Myanmar marks month of misery since historic quake
The magnitude-7.7 tremor was the strongest with an epicentre on Myanmar's land mass since 1912. PHOTO: AFP
Yangon - Myanmar marked one month since suffering its fiercest earthquake in more than a century on April 28, with military bombardments unabated despite a humanitarian truce as thousands of survivors camp in makeshift shelters.
The magnitude-7.7 tremor was the strongest with an epicentre on Myanmar's land mass since 1912, the United States Geological Survey reported, killing nearly 3,800 according to an official toll still rising daily.
Devastation centred on the second most populous city of Mandalay where apartments, tea shops, hotels and religious institutes were razed or heavily damaged.
'It's been a month but we are still very busy trying to get back what we lost,' said one Mandalay resident who asked to remain anonymous.
'I am not the only one still in difficulty, it's everyone around me as well.'
With tens of thousands people still homeless as monsoon season approaches, aid agencies are warning of major challenges to come.
'People are extremely concerned about what will happen in the next few weeks,' the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) Myanmar chief Nadia Khoury told AFP.
Meanwhile she said the organisation was planning a two-year relief plan because 'the geographical magnitude of this earthquake has been absolutely huge'.
Air strikes go on
The military – which sparked a civil war by snatching power in a 2021 coup – declared a ceasefire to spur relief efforts starting on April 2.
But since then monitors from the Britain-based Centre for Information Resilience have logged 65 air attacks by the junta.
A strike on April 23 killed five people and wounded eight more in a village on the outskirts of the town of Tabayin, residents told AFP, 100km northwest of the earthquake's epicentre.
'I managed to hide immediately after I heard explosions but my elder sister couldn't,' said 40-year-old Ko Aung.
'She ran randomly in a panic during the strike and a piece of shrapnel hit her head. She died on the spot.'
Ms Cho Tint, 46, said she sheltered in a cow shed as a fighter jet dropped two bombs.
'The military announced a ceasefire for the quake but they broke it already and are still attacking civilians,' she said. 'That's them crossing the line.'
A man works among the debris at the collapsed market in Naypyitaw, Myanmar, on April 24.
PHOTO: EPA-EFE
In eastern Myanmar residents also said they were forced from their homes in an offensive by opposition armed groups attempting to seize towns on a lucrative trade route to Thailand during the truce, due to last until April 30.
After four years of war, half the population were already living in poverty and 3.5 million were displaced before the quake, which sheared the ground up to 6m in places according to Nasa analysis.
Ms Khoury said some of the badly-hit regions already had a high level of humanitarian need because they were hosting people displaced by fighting.
'Now it's become even higher with this earthquake,' she said.
Ahead of the tremor the nation of more than 50 million was also bracing for the impact of international aid cuts following US President Donald Trump's campaign to slash Washington's humanitarian budget.
The World Food Programme had said it would cut off one million from vital food aid starting in April as a result of 'critical funding shortfalls'. AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
32 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Japan should allow nuclear arms on its soil for effective deterrence: Retired military officers
As the world's only country to have suffered atomic bombings, Japan vowed to never possess, produce and permit the introduction of nuclear weapons onto its territory. PHOTO: AFP Japan should allow nuclear arms on its soil for effective deterrence: Retired military officers – The volatile security environment facing Japan today has led its military experts to moot an idea that has long been taboo: that its Three Non-Nuclear Principles dating to 1967 should be reviewed. As the world's only country to have suffered atomic bombings, Japan vowed to never possess, produce and permit the introduction of nuclear weapons onto its territory. But retired Self-Defence Forces (SDF) officers have lamented an unofficial fourth principle – never discuss – as they fret over Japan's military preparedness with the country being surrounded by the nuclear-armed states of China, Russia and North Korea, and with the region becoming more turbulent. Japan enjoys the protection of the nuclear umbrella of its security ally the United States. Yet in what has been described as 'perverse logic', the third principle of never permitting nuclear arms on Japanese territory bars the US from bringing such weapons onto Japanese soil and its nuclear-equipped vessels and bombers from travelling through its waters and airspace. These retired officers said that Japan risks hamstringing itself with its antiquated policies. South Korea, another regional US ally, in 2023 resumed allowing American nuclear submarines to make port calls, having previously halted permission in 1981. The most recent call was in February, when the USS Alexandria docked in Busan. 'Both the Japanese government and its people have stopped thinking about the operational aspects of how Japan itself can make the US nuclear umbrella effective,' said a June 2 report released by the Sasakawa Peace Foundation think-tank. Its contributors included retired general Koji Yamazaki, a former Chief of Staff of the Joint Staff of the Japanese military. 