Boston police turn over 500,000 pages of messages investigators exchanged about accused rapist Matthew Nilo
The request was granted.
Prosecutors said they told Nilo's counsel this week 'there are still over 30,000 communications which needed to be reviewed' before they can turn them over.
Advertisement
The government didn't detail the content of the messages.
Nilo, 37,
Nilo, who attended Boston Latin School and formerly lived in the North End, previously pleaded not guilty to charges of raping three women, and attempting to rape a fourth, in 2007 and 2008. All told, Nilo is accused of raping or sexually assaulting eight women during those years. He remains free on bail.
Advertisement
Prosecutors have alleged that Nilo targeted women downtown, sometimes attacking them from behind and threatening them with a gun.
Once Nilo was identified as a suspect, investigators began surveilling him in the New York area, where he worked for an insurance company as a cyber claims counsel, officials said. They eventually collected DNA from drinking cups and utensils they watched Nilo use at a corporate event, prosecutors said.
During
violated their client's legal rights against unreasonable search and seizure.
'It's the entire case,' Nilo's attorney Rosemary C. Scapicchio said of the DNA evidence.
Scapicchio said police had no other reason to suspect her client, nor did they have a warrant to conduct the genetic search and match in the online database.
'Massachusetts courts have not yet considered the constitutionality of familial searching,' Scapicchio said in a court filing. 'The warrantless search of familial DNA prior to arrest or indictment implicates both the United States Constitution and the Massachusetts general laws.'
A trial date hasn't been set.
Material from prior Globe stories was used in this report.
Travis Andersen can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
This is what an ICE arrest in Boston immigration court looks like.
As Diaz Martinez left the courtroom, the five officers approached. Most of the other petitioners — men, women, families with children — had walked in and out of their hearings without issue that day. But she was not so lucky. As agents arrested the mother of two, she had a medical episode. Advertisement She pleaded not to be separated from her husband, Wiliz de Leon, whom she had just married the previous Saturday. And she had two children, 10 and 7 years old, who were back in the Dominican Republic. A lawyer standing nearby interjected. 'You don't have to take her into custody,' Sarah Sherman-Stokes, a clinical associate professor of law and associate director of the Immigrants' Rights and Human Trafficking Clinic at Boston University School of Law, told the ICE officials. Sherman-Stokes was there to observe Advertisement 'We're doing our job,' one of the agents said. Diaz Martinez, 29, had been in the US for a little over a year, after crossing the southern border unlawfully and being apprehended by immigration officials. She was fleeing domestic violence in her home country, Sherman-Stokes said, and is seeking asylum. Diaz Martinez's arrest was the result of a new immigration enforcement tactic that has played out across the nation: Department of Homeland Security lawyers have paired this tactic with a new legal strategy: pressing immigration court judges to dismiss pending cases or issue deportation orders against petitioners who have been in the country for less than two years, at their initial hearings. Dismissals and deportation orders leave immigrants more vulnerable to deportation. In Massachusetts, the immigration court arrests began in the last two weeks. Last Tuesday, at least three people were arrested at the Boston court, including a man who said he was a political torture survivor from Angola, according to Sherman-Stokes. Wiliz de Leon left the John F. Kennedy Federal Building in Boston on June 3 after his wife suffered a medical emergency while being arrested by ICE, while she was in the building for an immigration court appearance. He is a U.S. citizen. Pat Greenhouse/Globe Staff de Leon, Diaz Martinez's husband, is a US citizen. The couple met in the Dominican Republic about four and a half years ago, and have been together since. They live together in Providence. de Leon told the Globe that the couple had seen reports of arrests at Advertisement 'She was really scared to be deported,' de Leon said in Spanish. Now, de Leon said, the couple felt 'betrayed.' 'We always want to follow the rules,' de Leon said the morning after his wife's arrest, sounding defeated in a phone call. 'I don't understand what the motive for this is.' In a statement to the Globe, a Homeland Security spokesperson said most immigrants who entered the country illegally within the past two years are subject to expedited removals, and blamed the Biden administration for allowing 'millions of illegal aliens' into the United States. 'If they have a valid credible fear claim, they will continue in immigration proceedings, but if no valid claim is found, aliens will be subject to a swift deportation,' the spokesperson said. ICE did not respond to a request for comment on Diaz Martinez's case. Last Tuesday, as she was taken into custody, she seemed to need medical attention. She was struggling to breathe, had chest pain, and was having trouble standing upright. ICE called Emergency Medical Services, who examined her and eventually brought a gurney. 'I just don't understand. She's doing exactly what she's supposed to do,' Sherman-Stokes said, appealing again to the ICE agents to allow Diaz Martinez to return home. But it didn't sway the officials. An ICE agent accompanied her to the hospital because she was in custody. Her husband was not allowed to enter the ambulance, or, later, her hospital room. 