logo
How common is Israel's use of human shields in Gaza and the West Bank?

How common is Israel's use of human shields in Gaza and the West Bank?

Yahoo27-05-2025

A recent report by The Associated Press that exposed the Israeli military's 'systematic' use of Palestinians as human shields has shone a light on an illegal practice that has become commonplace over the 19-month war in Gaza and parallel offensives in the West Bank.
The report, published on Saturday, featured the testimonies of seven Palestinians who had been used as human shields in Gaza as well as the occupied West Bank, with two Israeli military officers confirming the ubiquity of the practice, which is considered a violation of international law.
Responding to the allegations, Israel's military told the news agency that using civilians as shields in its operations was strictly prohibited and that several cases were under investigation.
So what are human shields? How widely have they been used by the Israeli military? And is Israel likely to launch a crackdown any time soon?
Under international humanitarian law (IHL), the term 'human shields' refers to the use of civilians or other protected persons, whether voluntary or involuntary, in order to shield military targets from attacks.
The use of human shields in warfare is prohibited under IHL, but Israeli soldiers have allegedly employed it widely during the Gaza genocide.
Earlier this year, Israeli newspaper Haaretz published the first-hand testimony of an Israeli soldier who said that the practice had been used 'six times a day' in his unit and that it had effectively been 'normalised' in military ranks.
Back in August, the newspaper had revealed that Palestinians used as human shields in Gaza tended to be in their 20s and were used for periods of up to a week by units, which took pride in 'locating' detainees to send into tunnel shafts and buildings.
'It's become part of [Israel's] military culture,' said Nicola Perugini, co-author of Human Shields: A History of People in the Line of Fire, noting the 'huge archive' of evidence provided, not only by human rights groups, but also by soldiers, who were until recently posting evidence of Palestinians being used as 'fodder' on social media with an apparent sense of total impunity.
'Israeli army investigations have proven throughout the decades to be non-investigations,' Perugini said, noting that documentation of the practice, forbidden by Protocol 1 to the Geneva Conventions, started during the second Intifada of the early 2000s.
'What we have now in the live-streamed genocide is the most documented archive of human shielding in the history of the different wars between Israel and the Palestinians,' he said.
'What we have discovered is precisely that it is a systematic practice.'
Throughout the conflict, the Israeli military's response to allegations has been to withhold comment, to point to a lack of details, or, when faced with undeniable proof, to announce a probe.
Last year, Israel declined to respond to a range of allegations put to it by Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit, which examined thousands of photos and videos – the bulk of them posted online by Israeli soldiers – and testimonies pointing to a number of potential war crimes, including the use of human shields.
Among the atrocities revealed by the team in the resulting documentary was the case of Jamal Abu al-Ola, a detainee forced to act as a messenger by the Israelis. Footage showed the young man dressed in a white hazmat suit, with hands bound and head wrapped in a yellow cloth, telling displaced people at the Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis to evacuate. His mother followed him out, and witnessed him being shot dead by a sniper.
Commenting on the case for the documentary, Rodney Dixon, an international law expert, said that al-Ola had been used as a 'military asset', which was 'in many ways the definition of using persons as a human shield'.
This year, the military pushed back on calls to investigate a report on an 80-year-old man forced to act as a human shield in Gaza City, saying that 'additional details' were needed.
The joint report from Israeli outlet The Hottest Place in Hell and +972 Magazine revealed a horrific new dimension of the so-called 'mosquito procedure', with anonymous Israeli soldiers recounting that a senior officer had placed an explosive cord around the man's neck, threatening to blow his head off if he made any false moves.
Ordered afterwards to flee his home in Gaza City's Zeitoun neighbourhood, the man was shot dead with his wife by another battalion.However, the military will acknowledge violations when confronted with undeniable evidence provoking widespread outrage, such as last year's video of wounded Palestinian man Mujahed Azmi, strapped to the hood of an army jeep during a raid on the West Bank city of Jenin.
That particular case was described as 'human shielding in action' by Francesca Albanese, the United Nations' special rapporteur to the occupied Palestinian territory.
In a statement, Israel's military said its forces were fired at and exchanged fire, wounding a suspect and apprehending him. It added that the 'conduct of the forces in the video' did not 'conform to the values' of the military and that the incident would be investigated.
However, as Perugini observes, the very reason why the International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes in Gaza is because legal experts doubt Israel's ability to investigate itself.
Despite vast evidence, the question of whether the military will be launching a crackdown aimed at banishing the apparently systematic practice is moot. Even so, pressure for accountability is growing.
Rights groups say the practice of using human shields has been going on in the occupied Palestinian territories for decades. Breaking the Silence, a whistle-blower group gathering testimonies of former Israeli soldiers, cites evidence of what one high-ranking officer posted to Bethlehem in the occupied West Bank back in 2002 called 'neighbour procedure'.
'You order a Palestinian to accompany you and to open the door of the house you want to enter, to knock on the door and ask to enter, with a very simple objective: if the door blows up, a Palestinian will be blown up, and soldiers won't be blown up,' said the officer, ranked as a major.
In 2005, an Israeli Supreme Court ruling explicitly barred the practice. Five years later, two soldiers were convicted of using a nine-year-old boy as a human shield to check suspected booby traps in the Gaza City suburb of Tal al-Hawa.
It was reportedly the first such conviction in Israel.
But the military's use of human shields appears to have been normalised since then, particularly over the past 19 months of war in Gaza.
Indeed, there are indications that orders may be coming from the very top.
Haaretz's investigation from last August cited sources as saying that former Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi was among the senior officers aware of the use of Palestinians in Gaza as human shields.
And this week's report by the AP cited an anonymous Israeli officer as saying that the practice had become ubiquitous by mid-2004 in Gaza, with every infantry unit using a Palestinian to clear houses by the time he finished his service, and with orders 'to bring a mosquito' often being issued via radio.
The report also cited an anonymous Israeli sergeant as saying that his unit had tried to refuse to use human shields in Gaza in 2024, but was told they had no choice, a high-ranking officer telling them they shouldn't worry about international humanitarian law.
Responding to claims in the AP report, the Israeli military told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday that it would investigate the claims 'if further details are provided'.
'In several cases, investigations by the Military Police Criminal Investigation Division were opened following suspicions that the military was involving Palestinians in military missions. These investigations are ongoing, and naturally, no further details can be provided at this time,' it said.
In March, Haaretz reported that Israel's military police were investigating six cases in which Israeli soldiers were alleged to have used Palestinians as human shields after the publication of a Red Cross report earlier in the year that highlighted the abuses.
In the face of growing evidence that Palestinians are systematically being used as fodder for the Israeli military machine, in a war that has already killed more than 54,000 people, the military may find it increasingly difficult to kick the biggest can of all down the road.
Said Perugini: 'When you are in a genocide, then human shielding becomes a tool for something else. It becomes part of a different kind of crime, of the crime of crimes.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bogus social media accounts fueled backlash over Target rollback of DEI: ‘Masterclass in manufactured outrage'
Bogus social media accounts fueled backlash over Target rollback of DEI: ‘Masterclass in manufactured outrage'

