Assad-era political prisoner wants justice
SYRIAN fighter pilot Ragheed Tatari was 26 when he was arrested. Now 70, the country's longest-serving political prisoner is finally free after Bashar al-Assad's fall, seeking justice and accountability.
Tatari, arrested in 1981 and sentenced to life behind bars, was among scores of prisoners who walked free when longtime ruler Assad was overthrown on Dec 8.
He has made it out alive after 43 years in jail, but tens of thousands of Syrian families are still searching for their loved ones who disappeared long ago in Syria's hellish prison system.
"I came close to death under torture," said Tatari in his small Damascus apartment.
Since a military field court gave him a life sentence for "collaborating with foreign countries" — an accusation he denies — Tatari was moved from one prison to another, first under late president Hafez al-Assad and then his son Bashar who succeeded him in 2000.
Showing old pictures of him in his pilot uniform, Tatari said he was not seeking revenge, but stressed that "everyone must be held accountable for their crimes".
More than two million Syrians were jailed under the Assad dynasty's rule, half of them after anti-government protests in 2011 escalated into civil war, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor.
The Britain-based monitor says around 200,000 died in custody.
Diab Serriya, co-founder of the Association of Detainees and Missing Persons of Saydnaya Prison, said Tatari was "the longest-serving political prisoner in Syria and the Middle East".
Rights group Amnesty International has called the notorious Saydnaya prison outside Damascus a "human slaughterhouse".
Tatari had been detained there, but he said his 15 years in the Palmyra prison in the Syrian desert were the most difficult.
The Palmyra facility operated "without any discipline, any laws and any humanity", said Tatari.
Detainees were "not afraid of torture — we wished for death", he added.
"Everything that has been said about torture in Palmyra... is an understatement. A guard could kill a prisoner if he was displeased with him," said Tatari.
In 1980, Palmyra witnessed a massacre of hundreds detainees, gunned down by helicopters or executed in their cells after a failed assassination attempt on Hafez al-Assad.
Tatari said he was completely disconnected from the outside world there, only learning of the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union through a prisoner who had returned from a hospital visit.
In Sweida prison in the south, where Tatari was transferred after the 2011 revolt began, some inmates had phones that they would keep hidden from the guards.
"The cell phone gets you out of prison, it makes you feel alive," he said, recalling how he used to conceal his device in a hole dug in his cell.
But after his phone was discovered, he was transferred to a prison in Tartus — his final detention facility before gaining freedom.
Tatari was one of several military officers who were opposed to Syria's intervention in Lebanon in 1976, and to the violent repression in the early 1980s of the Muslim Brotherhood, Syria's main opposition force at the time.
After two of his fellow pilots defected and fled to Jordan in 1980, he escaped to Egypt and then on to Jordan.
But he returned when security forces began harassing his family and was arrested on arrival. His wife was pregnant at the time with their first and only son.
For years, the family assumed Tatari was dead, before receiving a proof of life in 1997.
It was then that Tatari was finally able to meet his son, then aged 16, under the watchful eye of guards during the family's first authorised prison visit that year.
