Does Zohran Mamdani's surprise victory in the New York mayor race prove that progressive ideas can win elections?
America is used to political drama, but a Democratic Party upset in New York has stunned some life into even the most cynical insiders.
Zohran Mamdani – a self-described democratic socialist (the 'S-word' is long considered kryptonite in US politics) and a relatively inexperienced member of the New York State Assembly – has defeated former state governor Andrew Cuomo to be the Democrats' chosen candidate for the mayoral election in November.
Cuomo was ousted in a sexual harassment scandal four years ago, and had been working towards a comeback. But in securing this win, 33-year-old newcomer Mamdani hasn't just shut out a titan of New York politics – he's given the Democratic Party its first real jolt of energy since it lost the White House last year.
Mamdani's victory wasn't an 'ABC' (Anyone But Cuomo) victory. For those outside the US – or even outside New York – Mamdani is a new name. He's the son of Ugandan academic Mahmood Mamdani and filmmaker Mira Nair, and grew up partly in East Africa before settling in the city. Elected to the state Assembly in 2020 – New York's lower elected house, closest to the UK's devolved governments, Mamdani is part of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and represents a gentrifying slice of western Queens.
He speaks the language of renters, immigrants and low-income workers – not in abstract policy terms, but with urgency and clarity. And that's what made this campaign take off. His platform focused on freezing rent, expanding tenants' rights, offering free buses, mostly paid for by a hefty new tax on the wealthy – solutions often dismissed by the establishment as too radical.
Mamdani ran a serious and organised campaign that beat its opposition with door-knocking, community trust and conviction. It's a sign that the progressive movement is finally maturing: no longer just shouting from the sidelines, it's now winning tough fights with party machinery.
The race also confirms my theory about something deeper in the current political mood. American voters, across ideological lines, are desperate for someone to 'flip the f***in' table'.
I came up with that phrase while working on Kamala Harris' presidential campaign last year, and I keep returning to it. People didn't vote for Donald Trump because they admired his criminality, racism or misogyny – they voted for him, despite all that, because he was the only candidate who promised to break the system.
Working people don't care who flips the table – Trump or Mamdani – as long as someone does.
I'm incredibly proud to have worked on the Harris campaign, but we struggled to articulate a path to improving the lives of voters who feel locked out, left behind and lied to. The system isn't working, and they didn't see change in our campaign. Whether it's the populist right or the democratic left, these people will rally behind whoever makes them feel heard. In 2024, that was Trump. Now, it's Mamdani.
Of course, Mamdani is not without controversy. He drew national attention for his past support for the Palestinian cause, including a 2021 protest chant to 'globalise the intifada'. In a city with more Jewish residents than Tel Aviv, this would typically be politically suicidal. But Mamdani has made a sharp distinction between opposing Israeli government policy and antisemitism – a feat that seems to have eluded practically every left-wing politician on the planet (see Jeremy Corbyn). He's spoken forcefully and repeatedly that Palestinian liberation must also mean protection for Jewish New Yorkers.
As Brad Lander – the Jewish comptroller of New York City, who ran a collaborative campaign with Mamdani to make the most of ranked-choice voting – told Stephen Colbert: 'No mayor is going to be responsible for what happens in the Middle East, but there is something quite remarkable about a Jewish New Yorker and a Muslim New Yorker coming together to say: 'Here's how we protect all New Yorkers. Jewish New Yorkers and Muslim New Yorkers are not going to be divided from each other.''
So what did Democrats just do? Whether they realise it or not, they might have finally chosen a direction. Mamdani's victory won't sit easily with the party's corporate donors or centrist strategists – but then we tried their way in 2016 and 2024. Instead, it offers something they've lacked for months: a vision.
Mamdani's win is proof that progressive ideas can win elections, that authenticity beats mediocrity, and that voters want more than messaging – they want someone who lives their struggles and means it when they say they'll change it. Mamdani has finally done what I've advised, hoped and craved someone would: Flipped the f***ing table.
