Madras High Court advices Chennai Commissioner of Police not to send investigating officers on bandobust duty
The Madras High Court, on Monday (June 9, 2025) advised Greater Chennai City Commissioner of Police (CoP) A. Arun to ensure officers investigating criminal cases do not get diverted for any other work such as providing bandobust (security) for public events/VIPs so that the investigating officers (IOs) could devote their time and conclude the investigations as early as possible.
Justice P. Velmurugan said, he would summon Director General of Police/Head of Police Force Shankar Jiwal too in an appropriate case and give a similar advice so that it could be followed by police officers across Tamil Nadu. The judge said, it was high time the judiciary and the police department worked in tandem to reduce the pendency of criminal cases.
The judge also told State Public Prosecutor Hasan Mohamed Jinnah there were discrepancies between the data maintained by the police department and the judiciary with respect to disposal of criminal cases. He said, most of the times, the police close criminal cases by terming them as 'mistake of fact' but that does not get reflected in the judicial records.
He added in some cases, the police complete investigation and file final reports but that information does not find place in judicial records because the courts do not take those reports on file. Mr. Arun told the court the discrepancies could be sorted out if the Principal District Judges and Superintendents of Police conduct monthly meetings to crosscheck the data.
Concurring with him, Justice Velmurugan said, such practice of conducting monthly meetings do not appear to be followed in many districts. After asking Mr. Arun to set things right at his end in coordination with the trial courts, the judge told the Commissioner that any non-cooperation on the part of the judicial officers could be brought to his notice so that he could issue appropriate directions.
'The poor and illiterate people do not know the legal procedures beyond the process of lodging police complaints. Therefore, it is essential that the criminal justice system works for their benefit and it does not take years together even for a simple criminal case to reach its logical conclusion. Let us do something to make sure that justice is delivered at the earliest,' the judge told the CoP.
He asked the officer to submit fresh data by July 8 regarding the pending criminal cases within Chennai city limits along with statistics related to those under investigation, the cases in which final reports had been filed, the cases that were pending trial and so on. The direction was issued after the Commissioner was summoned to the court in connection with non registration of a SC/ST case.
Mr. Jinnah told the court that though the writ petitioner V. Vanamalai had produced a copy of a communication sent by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes calling for an action taken report from the CoP on the petitioner's complaint, the Commissionerate had not received any such communication. Though the NCSC had claimed to have sent it by e-mail, no such e-mail had been received, he said.
After hearing the SPP, the judge asked him to make the submissions by way of a counter affidavit by June 23 so that appropriate orders could be passed on the writ petition.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
Kerala High Court grants 10 days for report on cases named in Hema Committee
The Kerala High Court has granted the Special Investigation Team (SIT) ten days to submit its report on the investigation into cases flagged in the Hema Committee report regarding women's harassment in the Malayalam film the hearing before a special bench comprising Justice AK Jayasankaran Nambiar and Justice CS Sudha, the state government informed the court that a Cinema Conclave is scheduled for August, before finalising the draft of the much delayed policy for the Malayalam film from 600 organisations have been considered while drafting the proposed film policy, which will be discussed at the conclave. The government added that the legislation based on this policy would be framed two months after the event. The court also took note of the progress in cases linked to the Hema Committee. Of the 40 cases registered based on its findings, further action has been dropped in 26. A report on these developments has been filed before the SIT clarified that these cases were not filed based on victim complaints following the publication of the Hema report. Instead, they were registered after reviewing the report and examining statements made to the court has posted the matter for further hearing on June IS HEMA COMMITTEE?The Hema Committee, formed in 2017, was established following a petition by the Women in Cinema Collective to investigate issues of sexual harassment and gender inequality in the Malayalam film three-member committee, comprising retired High Court Justice K Hema, actor Sharada, and retired IAS officer KB Valsala Kumari, examined the industry's treatment of women and provided recommendations after a series of shocking revelations, including sexual exploitation, discrimination, and a lack of a clear employer-employee InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Kerala
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"His PA Called 20 Times": When Ex Senior Cop Disobeyed Siddaramaiah
