logo
Police to significantly increase officer numbers in Ballymena after 'senseless violence'

Police to significantly increase officer numbers in Ballymena after 'senseless violence'

BBC News3 days ago

Update:
Date: 16:12 BST
Title: Police requested from Great Britain
Content: A process known as mutual aid allows police forces to request assistance from elsewhere in the country.
ACC Henderson says he has activated a request for mutual aid from colleagues in Great Britain.
He says this will allow PSNI officers to get some rest.
Update:
Date: 16:11 BST
Title: 'Important to hear message against violence'
Content: The senior police officer says he has heard condemnation of the violence from across the political spectrum.
He says it is important that people come together and put across the message that the disorder cannot continue.
Update:
Date: 16:10 BST
Title: People rioting are mostly from 'local area'
Content: He says that the people rioting are from their "local area."
He appeals for people with influence to be able to help take young people away from the disorder.
ACC Henderson adds that people may have travelled to Ballymena due to it being "advertised" on social media, but most of those involved in disorder are from the town.
Update:
Date: 16:07 BST
Title: Possibility of more violence
Content: He says his 30 years' experience in policing means he is aware there could be more violence tonight.
He adds the police are prepared for that eventuality.
Update:
Date: 16:06 BST
Title: Social media activity
Content: ACC Henderson says there have been many calls on social media for what he calls "protest activity".
He says there have been peaceful protestors who have acted within the law and complied with police instructions.
But he adds that others have been violent.
He says police will respect people's right to protest peacefully but will be ready to respond to violence.
Update:
Date: 16:05 BST
Title: Protest 'peacefully and lawfully'
Content: ACC Henderson is urging people to protest "peacefully and lawfully".
He adds people should be aware that "others may use your peaceful intention as a cover for their own violent agenda".
Update:
Date: 16:03 BST
Title: 'Criminals should not be louder than us'
Content: The senior police officer is calling for the public to "loudly condemn this criminal behaviour".
"These criminals should not be louder than us" he adds.
Update:
Date: 16:02 BST
Title: 'Significant increase in officers'
Content: ACC Henderson calls on people to think about how the violence is helping the ongoing criminal investigation into the alleged sexual assault.
He says there will be a significant increase in the number of officers and vehicles being deployed to Ballymena.
This, ACC Henderson adds, is taking resources away from other areas.
Update:
Date: 16:01 BST
Title: 'Senseless violence'
Content: ACC Henderson says "this senseless violence is utterly unacceptable".
He adds that in his eyes the violence "serves to only endanger lives and destroy our local area, our local communities".
Update:
Date: 16:00 BST
Title: ACC Henderson praises police officers
Content: The press conference has begun and Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson has praised the "bravery and professionalism" of the police officers who have been deployed in Ballymena.
"Those officers come form our communities, to work for our communities and to make a difference for our communities." he says.
Update:
Date: 15:55 BST
Title: What have police previously said about the violence?
Content: Yesterday ACC Henderson described the disorder as
"racist thuggery, pure and simple", saying it was targeted at ethnic
minorities and law enforcement.
"The fact that they had some weaponry ready to throw at
police would say to me that there was some degree of pre-planning from those
involved," he said.
ACC Henderson added there would be more arrests to follow
and his officers are working to identify those responsible, examining video and
online footage.
Update:
Date: 15:52 BST
Title: Why can't I watch the police press conference live?
Content: The Police Service of Northern Ireland has asked the media not to stream the press conference live.
We'll be able to report what is being said but you won't be able to watch it in real time.
Update:
Date: 15:47 BST
Title: What has been happening in Ballymena?
Content: The
first protest on Monday evening was organised hours after two 14-year-old boys appeared
before Coleraine Magistrates' Court accused of a serious sexual assault on a
teenage girl.
Both boys are charged with attempted oral rape and both deny
the charges.
They confirmed their names and ages through a Romanian
interpreter at Coleraine Magistrates' Court.
That evening hundreds of people gathered in Ballymena
at a peaceful protest that was related to the ongoing court case.
A short time later, however, violence broke out after people
wearing masks began to build barricades and attack properties on Clonavon
Terrace.
There were similar scenes in the County Antrim town last night.
PSNI officers fired baton rounds and used a water cannon to disperse protesters as cars were set on fire and the windows of several houses were smashed.
Five people were arrested and a further 17 officers were injured, bringing the total to 32.
Police said they also dealt with sporadic incidents of disorder in Newtownabbey, where a man was arrested, and Carrickfergus in County Antrim and north Belfast.
Update:
Date: 15:39 BST
Title: Police to give update on disorder in Ballymena
Content: The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) is due to give
an update on the ongoing disorder in Ballymena and other areas of Northern Ireland.
It follows two nights of violent scenes where petrol bombs,
bricks and fireworks were thrown – injuring 32 police officers.
The disorder began on Monday after a peaceful protest over
an alleged sexual assault in the County Antrim market town, which is about 30
miles outside of Belfast.
ACC Ryan Henderson is about to deliver a press conference at
PSNI HQ in Belfast.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A burqa ban won't protect or unite Britain – it will divide us
A burqa ban won't protect or unite Britain – it will divide us

