Myanmar marks month of misery since historic quake
The magnitude-7.7 tremor was the strongest with an epicentre on Myanmar's land mass since 1912. PHOTO: AFP
Yangon - Myanmar marked one month since suffering its fiercest earthquake in more than a century on April 28, with military bombardments unabated despite a humanitarian truce as thousands of survivors camp in makeshift shelters.
The magnitude-7.7 tremor was the strongest with an epicentre on Myanmar's land mass since 1912, the United States Geological Survey reported, killing nearly 3,800 according to an official toll still rising daily.
Devastation centred on the second most populous city of Mandalay where apartments, tea shops, hotels and religious institutes were razed or heavily damaged.
'It's been a month but we are still very busy trying to get back what we lost,' said one Mandalay resident who asked to remain anonymous.
'I am not the only one still in difficulty, it's everyone around me as well.'
With tens of thousands people still homeless as monsoon season approaches, aid agencies are warning of major challenges to come.
'People are extremely concerned about what will happen in the next few weeks,' the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) Myanmar chief Nadia Khoury told AFP.
Meanwhile she said the organisation was planning a two-year relief plan because 'the geographical magnitude of this earthquake has been absolutely huge'.
Air strikes go on
The military – which sparked a civil war by snatching power in a 2021 coup – declared a ceasefire to spur relief efforts starting on April 2.
But since then monitors from the Britain-based Centre for Information Resilience have logged 65 air attacks by the junta.
A strike on April 23 killed five people and wounded eight more in a village on the outskirts of the town of Tabayin, residents told AFP, 100km northwest of the earthquake's epicentre.
'I managed to hide immediately after I heard explosions but my elder sister couldn't,' said 40-year-old Ko Aung.
'She ran randomly in a panic during the strike and a piece of shrapnel hit her head. She died on the spot.'
Ms Cho Tint, 46, said she sheltered in a cow shed as a fighter jet dropped two bombs.
'The military announced a ceasefire for the quake but they broke it already and are still attacking civilians,' she said. 'That's them crossing the line.'
A man works among the debris at the collapsed market in Naypyitaw, Myanmar, on April 24.
PHOTO: EPA-EFE
In eastern Myanmar residents also said they were forced from their homes in an offensive by opposition armed groups attempting to seize towns on a lucrative trade route to Thailand during the truce, due to last until April 30.
After four years of war, half the population were already living in poverty and 3.5 million were displaced before the quake, which sheared the ground up to 6m in places according to Nasa analysis.
Ms Khoury said some of the badly-hit regions already had a high level of humanitarian need because they were hosting people displaced by fighting.
'Now it's become even higher with this earthquake,' she said.
Ahead of the tremor the nation of more than 50 million was also bracing for the impact of international aid cuts following US President Donald Trump's campaign to slash Washington's humanitarian budget.
The World Food Programme had said it would cut off one million from vital food aid starting in April as a result of 'critical funding shortfalls'. AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump travel ban in effect, citizens from 12 nations barred from US
Many of the nations covered by the restrictions have adversarial relations with the United States. PHOTO: AFP Trump travel ban in effect, citizens from 12 nations barred from US WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump's sweeping new travel ban came into effect early on June 9 immediately after midnight, barring citizens from a dozen nations from entering the United States and reviving a divisive measure from his first term. The move is expected to disrupt refugee pathways and further restrict immigration as the Trump administration expands its crackdown on illegal entries. Many of the nations covered by the restrictions have adversarial relations with the United States, such as Iran and Afghanistan, while others face severe crises, like Haiti and Libya. In announcing his restrictions last week, Mr Trump said the new measure was spurred by a recent 'terrorist attack' on Jews in Colorado. The group had been protesting in solidarity with hostages held in Gaza when they were assaulted by a man the White House said had overstayed his visa. That attack, Mr Trump said, 'underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted' or who overstay their visas. The move bans all travel to the United States by nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, according to the White House. Mr Trump also imposed a partial ban on travellers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Some temporary work visas from those countries will be allowed. New countries could be added, Mr Trump warned, 'as threats emerge around the world.' Ms Mehria, a 23-year-old woman from Afghanistan who applied for refugee status, said the new rules have trapped her and many other Afghans in uncertainty. 'We gave up thousands of hopes and our entire lives... on a promise from America, but today we are suffering one hell after another,' she told AFP. World Cup, Olympics, diplomats excluded The ban will not apply to athletes competing in the 2026 World Cup, which the United States is co-hosting with Canada and Mexico, or in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, Mr Trump's order said. Nor will it apply to diplomats from the targeted countries. United Nations rights chief Volker Turk warned that 'the broad and sweeping nature of the new travel ban raises concerns from the perspective of international law.' US Democratic lawmakers and elected officials blasted the ban as draconian and unconstitutional. 'I know the pain that Trump's cruel and xenophobic travel bans inflict because my family has felt it firsthand,' congresswoman Yassamin Ansari, who is Iranian-American, posted on June 8 on X. 'We will fight this ban with everything we have.' Rumours of a new travel ban had circulated following the Colorado attack, with Mr Trump's administration vowing to pursue 'terrorists' living in the United States on visas. US officials said suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national according to court documents, was in the country illegally having overstayed a tourist visa, but that he had applied for asylum in September 2022. Mr Trump's new travel ban notably does not include Egypt. His proclamation said Taliban-ruled Afghanistan and war-torn Libya, Sudan, Somalia and Yemen lacked 'competent' central authorities for processing passports and vetting. Iran was included because it is a 'state sponsor of terrorism,' the order said. For the other countries, Mr Trump's order cited an above-average likelihood that people would overstay their visas. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