'In case of a Taiwan contingency, nuclear-equipped US land, sea, and air forces capable of striking China cannot be deployed or ported in Japan, which undermines our national security interests and reduces the effectiveness of the US extended nuclear deterrence,' the report said. It was referring to the possibility of China attacking the self-ruled island that Beijing claims as its own. 'The principle should be revised to say, 'Do not let (the enemy) strike Japan with nuclear weapons'. The original wording, 'Do not allow nuclear weapons into Japan' is perverse as a security logic,' the report added. Another report in March by eight retired SDF officers, including retired general Ryoichi Oriki, also a former Chief of Staff of the Joint Staff, called for the creation of strategic guidelines on nuclear issues, and the clarification of how Japan can simultaneously pursue the contradictory goals of nuclear deterrence and nuclear disarmament. 'The time has come to fundamentally and comprehensively review our country's nuclear weapon policy,' the report said. These retired officers are planting the seeds for policy change as Tokyo is spooked by developments in its neighbourhood. China, which may possess 1,000 nuclear warheads by 2030, and has in recent years increased its military drills near Taiwan and its grey zone activity against it, could well wage a nuclear war in its bid to reunify the island. North Korea's ballistic missile development continues apace, while Russia has threatened to use its strategic nuclear forces on Ukraine. Events in Asia and beyond have led the US-based Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists to set its Doomsday Clock, which symbolises how close humanity is to its own destruction, at 89 seconds to midnight in January 2025 during its annual review, from the previous 90 seconds. This is the shortest it has ever been. Yet any broaching of the subject of nuclear weapons is taboo to the Japanese public – and would likely amount to political suicide for any politician who does. Security hawks such as the late former prime minister Shinzo Abe had considered revising the Three Non-Nuclear Principles, but eventually backed down. But Japan has refused to sign the 2017 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons that bans nuclear arms totally and goes further than two older treaties to which it is a signatory. It is undeniable that Japan is at a crossroads of its nuclear policy, 80 years after the US dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively. And this is worrisome for the region. On June 6, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan raised the spectre of North-east Asia being home to five nuclear powers – Russia, China, North Korea, South Korea and Japan – during a discussion at the Hudson Institute think-tank during his working visit to Washington. 'A North-east Asia with five nuclear powers – which in fact has become more, not less likely – is actually a very dangerous circumstance,' he said during a fireside chat with Hudson's Asia-Pacific security chair Patrick Cronin, noting that the weight of Japan's wartime history could be inflammatory. However, he noted that the discussions have been triggered by the turbulence wrought by US President Donald Trump, which has caused allies to reassess the robustness of their security relationships. 'For 80 years, the American security umbrella in North-east Asia in fact has been a key stabiliser for the relationships in a complicated part of the world,' he said. 'One adverse effect of the turbulence, uncertainty in rules, security arrangements, and trust, is that, I fear, other leaders will be having unthinkable thoughts.' Such 'unthinkable thoughts' might include a push towards manufacturing nuclear weapons. Japan is said to own enough stockpiles of plutonium, generated from spent nuclear plant fuel, to quickly produce 7,000 atomic bombs by some estimates. Cabinet Office statistics show that Japan held 44.5 tonnes of plutonium as at December 2023, with 8.6 tonnes stored within the country and 35.8 tonnes kept overseas. Experts, however, see this step as unlikely given that Japan does not have the delivery platforms, which would take decades to either acquire or build. 'Japan needs deterrence to be credible, all of which needs to be developed beyond simply building a warhead,' Professor Heng Yee Kuang of The University of Tokyo's Graduate School of Public Policy told The Straits Times. 'Doctrine would also require attention. This will open an additional can of worms. Will the US help? How might regional partners react, beyond domestic opinion?' he said, noting the worst-case scenario of a destabilising nuclear arms race. The introduction of nuclear weapons, however, is necessary for effective extended deterrence by the US-Japan alliance, the retired SDF officers argue. 'A Taiwan contingency has also been called a Japan contingency or a Japan-US contingency, and this possibility has been increasing,' Gen (Ret) Yamazaki told a Sasakawa Peace Foundation webinar on June 2. 'If China attempts to unify Taiwan by force, it could easily alienate Japan and the US by using tactical nuclear weapons,' he said, adding that the US would clearly be hampered in its deterrence if it did not have nuclear weapons in the neighbourhood. Furthermore, SDF personnel must be trained to deepen their understanding and operational capabilities of nuclear weapons, said retired Lieutenant-General Sadamasa Oue, who was formerly commander of the Air Materiel Command of the Japan Air Self-Defence Force. 'The SDF should be proactive in supporting the US military in their use of nuclear weapons,' he said. 'This will strengthen trust between the two allies.' Walter Sim is Japan correspondent at The Straits Times. Based in Tokyo, he writes about political, economic and socio-cultural issues. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump says Los Angeles ‘safe and sound' for two nights after protests
