logo
‘A colossal mistake': Abilene ISD superintendent criticizes Texas' new education voucher law

‘A colossal mistake': Abilene ISD superintendent criticizes Texas' new education voucher law

Yahoo7 hours ago

ABILENE, Texas () – Four days after Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 2 into law, allocating billions in public education funding and creating a new voucher-style program, Abilene ISD Superintendent Dr. John Kuhn is voicing serious concerns. Calling the move a 'colossal mistake,' Kuhn claims the new education savings account program threatens to weaken the state's public school system by diverting funds to private institutions and undermining decades of public education policy.
'I think it's really, really unfair to fund kids who go to private schools at $10,000 each out of the state treasury, while you're funding kids in public schools in Texas, $6,000 out of the state treasury. I think it doesn't pass the smell test,' Kuhn shared. 'The public school system was established to ensure that every kid in the state of Texas, no matter where they live, has access to free, appropriate public education, and that is the system that has traditionally educated 90 plus percent of the kids in Texas. It feels to me like the state is taking its eye off the ball, and rather than serving the majority of kids now, they've decided to spend a billion dollars covering the tuition costs that traditionally parents have covered when they chose private schools.'
Lambert backs $7.7B school bill, explains why he voted for vouchers
Kuhn pointed to other states that have adopted similar voucher programs, explaining that most recipients were already attending private schools prior to receiving state assistance.
'So the notion that these vouchers are going to be used to help public school kids escape failing schools, that's really not what pans out. I think it's Iowa, where only 13% of the voucher recipients ever attended a private school. So what it ends up being is a new entitlement. It's like reverse Robin Hood, where you're taking money away from the middle class to help offset expenses that traditionally, wealthy parents have covered for themselves,' Kuhn explained.
As this legislation rolls out, alongside efforts to eliminate the STAAR test, Kuhn believes public schools must begin to rethink how they present themselves to their communities.
'I think for a lot of us in schools, we had the mentality that we have to make sure that our students are being successful, so that when they take the STAAR test, we're getting a good accountability rating. I think a lot of us traditionally have thought that's really our marker of success, that we can show parents, hey, we're a high-quality school,' Kuhn said. 'What I've seen, especially with large charter school chains, is that they have huge marketing budgets that public schools have traditionally not had. With this new bill coming, I think it's really going to be important that public schools start to really more aggressively market themselves and really kind of aggressively compete for public eyeballs and for positive public perception.'
Kuhn noted that while public schools receive around $6,000 per student from the state, the $10,000 earmarked for voucher students is comprised of state funds, and there could potentially be more in federal funds soon. Programs like free and reduced lunch and Title I help bridge the gap in public school funding.
'The state is basically fronting these private schools' money that we get from the federal government, not from the state, right? ' Kuhn shared. 'There's a bill coming through the federal government right now that would add even more voucher dollars to students in the states that are in voucher programs. So ultimately, if and when that passes, which is pretty likely to pass at the federal level, voucher students will be getting more in state and federal voucher money than public schools get in state and federal money.'
Abilene & Wylie ISD superintendents discuss potential negative impact of vouchers on Texas education
As for how the new voucher program will impact enrollment in Abilene ISD, Kuhn anticipates only modest effects.
'I think this is just another choice in an already choice-rich environment. I don't expect a devastating impact on enrollment, but I'm also not going to say we won't have any students who opt for a voucher,' Kuhn explained.
Still, he remains wary of how voucher programs will evolve in the future, especially as more private institutions become eligible to participate.
'To participate in the voucher system, a private school has to have been in existence for at least two years. The purpose of that part of the bill was to prevent, like fly-by-night operators, from just popping up a private school because they see an opportunity to make money,' Kuhn added. 'I don't disagree with the notion of parents having choices. I do completely disagree with the rhetoric that they didn't already have a lot of choices; they have had them, but I think for us in Abilene, we definitely have looked at our own system and kind of broken through some of those really old barriers of how things have always been done in public schools. And that's a good thing.'
Kuhn also kept a close eye on another major education proposal this session: the potential elimination of the STAAR test. Though the Texas House voted to replace STAAR with a national norm-referenced alternative, the bill ultimately died due to disagreements between House and Senate leadership.
