the United Nations says more than 400 Palestinians have been killed seeking aid from both the U.N. and GHF operations.
"The majority of the casualties have been shot or shelled trying to reach U.S.-Israeli distribution sites purposefully set up in militarized zones," said senior U.N. aid official for the occupied Palestinian territories, Jonathan Whittall, on Sunday.
"Others have been killed when Israeli forces have fired on Palestinian crowds waiting for food along routes," he said. "Some people have also been killed or injured by armed gangs."
In response, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said on Tuesday that it had so far delivered 40 million meals in Gaza but that the U.N. and other groups were having difficulty distributing aid due to looting of their trucks and warehouses.
A GHF spokesperson said none of the group's trucks had been looted.
"Bottom-line, our aid is getting securely delivered. Instead of bickering and throwing insults from the sidelines, we would welcome the U.N. and other humanitarian groups to join us and feed the people in Gaza. We are ready to collaborate and help them get their aid to people in need," a GHF spokesperson said.
Earlier this month it halted aid deliveries for a day as it pressed Israel to boost civilian safety near its distribution sites after dozens of Palestinians seeking aid were killed. It says there have been no incidents at its sites.
The U.N. has long described its aid operation in Gaza as opportunistic - hindered by Israel's military operation, access restrictions by Israel into and throughout Gaza, and looting by armed gangs. The U.N. has stressed that when people know there is a steady flow of aid, the looting subsides. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Trump's chip tariff threat sparks pushback from auto industry to tech
[WASHINGTON] Blowback to US President Donald Trump's idea of tariffs on imported semiconductors is proving to be broad and deep, stretching from auto companies and boat makers to the technology industry and crypto enthusiasts, according to a review of more than 150 public comments on the proposal. The possible levy of up to 25 per cent has united rivals such as Tesla, General Motors and Ford Motor in voicing reservations. It's brought together industry lobbies from the Crypto Council for Innovation to the National Marine Manufacturers Association. Even Taiwan and the People's Republic of China are finding common cause, along with predictable parts of the tech sector, including chipmakers and wireless providers. The reason is that chips are now in almost everything: refrigerators and microwaves, tyre pressure sensors and navigation systems, electronic bidets and sonar equipment and, of course, smartphones and computers. Tariffs threaten to snarl supply lines and jack up costs for consumers. 'There's a large mismatch between the amount of chips we use in this country in various products and the supply created here in the US,' JoAnne Feeney, a partner and portfolio manager at Advisors Capital Management, said. 'Putting a tax on those imports will simply raise the cost, and that's not a good thing for consumers.' Case in point is the marine association, which warns that the impact would be felt by more than 1,300 manufacturers who face higher expenses for essentials such as propulsion technology, engines and GPS systems. 'These systems are not optional luxuries – they are fundamental to safety, function and performance,' the association said. 'Many components have no US equivalent or are only available from highly concentrated suppliers overseas.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The boating sector's concerns were among comments from 154 stakeholders submitted to a Commerce Department review of whether to slap tariffs on chips as part of Trump's campaign to redraw global supply lines and boost domestic manufacturing. Predictable tech sources weighed in, including chipmakers Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) and Intel. But feedback also landed from a wide spectrum of sectors, along with trading partners such as Japan and Brazil. The companies, trade groups and individuals who commented on the chips investigation largely signalled support for the president's vision of deepening the US manufacturing base and expanding the American workforce. Yet most expressed concern over the potential consequences and urged making any levies that emerge as targeted as possible. Taken together, the filings point to unease across a range of industries about the economic fallout from targeting chips. Trump has so far brushed off many of those concerns and cited plans by a range of companies to invest in the US, including Taiwan-based TSMC's decision to boost its commitment to building plants near Phoenix. White House spokesperson Kush Desai said Trump remains committed to reshoring manufacturing critical to US national security. 'While the Commerce Department completes its Section 232 investigation, the administration is expanding domestic critical mineral production, slashing regulations, and pushing pro-growth policies,' Desai said. The Commerce Department did not respond to a request for comment. In its submission, TSMC highlighted plans for six advanced semiconductor fabs and two packaging facilities along with a research centre as part of a US$165 billion investment in Arizona that's expected to create thousands of jobs. Yet the company warned import levies would make it harder to deliver those projects on schedule, while slowing US efforts to expand domestic production of chips for 5G wireless, artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous driving. 'Additional tariffs or other restrictive measures on semiconductors could reduce the profitability of leading US companies by limiting sourcing options, driving up production costs, and reducing product demand,' TSMC's Arizona subsidiary wrote. In its filing, Tesla urged coordination between government and industry to minimise uncertainty that could upset supply chains, citing its ties to Asia, Europe and Africa. 'These partnerships allow us to focus on increasing US dominance in advanced manufacturing,' the company wrote. 