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Bogus social media accounts fueled backlash over Target rollback of DEI: ‘Masterclass in manufactured outrage'

A coordinated campaign used bogus social media accounts to amplify backlash against Target after the company scaled back its Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives, according to a blockbuster report. An analysis by Israeli tech firm Cyabra found that nearly a third of the social media accounts driving outrage over the retail giant's policy change were fake. The Minneapolis-based retailert announced it would roll back its controversial initiatives — which had drawn scorn from conservatives for touting items such as tuck-friendly bathing suits — after President Trump returned to the White House on Jan. 20. Cyabra reviewed thousands of posts on Elon Musk-owned X, formerly Twitter, from Jan. 1 to April 21 and discovered that 27% of the accounts were inauthentic — many of which played a major role in pushing boycott narratives. 4 A coordinated disinformation campaign helped amplify backlash against Target, according to a report. REUTERS Cyabra's data showed that inauthentic posts jumped 764% after Target's announcement, flooding the platform with calls for consumer boycotts and viral hashtags like #EconomicBlackout. The firm's CEO, Dan Brahmy, described the backlash as a calculated effort to manufacture outrage. 'What happened with Target is a masterclass in manufactured outrage,' Brahmy told The Post on Thursday. 'Fake accounts hijacked the narrative, weaponized identity and pushed a boycott that looked grassroots but was anything but. This is how influence operations work now — they blur the line between real and fake until no one can tell the difference.' Many of the fake accounts were designed to mimic real users and took on the identities of black consumers or conservative commentators, according to Cyabra's findings, which were obtained by The Post. Some profiles pushed slogans such as 'Target Fast' and '40-day boycott,' while others accused the retailer of 'bending the knee' to Trump. 4 Cyabra's data showed that inauthentic posts jumped 764% after Target's announcement that it was scaling back its DEI. Cyabra One purported X user with the handle NenelsBack posted on Jan. 27: 'Target can't get my money. It's like being betrayed by a family member. We gave Target so much respect. BLK folk named Target, Targe't.' Another with the handle Nickolas Medina fanned the flames on the boycott push by posting on April 18: 'I stopped going to Target because of their support for the trans agenda. I think that is a greater motivation for people to boycott Target Target than DEI.' Both were found to be posted by fake accounts, according to the report, first cited by USA Today. 'We don't just look at what's being said, we analyze how it's being said, and whether they are even real,' Cyabra spokesperson Jill Burkes told The Post. 'We flag accounts that post in lockstep, recycle the same hashtags and slogans, or only interact within closed loops of other suspicious accounts.' Cyabra, which uses artificial intelligence to detect coordinated manipulation campaigns, did not find clear evidence linking the campaign to a specific foreign or domestic actor. 4 An Israeli analytics firm did a study which found a large number of posts from fake social media accounts fueled talk of a boycott. Cyabra However, the tactic of inflaming culture war debates through synthetic engagement has become increasingly common, particularly in polarized consumer environments. In a follow-up analysis of conversations on X from May 27 to June 3, Cyabra found the campaign had not only persisted but intensified. On some days, fake accounts made up 39% of the conversation –outnumbering genuine users. Cyabra has seen similar tactics used against other major brands, from fast food chains to tech companies. 4 Cyabra reviewed thousands of posts on X, formerly Twitter, from Jan. 1 to April 21 and discovered that 27% of the accounts were inauthentic. Cyabra 'The playbook is similar: hijack a polarizing moment, flood the zone with fake voices and let real users do the rest,' Burkes said. 'That's exactly what happened with Target. And it works — the stock dropped $12 billion and real people joined the boycott thinking they were part of a massive groundswell. Many still are.' The Post has sought comment from Target. Last month, Target lowered its full-year sales forecast. CEO Brian Cornell blamed several headwinds, including 'the reaction to the updates we shared on [DEI] in January.' Minneapolis activist Nekima Levy Armstrong, who launched a grassroots boycott of Target on Feb. 1, told USA Today she had no knowledge of the disinformation campaign identified by Cyabra. 'I'm not on X and I know our people in Minneapolis have no involvement in this situation,' Armstrong said.