'You have to let him go,' an EMS worker told Diaz Martinez in Spanish, gently, as she lay on the gurney in the hallway of the court. Advertisement Diaz Martinez reluctantly released her husband's hand. That night, she was taken to Massachusetts General Hospital, and then to the ICE field office in Burlington, where she has been sleeping on a concrete floor in a holding cell with about 12 other women, and using a foil blanket to cover herself, Sherman-Stokes said. Derege B. Demissie, a criminal defense attorney, filed a habeas petition for Diaz Martinez not to be moved out of state, in collaboration with Sherman-Stokes. A Massachusetts federal judge temporarily granted the motion last week. Sherman-Stokes filed a motion for Diaz Martinez to be released on bond. 'She hasn't stopped crying,' de Leon, 40, said in an interview. He followed up in a text: 'I don't know what to do.' Sherman-Stokes, who has been practicing immigration law for more than a decade, said she had seen asylum seekers enduring agonizing conditions at the US-Mexico border, in detention facilities, and elsewhere. But watching someone get arrested at court, where they were trying to follow the law and request asylum, was uniquely distressing. 'I just can't shake what just happened,' Sherman-Stokes said. 'These are folks trying their very best to comply with the law, and instead they're taken away in handcuffs.' Giulia McDonnell Nieto del Rio can be reached at
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Proud Boys Sue DOJ For $100 Million Over Jan. 6 Arrests
On his first day in office, President Donald Trump issued a blanket pardon to more than 1,500 people charged in the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection. But it still wasn't enough. Now, five Proud Boys leaders are suing the Department of Justice (DOJ) over their prosecutions and asking the government to surrender millions. The lawsuit, filed by Dominic Pezzola, Henry 'Enrique' Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joe Biggs, and Zachary Rehl, asks the government to pay them $100 million in restitution, despite the fact that the latter four were found guilty of engaging in a seditious 2021 conspiracy to keep Trump in power. Two years after the riot, Tarrio, Nordean, Biggs and Rehl were found guilty of plotting to oppose Congress' election certification by force. Pezzola was the only one who was acquitted of seditious conspiracy but was still found guilty of assaulting police, stealing a riot shield, smashing a window breached by rioters, conspiring to impede lawmakers and police, and more. The five men filed the lawsuit Friday in Florida, putting the ball in Trump's court to either defend the prosecutions or pay an exorbitant sum at taxpayers' expense. The Proud Boys is a far-right militant organization that promotes political violence and embraces misogynistic, xenophobic, and anti-LGBTQ+ ideologies. If the DOJ decides to pay the Proud Boys members, many Democrats worry that it could symbolize the president's willingness to outwardly sanction political violence and empower extremists. In the pardon proclamation announced on Jan. 20, Trump noted that the controversial mercy 'ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation.' Prior to the pardons, Tarrio, Nordean, Biggs, Rehl, and Pezzola were each sentenced to 22, 18, 17, 15, and 10 years in prison, respectively. The Proud Boys members claim there was an 'egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal.' 'A settlement would suggest that the violence of January 6 was entirely justified,' Matthew Dallek, a political historian at The George Washington University, told The Washington Post. 'It would say to the country that these Proud Boys who were convicted in a court of law, in a fair trial, were wrongfully prosecuted and victims. It just turns the entire day on its head.' The insurrection interrupted Congress' attempt to certify former President Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. After a mob stormed the Capitol, five people died in or immediately after the violence and 140 officers were assaulted. The Daily Beast has reached out to the Trump administration for comment.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Five Proud Boys leaders sue DOJ for $100 million over their Jan 6 prosecution
Five Proud Boys leaders who were convicted of spearheading the January 6 Capitol riot are suing the federal government and claiming that their constitutional rights were violated. The lawsuit, which was filed on Friday in a federal court in Florida, is seeking $100 million in restitution and comes after President Donald Trump pardoned almost all of the January 6 defendants on the first day of his second term, The Hill reports. The five men bringing the suit are Enrique Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Zachary Rehl, Joe Biggs and Dominic Pezzola. Four of the men were convicted on charges of seditious conspiracy. Pezzola was acquitted but was convicted on other felonies associated with the infamous riot. They are claiming that "political prosecution" violated their constitutional rights. 'What follows is a parade of horribles: egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal,' their lawsuit alleges. In the filing, the Proud Boys accuse the FBI of using paid informants to spy on their defense team, allege they were denied bail, and claim that federal agents had altered what they say was exculpatory evidence relevant to their defense, according to the New York Times. The lawsuit will force the Department of Justice under Trump to either defend its prosecution of Capitol rioters or offer a payout to the right-wing gang members. Ed Martin, who is now the Justice Department's pardon attorney, has said he believes that the Capitol riot convicts deserve compensation for what he claimed was mistreatment by the federal government. Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years in prison, the longest for any January 6 defendant before he was pardoned by Trump. The Proud Boys' lawsuit cites Trump's pardon in its language, arguing that it sought to "end a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years." The Independent has requested comment from the Department of Justice.