The Independent

time35 minutes ago

  • The Independent

A burqa ban won't protect or unite Britain – it will divide us

It wasn't surprising to hear newly elected Reform MP Sarah Pochin call for a ban on the burqa – such calls resurface from time to time. What was surprising, however, was her decision to use her very first parliamentary question to raise this issue, rather than ask about pressing concerns such as the cost of living, NHS pressures or the rise in crime levels. Instead, she chose to single out and stigmatise Muslim women, making unfounded claims about public safety. On reflection, though, Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs) provided a high-profile national platform, making it an ideal stage to stir further negativity towards Muslims. Unsurprisingly, Suella Braverman, known for her history of making disparaging remarks about Muslims, quickly added her voice. Targeting Muslims has become a convenient marketing tool for some right-wing politicians – a tactic used to gain support, attract media attention and generate publicity, regardless of the real-life consequences. Only a tiny minority of Muslim women in Britain have adopted the face veil (niqab) or the burqa – a long garment covering the entire body from head to foot, including the face. With a Muslim population of around four million, there has been no formal attempt to measure how many women wear the veil – but estimates suggest the number is likely to be only in the hundreds or low thousands. Similarly, in other European countries, estimates range from just 300 to 2,000. So why does such a small number attract so much public and political attention? The most common arguments used to justify prohibiting the veil in public are actually irrational. Tired and prejudiced tropes are used, such as suggesting women are being forced to wear the veil and need to be 'liberated', that it is a threat to public safety, that it is an obstacle to integration, or that it is simply visually offensive. Let's examine each of these claims more closely. Debates around women who wear the face veil are often driven by assumptions rather than grounded in evidence. In reality, the vast majority of Muslim women who choose to wear it do so voluntarily and for a variety of reasons – religious, cultural or personal. For many, it's an expression of faith, identity, modesty or spiritual commitment. Some even find it empowering, as it shifts the focus from appearance to character. Yes, there are cases where women may be pressured or forced to wear the veil – but these are instances of domestic abuse and coercive control, which require targeted support and awareness, not sweeping bans. I run the Muslim Women's Network Helpline, and in our 10 years of service, we've encountered only a handful of such cases. Concerns about identity concealment are often tied to public safety, yet there is no credible evidence linking the burqa to security threats in the UK. Security protocols already exist in sensitive settings (e.g. banks, airports and courts), where face coverings may need to be removed temporarily for identification purposes – and such situations are managed respectfully and without incident. This public safety narrative seems more about stoking fear than addressing real risks. Also, why is there so much anxiety about the anonymity of veiled Muslim women, especially in a world where much of our communication now happens online – through emails, social media and digital platforms – where anonymity is commonplace? Many people conceal their identities online to spread misinformation or abuse, yet this form of anonymity rarely provokes the same level of scrutiny by the same politicians. Claims that a burqa ban will promote community cohesion and integration are likely to have the opposite effect – deepening divisions instead. When any group feels threatened or pressured to conform through such hostile measures, they are more likely to become even more attached to how they express their identity. For the small minority of women who wear the veil, it may bring personal, social or economic challenges, but it remains their choice. Meanwhile, the vast majority of Muslim women who do not wear the veil continue to face significant social and economic barriers that are often overlooked. If concerns about integration and community cohesion were genuine, politicians would prioritise addressing the systemic discrimination and inequalities these women regularly experience. Some argue the burqa should be banned because it is considered offensive. Not everything that is offensive is prohibited. For example, in the UK, the right to offend is protected as part of freedom of speech, allowing the expression of unpopular or controversial views provided no harm is caused and laws are not broken. Similarly, while some may find the burqa visually offensive, the right of Muslim women to express their identity in this way must also be respected, because their clothing does not harm anyone. It is clearly a frightening time for Muslim women, especially those who are visibly identifiable by their clothing. Coded language by politicians that normalises hostility towards Muslims, fuels fear and hatred, and deepens societal intolerance, is making them feel unsafe. I therefore urge parliamentarians across all political parties to reject divisive rhetoric and commit instead to policies that address gendered anti-Muslim discrimination. Muslim women must be empowered to make independent choices about their own bodies – whatever those choices may be – and they must be able to live with dignity and equality.

