Rugby's 20-minute red card is a dangerous departure that risks devaluing the importance of player safety
'A good sketch is better than a long speech.' So spoke Napoleon Bonaparte, who was probably outlining a battle plan at the time.
Those words came to mind following news from World
Rugby
that the 20-minute red card will now be trialled global. In case you hadn't heard, this refers to instances where a player is red carded but their indiscretion is deemed unintentional. In such cases, the player will still be sent off, but his team will be able to bring on a replacement after 20 minutes.
We will see it in operation during the
Lions tour
. This is no surprise and nobody should be shocked. It has already been in place in southern hemisphere rugby for several years.
Reasonable people understand the merits involved when serious foul play borders on the accidental or unavoidable. However, when it consists of slamming a shoulder into an opponent's face, for example, it is debatable whether the 20-minute red card should even be considered.
READ MORE
Let's think about the emperor's words in today's parlance. It would be very helpful if World Rugby drew us a modern-day sketch. By this, I mean video clips of what we can expect, including straight reds given in the past that would now lead to a replacement being introduced. They will have plenty of examples and could easily splice it together in an informative little movie.
Is French club rugby becoming more popular than Ligue 1?
Listen |
20:26
Bordeaux seem to represent a rare enough phenomenon; a domestic rugby team growing in both on-field and commercial success. They are the best attended club in France, to the extent they can boast to be more popular than the local football team. We all know of their on-field talent, the likes of Louis Bielle-Biarrey, Damian Penaud and Mathieu Jalibert playing a brand of rugby which is easy on the eye. Of course, with Joey Carbery and Noel McNamara involved, there is Irish interest in the French side as they prepare for Saturday's Champions Cup final. But how has the on-field product built into their off-field success? Is their rise an indication of France's domestic success, as rugby's television rights continues to dwarf those of football's Ligue 1? To what extent can this story be repeated elsewhere?Host Nathan Johns is joined on the podcast by France-based rugby journalist James Harrington.Produced by John Casey.
We did see one clip in the Challenge Cup final. Bath's Sam Underhill smashed head-on-head into Lyon fullback Davit Niniashvili. It was a horrible collision. Unfortunately, referee Hollie Davidson misread it, deeming that a so-called step inside by Niniashvili was sufficient to mitigate to yellow.
The referee clearly erred, with a chunk of criticism also to be laid at the door of the TMO, Mike Adamson, who failed to steer Davidson in the direction of a red card. Unsurprisingly, it has been cited. While the right team won, the referee will review her overall performance with a measure of disappointment. We've all been there – it comes with the job.
In sniper mode, Underhill had a clear line of sight to the target before he pulled the trigger. He didn't miss. When the global trial kicks off, this high-level foul play will go to the bunker. It's hard to believe that those in high places think this is what the game needs.
It is, we are told, designed to punish the player, but not to punish the team or the spectacle. Balancing safety with spectacle is an impossible task. Inevitably, it removes the safety element from its priority position.
An extra 10 minutes of bin time cannot possibly have the same deterrent effect as straight reds. Lengthy suspensions and fines for coaches were perhaps alternative options, but turkeys have a habit of not voting for Christmas.
The global trial announcement also informs us that referees can issue a straight red if they deem it appropriate. Oh, come on. Pull the other one! The evidence to date simply does not back that up. Referees send everything to the bunker and once it arrives there, it cannot be upgraded to a straight red.
Nika Amashukeli shows a yellow card to Tommy Freeman of Northampton Saints (not pictured) during last Saturday's Champions Cup final in Cardiff. Photograph:The minuscule number of straight reds given down south have been for truly heinous acts. Stamping, kicking, eye gouging, head butts and targeting the lower limbs at breakdown will, rightly, still see red. Dangerous collisions to the head, such as Underhill's, are not mentioned, despite being the primary cause of brain injury.
Recently, this column outlined an incident in a southern hemisphere fixture. It involved a spear tackle by the Blues' Mark Tele'a on his Reds opponent Tim Ryan. It went to the bunker, so Tele'a was replaced. The judiciary subsequently handed him a paltry three-match ban. If that's what we can expect, then this global trial decision risks being remembered as one of rugby's blackest days.
