Labour's tax hikes force cancellation of long-running flower show
One of the world's longest-running flower shows has been cancelled following Labour's tax raid on employers.
The organisers of the Shrewsbury Flower Show blamed 'changes to National Insurance and the minimum wage' for driving up the cost of the annual event.
The show, which was due to take place on August 8-9, has been happening since 1875.
The chairman of Shropshire Horticultural Society, Maelor Owen, said: 'As a society, we have struggled to put on a show that was financially viable for several years.
'Over the past few years strenuous efforts have been made to reduce costs and boost attendance.
'Regrettably, the loss incurred by the society in staging the 2024 show was significantly greater than we had anticipated - by way of example, we spent over £150,000 on security and barriers.
'Recent changes to National Insurance and the minimum wage, combined with the cost-of-living crisis, mean that further extensive losses would be incurred should we proceed with the 2025 show.
'Such losses are simply no longer sustainable.'
The decision comes after Rachel Reeves raised taxes by a record £40 billion at the Budget in autumn.
The Chancellor has increased the rate of NI contributions paid by employers, from 13.8pc to 15pc, and also lowered the threshold at which companies become liable to pay the tax.
She has also increased the minimum wage by 6.7 per cent to £12.21 per hour for those aged 21 and older.
Critics claim the tax hikes are responsible for the halving of growth forecasts for this year from 2 per cent to 1 per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street
The spending review is 'settled', Downing Street has said, after the Home Office was the last department locked in budget negotiations. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with a number of infrastructure projects on Wednesday, as she shares out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules. But other areas could face cuts as she seeks to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, while meeting her fiscal rules that promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. On Monday morning, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last minister still to reach a deal with the Treasury, with reports suggesting greater police spending would mean a squeeze on other areas of her department's budget. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' The Government has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. Ms Reeves' plans will also include an £86 billion package for science and technology research and development. Last week the Chancellor admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back, amid the Whitehall spending wrangling. Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan's office is concerned that Wednesday's announcement will include no new funding or projects for London. The mayor had been looking to secure extensions to the Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line on the Underground, along with the power to introduce a tourist levy and a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police. A source close to the mayor said on Monday that ministers 'must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government', adding this would harm both London's public services and 'jobs and growth across the country'. They said: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs. 'We need backing for London as a global city that's pro-business, safe and well-connected.'
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ministers FINALLY settle spending plans with Rachel Reeves' Treasury 48 hours before they are to be revealed, as minister says 'austerity is over'
Ministers have finally all agreed spending deals with the Treasury, No10 confirmed this afternoon, just 48 hours before they are to be revealed by Rachel Reeves. Haggling had been raging this morning, with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper desperately trying to get more money for the police and borders funding. The Chancellor is due to lay out departmental allocations running up to 2029 - the likely timetable for the next general election - on Wednesday. But the generous fiscal envelope set at the Budget last Autumn has been put under massive pressure by the economic slowdown, calls for more defence cash, and Labour revolts on benefits. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' Ms Reeves has signalled she will announce real-terms increases to budgets for police as she tries to quell Home Office resistance. However, that is likely to be offset by cuts to other areas, with the NHS and defence sucking up funding. The political backdrop to the proposals this week is the Reform surge, with Labour panicking about the challenge from Nigel Farage. Touring broadcast studios this morning, Technology minister Chris Bryant denied the review will mark a return to austerity. But he acknowledged some parts of the budget will be 'more stretched'. He told Times Radio: 'That period of austerity where I think previous governments simply cut all public service budgets just because they believed that was what you had to do is over. 'But, secondly, we are investing, but it's not just about spending money, you have to get return, and that means we have to have change and we have to have a plan for change in every single one of our public services.' He pointed to increased investment in defence and health, but added: 'There are going to be other parts of the budget that are going to be much more stretched and be difficult.' Ms Reeves will have some £113billion to distribute that has been freed up by looser borrowing rules on capital investment. But she has acknowledged that she has been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back in a sign of the behind-the-scenes wrangling over her spending review. Economists have warned the Chancellor faces unavoidably tough choices in allocating funding for the next three years. She will need to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, as well as her strict fiscal rules which include a promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. The expected increase to police budgets comes after two senior policing figures publicly warned that the service is 'broken' and forces are left with no choice but to cut staff to save money. Nick Smart, the president of the Police Superintendents' Association, and Tiff Lynch, acting national chairman for the Police Federation of England and Wales, said policing was in 'crisis'. In a joint article for the Telegraph, they said: 'Police forces across the country are being forced to shed officers and staff to deliver savings. These are not administrative cuts. 