21-year-old Navy sailor mysteriously goes missing in Virginia
21-year-old Navy sailor mysteriously goes missing in Virginia

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

21-year-old Navy sailor mysteriously goes missing in Virginia

A 21-year-old Navy sailor has mysteriously disappeared in Virginia, leaving her mother desperate for answers. Angelina "Angie" Resendiz was last seen on Thursday, May 29, at 10 a.m. at her barracks in Miller Hall at Naval Station Norfolk, according to the Virginia State Police. "This disappearance poses a credible threat to their health and safety as determined by the investigating agency," police said. Resendiz, a Texas native, is a culinary specialist assigned to the USS James E. Williams, the Navy said. MORE: Manhunt continues for father police say killed 3 young daughters near Washington campground Resendiz's mother, Esmeralda Castle, insists that her daughter "does not miss work. Sick, snow, feeling down, she shows up." Resendiz joined the Navy in 2023 after high school "because she felt it was something that called her," Castle wrote to ABC News. As a culinary specialist, "She thought that one day she might be able to cook for the president and other world leaders," Castle said. "She worked really hard on her ship." "She's fun, loving, kind, compassionate, uplifting," she added. MORE: Israel recovers bodies of 2 American-Israeli hostages from Gaza "People that care about Angie shared with me that the last person she was with was missing with her," and "that person showed up Monday but not Angie," Castle said. "There are no answers for me," she said. "I just want my kid, she doesn't deserve to be missing." The Navy told ABC News in a statement that it's "cooperating fully with the investigation." The Naval Criminal Investigative Service said, "Out of respect for the investigative process, NCIS will not comment further while the investigation remains ongoing." Anyone with information is urged to call NCIS at 877-579-3648.

Thousands demand respect at annual gay pride parade in Jerusalem
Thousands demand respect at annual gay pride parade in Jerusalem

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Thousands demand respect at annual gay pride parade in Jerusalem

Thousands of people took part in the annual Pride Parade in Jerusalem on Thursday amidst very strict security measures. They demonstrated for the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer people (LGBTQ) and waved rainbow flags. According to the organizers, the parade is primarily about demanding equality, respect and tolerance. The Pride Parade in Jerusalem has to be protected by a massive police presence every year. Jerusalem is home to many conservative and strictly religious Jews, Muslims and Christians who deny same-sex relationships as a violation of their religious commandments. Ten years ago, an ultra-Orthodox Jew stabbed 16-year-old Shira Banki to death during the parade. Participants observed a minute's silence at the spot where Banki was killed in 2015. Israeli President Isaac Herzog, who was at the event, said: "We demand love, respect and equality – including for the LGBTQ community, which is an integral part of Israeli society." According to the news site ynet, Herzog is the first president to take part in the Pride Parade in Jerusalem. The chairwoman of the organizer Jerusalem Open House, Hadas Bloemendal Kerem, said: "The Pride Parade in Jerusalem is a ray of light that has illuminated the city for over two decades and reminds us that we can live here together – with equality, tolerance and respect." Clashes broke out between demonstrators and the police on the fringes of the parade, according to media reports. Next week, large crowds are expected to attend the well-known Gay Pride Parade in Tel Aviv. The liberal coastal metropolis is considered a stronghold of the gay scene in Israel and the LGBTQ capital of the Middle East.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store