logo
This Canadian 'content farm' topped the politics charts on YouTube — before it was taken down

This Canadian 'content farm' topped the politics charts on YouTube — before it was taken down

Yahoo23-05-2025

A YouTube account that was the most popular Canada-based news and politics channel during much of the 2025 federal election has been taken down by YouTube, following inquiries from CBC News's visual investigations team and Radio-Canada's Décrypteurs.
Real Talk Politiks regularly published confrontational, partisan video clips about politics that have been watched by millions of people.
The channel racked up almost 70 million views from April 3 to April 30, according to data from ViewStats.com. It's currently the third-most viewed Canada-based news and politics channel over the last three months.
It's just one example of what experts refer to as the "content" or "engagement" farming phenomenon, in which individuals or organizations tailor their content to tap into the algorithm of the platform and boost their popularity.
WATCH | The story behind this chart-topping Canada-based 'content farm':
"[It's a] particular form of a content farm, right? Because a content farm can take many different forms," said Paris Marx, a Canadian-based technology expert and host of the podcast Tech Won't Save Us.
"These channels ... seem to be using political content in particular, and what they feel is going to drive engagement," he said. Marx noted that political content farms could be both left- or right-leaning.
"Some of them will be just searching for the way that they are going to make the most money … And so they begin to shape their content to align with what is going to work on the platform."
Changing subject matter
CBC News's visual investigations unit looked into the Real Talk Politiks account and found its videos were highly formulaic and that the focus of the channel, along with a sister account on TikTok, had changed over the past few years — moving from finance content to videos covering Canadian and American politics and now almost exclusively dedicated to U.S. politics.
Short-form videos on the YouTube channel often featured a conservative figure as they "humiliate," "destroy" or "humble" a liberal one. The approximately one-minute-long videos feature what seems to be an AI voiceover and include some edits and images to illustrate what is being discussed. One of the recent videos was entitled "Canada's Corrupt WOKE Government."
Aengus Bridgman, director of the Media Ecosystem Observatory at McGill University and the University of Toronto, told Radio-Canada that content similar to Real Talk Politiks is increasingly dominant on social media.
"It's like an interesting AI-generated, entrepreneurial brain rot, news-type combination — it's not news. It's not information-rich, new facts. It's exactly the type of stuff that people were concerned about social media users overly consuming," he said.
YouTube confirmed the channel was taken down due to violations of YouTube's policies on spam, deceptive practices and scams. A spokesperson pointed to the company's rules around the use of AI and labelling requirements.
"We also continue to enforce our Community Guidelines and remove content violating our policies, regardless of how the content is made," the spokesperson said.
Emailing from an address attached to the YouTube channel, the person behind Real Talk Politiks did not reveal their name but told CBC News that YouTube's decision was "deeply mistaken" and that the company's "vague enforcement undermines creators trying to operate within the rules."
They also strongly denied the characterization of the account as a "content farm."
"The 'content farm' label suggests mass-produced, misleading content built solely to exploit platform mechanics. That doesn't describe this project at all," the creator said.
"The mission of the channel has always been to broaden political discourse by reaching audiences — especially younger and less traditionally engaged viewers — who are often left out of mainstream conversations."
CBC News had initially reached out to YouTube for comment on Real Talk Politiks and the company's policies around content farms, and included an example of a video published by Real Talk Politiks that featured an AI-altered Ronald Reagan telling a joke.
The joke, which appears to have originated in the mid-2000s, possibly as a chain email, was never told in public by Reagan. The video adapts footage from the former U.S. president's final address from the Oval Office with an AI voiceover. It was posted by Real Talk Politiks and several other accounts seen by CBC News.
Real Talk Politiks told CBC News they were not aware the Reagan video was AI-generated, having found the clip elsewhere on YouTube, without an AI label.
Along with the Real Talk Politiks video, CBC News flagged two other instances of the Reagan video to YouTube. One account was taken down and one video had a "synthetic or altered video" flag added to it.
The Real Talk Politiks channel is one of many that use similar techniques to engage viewers and thus boost potential revenue. Radio-Canada's Décrypteurs found dozens of channels posting these kinds of videos, some of which had also racked up millions of views.
Several of the channels found by Radio-Canada also covered politics, though not always with the rightward lean of Real Talk Politiks. Several channels, such as one called Real Progressive Politics, which posts similar videos but with a general anti-Trump tone, has a channel description that closely resembles Real Talk Politiks and uses the same voiceover. It's not clear who controls many of the similar-looking accounts, including Real Progressive Politics.
Elizabeth Dubois, an associate professor at the University of Ottawa who studies technology and communication, said accounts like Real Talk Politiks are taking advantage of a trend among internet users toward more opinion-based information and "distrust of mainstream media."
"These types of accounts are presenting themselves as the way to get informed and they are embedding partisan perspectives typically within that information delivery," Dubois said. "So it's really causing this shift in what information people are receiving, and it's also going to force us to really reconsider what we think of as media literacy."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who's responsible for online harms? Responsibility for troubled file floats between ministers
Who's responsible for online harms? Responsibility for troubled file floats between ministers