His wife has since died and their son left Syria, having received threats at the start of the protest movement, which had spiralled into war and eventually led to Assad's overthrow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Mass graves: A journalist's journey Into Malaysia's darkest chapter
WHEN journalists dig deep, ask hard questions, and refuse to let go, they become more than storytellers — they become catalysts for truth. Their relentless pursuit can shine a light on hidden crimes, expose wrongdoing and give voice to those silenced by fear or power. In a world where so much is buried beneath spin, silence or indifference, journalism remains one of the last lines of defence against injustice. Veteran journalist Datuk S. Arulldas was on the trail of a Penang-based human trafficking syndicate in 2015 when information from his police contacts led him to Perlis. It was a lead that would take him deep into a chilling web of crime and silence. For journalists like Arulldas, the pursuit of truth isn't just a job; it's a calling. Their dogged determination to follow the facts, no matter how remote or risky, has the power to uncover buried truths, expose hidden atrocities and push authorities into action. In this case, that pursuit would bring him face to face with one of Malaysia's darkest chapters. Combing through dense jungle, steep terrain and a wall of bureaucracy — from uncooperative security personnel to high-ranking officials — Arulldas and his steadfast photographer, Sayuti Zainudin, pushed forward. What they uncovered were Malaysia's own killing fields: 139 remains buried in shallow graves, scattered across remote forested slopes. Their discovery led to the exposure of hidden human trafficking camps along the border — grim evidence of a cross-border trade in human misery that had flourished in silence for too long. He has chronicled his journey in a book titled Mass Graves: Uncovering the Killing Fields of Wang Kelian. The book is a compelling account of the investigation, pieced together with a collection of newspaper clippings, photographs, and personal notes that offer a behind-the-scenes look at how investigative journalism operates in Malaysia. It not only documents the horrors uncovered in the Perlis jungle, but also sheds light on the perseverance, risks and resistance journalists often face when pursuing stories that challenge power and expose uncomfortable truths. Prompted by a spate of grisly murders involving Myanmar nationals in Penang, Arulldas began digging deeper. His investigation revealed troubling links between the killings and human trafficking networks, which soon led him to the country's northern border and a tip that would change everything. While seated at a coffee shop in Jitra, Kedah, just before heading to the border, Arulldas and Sayuti met a contact who dropped a bombshell. "He told us there were mass graves of migrants at Bukit Wang Burma, near Wang Kelian," Arulldas later wrote. Wang Kelian, located at the northernmost part of Perlis, shares a border with Wang Prachan in the Khuan Don District of Satun Province, southern Thailand. The contact revealed that a retired senior Thai army officer and his wife had recently been arrested by Thai authorities in connection with a human trafficking network and the discovery of mass graves. But when pressed for further details, he remained tight-lipped, insisting that if the journalist wanted answers, he'd have to find the graves himself. Sensing a story, Arulldas turned to his photographer and asked, "Shall we go?" Sayuti agreed without hesitation, and just like that, their journey veered off course. "It was a different kind of feeling when we arrived in Wang Kelian," Arulldas recalls. "It felt strange… like we weren't in Malaysia anymore. It was dusk. The houses were dark, the roads empty. Everything looked deserted." That evening, their first attempt to locate the mass graves was quickly called off. They had no maps, no landmarks and weren't equipped to navigate the forest reserve. "We didn't want to get lost in the jungle at night," he says wryly. Undeterred by the initial setback, Arulldas pressed on. He followed every lead, tracked down contacts and spoke to anyone who might help him find the mass graves believed to be hidden deep within the forest. Each encounter brought new challenges, from vague directions to hesitant sources. What stands out in his account isn't just the information he uncovered, but the relentless way he pursued it. Despite the uncertainty, the risks and the many obstacles, he never gave up. His tenacity, grounded in a journalist's instinct, carried him forward in search of a story that many would have walked away from. The then 60-year-old Arulldas went on to risk life and limb, trekking through dense forest terrain with guides he barely knew. "My legs were swollen and at that time, I nearly gave up so many times along the way," he recalls. "But my guides kept urging me on. They said, 'You've come this far. Just a little more.'" Eventually, he reached a small clearing where the ground had been crudely disturbed. Open graves lay before him, the surfaces loosely covered with palm fronds. He'd found the mass graves. "It was a human tragedy," he says soberly. "I feel it shouldn't have happened. These people were looking for greener pastures. They shouldn't have had to die or be killed. I felt such deep sadness and pity." Ten years on, the now 70-year-old reflects on that day and quietly admits it was the defining moment of his career. Yet a decade later, he concedes that more questions remain than answers. Still, the story demands to be told. "All we can do as journalists is expose the truth," he writes. "To put faces to a marginalised group that might otherwise remain nothing more than inconvenient statistics, too easily brushed aside." Arulldas' book is a courageous and unflinching account of a tragedy Malaysia has yet to fully confront. It stands as a testament to lives lost, justice denied, and the silence that continues to hang over Wang Kelian. Somewhere in Kedah, the victims lie buried under nameless headstones, marked only by DNA codes. Their stories remain untold, their identities unknown and the truth behind their deaths still cloaked in silence. Publisher: Gerakbudaya Enterprise 133 pages
