logo
The £5 Amazon buy Alan Titchmarsh says is the ‘only thing that really works' at stopping slugs attacking your plants

The £5 Amazon buy Alan Titchmarsh says is the ‘only thing that really works' at stopping slugs attacking your plants

The Sun2 days ago

SLUGS are the bane of every gardener's life.
But Britain's favourite gardening expert Alan Titchmarsh has one method that he swears by for combating the slimy slitherers.
3
3
Writing in County Life, the 76-year-old spoke about his lifelong battle with the garden pests - and his resistance to the idea that 'slugs are our friend'.
The Gardening Club star says he favours copper rings that sit around the base of the plant.
The copper rings are more expensive as they can be reused multiple times - they typically retail for between £25 and £30.
However, those who are greenfingered on a budget can instead invest in copper tape - which works in the same fashion and is available for only £4.99 on Amazon for a 25-metre roll.
Titchmarsh said: "The only things that have worked for me are those rings of copper that resemble a vicar's clerical collar and which can be pushed into the ground around individual plants to discourage the molluscs from coming any closer.
"They are reputed (if kept clean) to impart a kind of electric shock to any slug or snail attempting to scale their dizzying height of 1in."
How does copper tape work?
The copper tape works by imparting an electrical charge that gives the slug a small static shock.
The tape can be trimmed to size and wound around the lips of lower pots and planners - creating an uncrossable barrier.
Other slug deterrent methods
The veteran presenter has tried a number of other methods for tackling the slug menace over the years - with limited results.
Titchmarsh says he long ago stopped using slug pellets, which cause the slugs to convulse but also pose a poisoning threat to hedgehods and birds.
I'm a gardening expert and these are my top hacks to stop slugs taking over your garden as UK invasion worsens
The CBE has also tried various products that create a sharp or uncomfortable texture for the slugs to crawl over.
However, crushed eggshells, holly leaves, sharp grit, gravel and even sheep's wool were all 'at best, unreliable and more often than not totally ineffective', according to Titchmarsh.
Coffee grounds are another foodstuff often touted as a slug repellent, but Titchmarsh says he doesn't drink enough of it - plus he prefers that his garden doesn't smell of Starbucks.
That leaves hand-picking them off plants by hand in the evening, a time-intensive procedure that also requires gloves if you want to avoid slimy hands.
Titchmarsh says he has had some sucess with pot feet, which only allow the more acrobatic slugs to gain access to your prized blooms.
Gardeners could be forgiven for feeling confused about how best to combat slugs given the array of techniques floated for dealing with this in recent years.
One gardening fan claimed that garlic helped to repel slugs and snails - even posting a recipe for a garlic spray.
Another intriguing possibility suggested as a natural pest deterrent is foxgloves, whose purple flowers contain toxic compounds such as digitalis glycosides, which can be very harmful for slugs.
Why having slugs in your garden is a good thing
Yes, they chomp your precious plants, but having slugs in your garden should be celebrated.
Rebecca Miller, Associate Editor for Fabulous, and novice gardener, believes we should work in harmony with slugs and not try to get rid of them altogether.
"We've been conditioned as a society to believe we must have gardens with straight edges, short lawns with pretty stripes and perfect borders with flowers constantly blooming.
But unruly hedgerows, abundance of tall wildflowers buzzing with insects, and bugs and slugs galore in flowerbeds is totally natural - and necessary.
I understand that your plants might be very precious to you, but we need slugs and snails. They provide food for all sorts of mammals, birds, slow worms, earthworms, insects - and they are part of the natural balance.
By removing them, we upset the ecosystem and can do a lot of harm - thrushes in particular thrive on them!
It is said British Gardeners use some 650 billion slug pellets per year! Please find a natural alternative – the poison from slug pellets enters the food chain and can kill hedgehogs, who consider slugs and snails as a tasty treat.
If you're truly desperate, consider using Diatomaceous Earth - it is a naturally occurring compound approved for organic use, that can be used for pest control.
And while you're at it, challenge yourself to grow "sacrificial plants".
Sacrificial planting, commonly known as trap cropping, is the deliberate act of growing plants to attract pests. Pick a slugs favourite vegetable or ornamental plant for them to nibble on, and they will leave your more precious plants alone."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sheep farming is integral to the Lake District's heritage
Sheep farming is integral to the Lake District's heritage

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Sheep farming is integral to the Lake District's heritage

Your piece (Conservationists call for Lake District to lose Unesco world heritage status, 7 June) quotes campaigners who criticise sheep farming in this most revered area of Britain. The Lake District is a national park, with protected and designated sites of special scientific interest. The fact that sheep farming and hefted livestock grazing has been core to its management for over 3,000 years suggests it has created something of value. How ironic that rather than celebrate (and further fine tune) its farmers and graziers, and the surrounding rural infrastructure that depends on this primary activity, ecologists want to see sheep farming's demise. Given the right policy framework and the public being prepared to support local food producers, the Lake District's farmers will be able to continue to adapt and deliver what it wants – the enhancement of natural resources, a nature-rich countryside, and a vibrant society with cultural heritage and a contribution to food security. That surely is what conservation should be about – a recognition of the whole, and not just singular outcomes. Finally, while sheep farming enterprises in these harsh regions may be financially marginal, if they are considered within an economy where money is recirculated locally, creating jobs and enterprise and supporting a rural community, then they're not such poor performers. Public support helps farmers to do more for nature and protect water and other resources. Farmers want to continue looking after the land they have farmed for centuries, ensuring public access, balancing farming with nature, and managing the landscape in a viable way for future StockerChief executive, National Sheep Association Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Airliners are incredibly safe. The Air India crash doesn't change that fact
Airliners are incredibly safe. The Air India crash doesn't change that fact