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Who's responsible for online harms? Responsibility for troubled file floats between ministers

OTTAWA — As ministers settle into their new roles, discussions are underway about who is best suited to steer the government's efforts to legislate against online harms, cabinet minister Steven Guilbeault said on Tuesday. Questions have arisen about which minister and department would be best suited to handle the complicated issue after the Liberals' proposed Online Harms Act died in Parliament when Prime Minister Mark Carney triggered a federal election in March. 'It's a good question,' said Guilbeault, who oversees the Canadian Heritage department, told reporters on his way into the Liberals' weekly cabinet meeting. 'We're having conversations to see what would be the most appropriate department to bring this forward.' Canadian Heritage had been the first department to develop and later introduce the Liberals' initial plan to combat the harms Canadian users experience online. That proposal, which was released in 2021, was met with widespread backlash over concerns about the requirement for social media companies to remove content within 24 hours after receiving a complaint. Experts had warned the provision was overly broad and risked infringing on free expression, given that companies could remove legal content. The Liberals then struck an advisory group and got to work on figuring out a Plan B. Responsibility for the bill also shifted from Canadian Heritage to the Justice Department. In early 2024, former justice minister Arif Vriani introduced Bill C-63, which proposed to create a new digital safety regulator that would be tasked with ensuring social media giants took steps to reduce users' access to content, such as child sex abuse images and incite extremism and violence. That bill was also met with backlash over its proposal to introduce stiffer sentences for hate-related offences and reintroduce a controversial section to the Canadian Human Rights Act to allow people to bring forward complaints of hate speech, which civil liberties advocates and Parliamentarians said risked violating free speech. Virani spent months defending the need for the tougher Criminal Code measures to be included in the online safety bill, but last December announced the government was prepared to split the bill to help get it passed. In January, former prime minister Justin Trudeau announced his resignation and that Parliament would be suspended until March. Emily Laidlaw, a Canada Research Chair in cybersecurity law at the University of Calgary, who sat on the government's expert advisory group, said it was a mistake for the government to have combined different provisions into the same legislation and that by the time it announced the legislation would be split, 'it was too late.' 'What I'm hoping is, when they reintroduce it, they have very firmly the platform regulation law,' she says. Should the Liberals want to propose changes to the Criminal Code or the Canadian Human Rights Act, that should be separate, she said. Justice Minister Sean Fraser told reporters on Tuesday that the government was going to look at different measures when it comes to protecting children online, but would have more to say in the months ahead. One new factor in how the Liberals may decide to proceed is the fact that Carney named to his cabinet the country's first minister responsible for artificial intelligence and digital innovation, a position currently held by former broadcaster Evan Solomon, who was elected in late April's general election. The Liberals in their last bill listed AI-generated sexualized 'deepfakes' as one of the harms companies would have to take steps to tackle. Asked whether online harms would fall under his mandate, Solomon told reporters on Tuesday that it was 'up for debate.' 'But probably yeah.' Laidlaw said while she does not believe the government needs to start a new round of consultations, it ought to take a second look at the scope of harms it is seeking to tackle. For example, she suggested there was room to include the issue of identity fraud. 'I actually think it should be broadened to include some of the ways that AI can be used to facilitate harm, so it might not just be the typical social media on Instagram.' National Post staylor@ Hate crime laws to be split from Liberals' online harms bill after blowback PBO: Creating proposed online harms regulators estimated to cost $200M Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

LA anti-ICE looters shatter Apple store and make off with iPhones, Adidas in another night of chaos
LA anti-ICE looters shatter Apple store and make off with iPhones, Adidas in another night of chaos

New York Post

time14 minutes ago

  • New York Post

LA anti-ICE looters shatter Apple store and make off with iPhones, Adidas in another night of chaos