'Some of those national norm-referenced tests we already use in public schools as a kind of diagnostic tool to see how our students are progressing through the year, so that we know they're going to be ready when it's time to take the STAAR…The other good thing about using a national norm reference test is that the Texas Education Agency can't get its fingers in it and adjust the scoring metrics, and so it's like it's an objective measure. There's no subjectivity to it. Thirdly, you can compare how Texas students are doing versus students in several other states. With the STAAR test, you can't do that,' Kuhn said.
FORUM: Exploring school choice in Texas with Big Country leaders
He added that over time, STAAR has lost its credibility due to politically motivated adjustments and unclear metrics.
'They constantly tweak all of these metrics, and it has resulted in a system that really nobody has very much confidence in. In fact, there were representatives who said nobody trusts the STAAR test. Well, the reason nobody trusts the STAAR test is that it pretends to be a school accountability system, but it's really a political narrative machine. When we need schools to look good because somebody's running for office and wants to say we had a Texas miracle, then they make schools look good, and when they need them to look bad so they can get vouchers passed, then schools look bad, and that has happened over and over and over again. It's not a trustworthy system, because these aren't trustworthy people,' Kuhn expressed. 'When you let the politicians control the school accountability system, it has all the validity of the Soviet crop reports. You know what you hear about from the old days, right? It's a completely moral and ethically compromised system that misinforms Texans rather than informs them.'
Even so, Kuhn sees value in using standardized testing as a tool when done properly.
'As soon as you take student test results and weaponize them, turning them into a battering ram to beat up teachers and beat up schools. Now there's a motivation to have those tests not be great… The first thing I would do is make it diagnostic,' Kuhn said. 'When we get our STAAR results back, I dig into them. I've maintained a spreadsheet going back to 2012, which is the first year STAAR was given. I did it for my last school district. I'm doing it for Abilene ISD, where I track trends, and have we improved year upon year? And then, how did we do in comparison to the state? Are we lagging behind the state? Are we doing better than the state? Are we catching up to the state? All of that is very useful information to me.'
Kuhn said that the challenges he faced during his time at Mineral Wells ISD mirror many of those in Abilene. His solution: advocate loudly and consistently for his district and the people within it.
'I'm going to fight for the reputation of my district. I'm going to fight for the reputation of my teachers, my kids,' Kuhn expressed. 'We aren't just building up kids. We're building up a city, we're building up society, we're building up the state and the world by giving these kids a fighting chance. The accountability system is just one quality marker that matters. That's why I talked earlier about marketing, right, like I think public schools have put all of our eggs in the accountability system basket as the way we prove that we're good. But if you look at universities, look at ACU, they market themselves with logos everywhere. You look around, there's purple all over the place… I think we've been a little too passive in really being forward with the fact that we are a great school, and here are all the reasons why. I think part of the reason for that is we're very busy just trying to teach kids and trying to feed kids and trying to transport kids and trying to make sure that the hallways are safe. I mean, there's so much to be done just to have a school, that we've taken our eye off the ball when it comes to marketing ourselves as public schools. The big charter school chains haven't made that mistake. There are charter school chains that have worse academic scores than the public schools around them, but they still draw quite a few kids from the public schools because they market themselves extremely well.'
What is school choice? Big Country officials explain the 'voucher' dilemma
Still, Kuhn's primary concern remains the long-term fiscal impact of vouchers.
'The costs have exploded in the other states that have done universal vouchers. Currently, the bill they just passed is a billion cap over the next two years. The question is, are they going to remove that cap? When they do, there are states where it's now 10 times what they initially budgeted for it,' Kuhn explained. 'There's one state governor, Arizona, I think, who said, we're going to have to stop certain programs in our state just to pay for the voucher system. So I think that's what I would I would challenge people to watch over the next 5 to 10 years, what does this do to the state budget? Because I think they made a colossal mistake.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US and China kick off fresh round of trade talks in London over intractable issues
US and China kick off fresh round of trade talks in London over intractable issues

