Pa. awards $22.5 million in Solar for Schools grants to help 73 schools reduce energy costs
A solar array. (Robert Zullo/ States Newsroom)
Pennsylvania has awarded grants totaling $22.5 million to 73 schools across the state to help pay for solar energy installations, the Commonwealth Financing Authority announced Tuesday.
The awards under the Department of Community and Economic Development's Solar for Schools program will provide up to $500,000 to each school. The solar arrays they help pay for could save school districts millions of dollars in energy costs, state Rep. Elizabeth Fieldler (D-Philadelphia) said.
'I am so happy for each of these schools and excited to see names from nearly every corner of the state,' Fiedler, who introduced legislation to create the program last year, said. 'I've heard from rural schools who plan to include their solar panels in agricultural education and from city schools that are thinking strategically about rooftop solar with limited space. I have no doubt that the recipients will benefit from the program's flexibility to meet their school's needs and to make the most of their strengths.'
The grant awards come as the legislature is preparing for the final month before the state budget is due June 30. The current budget included up to $25 million for the Solar for Schools program and Gov. Josh Shapiro has proposed to match that amount in the upcoming budget.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Fiedler's bill, which passed both chambers of the General Assembly with broad bipartisan support last summer, was created as a way to address the school funding crisis, rising utility costs and climate change together, her office said.
'As energy costs rise, diversifying our energy sources is more important than ever. Increased energy usage throughout the country also puts us at a higher risk because of the inadequate power grid,' state Sen. Camera Bartolotta (R-Greene) said. 'Schools that use solar panels will counteract that problem by improving Pennsylvania's energy security and lowering costs – saving millions of dollars of taxpayer money.'
It also received strong support from building trade unions, whose members will benefit from the construction jobs the grants help to create.
'These new projects through Solar for Schools will open up doors for workers across the state,' said Robert S. Bair, president of the Pennsylvania Building Trades Council. 'Energy jobs are crucial in Pennsylvania. Labor needs to be on the forefront of growing industries like solar.'
Union support was, in part, the result of a yearslong effort to strengthen relationships between environmental and labor advocates, who recognize the adoption of renewable energy sources requires skilled workers just as fossil fuel plants do.
In the initial round of applications for Solar for School, districts from rural, suburban and urban areas requested $88 million, more than three times the amount available in the current budget. The grants awarded totaled less than the full $25 million because the money is divided between three regions and the DCED did not find enough qualifying applications in one of them, Fiedler said.
While interest in renewable energy is growing and political support for such programs is broadening, solar energy still faces hurdles in state government. With the overwhelming response to the initial appropriation, Fiedler said she is hopeful that at least another $25 million Solar for Schools will be approved as part of the next budget.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Supreme Court rules Ohio woman's ‘reverse discrimination' case should proceed
The U.S. Supreme Court building. (Photo by Ariana Figueroa/States Newsroom) In a unanimous decision Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court has sided with an Ohio woman who claimed she was the victim of reverse discrimination by her employer. The justices determined the lower courts improperly forced her to clear a higher burden of proof and sent the case back for further hearings. In 2019, after working at the Ohio Department of Youth Services for 15 years, Marlean Ames applied for a promotion. Instead, she claims her supervisors 'conspired' to demote her and move her to a different facility. The woman who got the job Ames wanted, and the man who took her old job both identify as LGBTQ+. Ames is straight. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX In 2020, Ames filed a lawsuit in federal court claiming her supervisors discriminated against her on account of her sexual orientation. The district and appeals court both sided with the agency — Ames had not shown the 'background circumstances' to demonstrate her bosses punished her because she was straight. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected that background circumstances rule. Writing for the majority, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson stated it 'cannot be squared with the text of Title VII or our longstanding precedents. And nothing Ohio has said, in its brief or at oral argument, persuades us otherwise.' Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 holds that employers may not discriminate on the basis of 'race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.' Importantly, Jackson wrote, the text draws no distinction between members of majority and minority groups. 'By establishing the same protections for every 'individual' — without regard to that individual's membership in a minority or majority group — Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone,' Jackson wrote. She added that the Circuit Court erred by rigidly enforcing an evidentiary standard, when court precedent holds there should be greater flexibility in proving discrimination cases. Jackson noted Ohio 'barely contests' the arguments Ames leveled against it. The state argued Ames' Title VII claims would've failed even if they cleared the background circumstances test. But Jackson insisted that sits outside the scope of the case. 'We granted review to consider the validity of the 'background circumstances' rule, and we reject that rule for the reasons set forth above,' she wrote. 