As a college professor, I see how AI is stripping away the humanity in education
As the 2025 school year ends, one thing teachers, parents and the broader public knows for sure is that AI is here, and it is taking on more responsibilities that used to be left to the human brain.
AI can now tutor students at their own pace, deliver custom content and even ace exams, including one I made for my own course. While a bit frightening, that part doesn't bother me. Of course machines can process information faster than we can.
What bothers me is that we seem ready to let the machines and political discontent define the purpose of education.
A recent Brookings report found that only one in three students is actively engaged in school. That tracks with what I have seen myself as a former high school teacher and current professor.
Many students are checked out, quietly drifting through the motions while teachers juggle multiple crises. They try to pull some students up to grade level and just hope the others don't slide backward. It's more triage than teaching.
I tested one of my own final exams in ChatGPT. It scored a 90% the first time and 100% the next. Colleagues tell me their students are submitting AI-written essays. One professor I know gave up and went back to in-class handwritten essays for his final exam. It's 2025 and we're back to blue books.
I recently surveyed and interviewed high school social studies teachers across the country for a study about democratic education. Every one of them said they're struggling to design assignments AI can't complete.
More: U.S. lawmakers, Nashville music industry members discuss AI: 'Making sure we get this right is really important'
These aren't multiple-choice quizzes or five-paragraph summaries. They're book analyses, historical critiques and policy arguments—real cognitive work that used to demand original thought. Now? A chatbot can mimic it well enough to get by.
So what do we do? Double down on job training? That's what I fear. A lot of today's education policy seems geared toward producing workers for an economy that's already in flux.
But AI is going to reshape the labor market whether we like it or not. Pretending we can out-credential our way through it is wishful thinking.
John Dewey, the early 20th century pragmatist, had the answer over 100 years ago. He reminded us that school is never just a pipeline to employment. It is a place to learn how to live in a democracy. Not just memorize facts about it, but participate in it. Build it. Challenge it.
Schools are not about the world; they are the world — just with guidance by adults and peers, and more chances to fail safely … hopefully.
In Dewey's model, teachers aren't content deliverers. They are guides and facilitators of meaning. They are people who help students figure out how to live together, how to argue without tearing each other apart, how to make sense of the world and their place in it, how to find their purpose and work with peers to solve problems.
That's not something AI can do. And frankly, it's not something our current test-driven, job-metric obsessed education system is doing either. Parents and community members also play an important role in shaping this type of education, which would lead to a healthier and more robust democracy for call.
More: From GPS gaffes to fabricated facts: AI still needs a human co-pilot
If we let AI define the boundaries of teaching, we'll hollow it out. Sure, students may learn more efficient ways to take in content. But they'll miss out on the messy, human work of collaboration, curiosity, disagreement and creation. And in a world increasingly shaped by machines, that may be the most important thing we can teach.
The challenge isn't to beat AI at its own game. It's to make sure school stays human enough that students learn how to be human—together.
Dustin Hornbeck, Ph.D., is an assistant professor of educational leadership and policy studies. His opinion does not represent that of the University for which he works.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: AI is transforming education. We're struggling to keep up | Opinion
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Vista CEO expects AI Could Replace 60% of Bankers
Get a jump start on the US trading day with Matt Miller, Katie Greifeld and Sonali Basak on "Bloomberg Open Interest." President Trump and China's Xi Jinping spoke by phone says they cleared up disputes surrounding rare earth exports. Meanwhile, the payrolls report also looms as job cuts pile up around the world... and billionaire Robert Smith sounds the alarm about AI's impact on the workforce. And Dan Mendelson the CEO of Morgan Health joins Bloomberg Open Interest to talk about Trump's order to lower drug prices. (Source: Bloomberg)
Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Breaks Silence on Minerals Chokehold Threatening Trump and US Allies
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Chinese officials responded to complaints on Thursday over export controls on rare earth elements—a group of metals crucial to a range of technologies, from electric motors to missile guidance systems. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment. Why It Matters China dominates the rare earth industry, accounting for 70 percent of mining and 90 percent of chemical processing. The imbalance is an Achilles' heel for Washington, which sees dependence on its top military rival as a national security threat. Beijing exploited this vulnerability in April, curbing exports of seven rare earths after President Donald Trump raised tariffs. The restrictions, along with investment bans on 17 American companies, were loosened last month after the United States and China reached a 90-day ceasefire in Geneva, Switzerland. Negotiations have since stalled. Trump has accused China of violating the agreement, without specifying how. Beijing believes Washington breached the consensus by tightening export controls on AI chips produced by Chinese tech giant Huawei "anywhere in the world" and by planning to revoke Chinese student visas. What To Know U.S. officials have said the country is still withholding rare earth shipments and magnets. European car manufacturers have complained of disruptions, and Japanese automaker Suzuki has reportedly halted production due to a parts shortage. Asked about the restrictions during the Chinese Ministry of Commerce's regular press conference, spokesperson He Yadong said it was "international practice" to maintain export controls on rare earths, citing their dual-use civilian and military applications. "The Chinese government will review applications for export licenses related to dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations, and will approve those applications that meet the requirements to facilitate compliant trade," he said. Chinese President Xi Jinping attends a dinner at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, on May 8, 2025. Chinese President Xi Jinping attends a dinner at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, on May 8, 2025. Alexandr Kryazhev/RIA Novosti via AP During the Foreign Ministry's press conference, Japan's NHK asked about Suzuki being forced to suspend production of some cars due to a lack of parts. Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian stressed that China's export control measures are non-discriminatory and "not targeted at any particular country." In a Thursday post on Truth Social, Trump said that he held a phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping—their first confirmed conversation since January 17, shortly before Trump's inauguration. Trump suggested the "complexity of rare earths" featured in the discussion, without elaborating. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump, Thursday on Truth Social: "I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi, of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, trade deal. "The call lasted approximately one and a half hours, and resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries. There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of rare earth products. What Happens Next Trump said U.S. and Chinese negotiators would be "meeting shortly" at an undetermined location. Rare earth products would be key to Trump's goal of revitalizing U.S. manufacturing. Japan's chief tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, departed Thursday for talks in Washington. As both a top vehicle exporter to the U.S. and a key security ally, Japan will propose a "cooperation package" aimed at boosting the supply of the seven rare earths restricted by China, Nikkei reported.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Utah attorneys sanctioned by appeals court for using AI to write legal brief
Two Utah attorneys were sanctioned after the Utah Court of Appeals found that they violated procedural rules for lawyers by citing cases that did not exist and appeared to have been created through artificial intelligence. The court's opinion says this is the first time Utah courts have addressed using AI when preparing legal documents. The judges said in the document that the use of reliable AI tools is not improper in itself, but the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure require attorneys to ensure their filings are accurate. 'The legal profession must be cautious of AI due to its tendency to hallucinate information. While technology continues to evolve, attorneys must verify each source,' the appellate judges said. Here, it said the attorneys 'fell short of their gatekeeping responsibilities as members of the Utah State Bar' when citing fake cases generated by ChatGPT. Richard Bednar and Douglas Durban, representing Matthew Garner, filed a petition asking the appellate court to review a decision of the 3rd District Court. When the attorneys on the other side of the dispute responded, they found the petition cited multiple cases that either didn't exist or were not applicable. In response, those attorneys stated that it appeared the petition could be AI-generated and cited at least one case they could only find by searching ChatGPT. They also stated that the petition contained references that were 'wholly unrelated' to the case. Bednar, who filed and signed the petition, was ordered not only to pay the opposing party's attorneys' fees for the time spent responding to a petition that included AI, but to refund his own client any fees associated with his filing of the petition. He was also ordered to pay $1,000 to "and Justice for all" a Utah nonprofit that works to provide equal access to justice and courts for Utahns. The Court of Appeals stated that it reviewed sanctions in other legal jurisdictions for attorneys citing 'hallucinated authority,' and believes the sanctions are appropriate. A hearing was scheduled for April 22 to give the attorneys the chance to argue why they should not be sanctioned. In a request to amend their petition filed before the hearing, Bednar and Durbano apologized for the errors and offered to pay the other party's attorneys' fees associated with their response. At the hearing, an attorney representing Bednar and Durbano explained that it was a law clerk who used ChatGPT to create the document, not Bednar; however, Bednar mistakenly trusted that someone else had checked the citations. The attorney said Bednar does take responsibility, although he was unaware that ChatGPT was being used until after the opposing attorneys brought it to his attention. He said his clients would voluntarily pay the opposing attorneys' fees to cover their efforts to respond to the petition. In their May 22 ruling, Utah's appellate judges stated that they appreciate the attorneys' acceptance of responsibility, but the lack of care is still an abuse of the justice system and caused harm. The opinion noted that other attorneys had to spend extra resources to research and judges were required to address this issue instead of other pending cases. The opinion further states that opposing counsel and Utah's courts cannot be responsible for independently verifying the validity of each citation. 'This court takes the submission of fake precedent seriously,' it said. 'Our system of justice must be able to rely on attorneys complying with their duty.' The case that included the first instance of AI use in Utah courts is a contract case filed by Matthew Garner against Kadince, a software company in North Ogden. He was a shareholder and employee at the company beginning in January 2016, when he was named chief experience officer. In his complaint, Garner claims that in December 2019, when he owned 30% of the company's shares, he was told that he would have to relinquish the majority of his shares or his employment would be terminated. He did relinquish the shares but later realized the employees who had threatened him were breaching his employment agreement by threatening to end his employment without giving him three formal written warnings, according to the complaint. He filed the lawsuit in February 2020. Kadince denied Garner's claims, asked for his lawsuit to be dismissed and claimed that he breached his contract with them by filing the lawsuit. Ultimately, the appellate judges denied both Garner's petition for appeal of a discovery issue and attorney fees order — the petition that included inaccurate citations — and his attorneys' request to allow them to file a new petition. The case will continue as if the appeal had not been filed.
