Victoria's Secret adopts poison pill to halt hostile takeover
This story was originally published on Retail Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Retail Dive newsletter.
Victoria's Secret & Co's board of directors approved the adoption of a limited-duration shareholder rights plan, or poison pill, to protect the best interest of shareholders, according to a Tuesday announcement. The plan was effective Tuesday and expires in one year.
The strategy is in response to the 'substantial accumulation' of Victoria's Secret stock by investment firm BBRC International. BBRC began increasing its position in Victoria's Secret in March to around 13% of outstanding shares.
Victoria's Secret will issue one right per share of common stock on May 29, which will become exercisable if a shareholder acquires a 15% or higher stake.
Victoria's Secret is pushing back after an Australian investment firm acquired a considerable amount of the company's stock.
Victoria's Secret said that, for nearly three years, BBRC acquired stock in violation of U.S. antitrust law. The retailer said the investment firm failed to file forms required under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. BBRC has since made corrective filings that would permit the firm to acquire nearly 50% of Victoria's Secret's voting stock once the waiting period expires on Wednesday.
A poison pill is a way of deterring investors from amassing enough shares to take control of a company or stage a takeover without the board's approval.
'In light of the circumstances and consistent with its fiduciary duties, the Board determined it was necessary to adopt a rights plan to protect the long-term interests of all Victoria's Secret shareholders and guard against tactics to gain control of the company without paying all shareholders an appropriate premium for that control,' Donna James, board chair, said in a statement.
BBRC did not respond to Retail Dive's request for comment.
Victoria's Secret has been in talks with BBRC representatives and its owner, billionaire businessman Brett Blundy, for the past three years. 'We value Mr. Blundy's input as a shareholder and look forward to continuing our dialogue,' James said.
However, the retailer pointed to BBRC's track record of acquiring controlling interests in retail companies and its recent launch of lingerie, sleepwear and beauty brand, Léays.
Blundy also founded Bras N Things in the 1980s and eventually sold it to Hanesbrands in 2018 for around $400 million.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
37 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
I think it's time to start planning for people in my position: Glenn Maxwell announces ODI retirement
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 2, 2025, 11:55 IST Australian allrounder Glenn Maxwell has announced his retirement from One Day Internationals (ODIs), bringing an end to a vibrant career that spanned over a decade. Maxwell, 35, made the decision to shift his full focus to T20 cricket, with an eye on the 2026 T20 World Cup in India and Sri Lanka. Maxwell played 149 ODIs for Australia between 2012 and 2025, amassing 3990 runs at an explosive strike rate of 126.70 and an average of 33.81. With the ball, he took 77 wickets with his offspin and was also a key fielder, taking 91 catches. His most iconic moment came during the 2023 World Cup, where he scored a sensational unbeaten 201 against Afghanistan—widely hailed as one of the greatest ODI innings of all time. The Victorian was part of Australia's victorious World Cup campaigns in 2015 and 2023 and leaves the format with four centuries and 23 fifties to his name. Reflecting on his journey, Maxwell told The Final Word Podcast , 'I was just proud to be playing a couple of games for Australia… I always said I wouldn't hold on to a spot selfishly. It's time to let others build towards 2027.' Cricket Australia confirmed the decision, noting Maxwell's plans to focus on the Big Bash League and international T20 commitments. George Bailey, Chair of Selectors and former captain, praised Maxwell's legacy: 'He will be remembered as one of ODI cricket's most dynamic players. His commitment to Australia and ability to deliver on the big stage has been second to none.' Maxwell's last ODI appearance came earlier this year in the Champions Trophy against India. He is currently sidelined with a leg injury that ruled him out of the IPL. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Business of Fashion
2 hours ago
- Business of Fashion
Explainer: How Retailers Can Fight a New Wave of Cyberattacks
Last week, Victoria's Secret went dark. On May 28, the lingerie giant shut down its website following a 'security incident,' the company said in a statement. (It did not confirm what caused the disruption). While the site was only down for two days, it likely cost Victoria's Secret millions in sales, adding another hurdle to its ongoing turnaround plan under new leader Hillary Super. The company's stock dropped as much as 8 percent the day it closed its site. It was just the latest technological dustup in a wave of cyberattacks on some of fashion's biggest brands and retailers. Bloomberg reported that in January hackers accessed some of Dior's customer data, then in April, UK-based high street retailer Marks & Spencer was forced to stop taking online orders after a security breach and in May, Harrods briefly restricted website access after hackers attempted to break into its systems. For years, the threat of security breaches — where individuals and organisations hack systems to access customer data such as contact information and credit card details — have haunted companies across industries, from Target to MGM Resorts. The frequency of these attacks is only growing: In 2024, the number of individuals and groups targeting companies' systems that cybersecurity consultancy S-RM engaged with across 600 incidents grew 96 percent year over year. These attacks can be extremely detrimental to a company's bottom line: Marks & Spencer still hasn't reopened its e-commerce operations, and doesn't expect to do so until July. The incident will likely end up costing the company as much as £300 million ($404 million) in lost profits. But the impact can be even further-reaching. Many cyber criminals require companies to pay multi-million dollar ransoms to regain access to their networks and even once the attack is over, retailers must work to avoid sustaining lasting reputational damage. The recent uptick in activity puts an extra burden on retailers to tighten existing cybersecurity processes or invest in additional tools that could chip away at profits. 