Referee Nika Amashukeli has found himself in many interesting matches. However,
last Saturday's Champions Cup final
provided him with a new level of difficulty. It was nonstop pressure-cooker stuff and both halves were like chalk and cheese. Bordeaux supporters will rarely have watched their team resort to a kicking game to grind out a win. Having dominated the first half with a blistering display of creative rugby, they found that Northampton had somehow hung in there.
They evened things up on the stroke of half-time with a try by the superb Alex Coles. He was then subjected to a defender sliding into him, knees first. It wasn't the worst cheap shot of its kind, but it warranted a penalty.
The second half saw a complete switch of tactics. Maxime Lucu and Matthieu Jalibert, kicking well and repeatedly, pinned the Northampton team in their own backyard, while French forward power supplied the only try of the half. This altered approach kept Northampton scoreless after half-time, which was quite some feat.
[
Why are so many young Irish rugby players moving to France?
Opens in new window
]
[
Matt Williams: Decision to abandon men's Sevens programme has shattered the dreams of generations of players
Opens in new window
]
There are few referees who could have come out of this torrid, attritional affair as well as the Georgian. The TMO, Marius Jonker, was also highly involved, some say too much. There was an unusually high number of critical moments and failing to advise the referee would not have pleased the teams' coaches, who demand microscopic perfection. Having let the players get on with things in a magical first half, Amashukeli became much busier as the match went into dogfight mode.
Nobody would contend that every refereeing decision was right as that's never going to happen. But it was a fine performance by the man in the middle, notable for his typical calm assuredness. At least half a dozen of his ilk are needed, but they don't appear to be emerging.
So, the European season ends with a deserved French victory – their fifth in succession. Who can halt their Napoleonic march towards a sixth? It won't be easy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Karen Duggan: Manager Carla Ward needs to park her fixation with attacking flair and embrace the Irish way
Belgium it is for Ireland in October's Nations League playoffs . They're a team you wouldn't be intimidated by, but you definitely need to respect them. They had a mixed bag of results and performances in a really tough League A group, some of which were poor while others were excellent. Their stand-out result was beating England at home. It is, then, hard to know what to expect from them. Instead of picking out their 5-0 defeat away to England and taking heart from it, it's much more important that we analyse how Ireland lost 4-0 away to Slovenia and learn from it. Yes, we won our other five group games, but that's the result that stands out. READ MORE It was a tough time for Carla Ward to come in . There had been no end of upheaval and disappointment before she arrived, not least with the defeat to Wales in the Euro 2025 playoffs and the subsequent departures of Eileen Gleeson and Colin Healy . Add in the retirements of Niamh Fahey, Louise Quinn, Diane Caldwell and Julie-Ann Russell – four leaders gone from the dressingroom and the pitch – and it was always going to be a challenge. There was also no getting away from Ward's own lack of experience at international level. But my worry throughout our League B campaign was the lack of balance between the Carla Ward way and the Irish way. It's all very well wanting a more adventurous attacking style, but it was our defensive strength and resoluteness that ultimately got us to the World Cup. We can't lose that. We can't afford to. It's not that she has reinvented the wheel with her preferred 4-4-2 system as all of our players have played it at some stage from underage up. But the effort to improve us going forward can't be done at the expense of us being defensively sound. That's the balance that has to be found. Maybe she underestimated Slovenia and overestimated us when we played them in February, but she went gung-ho, with too many attacking players on the pitch, some out of position. It just looked disjointed. We were torn apart. And that was the result that cost us top spot in the group. We were hearing too much about how it was a great job for her work-life balance She didn't quite know her team then and you'd hope she does now. But when you don't know your team, you need to err on the side of caution. I hope she's learned from that. We should certainly err on the side of caution against Belgium. They've been playing at a higher level than us recently and will have a Euro 2025 campaign behind them by the time we meet in October, so their intensity is going to be high. I didn't see any intensity from Ireland until that first half in Cork