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Experts: Major web outage came from within
The North's Internet was hit by a major outage that lasted several hours, knocking off connection to government websites and official news services online and severing the reclusive country from cyberspace. It was not clear what caused the outage but it may have been internal rather than a cyberattack, as connections via China and Russia were affected, said researchers who monitor North Korea's Internet and technology infrastructure. North Korea's main official news services, its Foreign Ministry, and the Air Koryo national airline were among websites inaccessible yesterday, before they started coming back slowly around midday. North Korea's entire Internet infrastructure was not showing up on systems that can monitor Internet activities, and email services were also affected, Junade Ali, a UK-based researcher who monitors the North Korean Internet, said earlier. 'Hard to say if this is intentional or accidental – but seems like this is internal rather than an attack.' Officials at South Korea's cyberterror response centre, a police division that monitors North Korea's cyberactivities, could not be reached for comment. Martyn Williams, who specialises in North Korea's technology and infrastructure at the Washington-based Stimson Center, also said the cause appeared to be internal as the Chinese and Russian connections were not working. — Reuters
The Star
16 hours ago
- The Star
Chinese spies at Stanford? US tightens visa policies over espionage fears
Chinese spies at Stanford University. American and Chinese pawns for Beijing at Duke Kunshan. Chinese student scouts near a military site in Michigan. These are some of the 'bombshell' allegations that have been fuelling online buzz and US government efforts to sever educational ties between the US and China in recent months. A day after The Stanford Review – a student-run conservative newspaper – published a report on May 7 alleging that Beijing was conducting a 'widespread intelligence-gathering campaign' on campus, Senator Ashley Moody, Republican of Florida, cited the piece as evidence that Congress must pass her bill to prevent all Chinese citizens from obtaining US student visas. Similarly, months after a Duke University student published an account of her experiences with Chinese media during a trip to China, two US representatives wrote to Duke's president seeking to shut down Duke Kunshan, the university's joint campus with Wuhan University in China, alleging that it was helping to facilitate Chinese propaganda and intellectual property theft. And, months after claims that Chinese students were spying near a military site in Michigan, the University of Michigan – facing pressure from lawmakers – announced it would end its partnership with Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Capping this trend, the State Department announced last week it would 'aggressively' revoke visas of Chinese students, including those with 'connections' to China's Communist Party and in 'critical fields', citing Beijing's 'intelligence collection' and theft of US research. Lawmakers and government officials involved say that US engagement with Chinese students and universities must be restricted to protect national security. But US-based China scholars and education advocates call the risks overstated and often unsubstantiated, and the proposed responses disproportionate. The cost, they say, of misjudging the balance between openness and protecting national security is high – putting not only America's ability to understand China, but also its capacity to innovate, at risk. That risk has become all the more potent as US President Donald Trump's administration targets international students more broadly, from expanding the review of visa applicants' social media accounts to revoking Harvard University's authority to host them at all. 'I do not believe that the danger here is that students on campus are going to gain access to secrets or be a national security risk,' said Dennis Wilder, a senior fellow at Georgetown University's Initiative for US-China Dialogue on Global Issues, adding that open campuses offered little intelligence value. Wilder, who previously worked at the CIA, said there was a conflation of worry about control by Beijing with the actual gathering of intelligence. 'There is a very real fear among Chinese students studying in the US that they are being monitored by other Chinese students on behalf of the Chinese embassy – but that doesn't mean those students are spies.' Defining spying as 'the stealing of secrets that a foreign government does not want you to have', Wilder cautioned that an overly broad definition would lead to a wasting of resources. 'Chasing after students means missing the bigger, more dangerous targets,' he said, citing as an example of a higher priority the case of Su Bin, a Chinese businessman who pleaded guilty in 2016 to hacking the computer networks of major US military contractors. China specialists have also questioned the strength of the evidence cited in some of the published allegations. 'The Stanford Review article relies heavily on anonymous sources and anecdotal experience, which could create serious problems for accurately assessing the nature of the risk,' said Rosie Levine, executive director of the US-China Education Trust, a Washington-based non-profit that facilitates academic exchanges. And that, Levine said, could lead to blanket suspicion being cast upon all Chinese students based on their country of origin rather than any problematic behaviour. 