Claim councillor told another to 'f*** off' after 'true history' clash
Rotorua councillors Robert Lee and Fisher Wang clashed during a museum exhibition funding decision.
Photo:
LDR / Laura Smith
A council discussion on adding funds to Rotorua Museum's exhibition project morphed into a debate over whether the city's "true history" would be displayed.
One councillor claims another told him to "f*** off" after the meeting. The accused says he did not say those words but his message was correctly inferred.
Rotorua Lakes Council decided in a meeting on Wednesday to fund a further $181,700 through debt to progress the exhibition project, to be matched by Rotorua Trust, to cover a funding shortfall.
The project is preparing the exhibitions for the museum, which is set to start reopening in 2027 at the earliest, after more than a decade closed for earthquake strengthening renovations.
The council had secured $1.062 million of $9.51m in funding needed for the exhibitions.
Wednesday's unanimous decision means exhibition funding would not be 100 percent external as previously planned, but progressing the exhibition work secured other funding agreements, including $17.1m towards construction.
Councillors debated a recommendation from the exhibition project steering group to accept a concept design and progress to a developed design.
Councillor Robert Lee voted against this and began asking whether Rotorua's "true history" would be portrayed once the museum opened. He disputed that iwi gifted the land for the town.
Rotorua Lakes Councillor Robert Lee at a June 2025 meeting.
Photo:
LDR / Laura Smith
Fisher Wang interrupted with a point of order on irrelevance, and Deputy Mayor Sandra Kai Fong asked Lee to rephrase his question several times.
Karen Barker repeated Wang's call. Kai Fong said they'd had previous discussions on the matter and called for other questions.
"I think you have an opinion on that and I'm sure everyone has a different recollection and view on history and events," Kai Fong said.
Lee later raised it again.
"I've been told that assurance [of historical accuracy] is not going to be forthcoming."
Wang called for a point of order for misrepresentation, which Kai Fong agreed to.
Rotorua Lakes Councillor Fisher Wang at a June 2025 meeting.
Photo:
LDR / Laura Smith
Lee said there were nine sections in the permanent exhibition wing of the museum dedicated to "tell Rotorua's story".
He believed this was told in a 1948 commission of inquiry that heard "various grievances" from Ngāti Whakaue, and the iwi accepted a settlement offer.
"It does say here this exhibition is to enable Te Arawa storytelling in a sympathetic way.
"That's fine but if the history is not going to be told, it's not a museum exhibition I can endorse."
Rawiri Waru "wholeheartedly" supported getting things moving to provide the community and those working on the project some assurance.
He addressed Lee's comments on historical accuracy.
"If you knew the people we are working with, their integrity is unquestionable.
"They will tell it, warts and all."
Rotorua Lakes Councillor Rawiri Waru at a June 2025 meeting.
Photo:
LDR / Laura Smith
Regarding the 1948 commission, he said Ngāti Whakaue could not even choose their own representatives or have involvement in the report.
His grandfather was present at the time, he said. "Maybe there's some history there that would be nice to hear."
After the meeting, Wang posted to social media he and Lee later argued about the call of misrepresentation.
He said Lee belittled him, called him "boy", and said "if you can't back up your claim of misrepresentation ... then you can f*** off".
Wang said he could back it up, as Kai Fong ruled in his favour.
"It's sad to say this isn't the first time this kind of behaviour has happened, and I know it won't be the last, but I can only bite my tongue for so long. Integrity matters."
Lee told Local Democracy Reporting he hadn't actually said the words "f*** off", but had trailed off. He said Wang inferred his meaning correctly, however.
Lee said it started as a courteous and quiet conversation but alleged Wang became "increasingly agitated" when pressed him on the validity of the misrepresentation dispute.
Lee believed it was invalid, as he had not received the assurance he asked for.
If he had received it, he said he would have changed his vote.
Last year Lee and Wang clashed over a Rainbow Storytime event at the library, which Wang supported but Lee viewed as inappropriate for children.
The council will consider options for when and how to reopen the museum late this year or early next year, once it had more information about the design and funding.
Of the $72.35m construction cost, $56.85m is externally funded.
If the museum was to reopen all at once rather than in stages, the exhibition fitout would likely be ready for a June 2028 opening.
To offset the further exhibition borrowing, the council's community experience group will reduce its 2024/25 financial year operational expenditures by $181,700.