37 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Climate change heightens risk of Indian farmer suicides
The agricultural industry has been in a persistent crisis for decades, with high suicide rates being a nationwide problem. PHOTO: AFP BEED, India - On a small farm in India's Maharashtra state, Ms Mirabai Khindkar said the only thing her land grew was debt, after crops failed in drought and her husband killed himself. Farmer suicides have a long history in India, where many are one crop failure away from disaster, but extreme weather caused by climate change is adding fresh pressure. Dwindling yields due to water shortages, floods, rising temperatures and erratic rainfall, coupled with crippling debt, have taken a heavy toll on a sector that employs 45 per cent of India's 1.4 billion people. Ms Mirabhai's husband Amol was left with debts to loan sharks worth hundreds of times their farm's annual income, after the 1ha soybean, millet and cotton plot withered in scorching heat. He swallowed poison in 2024. 'When he was in the hospital, I prayed to all the gods to save him,' said 30-year-old Mirabai, her voice breaking. Mr Amol died a week later, leaving behind Ms Mirabai and three children. Her last conversation with him was about debt. Their personal tragedy is replicated daily across Marathwada, a region in Maharashtra of 18 million, once known for fertile farmland. In 2024, extreme weather events across India affected 3.2 million hectares of cropland – an area bigger than Belgium – according to the New Delhi-based Centre for Science and Environment research group. Over 60 per cent of that was in Maharashtra. 'Summers are extreme, and even if we do what is necessary, the yield is not enough,' said Mr Amol's brother and fellow farmer Balaji Khindkar. 'There is not enough water to irrigate the fields. It doesn't rain properly.' 'Increase the risk' Between 2022 and 2024, 3,090 farmers took their own lives in Marathwada, an average of nearly three a day, according to India's Minister of Agriculture Shivraj Singh Chouhan. Government statistics do not specify what drove the farmers to kill themselves, but analysts point to several likely factors. 'Farmer suicides in India are a consequence of the crisis of incomes, investment and productivity that you have in agriculture,' said Professor R Ramakumar, professor of development studies at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Farming across many Indian smallholdings is done largely as it has been for centuries, and is highly dependent on the right weather at the correct time. 'What climate change and its vulnerabilities and variabilities have done is to increase the risks in farming,' Professor Ramakumar said. This 'is leading to crop failures, uncertainties... which is further weakening the economics of cultivation for small and marginal farmers.' The government could support farmers with better insurance schemes to cope with extreme weather events, as well as investments in agricultural research, Professor Ramakumar said. 'Agriculture should not be a gamble with the monsoon.' 'Make ends meet' Faced with uncertain weather, farmers often look to stem falling yields by investing in fertilisers or irrigation systems. But banks can be reluctant to offer credit to such uncertain borrowers. Some turn to loan sharks offering quick cash at exorbitant interest rates, and risking catastrophe if crops fail. 'It is difficult to make ends meet with just farming,' Ms Mirabai said, standing outside her home, a tin-roofed hut with patch-cloth walls. Her husband's loans soared to over US$8,000 (S$10,290), a huge sum in India, where the average monthly income of a farming household is around US$120. Ms Mirabai works on other farms as a labourer but could not pay back the debt. 'The loan instalments piled up,' she said, adding that she wants her children to find jobs outside of farming when they grow up. 'Nothing comes out of the farm.' The agricultural industry has been in a persistent crisis for decades. And while Maharashtra has some of the highest suicide rates, the problem is nationwide. Thirty people in the farming sector killed themselves every day in 2022, according to national crime records bureau statistics. At another farm in Marathwada, 32-year-old farmer Shaikh Imran took over the running of the family smallholding in 2024 after his brother took his own life. He is already more than US$1,100 in debt after borrowing to plant soybean. The crop failed. Meanwhile, the pop of explosives echoes around as farmers blast wells, hoping to hit water. 'There's no water to drink,' said family matriarch Khatijabi. 'Where shall we get water to irrigate the farm?' AFP Find out more about climate change and how it could affect you on the ST microsite here.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump jumps at the chance for a stand-off in Los Angeles over immigration
National Guard troops have been deployed in Los Angeles to quell protests arising from the Trump administration's attempts to deport migrants. PHOTO: AFP Trump jumps at the chance for a stand-off in Los Angeles over immigration WASHINGTON – It is the fight US President Donald Trump had been waiting for, a showdown with a top political rival in a deep blue state over an issue core to his political agenda. In bypassing the authority of Governor Gavin Newsom of California, a Democrat, to call in the National Guard to quell protests in the Los Angeles area over his administration's efforts to deport more migrants, Mr Trump is now pushing the boundaries of presidential authority and stoking criticism that he is inflaming the situation for political gain. Local and state authorities had not sought help in dealing with the scattered protests that erupted after an immigration raid on June 6 in the garment district. But Mr Trump and his top aides leaned into the confrontation with California leaders on June 8, portraying the demonstrations as an existential threat to the country – setting in motion an aggressive federal response that in turn sparked new protests across the city. As more demonstrators took to the streets, the president wrote on social media that Los Angeles was being 'invaded and occupied' by 'violent, insurrectionist mobs', and directed three of his top Cabinet officials to take any actions necessary to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion'. 