122m forcibly displaced worldwide 'untenably high': UN
The number of people forcibly displaced from their homes worldwide has dropped slightly from a record peak but remains "untenably high", the United Nations said Thursday.
A record 123.2 million people worldwide were forcibly displaced from their homes at the end of 2024, said UNHCR, the UN refugee agency.
But that figure dropped to 122.1 million by the end of April this year, as Syrians began returning home after years of turmoil.
More than 1.5 million Syrians have been able to return home from abroad or from displacement within the war-ravaged country.
But the UNHCR warned that the course of major conflicts worldwide would determine whether the figure would rise again.
The agency said the number of people displaced by war, violence and persecution worldwide was "untenably high", particularly in a period when humanitarian funding is evaporating.
"We are living in a time of intense volatility in international relations, with modern warfare creating a fragile, harrowing landscape marked by acute human suffering," said Filippo Grandi, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.
"We must redouble our efforts to search for peace and find long-lasting solutions for refugees and others forced to flee their homes."
The main drivers of displacement remain sprawling conflicts like those in Sudan, Myanmar and Ukraine, UNHCR said in its flagship annual Global Trends Report.
Syria's brutal civil war erupted in 2011 but ruler Bashar al-Assad was finally overthrown in December 2024.
The report said rising numbers of Syrians have since been able to return to their homes.
As of mid-May, more than 500,000 Syrians are estimated to have crossed back into the country since the fall of Assad, while an estimated 1.2 million internally displaced people (IDPs) have returned to their areas of origin since the end of November.
UNHCR estimates that up to 1.5 million Syrians from abroad and two million IDPs may return by the end of 2025.
Sudan is now the world's largest forced displacement situation with 14.3 million refugees and IDPs, overtaking Syria (13.5 million), which is followed by Afghanistan (10.3 million) and Ukraine (8.8 million).
"During the remainder of 2025, much will depend on the dynamics in key situations," the annual report said, including whether peace or ceasefires can be reached in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan and Ukraine.
It also depends on whether conditions for returns improve in Afghanistan and Syria.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan warns Israel's strikes on Iran pose grave threat to regional, global security
Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, speaks at the UN Security Council meeting on Israel-Iran conflict on June 13, 2025. Courtesy: X@PakistanUN_NY Listen to article Israel's strikes on Iranian nuclear and military facilities have been described as a 'grave danger and a serious threat' to the peace, security, and stability of the entire region and beyond, Pakistan told the UN Security Council during an emergency session convened on Friday. The 15-member Council adjusted its original schedule to address the rapidly evolving crisis, hearing from the head of the UN nuclear watchdog, who warned of the grave risks to both regional stability and nuclear safety. In his remarks, Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, Pakistan's permanent representative to the UN, strongly condemned Israel's 'unjustified and illegitimate' aggression against Iran. He reaffirmed that Pakistan stood in resolute solidarity with the Iranian government and people. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had requested the Security Council meeting, stating that Israel had 'now crossed every red line,' urging the international community to ensure that these crimes were not left unpunished. Among those supporting the request for the meeting were Pakistan, China, and Russia. In the face of escalating tensions, Ambassador Ahmad urged the Security Council to uphold its responsibility to enforce international law and immediately halt the aggression. He strongly called for the resolution of the crisis through dialogue and diplomacy. During the meeting, Rosemary DiCarlo, the UN Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, briefed the Council on the repercussions of the attacks, which were already being felt across the region. 'I reaffirm the Secretary-General's condemnation of any military escalation in the Middle East,' she said, urging both Israel and Iran to exercise maximum restraint and avoid, 'at all costs, a descent into a deeper and wider regional conflict.' She also highlighted that the military escalation had occurred just as 'some significant diplomatic developments' were unfolding, including the planned resumption of US-Iranian talks in Oman, which Iran has now indicated it will no longer attend. DiCarlo urged all parties to stay committed to diplomacy, stating, 'A peaceful resolution through negotiations remains the best means to ensure the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme.' She added, 'We must avoid, at all costs, a growing conflagration that could have enormous global consequences.' Rafael Grossi, Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), also briefed the Council, saying his agency was in constant contact with Iran's Nuclear Regulatory Authority to assess the status of affected facilities and determine the broader impacts on nuclear safety and security. He stressed that nuclear sites should never be targeted under any circumstances. 'Such attacks have serious implications for nuclear security, safety, and safeguards, as well as for regional and international peace and security,' Grossi said. He added that he was ready to travel to the region as soon as possible to assess the situation and support safety, security, and non-proliferation efforts in Iran. 'It is clear that the only sustainable path forward for Iran, Israel, the entire region, and the international community is one grounded in dialogue and diplomacy to ensure peace, stability, and cooperation,' Grossi concluded. He also offered the IAEA as a neutral platform, where 'facts prevail over rhetoric' and where technical engagement can replace escalation. 'I reaffirm both my personal commitment and the agency's readiness to facilitate dialogue and support efforts that promote transparency, security, and the peaceful resolution of nuclear issues in Iran.'