Labour minister who claimed majority of Channel migrants were women and children now says he was only talking about ONE boat - as nearly 1,000 more cross to UK
Labour minister who claimed majority of Channel migrants were women and children now says he was only talking about ONE boat - as nearly 1,000 more cross to UK

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour minister who claimed majority of Channel migrants were women and children now says he was only talking about ONE boat - as nearly 1,000 more cross to UK

A Labour Minister has had to issue a clarification after claiming on Question Time that 90 percent of people arriving in the UK on small boats are women and children, as another 919 made the dangerous journey across the Channel on Friday. Darren Jones, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, made the claim during Thursday's programme before hastily 'clarifying' he was referring to one specific boat after the figure was widely debunked online. The row came as Reform's Zia Yusuf, who revealed an inner chaos to the party when he abruptly quit as chairman last week before returning two days later in a new role, also made false claims when he said 'more than 90 percent' are men. Mr Jones provoked fury when he said that 'the majority of the people in these boats are children, babies and women'. Following cries of disbelief from members of the public, Mr Yusuf - who prevoiously said getting Reform elected was 'not a good use of my time' - interjected to say that 'more than 90 per cent of them are adult men', which is also incorrect. Home Office figures show 73 percent percent of small boat arrivals in 2024 - or 26,999 out of all 36,816 arrivals - were adult males. More than 14,800 people have arrived in Britain after making the crossing so far in 2025 - making it the highest start to the year on record, which experts have blamed on an usually high number of calm weather days. On Friday, another 919 people arrived in 14 small boats after making the dangerous crossing from France. The figure makes yesterday's arrivals the second highest number so far this year. On Question Time last night following Mr Yusuf's intervention, host Fiona Bruce turned to Mr Jones and asked: 'You're saying that's not true?' He replied: 'I'm saying it's not true. I'm saying this is controversial for a reason and you're told you're not supposed to challenge the audience on Question Time, but I'm going to. 'When there are babies and children put into that position by human trafficking gangs, who are coming across the Channel with skin burns from the oil from those boats mixing with the salt sea water, I would ask any of you to look at those babies and children and say 'go back'. Mr Yusuf hit back: 'In my previous answer, I made the case that this Government prioritises foreign citizens over citizens of the United Kingdom. After that testimony, I can rest my case. 'The vast, vast majority of people making the journey from France by small boat are fighting age, military age, males, not women and children. 'We're talking about asylum hotels, and Rachel Reeves saying we're going to shut down asylum hotels. 'I spent many weeks in the constituency of Runcorn and Helsby. Runcorn is a very deprived area. And do you know the issue that exercised people so much? The reason is primarily because of HMOs – houses of multiple occupancies. 'In an unholy alliance of Serco and Yvette Cooper, illegal migrants are being deposited into communities and there's no say for the local people.' Taking to X (formerly Twitter) this evening, Mr Jones clarified his position but maintained the percentage of migrants that are adult males is 'not north of 90 percent'. A group of people thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover, Kent, onboard the RNLI Ramsgate Lifeboat on Friday An overloaded dinghy is pictured as it attempts to make the perilous journey cross the Channel from France He wrote: 'Of course the overall majority of people arriving illegally on small boats are men - but not 'north of 90 percent' as Reform claimed. 'On @bbcquestiontime I shared a story from my visit to the Border Security Command about a dinghy that arrived mostly carrying women, children and babies who had suffered horrific burns. 'I'm happy to clarify this given how this is now being misrepresented. 