'I fear that articles like this will put a target on the back of Chinese students who are genuinely in the United States to get a good education,' she said, arguing that targeting behaviours rather than specific nationalities or institutions might be more productive. The Review article cited anonymous students and experts to claim the presence of spies at Stanford – without describing any concrete intelligence-gathering operation involving a current student or faculty member. It cites one former visiting researcher from China – Chen Song – who was indicted by the Department of Justice in 2021 for concealing her affiliation with the People's Liberation Army. The case was ultimately dismissed, a fact the report did not mention. Without directly criticising the article, some Stanford researchers and faculty warned that a more systematic collection of evidence was crucial to 'sound policy'. They also pushed for using spying-related terms more precisely. 'Espionage is a serious crime, and, while some cases will rise to that threshold, applying the label too broadly risks flawed prosecutions and confusing different aspects of research security,' said Larry Diamond, Matthew Pottinger and Matt Turpin in a letter to the Review. Pottinger and Turpin both worked in the White House during Trump's first term. The Stanford Review did not respond to a request for comment. China analysts were quick to outline the stakes of miscalibration. 'US academic institutions attract top talent globally, and many from China remain in the US and continue to make valuable contributions to research and development in their fields. This is a 'brain drain' from China that benefits the US,' said Jeremy Daum, a senior research scholar at Yale Law School. Daum recalled the Justice Department's China Initiative, a controversial and deactivated programme begun in the first Trump administration, saying that in the name of protecting against economic espionage, its investigations focused more on individuals' connections to China rather than on criminal acts related to the transfer of intellectual property. 'Naturally, crimes should be investigated, and confidential materials in businesses and universities should be protected,' Daum said. 'There is no basis, however, for suspecting anyone based solely on their nationality, ethnicity, affiliations, or the affiliations of their affiliations – such as where they only attended a school that had military research ties unrelated to their own work.' Levine said that, left unchecked, broad classifications would 'cast a net so wide that non-sensitive programmes that benefit Americans will be inadvertently affected'. That has already happened in states across the country. Florida International University, for instance, in 2023 cancelled a two-decade-old hospitality programme with the Tianjin University of Commerce after Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed a law restricting US-China partnerships. Since the start of Trump's second term, efforts targeting US-China education exchanges based on sweeping criteria have picked up. Last month, the full House of Representatives passed a bill that incentivises US universities to cut partnerships with a broad group of universities in China. Last week, the State Department declined to provide details on what areas of study or type of link to the Communist Party would make a Chinese citizen subject to greater visa scrutiny. Washington has already set rules that prevent foreign students and scholars from gaining access to sensitive information on university campuses, such as 'export administration regulations' on certain advanced technologies. And in 2020, the US government cancelled visas for graduate programme students from Chinese universities believed to have close research relationships with China's military. For proponents of exchange, the benefits include deep country expertise that Wilder says has been instrumental to US policy on China for decades. While there were more than 11,000 American students in China as recently as 2019, the latest available estimate, from 2024, hovers around 1,000. Experts say government oversight of US-China exchanges is often shaped by broad or inaccurate assumptions. 'American students are not as naive as the congressional committees seem to want to believe they are,' Wilder said, noting that they are often aware that they may be targets for Beijing's espionage or propaganda before heading to China. Andrew Polk, founder of the Trivium China consultancy, noted that US scrutiny often hinged on whether an institution has ties to the Chinese Communist Party – but in China, 'everything is linked to the CCP'. That ubiquity, he argued, makes such a standard too blunt to be meaningful. Jessica Chen Weiss, a professor of China studies at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), said reports about Chinese intelligence gathering often 'make little effort to convey a sense of proportion, either in the risks or benefits of having Chinese students'. The Stanford report, for instance, 'uses language like 'existential' without acknowledging that more than 90 per cent of Chinese-born doctoral students in STEM stay in the US ... And it assumes that the US can stay ahead if we prevent Chinese IP theft, whereas China is in the lead on many technologies', she said. Ho-fung Hung, another professor at SAIS, said clear parameters should be established for research areas that are off-limits. 'Even at the height of the Cold War, US and USSR scientific and technological cooperation continued. But a clear boundary needs to be set,' he said. 'Without such boundary, universities are going to be cautious and reluctant to continue working with Chinese scholars and students in all fields,' he continued, adding that China could help the situation by 'rethinking, revising, or refining the law that obliges all individual citizens, companies and organisations to spy for the state'. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