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Iran's Natanz enrichment plant destroyed: IAEA chief
Listen to article The above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Iran's Natanz nuclear site has been destroyed, UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi told the Security Council on Friday. "At present, the Iranian authorities are informing us of attacks on two other facilities, namely the Fordow fuel enrichment plant and at Isfahan," the International Atomic Energy Agency's Rafael Grossi Grossi told the 15-member council. With the violence raising questions on whether a sixth round of talks planned between the US and Iran would go ahead on Sunday in Oman, Trump said Washington was "hoping to get back to the negotiating table". Confirming Natanz had been among Israel's targets, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said radiation levels outside the site "remained unchanged". "Most of the damage is on the surface level," said the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran's spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi. Fawaz Gerges, a professor of international relations at the London School of Economics, said: "I think Israel has declared all-out war against Iran." The United States and other Western governments have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, an ambition it has consistently denied. Israel again called for global action after the IAEA accused Iran on Thursday of non-compliance with its obligations. The agency later said it would hold an extraordinary meeting of its board of governors in the coming days. Iran currently enriches uranium to 60 percent, far above the 3.67-percent limit set by a largely moribund 2015 agreement with major powers, but still short of the 90 percent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. The damage to Iran's nuclear facilities from Israel's initial wave of air strikes early on Friday appeared to be limited, experts who have reviewed commercially available satellite imagery said. Israel's attacks succeeded in killing Iranian military leaders and nuclear scientists and in striking military command and control facilities and air defenses, but satellite imagery did not yet show significant damage to nuclear infrastructure, several experts said. "The first day was aimed at things that you would get through surprise - killing leadership, going after nuclear scientists, air defense systems, the ability to retaliate," said nuclear expert David Albright at the Institute for Science and International Security. "We can't see any visible damage at Fordow or Isfahan. There was damage at Natanz," said Albright, referring to Iranian nuclear sites. But "there's no evidence that the underground site was destroyed." The sprawling Natanz nuclear complex is Iran's main uranium enrichment facility. It has both an underground enrichment plant and an above-ground operation. Two regional sources said at least 20 Iranian military commanders were killed in the attack, a stunning decapitation reminiscent of Israeli attacks that swiftly wiped out the leadership of Lebanon's once-feared Hezbollah militia last year. Iran also said six of its top nuclear scientists were killed. Albright said his analysis was based on the latest available images from about 11:20 a.m. Tehran time (0750 GMT). He added there may also have been drone strikes on tunnels to underground centrifuge plants and cyber attacks that did not leave visible traces. "In terms of visible damage, we don't see much and we'll see what happens tonight," he said, adding that he believes Israel's strikes were still in an early stage. Albright said the status of Iran's stocks of enriched uranium was not known and that it was possible Israel had avoided major attacks on nuclear sites due to concerns about harming international inspectors who were there. Isreal warns of prolonged operation Israel said it targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders at the start of what would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon. Military and nuclear experts said that even with massive firepower, military action would probably only temporarily set back a program the West fears is already aimed at producing atom bombs one day, although Iran denies it. Jeffrey Lewis, a non-proliferation expert at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, said damage at the Natanz facility appeared "moderate." "Israel destroyed the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant, as well as some support buildings associated with power supply," he said. Lewis added Israel also hit a support building – possibly for power supply - near two underground nuclear enrichment facilities. "The underground enrichment halls, as well as the large underground facility nearby in the mountains, do not appear damaged." It was unclear what damage was sustained at the key Fordow nuclear facility, which could be used to develop nuclear weapons and is buried deep underground. "It has always been the conventional wisdom that Israel may not have the ordnance to destroy Fordow without American military support," Mark Dubowitz, head of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank, told a podcast. The United States is better equipped than Israel to destroy such targets with its most powerful bunker buster bombs, the 30,000-pound (14,000 kg) Massive Ordnance Penetrator. If Iran decides not to negotiate a nuclear deal, the US could use its B2 bombers and those bombs to destroy Fordow, Dubowitz said. Decker Eveleth, a strategic analyst with the CAN Corp research group, said the overall aim of Israel's campaign was still unclear. "They may be successful at dismantling Iranian command and control, destroying air forces (and) hitting a variety of targets related to the Iranian missile program," he said. "(But) if their core objective is prevention of a nuclear breakout, can they destroy enough of Iran's nuclear infrastructure to actually prevent that from happening?"
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
UN Security Council to meet on Iran as Israel promises further strikes
UNITED NATIONS: The United Nations Security Council will meet later on Friday over Israel's strikes on Iran as Israel's U.N. envoy said the military operation would continue until Iran's nuclear capabilities and ballistic missile operation were eliminated. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi requested the council meeting in a letter to the 15-member body, saying Israel 'has now crossed every red line, and the international community must not allow these crimes to go unpunished.' 'Iran reaffirms its inherent right to self-defense as enshrined in Article 51 of the UN Charter and will respond decisively and proportionately to these unlawful and cowardly acts,' Araghchi wrote. Article 51 of the U.N. Charter covers the individual or collective right of states to self-defense against armed attack. Israel hits Iran nuclear and missile facilities, appears to block retaliation Israel launched a barrage of strikes across Iran on Friday, saying it had attacked nuclear facilities and missile factories and killed military commanders in what could be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran building an atomic weapon. 'We don't know how long it will take,' Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon told reporters. 'We will continue to act until we will know that we eliminated the threats.' 'The goals of our operation are very clear - to make sure that Iran will not have nuclear capabilities and to stop the ballistic missile operation,' he said. 'I will explain to the council… and I expect the Security Council to understand.' Araghchi, in his letter to the Security Council, said Israel had not only violated Iran's sovereignty, but also committed 'acts of aggression and war crimes.'