'Impacts to these inputs for which there is insufficient domestic availability will put a strain on resources during a key moment in the global AI race.' Chipmaker Intel cautioned that trading partners could respond with protective measures that exclude American products. Intel is seeking to reverse years of struggle by spending more than US$100 billion to expand its domestic manufacturing, and the company called on the administration to spare US-made wafers as well as any chips made abroad using American technology. A common concern aired by TSMC, Intel and others in the semiconductor industry centred on the risk that chipmaking equipment produced by foreign suppliers such as ASML Holding would get hit with import taxes. A single extreme ultraviolet lithography machine from Netherlands-based ASML, the world's sole provider of the most advanced chipmaking gear, can cost nearly US$400 million. Adding tariffs would significantly boost the cost of equipping new US facilities. ASML submitted feedback to the Commerce Department, but its filing was marked 'business confidential' and unavailable for public review. In its comments, Intel urged exempting such machines, noting that 'the primary cost driver for semiconductor fabs, accounting for two-thirds of total construction expenses, is equipment and machinery'. Replacing semiconductors produced abroad with domestic output would be very difficult, Feeney said. 'It takes years to create the industrial infrastructure to make creating a semiconductor fabrication facility even possible,' she said. 'At a time, we are trying to build up an AI infrastructure of data centres, the last thing you want to do is put a substantial tariff on the most important input into those data centres.' Major US trading partners, already stung by Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs, objected to the idea of targeting chips, after seeing the auto sector, along with steel and aluminium imports, hit with levies. Taiwan, which produces nearly 90 per cent of the world's most advanced semiconductors, highlighted the complementary role of TSMC foundries that churn out wafers for leading American chip designers Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. Tariffs on semiconductors or related products from the island 'would severely impair Taiwan's ability to meet the demands of the US semiconductor industry in a timely manner', the Taiwanese government said in its filing. 'This would drive up costs for US companies, raise end-product prices, reduce profitability and revenue, and ultimately weaken the capacity of US firms to invest in R&D and innovation.' BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Why Iran faced Israel and the US alone as its friends stood by
Iran spent decades expanding its reach in the Middle East by building a network of partners that came to be known as the 'axis of resistance'. PHOTO: AFP Why Iran faced Israel and the US alone as its friends stood by Iran spent decades expanding its reach in the Middle East by building a network of partners that came to be known as the 'axis of resistance'. Yet it found itself standing alone to face the recent attacks by Israel, which the US joined by bombing three of the Islamic Republic's key nuclear facilities. A tentative ceasefire with Israel went into effect on June 24. The web of partnerships that Iran has funded and armed for years is struggling, and the country's state ally, the regime of Bashar Al-Assad in Syria, fell in December 2024. Nearly two years of war with Israel has weakened the Palestinian group Hamas and the Lebanese organisation Hezbollah. And while the Houthi militants in Yemen remain defiant, their capabilities have also been impaired by American strikes. Iran has been building ties elsewhere. It has shifted closer to Russia and China, and mended relations with its Gulf Arab rivals for regional power, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Hezbollah Hezbollah, Iran's main regional partner, stayed out of the latest conflict between Iran and Israel. The Shi'ite Muslim group, which is both a militia and a political party, is trying to figure out its own next steps. Hezbollah was formed in 1982 in response to Israel's invasion of southern Lebanon – a region Israel went on to occupy for 18 years. The group's leadership and capabilities have been weakened by Israeli strikes – a response to Hezbollah launching a rocket campaign on Israel in support of Gaza, following the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct 7, 2023. While Hezbollah still retains some fighting capacity, Israel says it has taken out 70 per cent of the group's arsenal, including rockets and missiles, a claim that is difficult to verify. Even if Hezbollah were better positioned to assist Iran, there's a question of motivation. There is resentment among some members over how Iran appeared to abandon them during the fight with Israel. In addition, there is war fatigue among Hezbollah's constituents. Areas under its control have borne the brunt of Israel's bombing of Lebanon and many people have lost their homes and possessions. While Iran gives Hezbollah free rein to make its own strategic calculations, it works closely with the group and has influence with it. At the same time, knowing how delicate the relationship is with Hezbollah now, authorities in Iran are likely to hesitate before calling on the group to join their battles. The Houthis The Houthis also stuck to the sidelines during the latest Israel-Iran flare-up, although they appeared more willing to get involved, if needed. The group first arose during Yemen's civil war in the 1990s and today controls approximately one-third of the country's territory, including the capital Sana'a. The Houthis targeted Israel with missiles and drones and launched a maritime campaign harassing ships in the Red Sea in support of the Palestinians after Oct 7, 2023. The group receives some help and support from Iran without taking direct orders from it. The Houthis have been hurt by US strikes on its targets, which escalated in March. While the group retains robust