New Yorkers rightly crave a representative who understands what it is like to live in cramped, overpriced apartments and make long commutes on a struggling subway. A Ugandan-born socialist millennial Muslim may just have given the Democrats the shot in their arm that the national party needs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Bipartisan bill seeks to ban Chinese AI from federal agencies, as U.S. vows to win the AI race
A bipartisan group of lawmakers on Wednesday vowed to keep Chinese artificial intelligence systems out of federal agencies while pledging to ensure the U.S. will prevail against China in the global AI competition. 'We are in a new Cold War, and AI is the strategic technology at the center,' Rep. John Moolenaar, the Republican chair of the House Select Committee on China, said as he opened a hearing on the matter. 'The future balance of power may very well be determined by who leads in AI.' The hearing on Capitol Hill comes about five months after a Chinese technology start-up called DeekSeek introduced an AI model that rivaled platforms from OpenAI and Google in performance, but cost only a fraction to build. This raised concerns that China was catching up to U.S. despite restrictions on chips and other key technologies used to develop AI. The ever-tighter race is now a central part of the U.S.-China rivalry. And so much is at stake that the U.S. must win, witnesses told the congressional panel. The two countries are 'in a long-term techno-security competition that will determine the shape of the global political order for the coming years,' said Thomas Mahnken, president and CEO of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Jack Clark, co-founder and head of policy at Anthropic, told the committee that AI has built-in values. 'I know that AI systems are a reflection of the societies that are built from. AI built in democracies will lead to better technology for all of humanity. AI built in authoritarian nations will... be inescapably intertwined and imbued with authoritarianism,' Clark said. 'We must take decisive action to ensure America prevails.' Earlier this year, Chris Lehane, OpenAI's head of global affairs, told reporters in Paris that the U.S. and China were the only two countries in the world that could build AI at scale. The competition, which he described as one between democratic AI and autocratic AI, is 'very real and very serious,' and the stakes are 'enormous,' he said, for 'the global rails of AI will be built by one of those two countries.' The 2025 AI Index Report by Stanford University's Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence center has the U.S. in the lead in producing top AI models. But the report notes China is rapidly closing the performance gap, reaching near parity in 2024 on several major benchmarks. It also shows that China leads in AI publications and patents. At the hearing, Clark urged the lawmakers to maintain and strengthen export controls of advanced chips to China. 'This competition fundamentally runs on compute,' he said. The U.S. must control the flow of powerful chips to China, Clark said, 'or else you're giving them the tools they will need to build powerful AI to harm American interests.' Mark Beall, Jr., president of government affairs at The AI Policy Network, said there are 'a number of very glaring gaps' in the U.S. export controls that have allowed China to obtain controlled chips. Lawmakers earlier this year introduced a bill to track such chips to ensure they would not be diverted to the wrong hands. In another legislative step, Republican and Democratic lawmakers in both the House and the Senate on Wednesday introduced a bill to ban Chinese AI systems in the federal government. 'The U.S. must draw a hard line: hostile AI systems have no business operating inside our government,' Moolenaar said. The No Adversarial AI Act, as proposed, seeks to identify AI systems developed by foreign adversaries and ban their use in the U.S. government, with exceptions for use in research and counter terrorism.
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C50%2C0%2C50%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
CNN anchors denounce Trump's ‘manipulative' claims that questions over Iran bombing are an attack on US military
CNN anchors Pamela Brown and Wolf Blitzer pushed back against Donald Trump's 'blatantly manipulative' narrative that the network's reporting on the effectiveness of America's bombing raid on Iranian nuclear facilities had demeaned and disparaged members of the military. During a press conference at the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday, the president and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth assailed CNN and other legacy media outlets for reporting on an early US intelligence assessment that found the airstrikes had likely only set Iran's nuclear program back a few months. The president, meanwhile, maintains that Tehran's nuclear capabilities were 'completely and totally obliterated' by the bombing campaign. All the while, the president may have also compromised Israeli intelligence secrets while brushing off the findings of his own intelligence community. 'I just want to thank our pilots. You know, they were maligned and treated very bad, demeaned by fake news CNN, which is back there, believe it or not, wasting time,' Trump fumed. 'So they just waste a lot of time, wasting my time. And The New York Times, they put out a story that, 'well, maybe they were hit, but it wasn't bad.' Well, it was so bad that they ended the war. It ended the war!' Speaking of the assessment, which reportedly was produced by the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency, Hegseth groused that there's a 'reason the president calls out fake news for what it is' while raging at news organizations for reporting on the preliminary intel. 'The instinct of CNN, the instinct of the New York Times, is to try to find a way to spin it for their own political reasons, to try to hurt President Trump or our country,' the former Fox News morning host complained. 'They don't care what the troops think. They don't care what the world thinks. They want to spin it, to try to make him look bad based on a leak, of course, we've all seen plenty of leakers and what leakers do.' While the Pentagon chief said he's 'doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now,' Trump continued to lash out at the media – piggybacking on his Tuesday morning attacks against 'scum' CNN – and repeat his allegations that the network's coverage was 'hurting' the military. 'I first want to just address what was very blatantly manipulative from President Trump and Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, saying that because of our reporting and other reporting about the preliminary US intel assessment, that is in some way disparaging members of the military involved in this mission,' Brown declared following the end of Trump's presser. 'That is false,' she added. 'That is absolutely false, and that is a straw man argument.' Brown noted that 'there were questions' as to whether the bunker-busting bombs dropped on the underground facilities 'could effectively do the job because they've never been used before and these nuclear sites are very deep.' She added that it could be equally true that the troops involved in 'Operation Midnight Hammer' are 'very brave' – noting that she herself is a veteran's spouse – and that 'the initial intel assessment showed that it didn't fully obliterate the sites' despite the president's claims. 'I speak as a former Pentagon correspondent and we appreciate, we love the men and women of the United States military who risk their lives to protect all of us and we're not criticizing them at all,' Blitzer further stated. 'The only thing that we were doing was, of course, reporting what the Pentagon's top intelligence agency, the DIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, said in their preliminary report about the damage that was assessed as a result of this mission,' he concluded. 'And we reported that fairly and accurately and in detail, and it was not fake news.'