against Slovenia on Tuesday, in our final group game . By that stage, my concern had grown about how this team was shaping up. But there was real improvement that evening. We were excellent: back to basics, direct, strong, quick, playing for each other, taking responsibility. I thought it was all there – except we still didn't have the finishing. Louise Quinn with her son Darragh after her final appearance for Ireland against Slovenia in Cork last Tuesday. Photograph: Ryan Byrne/Inpho I wondered if that performance was an emotional reaction from the players to it being Louise Quinn's last game for Ireland, although I'd prefer to think that it was down to work done with Ward in training, having reviewed the team's struggles in the campaign until then. Either way, it was heartening after a less-than-stirring start to her time in charge. I think she started off with too much of a 'nice' approach to it all. We were hearing too much about how it was a great job for her work-life balance and how she loves the Irish way, the grit and determination. But sometimes you have to coax that out of the players too, especially when they had taken such a confidence hit from their defeat by Wales. I don't think that was addressed. The key for me is that she learns she has to bend a little bit on the Carla Ward way in favour of the Irish way until we're a bit more settled. It's all still a work in progress, I'm not sure she even knows her best starting 11 yet. And there's still scope for change on the player front. She has talked about the scouting efforts for new talent. She brought in Mel Filis, from the English Championship, in her first squad, and Erin Healy, from the Australian league, in her last, after both of them got their Irish passports. And that's fine. But both inclusions raised an eyebrow and in the end, neither played. I think you need to be very sure, when you pick these players, that they'll come in and make an impact. Otherwise, why not keep an eye on players closer to home? Such as Ellen Molloy, Jess Fitzgerald, Ellen Dolan and Joy Ralph, or any of the players coming through from the under-19s. Bring them in, give them a taste of where they need to get to in terms of making it at professional level. Have a look at them. If you don't rate them, fine. But give them a chance. In wider development terms, nothing seems to be working too well. Hannah Dingley left her role as head of women and girls' football after just a year. There was no impact. In with a whimper, out with a whimper. And the strategic plan that she presented was, to put it mildly, underwhelming. We need someone in that role who is willing to put a few years and a lot of blood, sweat and tears into it. It needs to be someone who is passionate about the development of the game here. Dingley's predecessor, Eileen Gleeson, was a great appointment. Would she be willing to take that role again? I don't know what her relationship is like with the FAI now. Ward could have done without all that drama, but her focus now has to be on getting past Belgium in the playoffs. It's been a damp squib of a start for her in this job, but there's time to get things right. The report card on her and her team, at this point, might say: 'Expect more from someone with their ability.'
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
LIV Golf shows what happens when a niche sport goes to war with itself – rugby should take note
This R360 stuff is interesting for the thunder that isn't rolling. Normally, when you come across a sport being sized up for attack by an outside disrupter, you can't move for sirens wailing and cannons firing in opposition. That doesn't quite seem to be the case with rugby in this instance, which raises the fascinating question of why that might be. It feels like a little more than just the usual rugby confidence in itself, although that is certainly part of it. World Rugby hasn't said anything about the proposed breakaway league spearheaded by former England international Mike Tindall. There hasn't been a peep out of any of the unions. None of the players' bodies have chirped up, either in support or in high dudgeon. Since nothing is yet official and all anybody has to go on is a strategically leaked business pitch and a year-old podcast rumination by Tindall, it's maybe no surprise that everyone is holding fire for now. But somewhere in the silence lies the uncomfortable truth that has set this thing in motion in the first place. Rugby is in a precarious place right now. Nobody can say with any confidence what it's going to look like in, say, a decade's time, but it probably won't look like this. Particularly in England, where three Premiership clubs have gone to the wall in recent seasons and seven of those remaining are losing money. READ MORE England is one of the great rugby nations on the planet and it is struggling to make the sport a viable business. Same goes for Wales , where the WRU