logo
Trump administration bans agencies from considering race or gender in hiring process

Trump administration bans agencies from considering race or gender in hiring process

CNN6 days ago

The Trump administration on Thursday issued new guidelines barring federal agencies from considering race or gender in the hiring process.
The guidelines, part of a Merit Hiring Plan sent to agency leaders, also call for preventing the hiring of workers unwilling to 'faithfully serve the Executive Branch.'
'The overly complex Federal hiring system overemphasized discriminatory 'equity' quotas and too often resulted in the hiring of unfit, unskilled bureaucrats,' the Office of Personnel Management wrote in a memo to agency leaders.
The memo stems from an executive order President Donald Trump signed on his first day in office that seeks to 'restore merit to government service.' The administration has already moved to dismantle diversity, equity and inclusion programs within federal agencies and sought to extend that effort to institutions and companies that interact with the federal government.
The hiring plan comes as the federal government has been implementing mass layoffs known as reductions in force, or RIFs, though that process has been put on hold at multiple agencies by federal courts. The administration has also restricted how many new hires agencies can add to their ranks — with only one new position for every four people who depart.
OPM is seeking to reduce the hiring process to fewer than 80 days. The memo also calls for eliminating unnecessary degree requirements in favor of skills-based hiring, which both Republicans and Democrats have supported. However, it also requires that agencies use 'rigorous, job-related assessments to ensure candidates are selected based on their merit and competence, not their skin color or academic pedigree,' which has been a focus of Republicans.
The 30-page memo orders agencies to stop using statistics on race, sex, ethnicity, national origin or the concept of 'underrepresentation' in hiring, recruiting, retention or promotion decisions. It also prevents agencies from releasing data on the compositions of their workforces based on race, sex, color, religion or national origin.
And it ends all programs and initiatives related to hiring, training and promotions based on these criteria, while warning that any hiring manager or employee will face disciplinary action if they engage in 'unlawful race preferential discrimination.'
'An asserted interest in 'diversity' or 'equity' cannot justify discrimination based on race, sex, color, religion, or national origin,' the memo reads.
OPM also takes a shot at the nation's top universities, several of which the Trump administration is targeting, in its mandate to broaden early career recruitment efforts.
'Federal hiring too often focuses on elite universities and credentials, instead of merit, practical skill, and commitment to American ideals,' the memo reads.
Instead, the office directs agencies to target recruitment at state universities, religious colleges, community colleges and trade schools, homeschooling groups, faith-based groups and the military, among others.
Axios first reported on the memo.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Junk Fees, Airport Security, No Tax on Tips: 7 Travel Bills in Congress We're Tracking
Junk Fees, Airport Security, No Tax on Tips: 7 Travel Bills in Congress We're Tracking

Skift

time7 minutes ago

  • Skift

Junk Fees, Airport Security, No Tax on Tips: 7 Travel Bills in Congress We're Tracking

Although travel isn't at the top of Congress' agenda, lawmakers in Washington are discussing several bills that would impact the industry. Travel and tourism isn't at the top of Congress' agenda, which this month is dominated by debate over the President Donald Trump-backed 'big, beautiful' tax and spending bill. But that doesn't mean that lawmakers aren't attempting to make laws that would directly affect the hotel, lodging, air travel, and cruise industries. Here are seven such federal bills to watch heading into the summer: 1: Hotel Fees Transparency Act of 2025 Introduced by Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.), this bipartisan bill targets 'unfair and deceptive advertising of prices for hotel rooms and other places of short-term lodging.' Bill co-sponsors include Reps. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), Russell Fry (R-S.C.), Kevin Mullin (D-Calif.), Craig Goldman (R-Texas), Eugene Vindman (D-Va.) and André Carson (D-Ind.). The bill mandates that hotels and short-term rental providers must: Display the 'total services price, if a price is displayed, in any advertisement, marketing, or price list wherever the covered services are displayed, advertised, marketed, or offered for sale.' Disclose 'the total services price at the time the covered services are first displayed to [an] individual and anytime thereafter throughout the covered services purchasing process.' Disclose before a final purchase 'any tax, fee, or assessment imposed by any government entity, quasi-government entity, or government-created special district or program on the sale of covered services.' The bill passed the U.S. House on a voice vote in April. The U.S. Senate is now considering the measure. There, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) has introduced a Senate version of the Hotel Fees and Transparency Act of 2025, which is co-sponsored by Sens. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) and Shelley Moo

About That ‘Panel' of M.D.s
About That ‘Panel' of M.D.s

Wall Street Journal

time11 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

About That ‘Panel' of M.D.s

As Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel notes in his May 27 letter, the nation deserves to have the president monitored by more than one doctor. He suggests a panel of three independent physicians, whose ethical duty would be to the American public, each chosen by one of three large and prominent medical associations: the American Medical Association, the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Count me as skeptical. Why should we expect a group of physicians to be objective and nonpolitical in such a politically charged time? Does anyone think such a panel—largely made up of physicians chosen by liberal medical associations—would give a clean bill of health to Donald Trump? Recall that each of those groups is vested in the dogma of DEI, the opposite of disinterested nonpartisan inquiry. They put identity politics above excellence.

Trump says Musk went 'CRAZY,' suggests cutting government contracts for his companies
Trump says Musk went 'CRAZY,' suggests cutting government contracts for his companies

CNBC

time12 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump says Musk went 'CRAZY,' suggests cutting government contracts for his companies

President Donald Trump on Thursday lashed out at Elon Musk as their feud rapidly ramped up, calling him "CRAZY" and suggesting that he may terminate the Tesla CEO's government contracts. Trump in a vicious Truth Social post wrote that Musk was "wearing thin" by the end of his tenure leading the president's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. "I asked him to leave," Trump claimed. "I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store