'We leave it to the courts below to address any of Ohio's remaining arguments on remand.' Following the ruling, both sides of the case portrayed it as a win. For Xiao Wang, a law school professor at the University of Virginia who represented Ames, that argument was straightforward. 'When Congress passed this law, it said, look, don't discriminate,' Wang said, 'don't consider race, don't consider religion, don't consider sex, or some of these other characteristics.' He argued the decision 'reiterates and affirms' that message. 'If someone has a case, they're subject to the same legal standards, and the same legal treatment as everyone else,' Wang argued. Meanwhile Ohio Attorney General spokesman Dominic Binkley emphasized the fact that the Supreme Court didn't decide the underlying discrimination claim. 'We are glad that the court agreed with what Ohio has said all along: 'It is wrong to hold some litigants to a higher standard because of their protected characteristics.'' Still, he said, 'the court made clear that this case is not over,' referring to the opinion stating Ohio's remaining arguments could be handled when they're sent back to a lower court. 'We look forward to fully pressing those arguments as the case moves forward,' he said, 'because the Ohio Department of Youth Services did not engage in unlawful discrimination.' An Ohio Department of Youth Services spokesman declined to comment citing pending litigation. As the case was considered by the Supreme Court, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund filed an amicus brief in the case, urging the court not to entertain Ames' arguments. The LDF's Assistant Counsel Avatara Smith-Carrington, warned the decision doesn't shift the balance and grant majority groups some new advantage in court. 'Of course everyone is protected by Title VII,' she said in a statement. 'However, there is a persisting legacy of discrimination targeting Black people and other historically marginalized groups that cannot be ignored.' Equality Ohio downplayed the decision's potential impact. In a statement, the group's former legal director Maya Simek, cast it as a 'technical and narrow correction.' 'What's most important here is what the Court didn't do,' she added. 'It did not undercut or call into question the landmark Bostock decision, which affirms protections for LGBTQ+ people under federal employment law.' Equality Ohio Executive Director Dwayne Steward insisted, 'This ruling doesn't roll back rights or erase hard-won protections. What it does is quietly reaffirm that Title VII means what it says: all workers are protected from discrimination.' Drexel University Law Professor D. Wendy Greene has written extensively on anti-discrimination law and heads up the school's Center for Law, Policy, and Social Action. She argued the most important factor going forward will be judicial perception. When a judge believes racism is exceptional rather than commonplace, she said, workers of color often have to meet or exceed the evidence required by the 'background circumstances test.' By the same token, if a judge believes 'reverse discrimination' is the norm, litigants get greater leeway to make their case. 'These perceptions often shape judicial decision-making and the evidentiary burdens in intentional discrimination cases — with or without an express 'background circumstances' evidentiary requirement,' she explained. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Tim Walz calls for less ‘rigid' Democratic nominating calendar in future election cycles
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz answers questions during a June 5, 2025, interview with States Newsroom staff in Minneapolis. (Photo by Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector) Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said Thursday Democrats need to take a broader approach to the states they are targeting during elections — which could mean further changes to the presidential nominating calendar. Speaking with Minnesota Reformer editor Patrick Coolican at a States Newsroom conference in Minneapolis, the 2024 vice presidential candidate tackled multiple topics related to President Donald Trump's time in office. He also discussed ways for the Democratic Party to bounce back after significant Republican wins in 2024, including Trump's win over his and Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential campaign. One of the major questions leading up to the 2028 presidential election season — especially for Iowa — is the Democratic presidential nominating calendar. Following issues in the 2020 Democratic caucuses and Democratic National Committee concerns about the accessibility of the caucus system, Iowa was booted from it's longtime first-in-the-nation position in the Democratic nominating calendar in 2022, replaced by South Carolina. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX When asked by Iowa Capital Dispatch Editor-in-Chief Kathie Obradovich which state should go first, Walz immediately quipped, 'Minnesota.' But in a longer response, the Democratic governor said he believes Democrats should rotate which states kick off the nominating process each presidential election cycle — a process he said may not be popular in states that may not traditionally have held early contests, but could improve Democrats' odds in elections. He reflected on how in his 2024 run with Harris, winning the presidency came down to winning a handful of contested states. 'On the calendar, I think you can't be too rigid,' Walz said. 