capabilities, some of its weapons, including those that allowed it to conduct cross-border and precision attacks, were taken out. There is also a question of incentive with them. The Houthis are a local group with local grievances that aims to be seen as an actor in its own right, rather than as an Iranian proxy. They view themselves as active in the fight for Gaza – and have popular support for this – but that does not necessarily extend to Iran. The Houthis also have their hands full with governance and economic challenges that have produced rising discontent in the areas they control. Hamas Hamas remains resolved to continue fighting Israel, but after almost two years of war, it lacks the capacity to pose a credible threat on Iran's behalf. Also, Hamas is not as close to Iran as other members of the axis of resistance. The group – which like Hezbollah and the Houthis is classified as a terrorist organisation by the US – receives funding and military assistance from Iran, as well as financial support from Qatar, but does not always follow orders or calls for restraint. The relationship between Hamas and Iran is more a marriage of convenience rather than a close partnership. Iraq's Shi'ite militias Iran has traditionally relied on Shi'ite militias in Iraq known as the Hashd al Shaabi, or Popular Mobilisation Forces, to confront the US presence there. The Hashd emerged in 2014 after the radical Sunni group Islamic State took over large swathes of Iraq, and the country's highest ranking Shi'ite cleric Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani called on Shi'ites to join the security forces to push back against the threat. While the Hashd is no monolith – a wide array of views and relationships are represented – its components receive arms, money and close guidance from Iran. Iran-backed militias have periodically attacked US military personnel remaining in Iraq, who number some 2,500. But Hezbollah's recent experience of being battered and getting no help from Iran is a cautionary tale. When Iran on June 23 retaliated against the US attack on its nuclear facilities two days earlier, it chose a US base in Qatar as its main target, rather than Iraq. Syria Syria, under the Assad regime, became the state closest to Iran after its Islamic revolution in 1979. Assad's fall was a surprise to many, including the authorities in Iran. They took no measures to stop it and instead turned their back on Assad in the hope that they could build at least basic ties with the next government. But Syria's new leader Ahmed al-Sharaa appears to have other priorities, including strengthening ties with the US and its allies, and courting the Gulf Arab states in the pursuit of economic dividends to help him build his constituency and overcome his difficulty controlling all of Syria. In the pursuit of a 'no problems with neighbors' policy', he went so far as to barely respond to Israeli strikes on Syria and to allow Israel to use his country's airspace in its campaign against Iran. The Gulf Arab states While Iran has had good ties with the Gulf Arab states Oman and Qatar, its relations with Saudi Arabia and the UAE were tumultuous until recently. The latter two encouraged US President Donald Trump's efforts to exert 'maximum pressure' on Iran during his first term. But they were disappointed with what they perceived to be a US failure to react to attacks on Saudi oil installations in 2019 and on the UAE in 2022 that they ultimately held Iran responsible for. Afterward, they both began to pursue de-escalation with Iran, arguing that containment would only work if it was combined with engagement. In 2022 the UAE restored normal diplomatic relations with Iran, and Saudi Arabia followed the next year. But this olive branch from Saudi Arabia and the UAE will only extend so far given that good relations with the US, their main security guarantor, is also critical to them. In addition, some of the ruling elites in the two countries privately welcomed Israel's attacks on Iranian leaders, even if others were more fearful of what might come next. All in all, the only support Gulf Arab states gave Iran in the June conflict was strong words of condemnation for Israel, calls for a return to peace and offers to mediate. Russia and China Smarting from the West's ability to isolate it in the 2010s, Iran set out to build closer ties with both Russia and China, and succeeded. Russia's own fallout with the US and its allies over its full-scale invasion of Ukraine helped draw it closer to Iran, which supplied the Russian military with drones for the war. And, as part of its rivalry with the US, China tends to present itself as a defender of countries, such as Iran, that are in conflict with the other superpower. Both Russia and China strongly condemned the Israeli and US strikes on Iran, and Russia offered to mediate to de-escalate tensions. But neither country offered Iran tangible assistance. While Iran has a 20-year strategic partnership with Russia and a 25-year cooperation deal with China, these arrangements are not formal alliances. Officials in Russia, who are already mired in the war in Ukraine, made it clear that their agreement with Iran does not include mutual-defence obligations. China, which imports much of its oil from Iran, has cause to worry about the flow of energy from the region, and therefore an incentive to encourage an end to any hostilities that would disrupt its crude supply and prompt Iran to curb access to the Strait of Hormuz – a key shipping chokepoint located at the mouth of the Persian Gulf that handles about a quarter of the world's seaborne oil trade. However, for Russia, a major oil exporter, instability in the region leading to higher oil prices could be an economic boon. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
US strikes failed to destroy Iran's nuclear sites, intelligence report says, World News
