Disgraced lawyer 'can't attend court hearing due to wedding'
A disgraced lawyer serving time for money laundering can't attend court for a hearing as he's attending a wedding on the same day, a judge heard.
Iain Robertson, 71, told judge Olga Pasportnikov on Monday that he wouldn't be able present for a proceeds of crime case on June 23.
The High Court in Edinburgh heard that this was because he was a guest at a marriage ceremony on the same day.
Robertson, who is representing himself in a bid by the Crown to recover money he made from a £1.5m laundering racket, told judge Pasportnikov: 'I'm on home leave for a wedding that day. I have a week of home leave every month.'
Robertson, of Kilmacolm, Renfrewshire, is currently the subject of an action brought by prosecutors under proceeds of crime laws.
Robertson was given eight years in January 2023. He and two other corrupt solicitors – Alistair Blackwood, 69, and David Lyons – used their law firm Robertson & Ross in Paisley, Renfrewshire, to launder cash obtained illegally.
The trio acted alongside Mohammed Aziz, 63, and Robert Ferguson, 69, in a course of criminal activity.
The five men were sentenced following a nine week trial at the High Court in Glasgow before judge Lord Richardson.
The trial was the culmination of a process which had been triggered by a Law Society probe into activities at the firm.
They were convicted of fraud and multiple charges under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
Robertson, Lyons and Aziz were also convicted on charges of being involved in serious organised crime. All were sent to prison.
Prosecutors told jurors the case centred on four transactions carried out between May 2015 and July 2016.
The first transaction involved a £79,340 stolen cheque due to be paid to a law firm in Jersey.
The next centred on £240,000 from a fraudulent house sale in London.
The third transaction saw £985,000 stolen from the hacked bank account of an individual.
And the final illegal activity was uncovered after Robertson claimed to be acting for a man who wanted to sell his home in Essex.
The court heard that the 'seller' was said to be staying at a flat that turned out to be Ferguson's address.
A total of £181,786 was made from the fraudulent sale.
In each transaction, the proceeds were funnelled through the client bank account held by Robertson's firm in Paisley, Robertson & Ross
Limited, and false records were created to make them appear legitimate.
Fake papers and fake IDs – including a passport and driver's licence – were collated in a bid to cover up the crimes.
The Law Society raised concerns about several of these transactions before alerting police to the potential illegal activity.
The trial heard that lawyer Robertson, who has been suspended by the Law Society along with Blackwood, was at the heart of the money-laundering scheme since he had access to his firm's client account.
Judge Pasportnikov fixed a hearing in the proceeds case to take place on June 30, 2025.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Disgraced lawyer from Kilmacolm can't attend court date due to wedding
Iain Robertson, 71, told judge Olga Pasportnikov on Monday that he wouldn't be able to be present for a proceeds of crime case on June 23, 2025. The High Court in Edinburgh heard that this was because he was a guest at a marriage ceremony on the same day. Robertson, who is representing himself in a bid by the Crown to recover money he made from a £1.5 million laundering racket, told judge Pasportnikov: 'I'm on home leave for a wedding that day. I have a week of home leave every month.' Robertson, of Kilmacolm, is currently the subject of an action brought by prosecutors under proceeds of crime laws. Robertson was given eight years in January 2023. He and two other corrupt solicitors - Alistair Blackwood, 69, and David Lyons - used their law firm Robertson & Ross in Paisley to launder cash obtained illegally. The trio acted alongside Mohammed Aziz, 63, and Robert Ferguson, 69, in a course of criminal activity. The five men were sentenced following a nine-week trial at the High Court in Glasgow before judge Lord Richardson. READ MORE: Man made £442k in ill-gotten gains during time as drug dealer The trial was the culmination of a process which had been triggered by a Law Society probe into activities at the firm. They were convicted of fraud and multiple charges under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Robertson, Lyons and Aziz were also convicted on charges of being involved in serious organised crime. All were sent to prison. Prosecutors told jurors the case centred on four transactions carried out between May 2015 and July 2016. The first transaction involved a £79,340 stolen cheque due to be