'Nobody's going to spit on our police officers. Nobody's going to spit on our military,' Mr Trump told reporters as he headed to Camp David on June 8, although it was unclear whether any such incidents had occurred. 'That happens, they get hit very hard.' The president declined to say whether he planned to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act, which allows for the use of federal troops on domestic soil to quell a rebellion. But either way, he added, 'we're going to have troops everywhere.' Mr Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, posted on social media that 'this is a fight to save civilisation'. Mr Trump's decision to deploy at least 2,000 members of the California National Guard is the latest example of his willingness and, at times, an eagerness to shatter norms to pursue his political goals and bypass limits on presidential power. The last president to send in the National Guard for a domestic operation without a request from the state's governor, Lyndon B. Johnson, did so in 1965, to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. But aides and allies of the president say the events unfolding in Los Angeles provide an almost perfect distillation of why Mr Trump was elected in November. 'It could not be clearer,' said Mr Newt Gingrich, the former Republican House speaker and ally of the president who noted that Mr Trump had been focused on immigration enforcement since 2015. 'One side is for enforcing the law and protecting Americans, and the other side is for defending illegals and being on the side of the people who break the law.' Sporadic protests have occurred across the country in recent days as federal agents have descended on Los Angeles and other cities searching workplaces for undocumented immigrants, part of an expanded effort by the administration to ramp up the number of daily deportations. On social media, Mr Trump, his aides and allies have sought to frame the demonstrations against immigration officials on their own terms. They have shared images and videos of the most violent episodes – focusing particularly on examples of protesters lashing out at federal agents – even as many remained peaceful. Officials also zeroed in on demonstrators waving flags of other countries, including Mexico and El Salvador, as evidence of a foreign invasion. 'Illegal criminal aliens and violent mobs have been committing arson, throwing rocks at vehicles, and attacking federal law enforcement for days,' wrote Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary. Mr Newsom, whom the president refers to as 'Newscum', has long been a foil for Mr Trump, who has repeatedly targeted California and its leader as emblematic of failures of the Democratic Party. 'We expected this, we prepared for this,' Mr Newsom said in a statement to The New York Times. 'This is not surprising – for them to succeed, California must fail, and so they're going to try everything in their tired playbook despite the evidence against them.' On June 8, the governor sent a letter to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth formally requesting that Mr Trump rescind the call-up of the National Guard, saying federal actions were inflaming the situation. He was echoed by other Democratic officials, who said the mounting demonstrations were the result of Mr Trump's own actions. The president and his aides 'are masters of misinformation and disinformation', Senator Alex Padilla of California, a Democrat, said in an interview. 'They create a crisis of their own making and come in with all the theatrics and cruelty of immigration enforcement. They should not be surprised in a community like Los Angeles they will be met by demonstrators who are very passionate about standing up for fundamental rights and due process.' Republicans defended Mr Trump's moves, saying he was rightfully exercising his power to protect public safety. 'The president is extremely concerned about the safety of federal officials in LA right now who have been subject to acts of violence and harassment and obstruction,' Representative Kevin Kiley, R-California, said in an interview. He added: 'We are in this moment because of a series of reckless decisions by California's political leaders, the aiding and abetting the open-border policies of President Biden.' Trump officials said on June 8 that they were ready to escalate their response even more, if necessary. Mr Tom Homan, the president's border czar, suggested in an interview with NBC News that the administration would arrest anyone, including public officials, who interfered with immigration enforcement activities, which he said would continue in California and across the country. Mr Trump appears to be deploying against California a similar playbook that he has used to punish universities, law firms and other institutions and individuals that he views as political adversaries. In May, he threatened to strip 'large scale' federal funding from California 'maybe permanently' over the inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports. And in recent days, his administration said it would pull roughly US$4 billion (S$5.15 billion) in federal funding for California's high-speed train, which would further delay a project that has long been plagued by delays and funding shortages. 'Everything he's done to attack California or anybody he fears isn't supportive of him is going to continue to be an obsession of his,' Mr Padilla said. 'He may think it plays smart for his base, but it's actually been bad for the country.' White House officials said there was a different common denominator that explains Mr Trump's actions both against institutions like Harvard and immigration protests in Los Angeles. 'For years Democrat-run cities and institutions have failed the American people, by both choice and incompetence,' Ms Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, said in a statement. 'In each instance,' she added, 'the president took necessary action to protect Americans when Democrats refused.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