CNN

time21 minutes ago

  • CNN

US and China kick off fresh round of trade talks in London over intractable issues

A new round of trade negotiations between the United States and China is set to begin Monday in London as both sides try to preserve a fragile truce brokered last month. The fresh talks were announced last week after a long-anticipated phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, which appeared to ease tensions that erupted over the past month following a surprise agreement in Geneva. In May, the two sides agreed to drastically roll back tariffs on each other's goods for an initial 90-day period. The mood was upbeat. However, sentiment soured quickly over two major sticking points: China's control over so-called rare earths minerals and its access to semiconductor technology originating from the US. Beijing's exports of rare earths and their related magnets are expected to take center stage at the London meeting. But experts say Beijing is unlikely to give up its strategic grip over the essential minerals, which are needed in a wide range of electronics, vehicles and defense systems. 'China's control over rare earth supply has become a calibrated yet assertive tool for strategic influence,' Robin Xing, Morgan Stanley's chief China economist and other analysts wrote in a Monday research note. 'Its near-monopoly of the supply chain means rare earths will remain a significant bargaining chip in trade negotiations.' Since the talks in Geneva, Trump has accused Beijing of effectively blocking the export of rare earths, announcing additional chip curbs and threatening to revoke the US visas of Chinese students. The moves have provoked backlash from China, which views Washington's decisions as reneging on its trade promises. All eyes will be on whether both sides can come to a consensus in London on issues of fundamental importance. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will meet a Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng. On Saturday, Beijing appeared to send conciliatory signals. A spokesperson for China's Commerce Ministry, which oversees the export controls, said it had 'approved a certain number of compliant applications.' 'China is willing to further enhance communication and dialogue with relevant countries regarding export controls to facilitate compliant trade,' the spokesperson said. Kevin Hassett, head of the National Economic Council at the White House, told CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday that the US side would be looking to restore the flow of rare earth minerals. 'Those exports of critical minerals have been getting released at a rate that is higher than it was, but not as high as we believe we agreed to in Geneva,' he said, adding that he is 'very comfortable' with a trade deal being made after the talks. In April, as tit-for-tat trade tension between the two countries escalated, China imposed a new licensing regime on seven rare earth minerals and several magnets, requiring exporters to seek approvals for each shipment and submit documentation to verify the intended end use of these materials. Following the trade truce negotiated in Geneva, the Trump administration expected China to lift restrictions on those minerals. But Beijing's apparent slow-walking of approvals triggered deep frustration within the White House, CNN reported last month. Rare earths are a group of 17 elements that are more abundant than gold and can be found in many countries, including the United States. But they're difficult, costly and environmentally polluting to extract and process. China controls 90% of global rare earth processing. Experts say it's possible that Beijing may seek to use its leverage over rare earths to get Washington to ease its own export controls aimed at blocking China's access to advanced US semiconductors and related technologies. The American Chamber of Commerce in China said on Friday that some Chinese suppliers of American companies have received six-month export licenses. Reuters also reported that suppliers of major American carmakers – including General Motors, Ford and Jeep-maker Stellantis – were granted temporary export licenses for a period of up to six months. While China may step up the pace of license approvals to cool the diplomatic temperature, global access to Chinese rare earth minerals will likely remain more restricted than it was before April, according to a Friday research note by Leah Fahy, a China economist and other experts at Capital Economics, a London-based consultancy. 'Beijing had become more assertive in its use of export controls as tools to protect and cement its global position in strategic sectors, even before Trump hiked China tariffs this year,' the note said. As China tackles a tariff war with the US head on, it's clear that it is continuing to cause economic pain at home. Trade data released Monday painted a gloomy picture for the country's export-reliant economy. Its overall overseas shipments rose by just 4.8% in May compared to the same month a year earlier, according to data released by China's General Administration of Customs. It was a sharp slowdown from the 8.1% recorded in April, and lower than the estimate of 5.0% export growth from a Reuters poll of economists. Its exports to the US suffered a steep decline of 34.5%. The sharp monthly fall widened from a 21% drop in April and came despite the trade truce announced on May 12 that brought American tariffs on Chinese goods down from 145% to 30%. Still, Lv Daliang, a spokesperson for the customs department, talked up China's economic strength, telling the state-run media Xinhua that China's goods trade has demonstrated 'resilience in the face of external challenges.' Meanwhile, deflationary pressures continue to stalk the world's second-largest economy persist, according to data released separately on Monday by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). In May, China's Consumer Price Index (CPI), a benchmark for measuring inflation, dropped 0.1% compared to the same month last year. Factory-gate deflation, measured by the Producer Price Index (PPI), worsened with a 3.3% decrease in May from a year earlier. Last month's drop marks the sharpest year-on-year contraction in 22 months, according to NBS data. Dong Lijuan, chief statistician at the NBS, attributed the decline in producer prices, which measures the average change in prices received by producers of goods and services, to a drop in global oil and gas prices, as well as the decrease in prices for coal and other raw materials due to low cyclical demand. The high base of last year was cited as another reason for the decline, Dong said in a statement. CNN's Hassan Tayir, Simone McCarthy, Fred He contributed reporting.