is reducing its funding to two of the four regions. Same Down Under , where Rugby Australia recently announced a loss of $36.8 million (a shade under €21 million) for 2024 – and had the chutzpah to pass it off as good news because the Lions tour and next year's World Cup will bring in the bucks. So much jam tomorrow. Into this world, the arrival of an idea that is apparently attracting new sources of funding can't be dismissed out of hand. Especially when some of the people interested are reportedly established owners from the big, sexy, moneymaking leagues – the NFL, the Premier League, Formula 1. These are the lads with a proven record of turning existing sports into spun gold. If they think they have a way of making rugby viable, there's probably more rugby people than you think who are willing to give them a hearing. Instinctively though, it feels like the whole idea has two glaring issues. One, rugby is too small for a breakaway league to work. And two, rugby players aren't famous enough to build a breakaway league around. They're both variations on the same problem, but let's take them in order and use the most recent sports league disruptor as a case study. [ 'Crampgate' tells us rugby's code of dignity counts for little when lucrative online views are at stake Opens in new window ] Bryson DeChambeau celebrates his birdie putt on the 18th hole with a record 58 to win the LIV Golf Invitational - Greenbrier at The Old White Course in August 2023 in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia. Photograph:The first LIV Golf tournament took place this week in 2022. Since then, LIV has unquestionably gone on to establish itself as a player in the golf ecosystem. Whatever future the game has, LIV and its players will have to be dealt with, one way or the other. It's maybe no surprise that some of the people involved in R360 have worked on LIV. Plenty of commentators pooh-poohed LIV from the start and didn't envisage it lasting the course. That it's still here at all will be proof enough for some of those involved that a successful template exists and that rugby is ripe for its application. But the reality is that LIV has been a disaster for golf , simply because golf is far too niche a sport to be going to war with itself. By breaking away from the PGA Tour , LIV is running an unprofitable sports league that is bringing in pitiful broadcasting money and is only surviving because there's a bottomless well of Saudi oil cash to feed it. Rugby is played seriously in nine countries on the planet. In only two of those is it the number one sport – arguably only in one, given that football at least has parity in Wales these days. Rugby's problems stem from the fact that there are already not enough people who want to pay to watch it, be that in person or on the TV. Slicing the sausage even thinner makes it highly unlikely that more people will suddenly think it's worth shelling out for. That's especially true when you take the second lesson from the LIV disaster. LIV's signature achievement has been to slough off most of the interesting players away from the PGA Tour and hide them in a league that nobody watches. Jon Rahm , Bryson DeChambeau , Brooks Koepka , Phil Mickelson , Patrick Reed – these are (in some cases, were) some of the best players in the world and some of the most watchable. But they may as well be bog-snorkelling for their dime now, for all that anybody tunes in to see them. And yet, whatever LIV's problems, at least the idea of following individual sportspeople is already established in golf. People don't follow rugby players. They follow rugby teams. The international game is the financial engine of the sport not because Antoine Dupont plays for France and Sam Prendergast for Ireland, but because millions of people are invested in the outcome regardless of who is the blue nine and the Ireland 10. [ Craig Casey to captain Ireland for summer Tests against Georgia and Portugal Opens in new window ] [ Tiger Woods son Charlie fires 66 to clinch first career AJGA title Opens in new window ] Let's say – and this is entirely for argument's sake before anyone's lawyers get twitchy – that Dupont and Prendergast are R360 players in a couple of years' time, taking each other on in São Paulo, LA and Barcelona. Are you watching? Maybe. Do you care who wins? Not a chance. If it means that neither of them is playing for Ireland or France, will it stop you watching the Six Nations? Even less of a chance. Rugby will change in the coming years. It has to. But the R360 proposal seems to want to (a) chop an already small sport into even smaller pieces and (b) build a new entity around a group of players who are pretty much interchangeable to all but the sport's most engaged devotees. LIV Golf gets away with it because the Saudis seem comfortable emptying barrels of money into it indefinitely. Hard to imagine R360's backers aspiring to their munificence.