paid to a law firm in Jersey. The next centred on £240,000 from a fraudulent house sale in London. The third transaction saw £985,000 stolen from the hacked bank account of an individual. And the final illegal activity was uncovered after Robertson claimed to be acting for a man who wanted to sell his home in Essex. READ MORE: Four men jailed after £6m corruption and bribery probe at health boards The court heard that the "seller" was said to be staying at a flat that turned out to be Ferguson's address. A total of £181,786 was made from the fraudulent sale. In each transaction, the proceeds were funnelled through the client bank account held by Robertson's firm in Paisley, Robertson & Ross. Limited and false records were created to make them appear legitimate. Fake papers and fake IDs - including a passport and driver's licence - were collated in a bid to cover up the crimes. The Law Society raised concerns about several of these transactions before alerting police to the potential illegal activity. The trial heard that lawyer Robertson, who has been suspended by the Law Society along with Blackwood, was at the heart of the money-laundering scheme since he had access to his firm's client account. Judge Pasportnikov fixed a hearing in the proceeds case to take place on June 30, 2025.
Belfast Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Moldovan courier company advertising people trafficking services on Facebook, Belfast court hears
A Moldovan-based courier company advertising on Facebook is at the centre of an investigation into a suspected people smuggling operation, the High Court heard today. Prosecutors said two men and a woman working for the firm were stopped at Belfast port in a van carrying Romanian nationals who were illegally in the United Kingdom.
North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Dale Vince's High Court claim against Daily Mail publisher thrown out
Mr Vince brought legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) over an article headlined 'Labour repays £100,000 to sex pest donor', published in June 2023. The story reported that the Labour Party was handing back money to donor Davide Serra with a picture showing Mr Vince holding a Just Stop Oil banner. This picture, published in print and on The Mail+ app, was changed to one of Mr Serra online 47 minutes after publication, while the original picture of Mr Vince remained in the print version. An employment tribunal in 2022 heard Mr Serra had made sexist comments to a female colleague which were found to amount to unlawful harassment related to sex. Mr Vince claimed ANL misused his personal data and that the publication of his photograph with this story would lead readers to believe he had been accused of sexual harassment. ANL had defended the claim, with its lawyers previously telling the High Court in London that it was an abuse of process and a 'resurrection' of a libel claim that was dismissed last year. In a judgment on Monday, a High Court judge threw out the data protection claim. Mr Justice Swift said: 'There is no real prospect that Mr Vince will succeed on his claim. 'As in the defamation proceedings, it is accepted that on reading the text of the article published in Mail+ and the Daily Mail any ordinary reader would very quickly realise that Mr Vince was not being accused of sexual harassment. 'Considered on this basis the personal data relating to Mr Vince was processed fairly.' He said there was 'every reason' why the data protection claim should have been heard with the defamation claim last year. 'Both claims arose out of the same event, the publication of the article in Mail+ and the Daily Mail,' he added. 'Both claims rely on the same factual circumstances, namely the juxtaposition of the headline, photographs and caption, and the contention that the combination of the headline and the photograph created the misleading impression that Mr Vince had been accused of sexual harassment.' Following the decision, Mr Vince said he planned to appeal. He said: 'What we're dealing with here is a media law that predates the internet. Think about that. Essentially, UK law says that people read entire articles and not just headlines. 'We all know this is untrue, the internet has changed everything, modern attention spans are famously small and shrinking, dwell times on articles are measured in seconds and media organisations have an abundance of data on this.' He continued: 'The judge said if you read the whole story, you'd realise the headline was not about me, begging the question why was my face highlighted in the articles perhaps. 'But more importantly, people don't read entire articles, the law assumes it – but does so wrongly, against all data and against common sense.'