Anti-ICE protest in Houston; rally remains peaceful with hundreds of demonstrators
Anti-ICE protest in Houston; rally remains peaceful with hundreds of demonstrators

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Anti-ICE protest in Houston; rally remains peaceful with hundreds of demonstrators

The Brief A group called "Houston Unidos" organized a rally to demonstrate against recent immigration policies. Houston police were present, blocking off streets for the march to happen. The demonstration remained peaceful. What we know HOUSTON - A group called Houston Unidos organized a rally Sunday in Houston, marching from Ervan Chew Park to Herman Park, demonstrating against recent immigration policy. The group said on an event flyer the rally is "a call for justice and an end to cruel immigration practices." Hundreds were seen with signs and flags to share their message. What they're saying One demonstrator, Frida, held a sign that read "My parents fought for my future so we're fighting for theirs." "We're here to protest for the rights of our parents - they've sacrificed everything for us," she said. "I'm really hurt with children and parents getting detained. It hurts everyone around," said another participant and activist, Itsel. Local perspective Houston Police were seen blocking off cross streets down Dunlavey with units, giving the rally a safe path from one park to another. HPD mounted patrols also trailed behind the crowd, monitoring the situation. The demonstration remained peaceful. "It's actually really beautiful seeing everyone get together and support right now - it's difficult times right now and coming together as one is very powerful," said Valerie, another demonstrator. The Source This article was written with information gathered at the rally by FOX26.

Trump Fans the Flames With Call to ‘Liberate Los Angeles'
Trump Fans the Flames With Call to ‘Liberate Los Angeles'

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Fans the Flames With Call to ‘Liberate Los Angeles'

President Donald Trump showed little interest in de-escalating the situation in Los Angeles on Sunday evening as he fired off a charged post calling on administration officials to 'liberate' the city from what he called a 'Migrant Invasion.' In an extraordinary step on Saturday, the president ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to the area, against the wishes of local leaders, to quash protests that broke out over federal immigration raids at workplaces. California Governor Gavin Newsom formally asked the Trump administration to rescind the order on Sunday evening, accusing it of deploying troops unlawfully and unnecessarily. Newsom said Trump is 'hoping for chaos so he can justify more crackdowns, more fear, more control.' But Trump poured fuel on the fire with a Sunday evening post on Truth Social, claiming Los Angeles 'has been invaded and occupied by Illegal Aliens and Criminals.' 'Now violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations — But these lawless riots only strengthen our resolve‚' Trump wrote, even though he'd said hours earlier he didn't think the clashes amounted to an insurrection. He said he was directing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Attorney General Pam Bondi to 'take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots.' 'Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free,' he wrote. Trump also rolled out quite a specific new catchphrase on Sunday, claiming protesters were spitting at law enforcement. 'They spit, we hit,' Trump said. It was somewhat reminiscent of a rhyme he coined during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests: 'When the looting starts, the shooting starts.' People began taking to the streets of L.A. late last week to protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and arrests at multiple workplaces—part of Trump's promise of a deportation crackdown. The Los Angeles Police Department said Saturday the protests had been peaceful, but it was prepared to respond to 'any potential acts of civil unrest.' Some demonstrations resulted in tense clashes, with authorities deploying flash bangs and tear gas to disperse crowds. As tensions escalated on Sunday, police reported that some protesters had thrown objects and set cars on fire. Local authorities said the federal response only inflamed tensions. 'Trump is trying to manufacture a crisis in LA County—deploying troops not for order, but to create chaos," Newsom posted on X Sunday, imploring his constituents: 'Don't take the bait. Never use violence or harm law enforcement.' Later on Sunday evening, he said he had met with the Los Angeles police and sheriffs departments and other state emergency officials 'as we respond to protests provoked by chaos from Washington.' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said Sunday evening the federal response evoked a 'feeling here of intentional chaos in a situation that had not broken out to violence short of a few people—and there's nothing unusual about that—and our police departments can manage that." Earlier, she had written on X: 'We will always protect the constitutional right for Angelenos to peacefully protest. However, violence, destruction and vandalism will not be tolerated in our City and those responsible will be held fully accountable.' Late Sunday night, Trump lashed out at Newsom and Bass yet again with another Truth Social post. 'Governor Gavin Newscum and 'Mayor' Bass should apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they have done, and this now includes the ongoing L.A. riots,' he wrote. 'These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists. Remember, NO MASKS!' The president followed that post up with another simply declaring 'Paid Insurrectionists!'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store