WASHINGTON/TEL AVIV/ISTANBUL - US airstrikes did not destroy Iran's nuclear capability and only set it back by a few months, according to a preliminary US intelligence assessment, as a shaky ceasefire brokered by US President Donald Trump took hold between Iran and Israel. Earlier on Tuesday (June 26), both Iran and Israel signaled that the air war between the two nations had ended, at least for now, after Trump publicly scolded them for violating a ceasefire he announced at 0500 GMT. As the two countries lifted civilian restrictions after 12 days of war - which the US joined with an attack on Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities - each sought to claim victory. Trump said over the weekend that the US deployment of 30,000-pound bombs had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme. But that claim appeared to be contradicted by an initial assessment by one of his administration's intelligence agencies, according to three people familiar with the matter. One of the sources said Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated, and the country's nuclear programme, much of which is buried deep underground, may have been set back only a month or two. Iran says its nuclear research is for civilian energy production. [[nid:719452]] The White House said the intelligence assessment was "flat out wrong." According to the report, which was produced by the Defence Intelligence Agency, the strikes sealed off the entrances to two of the facilities, but did not collapse underground buildings, said one of the people familiar with its findings. Some centrifuges still remained intact after the attacks, the Washington Post said, citing an unnamed person familiar with the report. Trump's administration told the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday that its weekend strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities had "degraded" Iran's nuclear programme, short of Trump's earlier assertion that the facilities had been "obliterated." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday that the attack on Iran had removed the threat of nuclear annihilation and was determined to thwart any attempt by Tehran to revive its weapons programme. "We have removed two immediate existential threats to us: The threat of nuclear annihilation and the threat of annihilation by 20,000 ballistic missiles," Netanyahu said. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said his country had successfully ended the war in what he called a "great victory," according to Iranian media. Pezeshkian also told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman that Tehran was ready to resolve differences with the US, according to official news agency IRNA. Israel launched the surprise air war on June 13, attacking Iranian nuclear facilities and killing top military commanders in the worst blow to the Islamic Republic since the 1980s war with Iraq. Iran, which denies trying to build nuclear weapons, retaliated with barrages of missiles on Israeli military sites and cities. 'Great victory' Israel's military lifted restrictions on activity across the country at 8 pm local time (1700 GMT), and officials said Ben Gurion Airport, the country's main airport near Tel Aviv, had reopened. Iran's airspace likewise will be reopened, state-affiliated Nournews reported. A White House official said Trump brokered the ceasefire deal with Netanyahu, and other administration officials were in touch with the Iranian government. The truce appeared fragile: Both Israel and Iran took hours to acknowledge they had accepted the ceasefire and accused each other of violating it. Trump scolded both sides but aimed especially stinging criticism at Israel, telling the close US ally to "calm down now." He later said Israel called off further attacks at his command. Israel's defence minister, Israel Katz, said he told his US counterpart, Pete Hegseth, that his country would respect the ceasefire unless Iran violated it. Pezeshkian likewise said Iran would honour the ceasefire as long as Israel did, according to Iranian media. Whether the Israel-Iran truce can hold is a major question given the deep mistrust between the two foes. But Trump's ability to broker a ceasefire showed Washington retains some leverage in the volatile region. Israeli armed forces chief of staff Eyal Zamir said a "significant chapter" of the conflict had concluded but the campaign against Iran was not over. He said the military would refocus on its war against Iran-backed Hamas militants in Gaza. Iran's military command also warned Israel and the US to learn from the "crushing blows" it delivered during the conflict. Iranian authorities said 610 people were killed in their country by Israeli strikes and 4,746 injured. Iran's retaliatory bombardment killed 28 people in Israel, the first time its air defences were penetrated by large numbers of Iranian missiles. Oil prices plunged and stock markets rallied worldwide in a sign of confidence inspired by the ceasefire, which allayed fears of disruption to critical oil supplies from the Gulf. Ceasefire violations? Earlier in the day, Trump admonished Israel with an obscenity in an extraordinary outburst at an ally whose air war he had joined two days before by dropping massive bunker-buster bombs on Iran's underground nuclear sites. Before departing the White House en route to a Nato summit in Europe, Trump told reporters he was unhappy with both sides for the ceasefire breach but particularly frustrated with Israel, which he said had "unloaded" shortly after agreeing to the deal. "I've got to get Israel to calm down now," Trump said. Iran and Israel had been fighting "so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing." Netanyahu's office acknowledged Israel bombed a radar site near Tehran in what it said was retaliation for Iranian missiles fired three-and-a-half hours after the ceasefire was due to begin. It did not explicitly say whether the strike on the radar site took place before or after they spoke. The Islamic Republic denied launching any missiles and said Israel's attacks had continued for an hour-and-a-half beyond the time the truce was meant to start. "Who mediated or how it happened doesn't matter," said Reza Sharifi, 38, heading back to Tehran from Rasht on the Caspian Sea, where he had fled with his family. "The war is over. It never should have started in the first place."