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Joe Rogan stuns Bernie Sanders as he debunks climate change 'hoax' leaving senator speechless
Joe Rogan shut down one of the biggest advocates for strict government-controlled climate regulations, revealing that the Earth may actually be in a 'cooling period.' US Senator Bernie Sanders was put on the defensive as Rogan, 57, pushed back on the politician's stance that the US needs to focus on creating jobs and sustainable energy facilities. As Sanders argued that climate change was not a 'hoax', Rogan interrupted with data from a Washington Post report which found that the Earth actually goes through peaks and valleys when it comes to temperature. In that report, researchers had found the planet was currently in one of its cooler periods when compared to the last 485 million years of climate data. When Sanders, 83, voiced his skepticism about the report and said that other scientists were still saying climate change is a real emergency, Rogan pounced on his guest. 'I know, but there's a lot of money involved in that, too, Bernie,' the host said on the June 24 episode of the Joe Rogan Experience podcast. 'That's part of the problem. There's a lot of money involved in this whole climate change emergency issue, and there's a lot of control. And that's a big part of this problem,' he continued. Sanders sat in silence as Rogan continued to lay out the case that climate scientists had become financially entangled in pushing costly policies that regulate the public's behavior. 'I think one of the things that we have to recognize is that whenever there's an issue that everyone can agree on, you're going to have a bunch of people that capitalize on that issue and they look to gain more money,' Rogan said on Tuesday's podcast. The American podcast host then pointed out that the UK was already instituting climate policies which promote '15-minute cities,' where the government has control over residents' movements and how they impact global warming. 'You're not allowed to travel. They'll be able to look at your carbon footprint. Yeah, see? That's the problem,' Rogan told Sanders. 'The problem is giving people that are in power, these people that we've all discussed that have so much money and so much control over our societies, multinational corporations, giving them more control over citizens. And this is a vehicle for that. And this is what's dangerous,' he added. Rogan then directly attacked the 'climate change emergency,' saying that a group of 'f****** creeps' had been allowed to instill fear and place more constraints on the public, who were already living paycheck to paycheck. 'You put additional measures where you can look at their carbon footprint, you can look at the amount they travel, what do you, you know, put a carbon tax on these people, let's figure out how to extract more money from them. That's what bothers me about this climate change emergency,' Rogan argued. Sanders did not address Rogan's comments about the perceived corruption taking place in climate science. Instead, the senator shifted the discussion to the Native American tradition of respecting nature. However, Sanders soon changed topics completely, telling Rogan he wanted to move the conversation to artificial intelligence and robotics. Sanders has been a consistent advocate for government regulations to address climate change for over four decades, emphasizing the need for aggressive action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and transition to renewable energy. Sanders was already alleging that fossil fuel industries had influence on media coverage of climate issues in the 1980s. By 2007, he was vocal in US Senate hearings, criticizing the Bush administration's inaction on global warming and urging stronger federal oversight. In 2015, Sanders introduced a bill to tax carbon emissions, described as a 'gold standard' for climate legislation, aiming to transform the US energy system. Four years later, he co-sponsored legislation with Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and others to declare climate change a national and global emergency. Since then, however, multiple studies have pushed back on the scale of that global emergency. In March, researchers from Tongji University in Shanghai found Antarctica suddenly reversed its decades-long trend of catastrophic melting and actually gained record amounts of ice in recent years. From 2021 through 2023, the study found unusually 'intense snowfall' in Antarctica helped build up layers of fresh ice, an event that also caused sea level rise to slow as well. The Washington Post report noted by Rogan was based on 2024 study in the journal Science that examined 485 million years of Earth's climate history. While scientists found that Earth was experiencing rapid warming due to human-created CO2 emissions, they emphasized that Earth experienced warmer climates for most of the Phanerozoic Eon, our current current geological period spanning over 500 million years. Sanders is not the only politician to face pushback on his call for strict government control and lavish funding of climate initiatives. In 2024, the Biden-Harris Administration was slammed for giving $41 billion to fund nonprofits that 'spread radical, left-leaning ideology' to eliminate fossil fuels. A report by the House Energy and Commerce Committee blasted the White House for subsidizing a shift to green energy tech 'which relies upon supply chains dominated by the Chinese Communist Party.' Financial analysts who cover the US energy sector disputed those claims. In a public statement , Committee Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) said in November: 'It couldn't be more clear: The Biden-Harris administration rewards its environmental special interests at the expense of the American people.' 'Equally as alarming is how these policies benefit the Chinese Communist Party — the world's worst polluter,' Representative Rodgers noted. On Tuesday, Sanders and Rogan both agreed that China had surpassed the US as the world's largest creator of carbon emissions. 'It's not an American issue. It is a global issue. And all I can tell you is that we are, in my view, going to see more extreme weather disturbances in the coming years than we have ever,' Sanders warned.