'And it was … I don't know if the word is depressing, but going to the seven states over and over and over again, and recognizing that you could win a presidential election or lose one doing that — I think we've got to be broader.' Iowa Democrats made changes to the caucus system, moving from in-person events to a mail-in presidential preference contest in 2024, but there is not any indication the DNC plans to reinstate Iowa as an early state in the next nominating cycle. However, Iowa and other states that were not a part of the early state lineup in 2024 will have a chance to take a top position in 2028. Iowa Democratic Party Chair Rita Hart and other Iowa officials have said the DNC plans to revisit the calendar leading up to the next presidential election. Though Iowa is still in the running, a potential blow was dealt to the state with Iowa Democrat Scott Brennan losing his longtime seat on the DNC Rules and Bylaws committee, the body overseeing the nominating calendar, the Des Moines Register reported. Walz said he is not running as a Democratic presidential candidate, he has made visits to many of the traditional early states, including a May Democratic Party event in South Carolina and March event in Des Moines. He is not the only speculated 2028 Democratic presidential candidate to visit Iowa in recent months — former U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, who won the 2020 Iowa Democratic caucuses, held an event in Cedar Rapids in May. Walz is also not the only person who thinks changes Democratic presidential nominating calendar would serve the party well in future elections. Chris Cillizza, a political commentator who formerly worked for CNN, said during a Potluck Podcast episode Monday with members of the Iowa Writers' Collaborative that it was 'very clear' former President Joe Biden moved South Carolina to the front of the calendar in 2024 'because South Carolina and Jim Clyburn got him elected president' in 2020. However, Biden ultimately was not the Democratic presidential candidate in 2024, Cillizza said, and recent Democratic losses for the presidency with Harris and Hillary Clinton in 2024 show states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania are crucial to winning the general election. He said he believes Iowa should go first because 'if you're if you're a Democrat trying to solve your broader problems, I think Iowa going first would help, not hurt' in the fight to win Midwestern states. He said he believes this strategy has been reflected with the potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidates visiting traditional early states like Iowa. When I look at travel schedules now, they're acting as though we're back to the pre-Joe Biden nominating calendar — Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina,' Cillizza said. 'And I wouldn't be surprised if it went back to that. I mean, look, I actually think there's a case to be made.' However, he said he is not sure about the DNC chair Ken Martin's strategy heading into 2028. Martin, elected in February, is from Minnesota, which Cillizza said 'probably helps a little bit in the case for the Midwest.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Walz says Trump administration is ghosting states, leaving government vulnerable in crisis
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz speaks with Minnesota Reformer Editor in Chief Patrick Coolican in front of States Newsroom leaders and reporters Thursday, June 5, 2025 at the Royal Sonesta in downtown Minneapolis. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer) Gov. Tim Walz on Thursday said that communication between states and the federal government under the second Trump administration 'is nonexistent,' opening the door to catastrophe in the case of a natural disaster or other emergency. Walz, during an interview with Reformer editor Patrick Coolican at a States Newsroom conference in Minneapolis, said that the Trump administration is unprepared for the next disaster — like another global pandemic — and that leaves states particularly vulnerable. 'The flow of information has been disrupted between the states and the federal government, and we just can't get answers … No one is allowed to talk to us, and that's really problematic,' Walz said. The Minnesota governor said the silence from the feds differs from the first Trump administration. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, Walz said then-Vice President Mike Pence would call him every few weeks to check in to see what he needed. He said he sensed Pence would call in 'under the radar, so he didn't draw anybody's attention.' 'There were a lot of great people inside the first Trump administration that, in spite of the president, were doing good work,' Walz said. Walz said one of his biggest fears is a cybersecurity attack. The Trump administration has cut millions of dollars for several cyber security initiatives and slashed jobs from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which helps protect the nation's critical infrastructure. Walz discussed the role of the states in opposing the Trump administration's agenda — particularly on immigration — and the Democratic Party's current malaise. Minnesota is increasingly reliant on immigrants, who are needed to fill jobs being vacated by an aging workforce. 'There's not a cow in Minnesota that's not being milked by an immigrant,' he said. Walz said Minnesota would not be commandeered into enforcing immigration law, which he said is a federal duty. Walz repeated a spiel he's given around the country, including at a recent Democratic Party event in South Carolina, which has traditionally been early on the presidential primary calendar, fueling speculation that he is considering a presidential run. He said he's not running, but merely using his megaphone to help fill a vacuum left by a Democratic Party in disarray. The governor urged Democrats to figure out how to become the party of the working class again and said Democrats need to 'fill all the lanes' in the media environment to reach voters. 'I still have come to the conclusion that Trump fills so much space that you've got to fill all these new spaces. Do I think if we would have gone on, you know, Joe Rogan, would we have won? I doubt that, but I also don't think it hurts,' Walz said. 'If your message is good, you want to get out there.' Walz backed the 2005-06 idea of former DNC Chair Howard Dean and his '50 State Project,' which sought to reach voters in areas not traditionally associated with Democrats. 'We're probably never going to win Idaho, but … you got to be out there for it,' Walz said. Walz said Democrats should rotate where they hold the early primary to reach more voters, which may not endear him to Democrats in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, the traditional early states that have long jealously guarded their first in the nation status. When asked which state should be the first to hold the primary, Walz deadpanned 'Minnesota.'