'Labour committed new funding this week to secure our borders while Reform have voted against giving our police the powers needed to smash the gangs fuelling this vile trade.' At her spending review on Wednesday, Rachel Reeves pledged that migrants would be moved out of hotel accommodation by the time of the next general election, due in 2029. Ms Reeves also promised £1 billion of savings by speeding up the asylum system, along with £280 million investment in future years for the new Border Security Command. Latest figures show £3.1 billion was spent on housing asylum seekers in hotels in 2023-24, out of a total asylum support bill of £4.7 billion. More than 30,000 asylum seekers are housed in about 200 hotels across Britain, many of whom arrived illegally in dinghies, and ministers are looking at moving them into derelict tower blocks and student digs. But despite Ms Reeves' pledge to end the use of hotels, the Tories pointed out that the small print of her Spending Review documents revealed that £2.5 billion will still be spent each year on asylum support by the end of the decade. It comes as dramatic pictures emerged of French police using tear gas and pepper spray to disperse hundreds of migrants trying to board boats headed for Britain. Some officers were seen entering the water and dragging them back to shore. A major point of contention between Britain and France has been the French authorities' refusal to turn back migrants who are already in the water. Despite officers' efforts, a significant number of migrants were able to successfully cross this morning - with pictures showing them at Dover. A major point of contention between Britain and France has been the French authorities' refusal to turn back migrants who are already in the water A record five months of the year has brought the provisional arrivals today so far to 14,812 arrivals. This has also surpassed the highest total recorded for the first six months of the year, which was previously 13,489 on June 30 last year. In 2024, the number of arrivals did not reach more than 14,000 until July 9 (14,058). The Government has vowed to crack down on people-smuggling and Channel crossings since coming to power in July last year. This includes funding elite officers to increase patrols along the northern French coastline and launching a specialist intelligence unit in Dunkirk to track down people smugglers. It has also established a Border Security Command to lead strategy and its Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, currently going through Parliament, seeks to introduce new criminal offences and hand counter terror-style powers to law enforcement agencies to target smuggling gangs. However, critics have repeatedly warned the 'smash the gangs' strategy will not work unless there is a deterrent strong enough to prevent migrants from wanting to make the crossing in the first place. Yesterday, a spokesman for the PM repeatedly refused to engaged with questions about whether Mr Jones was right. 'The Government is absolutely focused on tackling these vile smuggling gangs… ' they said. Asked again about Home Office figures suggesting he is wrong, the spokesman said: 'The focus of the government is tackling these vile gangs that deal in misery.' Pressed if the PM had confidence in Mr Jones, the spokesman said: 'Yes.' Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Darren Jones is completely out of touch with reality. 'Since 2018, 73 percent of small boat arrivals have been single adult men. Yet Labour MPs like Jones still push the fairytale that these boats are full of women and babies. It's a dangerous distortion of the truth. 'No wonder this is shaping up to be the worst year on record for small boat crossings. If this is what passes for reality inside the Labour Government, Britain is in serious trouble.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We all want to end dangerous small boat crossings, which threaten lives and undermine our border security. 'The people-smuggling gangs do not care if the vulnerable people they exploit live or die as long as they pay, and we will stop at nothing to dismantle their business models and bring them to justice. 'That is why this Government has put together a serious plan to take down these networks at every stage, and why we are investing up to an additional £280 million per year by 2028-29 in the Border Security Command. 'Through international intelligence-sharing under our Border Security Command, enhanced enforcement operations in northern France and tougher legislation in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, we are strengthening international partnerships and boosting our ability to identify, disrupt and dismantle criminal gangs whilst strengthening the security of our borders.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store