The protests had ignited over an escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants in the US illegally. PHOTO: AFP Trump says Los Angeles 'safe and sound' for two nights after protests WASHINGTON - Los Angeles 'was safe and sound for the last two nights', US President Donald Trump said on the morning of J une 12 , as he hailed troops for helping to restore order in the city after days of anti-deportation protests. 'Our great National Guard, with a little help from the Marines, put the LA Police in a position to effectively do their job,' Mr Trump said on Truth Social, adding that without the military the city 'would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years'. The mostly peaceful protests ignited last week over a sudden escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants in the country illegally. But there were also pockets of violence, including the burning of self-driving taxis and hurling stones at police. Mr Trump deployed several thousand National Guard troops and some 700 active-duty Marines over the objections of Democratic California governor Gavin Newsom, the first such action by a US president in decades. In his post, Mr Trump said Mr Newsom 'had totally lost control of the situation'. 'He should be saying THANK YOU for saving his a**, instead of trying to justify his mistakes and incompetence!!!' the president added. Similar protests also ignited in other cities across the United States, as California prepared on June 12 for a legal showdown of Mr Trump's deployment of the military. A second night of curfew was in place as city leaders tried to get a handle on the after-dark vandalism and looting that scarred a few city blocks in the 1,300 sq km metropolis. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
UN nuclear watchdog says Iran in breach of obligations, Iran announces counter-measures
FILE PHOTO: A flag with the logo of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) flutters in front of their headquarters in Vienna, Austria July 10, 2019. REUTERS/Lisi Niesner/ File Photo VIENNA/DUBAI - The U.N. nuclear watchdog's board of governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations on Thursday and Tehran announced counter-measures, as tensions rose in the Middle East before further U.S.-Iranian nuclear talks. U.S. and Iranian officials will hold a sixth round of talks on Tehran's accelerating uranium enrichment programme in Oman on Sunday, the Omani foreign minister said on Thursday. But security fears have risen since U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday American personnel were being moved out of the region because "it could be a dangerous place" and that Tehran would not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. The International Atomic Energy Agency's policy-making Board of Governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years, raising the prospect of reporting it to the U.N. Security Council. The step is the culmination of several stand-offs between the Vienna-based IAEA and Iran since Trump pulled the U.S. out of a nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers in 2018 during his first term, after which that accord unravelled. An IAEA official said Iran had responded by informing the nuclear watchdog that it plans to open a new uranium enrichment facility. The move by Iran was among several measures being taken because of the resolution, Iranian state TV said. The IAEA official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Iran had given no further details such as the location of the site. Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesperson for Iran's atomic energy organisation, told state TV that Tehran had informed the IAEA of two countermeasures including "the upgrading of centrifuges in Fordow (enrichment plant) from first to sixth generation, which will significantly boost the production of enriched uranium". Enrichment can be used to produce uranium for reactor fuel or, at higher levels of refinement, for atomic bombs. Iran says its nuclear energy programme is only for peaceful purposes. Reiterating Iran's stance that it will not abandon the right to nuclear enrichment as a signatory to the global Non-Proliferation Treaty, a senior Iranian official told Reuters that rising tensions in the region were intended to "influence Tehran to change its position about its nuclear rights." 'POTENTIAL ISRAELI STRIKE' The Iranian official said a "friendly" country had alerted Tehran to a potential strike on its nuclear sites by arch-adversary Israel and reiterated that the Islamic Republic would not abandon its commitment to nuclear enrichment. "We don't want tensions and prefer diplomacy to resolve the (nuclear) issue, but our armed forces are fully ready to respond to any military strike," the Iranian official said. Iranian state media reported that Iran's military had begun drills earlier than planned to focus on "enemy movements". The decision by Trump to remove some personnel from the region comes at a volatile and highly sensitive moment in the oil-producing Middle East, where security has already been destabilised by the Gaza war between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas that began in October 2023. Oil prices initially rose after Trump's announcement but later eased. Foreign energy companies were continuing their operations as usual, a senior Iraqi official overseeing operations in southern oilfields told Reuters on Thursday. Trump has threatened to strike Iran if the nuclear talks do not progress, and in an interview released on Wednesday said he had become less confident that Tehran would agree to stop enriching uranium. The Islamic Republic wants a lifting of the U.S. sanctions imposed on the country since 2018. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