The Rotorua Trust portion would be repaid if there was money left over when the project finished.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Regulatory Standards Bill will stop lawmakers considering broader public health, warns cancer specialist
The Bill is part of ACT Party leader David Seymour's coalition agreement. Photo: RNZ Graphic / Nik Dirga The Regulatory Standards Bill will stop lawmakers from taking broader public health considerations into account, warns a leading cancer specialist. ACT Party leader David Seymour said the Bill - part of its coalition agreement with the National Party and New Zealand First - was about requiring governments to be more "transparent" about the financial impact of legislation. However, Auckland University associate professor George Laking, a medical oncologist and clinical Māori director in the Centre for Cancer Research, said the real intent seemed to make economic factors the only measure. "We already have transparency around lawmaking - that's why we have regulatory impact reports," he said. "This seems more like an attempt to narrow the frame for what's considered to count as being relevant in that type of decision." He joined other public health and legal experts, who have criticised the bill (in its current form) as allowing tobacco, alcohol industries or environmental polluters to seek compensation, if future legislation costs them profit. Associate professor George Laking from Auckland University. Photo: Supplied "You wouldn't want your surgeon to operate with a blunt instrument, but that's exactly the approach the Regulatory Standards Bill takes to the health needs of our society," Laking said. "I acknowledge ACT's faith in market-based solutions, but it is well known that markets fail. That's why the government should be very careful about market deregulation, when human health is at stake." The Bill also appeared to be a covert attack on the principles and articles of te Tiriti o Waitangi, he said. "The situation we have is quite inequitable in terms of distribution of wealth and power in society, and that's a big reason why government needs to be able to take into account a wider set of principles, than rather just the narrow, market-based, productivity-based ones that ACT likes to focus on. "The definition of 'liberty' begs the question of whose liberty - the ability to pollute the environment, to get people hooked on addictive substances, that's one side of the liberty coin. "The pursuit of short term economic gain is not necessarily the recipe for an harmonious society." Public submissions on the Regulatory Standards Bill close at 1pm Monday, 23 June 2025. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Youth-led Hīkoi highlights Auckland homelessness crisis says advocate
About 100 people marched on the footpath from Karangahape Road to downtown Auckland. Photo: Kick Back / Aaron Hendry A youth advocate says the turnout at a hīkoi to highlight youth homelessness in Auckland CBD clearly shows the pain and trauma young people are experiencing. Co-founder and manager of youth development organisation Kick Back, Aaron Hendry, said about 100 people marched on the footpath from Karangahape Road to downtown Auckland after noon Saturday. He said the hīkoi was organised by youth who had or still experienced homelessness. "Many young people in our community have been denied emergency housing, are couch surfing, living in hostels and in unsafe living environments, because this government and successive governments have not invested in a clear strategy to end youth homelessness. "This is them standing up and saying, 'We have a voice, we are going to use it'." Kick Back was actively monitoring 140 young people in the city, who do not have stable housing - some as young as 11 years old. Hendry said marching on the footpath instead of the road was a way of recognising where many had slept rough. "Young people denied shelter because of government decisions around emergency housing had to sleep on Karangahape Road or Queen Street. Youth protestors wave flags during a hīkoi to highlight youth homelessness in Auckland CBD. Photo: Kick Back / Aaron Hendry "They are taking the street back and saying, 'This is where you left us, this is not a place for any child or young person to live'." He said Labour MPs Shanan Halbert and Kieran McAnulty, and Green MP Ricardo Menéndez March participated in the march. Auckland councillor and mayoral candidate Kerrin Leoni also attended. "Central government have taken quite a lot of money away from homeless initiatives and it is a real concern for our city," Leoni said. "There are multiple issues young homeless people are experiencing and hearing a story of a suicide today is heart-breaking, as a leader of this city, to know this is happening in the wealthiest and biggest city of our country. She said, if elected mayor, she would work with community housing and poverty action groups to find ways Auckland Council could help. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
Embassy Of Israel In Wellington Closes Amid International Conflict
The Israeli embassy in New Zealand has shut as part of a worldwide closure of the country's diplomatic missions,. The closures comes as tensions remain high in the region - Israel launched an attack on Iranian nuclear and military facilities on Friday, which Iran responded to with attacks of its own. The Embassy of Israel - on Brandon Street in Wellington - services Tonga, Samoa, Cook Islands and Niue, as well as New Zealand. It also operates a consulate office in Auckland. A message on the embassy's website announced the decision: "In light of recent developments, Israeli missions around the world will be closed and consular services will not be provided," it said. "An online form is available for Israelis abroad to report their location and current status." The message also issued general safety guidelines for Israelis abroad - encouraging them to avoid displaying Jewish or Israeli symbols in public spaces and avoid attending large gatherings or events associated with Israel or Jewish communities. An 'unpublish' date on the message indicated it was intended to appear on the website until the end of July. In a statement sent to RNZ on Saturday morning, the Israeli embassy said Iran was "only moments away from a nuclear weapon" and Israel "had no choice". "Iran accumulated large amounts of highly enriched uranium that are sufficient for more than nine nuclear bombs. A third of which was enriched and accumulated in the last three months alone - a drastic increase of production volume. " Israel has for years said Iran was working towards obtaining nuclear weapons. The embassy said the recent "accelerated effort has not been seen in the last two decades". "Israel has the right to defend itself, and it has launched a precise self-defense campaign as a last resort." It accused Iran of targeting civilian populations in its retaliatory attacks, saying Israel only "targeted senior military commanders and nuclear weapons developers". "Israel will not allow a regime that openly calls for its destruction to possess nuclear weapons or vast stockpiles of advanced ballistic missiles." The embassy closure came as part of a global shutting of Israeli embassies. Israel's embassy in Sweden said the country would close its diplomatic missions around the world and that consular services would not be provided at about 11pm on Friday night (NZ), Reuters reported. It did not say how long the missions would be closed. Correction: This story earlier said Iran launched 100 drones towards Israel, which was unconfirmed. It has been changed since to 'responded to with attacks of its own'.