Telegraph

time7 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Airliners are incredibly safe. The Air India crash doesn't change that fact

We do not yet know the exact situation following the disastrous crash of Air India flight 171 in Ahmedabad, but the toll of deaths and injuries among the 242 people aboard and others on the ground at the crash site seems likely to be high. The aircraft plainly struck the ground at high speed, and it was fully loaded with fuel for a long flight to Britain, leading to a massive explosion and fireball on impact. Families in India, in Britain and in other nations will soon be grieving the loss of their loved ones. This is a terrible tragedy. But we should not let natural human feelings of shock and distress change our perception of modern airline aviation, which is and will continue to be an extremely safe activity. Indeed it has been getting safer and safer for many years, to the point where it's now a rare year that sees more than 1,000 people die in airliner accidents. That sounds like a lot of deaths, but we should also remember that last year 4.4 billion flights were taken. The chance of dying as a result of taking an airline flight that year was approximately one in ten million, around the same as the chance of winning the National Lottery Thunderball. (I make the distinction regarding airliners because other kinds of aviation – flying in light aircraft, for instance, or helicopters – are considerably more dangerous.) Indeed, airliners are so safe that lightning strikes kill at least four times more people each year. None of this, of course, will be any consolation to the grieving families and friends following the awful end of Flight 171. Every death, every injury, is a human tragedy and not to be belittled. The accident must, and will, be thoroughly investigated and lessons learned. But we can be confident that this will happen: one of the reasons airliners have become so safe is aviation's rigorous worldwide culture of investigating and learning from disasters. Meanwhile the rest of us should not allow the shocking images and harrowing stories from Ahmedabad to put us off flying, or to make us perceive flying as dangerous. As we have seen, it is actually very safe indeed. Our irrational fears and failure to understand numbers have caused a lot of damage to various valuable industries over the years. Perhaps the most obvious example is Germany's decision to end its civil nuclear power programme following the Fukushima accident, despite the fact that no health effect to anyone from Fukushima radiation 'is ever likely to be discernible' according to the UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Let's not let airlines and airliners go the same way. Keep calm, as they say, and carry on.

The 20 toughest everyday jobs in UK are revealed – including firefighters, paramedics and farmers
The 20 toughest everyday jobs in UK are revealed – including firefighters, paramedics and farmers

The Sun

time10 hours ago

  • The Sun

The 20 toughest everyday jobs in UK are revealed – including firefighters, paramedics and farmers

THE toughest everyday jobs in the UK have been revealed and include firefighters, paramedics – and farmers. A poll of 2,000 adults found surgeons (44 per cent), police officers (34 per cent), and care workers (22 per cent) are also seen as roles only the iron-willed could take on. 4 Others said teachers (20 per cent) and social workers (18 per cent) do some of the most mentally taxing work out there day-in-day-out. Six in 10 (62 per cent) want to see more recognition in the UK for those performing tough jobs – with 64 per cent believing they are vital to keeping the country running. Others want them to get more credit because they involve working long hours with little rest (46 per cent) and facing hazardous conditions daily (62 per cent). And in many cases, it involves working with dangerous people (55 per cent). The study was commissioned by Samsung to launch their latest Rugged device range, which is designed to withstand the demands of challenging work environments. The tech brand teamed up with TV farmer Amanda Owens to give an insight into the realities of working life on a farm – from mucking out and herding animals to operating machinery and navigating unpredictable weather. She said: 'Farming isn't for the faint hearted – we're up before dawn, battling the elements, and it takes real resilience out here. 'In this environment, our tech needs to be just as tough – anything that can't handle water or a drop is a liability. 'We need something rugged on the outside, smart on the inside, that can keep up with the job.' 4 4 Almost half (46 per cent) of Brits admitted they don't feel like they have the resilience to take on a physically demanding role, a figure that dropped to 40 per cent among men. In contrast, 52 per cent of women believe they have what it takes to handle roles that might require higher levels of emotional and mental capacity. When it comes to younger generations, 61 per cent of those aged 18–24 have considered taking up physically tough roles when exploring career options. This compares with just 11 per cent of Boomers, who prefer to steer clear of jobs they'd deem tough. 4 Nearly four in 10 (38 per cent) agree there's a misconception that physically demanding jobs don't require robust technology. In fact, nine in 10 think devices capable of withstanding harsh conditions are essential to making these roles more manageable. Many cited reducing physical strain through equipment (54 per cent), alerting workers to risks more quickly (53 per cent), and automating repetitive tasks (45 per cent) as effective ways to ease pressure. Annika Bizon from Samsung UK & Ireland, makers of the Galaxy XCover7 Pro and Tab Active5 Pro Enterprise Edition, designed to take on tough environments, added: 'Tough roles demand robust support. "Whether it's maintaining connectivity in the field or ensuring mission-critical tasks aren't interrupted, having the right tech in place is essential. "The Rugged range has been engineered specifically for these environments — combining military-grade durability with the business tools workforces require.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store