'They go to the core of policing's ability to deliver a quality service: fewer officers on the beat, longer wait times for victims, and less available officers when crisis hits.' The Department of Health is set to be the biggest winner in Ms Reeves' spending review on Wednesday, with the NHS expected to receive a boost of up to £30billion at the expense of other public services. Meanwhile, day-to-day funding for schools is expected to increase by £4.5billion by 2028-9 compared with the 2025-6 core budget, which was published in the spring statement. Elsewhere, the Government has committed to spend 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3 per cent over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. Ms Reeves' plans will also include an £86billion package for science and technology research and development. But Sadiq Khan's office is concerned the spending review will include no new projects or funding for London. The mayor had been seeking extensions to the Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo Underground line, along with powers to introduce a tourist levy and a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police, but his office now expects none of these will be approved. A source close to Sir Sadiq said ministers 'must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government', adding this would harm both London's public services and 'jobs and growth across the country'. They said: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs.
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Winter fuel payment should be restored for NI pensioners
Stormont's Communities Minister Gordon Lyons has said he will be recommending that pensioners in Northern Ireland have their winter fuel payment restored following a U-turn by the UK Government. Mr Lyons said the details of Chancellor Rachel Reeves' decision were still to be worked out, but added that the 'most simple and straightforward' approach seemed to be to replicate the same approach in Northern Ireland. Around 250,000 pensioners in the region were affected when the payment was cut last year in a cost-saving measure by the new Labour government. On Monday, the Chancellor announced she had changed course and some nine million pensioners in England and Wales will receive the winter fuel payment this winter. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it because anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year will now get the payment automatically. Mr Lyons told the Northern Ireland Assembly that 'more clarity is needed' on how pensioners affected by previous winter fuel payment cuts will have the benefit reinstated. Speaking to the media, Mr Lyons said it was 'good news' that the Government had listened to concerns over its policy. He said: 'It is right that they have had a think again on this. There were many people right on the borderline of pension credit who were in need and weren't getting the support that they should have got. 'I am glad the Government has made a U-turn in relation to this. 'What we now need to do is to work out what is coming next and how that impacts upon Northern Ireland. 'I met with one of the Department for Work and Pensions ministers this afternoon, along with the Finance Minister (John O'Dowd) and officials will continue to work throughout the course of today to nail down some of those details.' Pressed on whether pensioners in Northern Ireland would definitely have their payment restored, Mr Lyons said: 'That will ultimately be a decision for the Executive, but right now that is certainly what I would be recommending. 'That the money that will be there, that will be available, that we allow what is happening in England and Wales to happen in Northern Ireland as well. 'I think that is going to be the most simple and straightforward way to do it and that is what I want to see happen.' After the Government withdrew the payment from many pensioners last year, Mr Lyons announced a one-off £100 fuel support payment for pensioner households in Northern Ireland who were no longer eligible. He said: 'It has been handled very poorly by the Government, I don't think anybody expected a Labour government to attack pensioners in this way. 'My focus was always on those who were in need, those who just about missed out because of where the boundary was for pension credit. 'I met a lot of people who were worried and they were concerned and that is why I was pleased to be able to give a little bit to help those who otherwise would have missed out. 'It was imperfect, it wasn't as quick as I would have liked it to have been. 'Hopefully those who have been most affected will now be helped again and that is a good thing.' Alliance Party MLA Sian Mulholland said it was important that pensioners in Northern Ireland are not left behind. She said: 'The Communities Minister has a duty to explore the possibilities associated with bringing in a comparable uplift for those in Northern Ireland who have borne the brunt of previous cuts.' SDLP MLA Daniel McCrossan said: 'This announcement today will be welcome news for many pensioners across the north who struggled to pay their heating bill and keep warm over a difficult winter. 'This cut was a decision that should never have been made in the first place, it is the duty of government to protect the most vulnerable people in our society and the UK Government totally failed in that regard.'