Looters tore apart stores across Los Angeles as daytime protests against ICE-immigration raids descended into chaos overnight, yet again — and even a museum dedicated to Japanese-American immigrants was vandalized. Windows were smashed and merchandise was stolen at LA's Broadway Apple store Monday night, while down the block the Adidas store was broken into and robbed of sneakers by frenzied crowds. The windows of a nearby jewelry store were also smashed open and the shop's shelves were completely emptied by looters, while two marijuana dispensaries and a pharmacy were also raided, according to NBC 4. 4 A worker boards up an Adidas store after it was looted following days of protests against federal immigration sweeps and the deployment of the California National Guard and U.S. Marines, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS Footage from the chaos showed mobs masked and hooded hooligans pouring into the stores and grabbing armloads of whatever was in sight and then pouring back out onto the street spilling goods as they fled. Some ran right into the ranks of waiting cops, but many were able to muscle themselves free from the overwhelmed officers and escape. 'This is so ridiculous. This doesn't look like they're protesting for ICE or anything. Just looting the stores,' one fed up business owner who watched the overnight chaos unfold told News Nation. Across town in Little Tokyo, a sushi restaurant — Otoro Sushi — even had its doors ripped open by mobs, with troublemakers appearing to make off with a computer monitor and other equipment while onlookers yelled that they were 'Making us look bad.' 4 Products lie scattered in an Apple store after it was looted following days of protests against federal immigration sweeps and the deployment of the California National Guard and U.S. Marines, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS 4 People clean graffiti after days of protests against federal immigration sweeps and the deployment of the California National Guard and US Marines, outside the Japanese American National Museum in Little Tokyo, Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS The Japanese American National Museum was even targeted, with 'F**k ICE' and other graffiti spray-painted across windows, walls, and even over what appeared to be an outdoor exhibit about Japanese-American soldiers who fought in WWII as their families were locked away in internment camps. Volunteers flocked to the museum Tuesday morning with brushes and soap to help scrub away what vandalism they could, photos showed. And back on Broadway workers were seen laboring to sweep up and take stock of the damaged stores, while shattered windows and doors were boarded up. 4 Broken glass lies on the floor of a cannabis stores after it was looted following days of protests against federal immigration sweeps and the deployment of the California National Guard and U.S. Marines, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS At least 14 people were arrested for looting, according to police, while another 96 were arrested for failure to disperse. The protests were expected to continue for a fifth day and night Tuesday, as President Trump dispatched another round of National Guard troops — as well as Marines forces — to quell the chaos. Those deployments — which California's and LA's Democrat leaders say have done nothing but fuel the chaos in the city — is expected to cost at least $134 million, the Pentagon revealed Tuesday. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said its likely the troops will remain in LA for about 60 days, telling a House budget hearing that the protestors were 'rioters, looters and thugs.' Chaos was sparked in the City of Angels Friday after ICE carried out numerous raids to arrest suspected illegal immigrants. Activists attempted to block the raids and later picketed a downtown detention center where some of the detainees were being held, before the demonstrations snowballed into all-out riots in some areas.

House GOP secures four key witnesses in Biden mental-decline probe as former aides agree to talk
House GOP secures four key witnesses in Biden mental-decline probe as former aides agree to talk

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

House GOP secures four key witnesses in Biden mental-decline probe as former aides agree to talk

Four former Biden aides have agreed to voluntarily testify in House Oversight Republican's investigation into an alleged cover-up of former President Joe Biden's mental decline and potentially unauthorized issuance of sweeping pardons and other executive actions. The four voluntary, transcribed interviews, confirmed today by a GOP Oversight Committee aide, will include the director of Biden's former Domestic Policy Council, Neera Tanden, Biden's assistant and senior advisor to the first lady, Anthony Bernal, former special assistant to Biden and Deputy Director of Oval Office Operations, Ashley Williams, and Biden's Deputy Chief of Staff, Annie Tomasini. Comer Widens Biden 'Cover-up' Probe, Seeks Interviews With Anita Dunn And Ron Klain Tanden will appear before the House Oversight Committee on June 24, Bernal two days later on June 26, while Williams will testify July 11 and Tomasini on July 18. News of the voluntary testimonies comes after Biden's former White House doctor, Kevin O'Connor, declined to sit for a transcribed interview on June 27, according to Oversight Committee Republicans leading the probe. As a result of O'Connor's refusal to voluntarily testify, House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., served him with a subpoena to compel his testimony. Read On The Fox News App Biden's Personal Doctor Summoned As Republicans Dig Deeper Into Alleged Cognitive Decline Cover-up Comer began an investigation into whether those comprising Biden's inner-circle knowingly colluded to hide the former president's declining mental acuity and used methods to circumvent the former president when it came to the issuance of important orders, particularly through the use of an autopen tool used to mimic the president's signature. Last week, President Donald Trump also ordered the Department of Justice to open an investigation into the matter. The president directed Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House counsel David Warrington to handle the investigation. In response to the Trump administration's call for an investigation, Biden declared he was the only one who "made the decisions" during his presidency and called Trump's efforts a "distraction." "Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false," Biden said. "This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations." Fox News Digital reached out to the former president's office for comment on this new development, but did not hear back in time for article source: House GOP secures four key witnesses in Biden mental-decline probe as former aides agree to talk

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store