Bengaluru: Bhaskar Rao, who served as the police commissioner of Bengaluru from 2019 to 2020, has condemned the suspension of police officers over the deadly June 4 stampede that killed 11 people in the IT capital. He said that if one had to go against the order of the Chief Minister to maintain public order, they should do that. "I once had to disobey the Chief Minister," Mr Rao told NDTV, recalling an incident when he refused to obey Siddaramaiah's orders. He said he stood his ground even after the personal assistant of Siddaramaiah called him "20 to 22 times". He was the Inspector-General (IG) of Police in Belagavi back then. "An incident happened with me with the same Chief Minister (Siddaramaiah) when a person tried to die by suicide after consuming poison in front of the Vidhana Soudha (Suvarna Vidhana Soudha in Balagavi). He died in the hospital. The opposition demanded that the body be brought to the Vidhana Soudha. Siddaramaih asked me to do that. I refused, saying, 'If I do that, there will be chaos, police would have to resort to firing'," he said. Mr Rao was referring to the incident that happened in December 2013 in Belagavi during the Winter Session of Vidhana Soudha. "He (Siddaramaiah) said he would take care of any such situation. I told him you won't be able to, it's my duty as my neck is on the line. I was the IG of Belagavi at that time. His PA called me 20 to 22 times. I told his PA, 'Tell your chief minister it's not possible'," said the former police officer. He said that he got the man's body out of the hospital's back gate, which was then taken to his native village without attracting attention. Mr Rao recalled being chided by Siddaramaiah for not following his order, but he insisted that he would rather "listen to your reprimands" than face a situation which could disturb the law and order. "I had to disobey the Chief Minister. He reprimanded me. I said I accept everything. If I had done what was asked of me, the police would have had to open fire, and his government would have been blamed for it, and the whole system would have got messed up. I told him, 'I would rather listen to your reprimands than face all of this'." "Politicians are mentally very weak. They buckle under pressure," he added. He also had a message for the senior police officers: "You need to understand the integrity of the position they hold so that they are not taken for granted". The Karnataka government suspended top police officials, including Bengaluru commissioner B Dayananda, a day after the stampede in front of the Chinnaswamy Stadium during the IPL victory celebration of Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB). "The suspension of police officials is unjustified. This was done in nervousness to cover for their lapses," Mr Rao criticised the Congress government in Karnataka. He also said the officers should approach the court to challenge the suspension. "They should go to court because the reasons for the suspension are ridiculous. They (the Karnataka government) will be rapped for this decision. If they wanted to do something like this, they could have asked them to go on leave, or they could have been transferred. Why did you suspend them? It's your fault, it's your foolishness," Mr Rao said. "Whatever happened in the RCB event is due to the foolishness of the Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister. They asked you not to go ahead with it. They wanted it to happen on Sunday. No one does these events in the 24 hours of the match. They do it after two days," he added. The tragedy led to a blame game after police said that they had flagged concerns about the event. A letter accessed by NDTV established that the police force deployed at the Karnataka Vidhana Soudha had warned against the idea of holding the RCB's IPL trophy celebrations at the grand stairs of the premises. In a letter to the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms on June 4, Vidhana Soudha's Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) MN Karibasavana Gowda pointed out the lack of time for security preparedness to tackle "lakhs of cricket fans" expected at the spot.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
'Nothing unusual, expects change': Kerala HC as woman withdraws criminal case against husband
The Kerala High Court on Monday contended that there is nothing unusual for a woman to close criminal cases filed by her against her ex-husband to save him. Hearing the ex-husband's challenge against a divorce decree, the court said that a wife does so in the expectation that her husband would change. The Family Court had allowed divorce on the ground of cruelty. Before filing the present case, she had filed a criminal case against her husband and two divorce petitions, which were withdrawn or dismissed due to her own disposition, as she chose not to prosecute. She submitted before the court that she did so to protect her former husband and his job as a Higher Secondary School teacher. The division bench of Justice Devan Ramachandran and Justice M. B. Snehalatha observed that a woman will forgive to protect her family. "A woman will forgive and condone to protect her matrimonial union and family. Forgiveness in such a sense is not a passive act but is an active and transformative one, to heal emotional wounds and to obtain inner peace. For a woman, this is not a sign of her weakness, but a powerful act of strength, ingrained in her inner power, by which the chain of resentment and bitterness is consciously broken. The emotional burden of holding on to grudges happens very often in many relationships and families, and it is the power of a woman to forgive that enables families to rise above pain and create healthy relationships. But, there is always a limit to what a woman can endure," the court said. The court further said that the wife was able to prove that she was assaulted by an iron rod through her discharge summary. Further, there is a protection order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act in favour of the wife against the husband. It was further pointed out that there are two other criminal cases filed against him, and taking all those into account, the court held that there was no need to interfere with the order of the Family Court.