'From a business perspective, it's nothing if not unfair [to the companies impacted by it],' said Simeon Siegel, managing director and senior analyst of retail and e-commerce at BMO Capital Markets. In the event of a cyber attack, companies have 'to balance short term fixes, while ensuring they don't have [long-term] implications,' he added. BoF breaks down what leaves fashion businesses vulnerable to cyberattacks and how they can protect themselves. How does this happen? Cyberattacks are typically orchestrated by groups that find and exploit a company's technological shortcomings. The culprit can often be difficult to trace, because even when law enforcement tracks them down, individuals can splinter into other smaller organisations. Criminals can also act individually by finding hacking tools on the dark web, said Christian Beckner, vice president of retail technology and cybersecurity at NRF. The tactics range in their level of sophistication. One of the common ways hackers infiltrate a company's systems is through 'phishing' — the dreaded emails where, posing as a company executive, they encourage employees to click a link that, if opened, can give them access to an organisation's entire data network. They can also use employee voice impersonation tools to target a company's customer service call centres, Beckner said. 'If one employee accidentally clicks a link in an email, it may not matter how protected and up-to-date your technology is,' Siegel said. 'Human error can supersede the most advanced technology.' Cyberattackers will target any industry with high transaction volumes, making fashion an appealing target. Plus, because most retail giants operate their e-commerce storefronts on years-old custom platforms that are likely outdated, they are particularly vulnerable, said Juan Pellerano-Rendón, chief marketing officer at e-commerce software start-up Swap. 'A lot of times these larger conglomerates have IT teams, and they're updating their website regularly, but security might not always be at the top of their list,' Pellerano-Rendón added. Retailers that operate with thin margins have historically been slower to invest in cybersecurity over tools like a website redesign that can immediately drive revenue, said Sam Rubin, senior vice president of consulting and threat intelligence for Unit 42 at cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks. 'You could spend several million dollars on cybersecurity and feel safer and be safer, but what's going to show up on your P&L is greater operating expenses without a necessarily highly visible tangible benefit,' Rubin said. 'Sometimes that does get neglected in favor of driving top line growth in business.' How should retailers respond? When a company is hacked, they often have no choice but to shut down services until they can find the culprit and boot them out of their network. Preventing an initial cyberattack can be a near impossible task as cyber criminals' tools become more advanced and accessible. Many retailers have increased cybersecurity measures in recent years, specifically around payment processing, Beckner said. Customers' financial information wasn't compromised in many of the recent attacks, which is the scariest violation for many customers and therefore a natural priority for companies to prevent. To lower the risk of repeat offenses, retailers have to 'assess where there might be existing vulnerabilities in your IT systems and services, and patch and upgrade those where they existed,' Beckner added, including adding multi-step authentications for company log-ins and conducting additional training for employees across the organisation. The latest run of cybersecurity hiccups could also push major retailers to make big personnel changes such as hiring heads of security (if they don't have them already), according to Pellerano-Rendón. They might also consider using more e-commerce services from software giants like Shopify that routinely update their software, making it more difficult to infiltrate, he added. Companies can institute drills where they work with third party firms to simulate an attack to better assess the strength of their existing systems and what additional processes they need to implement, said Steve Ross, director of cybersecurity, Americas at S-RM. In the aftermath of an attack, retailers also must do damage control in order to make sure their customers feel safe buying from them again. Shoppers today are aware that technology violations occur and are outside of a company's control, 'and not necessarily that Victoria's Secret or Marks & Spencer has betrayed their trust in any way,' Pellerano-Rendón said. Still, retailers need to tell customers whose personal information may have been compromised exactly which steps they've taken to protect their data down the line. 'It really comes down to making sure you're communicating … and having that plan in place to quickly bounce back,' Beckner said.
CNBC
4 hours ago
- CNBC
Stocks of Australia's Soul Patts and Brickworks surge after merger ends 56-year cross-ownership
Stocks of Australian investment firm Washington H. Soul Pattinson, also known as Soul Patts, and its affiliate Brickworks surged after both companies announced a A$14 billion ($9 billion) merger. Shares of Soul Patts traded 13.78% higher, while Brickworks, Australia's largest brickmaker, jumped 22.32% as of 1 p.m. local time. As part of the deal, a new company listed in Sydney will acquire all outstanding shares of Soul Patts and Brickworks. The merged entity is projected to be worth around A$14 billion ($9 billion), with holdings across real estate, private equity, and credit totaling A$13.1 billion. "Merging Soul Patts with Brickworks makes a lot of strategic and financial sense," Soul Patts CEO and Managing Director, Todd Barlow, said in a statement. He added that the deal "simplifies the structure, adds scale, and creates a more investable company." The merger will unwind a 56-year mutual ownership that was designed to fend off hostile takeovers and promote long-term investment strategies. Soul Patts owns 43% of Brickworks, while the brickmaker has a 26% stake in Soul Patts. However, critics argued that it suppressed shareholder value and corporate transparency. Brickworks shareholders are set to receive an implied value of A$30.28 per share, reflecting a 10.1% premium over the stock's closing price last Friday. Pitt Capital Partners is acting as adviser to Soul Pattinson, and Citigroup Global Markets Australia is advising Brickworks. The merger follows several unsuccessful attempts to unwind the cross-shareholding between Soul Patts and Brickworks, including a concerted effort by Perpetual Investment Management and venture capitalist Mark Carnegie between 2012 and 2017, which was dismissed after the Federal Court ruled that the structure was not detrimental to shareholders.