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ken Early: Heimir Hallgrímsson's plan very nearly pays off in Ireland's solid performance against Senegal
Last month, Heimir Hallgrímsson decided he would give most of Ireland's Championship-based players this international window off to make the most of their holidays. It may prove a far-sighted decision, but it didn't do much for excitement levels in advance of Friday night's Senegal match, where the vibe was less 'do or die' than 'let's get this over with'. So the Irish starting XI contained eight 2024-25 Premier League players, five of whom have just been relegated. The Irish set-up was 4-4-1-1 without the ball and 3-4-2-1 with the ball, with Robbie Brady and Kasey McAteer as the wide players and Ryan Manning and Ipswich's Jack Taylor supporting the centre-forward Adam Idah. It was more disappointing than surprising to see Evan Ferguson left out of the starting line-up. Despite a terrible season at club level, he scored one of the best goals by an Ireland player in years in his last game here, against Bulgaria. Hallgrímsson went with Taylor as the player closest to Idah up front. Taylor is generally used by Ipswich in a defensive midfield position. His selection here in a more attacking role showed the importance the Ireland manager attaches to physical strength through the team. That is consistent with an approach that puts a lot of importance on set pieces. In the second minute Ireland won a throw high on the left and Nathan Collins and Dara O'Shea both advanced into the Senegal penalty area for the long throw. Ireland's opening goal midway through the first half came from a set-piece, though not one that seemed to have gone exactly according to plan. READ MORE Matt Doherty was running in to attack Robbie Brady's corner at the far post but O'Shea reached the ball first and headed it back towards the edge of the box. As Doherty and O'Shea appeared to argue over what had gone wrong, Manning clipped it back towards the penalty spot and Nathan Collins flicked a looping head over the advancing Senegal defenders. Kasey McAteer had reacted quickest and although Yahvann Diouf saved his first header, he latched on to the rebound and buried it low for his first Ireland goal. The joy on McAteer's face reminded you that not everybody considered this match a meaningless chore. Ireland's Adam Idah with Abdoulaye Seck and Abdou Diallo of Senegal. Photograph: Bryan Keane/Inpho McAteer was seeing a fair bit of the ball, Dara O'Shea often picking him out with raking passes from left centre back. The right-sided wide role has been variously filled by Mikey Johnston, Festy Ebosele and Chiedozie Ogbene in Hallgrímsson's eight previous matches, but on this showing McAteer is as strong an option as any of these. Certainly he has the physicality the manager likes. Ireland's performance in the first half was the kind that managers love while the fans rose en masse at the 40-minute mark to beat the queues at the bar. Solid, organised, going close on a few occasions, denying the opponents any sight of goal, getting a goal and keeping a clean sheet? There may not have been much to cheer about, but there was very little to complain about either. The start of the second half was enlivened by the invasion of a flock of seagulls, maybe attracted by the smell of half-time chips. They glided low over the seats in the west stand hunting for food before perching on the huge steel girders of the roof. The birds all sat facing the stands rather than the pitch. [ Hallgrímsson stresses Ireland's World Cup ambitions before valuable Senegal test Opens in new window ] They were missing Senegal gradually working their way back into the game. Caoimhín Kelleher had had nothing to do in the first half, but early in the second he needed to stretch to tip a header on to the underside of the bar. A few minutes later he was scrambling another ball clear after O'Shea had inadvertently deflected a cross on to the Irish post. The Irish goalkeeper's luck couldn't hold forever. Everton's Iliman Ndiaye is a useful dribbler but Andrew Moran – who had just come on as substitute – will be disappointed with how easy Ndiaye made beating him look. Ireland goalkeeper Caoimhin Kelleher watches the ball go just wide at the Aviva Stadium on Friday. Photograph: Laszlo Geczo/Inpho The Senegalese attacker dribbled in from the right before hitting a low cross that took a deflection away from goal along the way, wrong-footing the Irish defence and allowing Cherif Ndiaye to get off a low shot from eight yards. Kelleher stuck out his left foot to save the first effort but was powerless to stop Ismaila Sarr finishing off the rebound. After four wins and four defeats, this was the first draw of Hallgrímsson's tenure. The day before the match he had talked about how the identity and the principles of the team were becoming clearer all the time. The performance here bore that out to a certain extent, though this occasion lacked the intensity of a serious qualifying match. It goes without saying that neither Senegal nor Ireland looked anywhere near the level of Ireland's qualifying opponents, Portugal, as they came back to beat Germany in Munich in the Nations League semi-final during the week. Come the World Cup qualifiers in the autumn, less will depend on what has happened in these two summer friendlies, and more on whether between now and then Evan Ferguson can find himself a club, get some minutes on the field, and play himself back into the kind of form he was showing two years ago.
