Three killed in Major League Fishing tournament boat crash
Three men were killed and several others were injured when two boats collided during a fishing tournament Wednesday on a lake about an hour north of Birmingham, Alabama.
The accident on the second day of Major League Fishing's Tackle Warehouse Invitational occurred at around 7 a.m. on Lewis Smith Lake. A Center Console boat carrying Joey M. Broom, 58, of Altoona, Alabama; John K. Clark, 44, of Cullman, Alabama; and Jeffrey C. Little, 62, of Brandon, Mississippi, collided with a Nitro Bass Boat, the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency confirmed in an email to The Washington Post.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
2 days ago
- Black America Web
Mayo Tears Or Real Fears: Supreme Court Rules For Straight Woman In Job Discrimination Suit
Source: The Washington Post / Getty In a unanimous Supreme Court decision that's already sending ripples through workplace law and DEI discourse, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Marlean Ames, a straight woman who claimed she was discriminated against for her sexual orientation after being passed over for promotion in favor of gay colleagues. According to reports, the high court rejected a previously accepted legal standard that required members of majority groups to meet a higher burden of proof when alleging discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The ruling, penned by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, made it clear that equal protection under employment discrimination law does not shift depending on whether the plaintiff is part of a historically marginalized group or not. 'Title VII does not impose such a heightened standard on majority group plaintiffs,' Jackson wrote. And with that decision, what many had considered a quietly accepted court norm was struck down. The decision comes amid growing backlash against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs nationwide, with critics arguing such initiatives increasingly favor the historically excluded to the point of excluding everyone else. Ames' legal victory is likely to fuel further debate over whether we're entering a new phase of 'reverse discrimination' litigation—where being white, straight, or male can now be leveraged in civil rights courtrooms as the basis of systemic bias. But the facts of Ames' case, while legally persuasive to the Court, remain emotionally murky. According to the lawsuit, Ames had been with the Ohio Department of Youth Services since 2004, eventually rising to lead a program aimed at combating prison rape. In 2019, she reportedly applied for a promotion and was passed over for a lesbian colleague who allegedly lacked a college degree and had less tenure. Not long after, Ames was demoted, and her former position was filled by a gay man. Her complaint: she lost both opportunities because she was straight. The employer's rebuttal: she lacked vision, leadership, and—more subtly—the emotional intelligence to lead. One might read between those HR lines and detect the scent of a corporate 'Karen.' Source: The Washington Post / Getty Despite Ames' insistence that her sexual orientation was the problem, court filings from the state describe her office performance as the real issue, revealing that she was more of a poor team player than a persecuted worker. Officials reportedly described her as 'difficult to work with' and pointed out that the supervisors who made promotion decisions were straight, challenging the idea of an anti-hetero bias at the institutional level. Republican Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost defended the department's actions in court, saying Ames' rejection and eventual demotion were part of an internal restructuring process, with department leaders saying they felt she was difficult to work with, and lacked the vision and leadership needed for the position she sought. Still, the Court's ruling wasn't about whether Ames was discriminated against—it was about her right to argue that she was without being subjected to an unfair legal burden simply because she's straight. For that reason, this case now returns to the lower courts for another round and potentially a full trial. Legal scholars note that this ruling could open the floodgates to more lawsuits from majority-group plaintiffs who feel shut out by race- or orientation-conscious hiring and promotion practices. Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, in a concurring opinion, cited an amicus brief from the Trump-aligned group America First Legal, which has recently taken aim at major corporations like Starbucks and IBM for so-called reverse discrimination. But there's a deeper cultural layer here that can't be ignored. Was Ames truly the victim of anti-straight bias, or was she an underwhelming candidate looking for a convenient legal hook in the form of her colleagues' LGBTQ+ status? In an era where 'DEI fatigue' is a real thing in boardrooms and breakrooms alike, the line between legitimate grievance and performative fragility is increasingly blurred. Still, the Supreme Court's message is clear: Discrimination law is about equality of process, not identity advantage. No group, majority or minority, gets a shortcut or a steeper climb to their day in court. So while Ames may still lose her case, she'll now do so with the same legal footing afforded to any other claimant, and for some, that's progress. For others, it's the beginning of a new kind of fear. But let's be clear: whether Ames' tears are of mayo or merit, this ruling is a turning point and in today's polarized professional climate, it's only the beginning of a much larger reckoning over who gets to claim 'discrimination'—and who gets believed. SEE ALSO: California Teen Sprinter Disqualified For Celebrating State Title Win Donald Trump vs. Elon Musk: Feud Cools After Explosive Clash SEE ALSO Mayo Tears Or Real Fears: Supreme Court Rules For Straight Woman In Job Discrimination Suit was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
ALEA warns of scam pretending to be the ‘Alabama DMV'
ALABAMA (WHNT) — The Alabama Law Enforcement Agency is warning Alabama residents of a text messaging scam claiming to be from the 'Alabama Department of Vehicles,' a department that does not exist. ALEA said the texts threaten to suspend a person's driver's privileges for 30 days and suspend their vehicle registration unless recipients click a malicious link or provide personal information. Early morning Shooting in Polyplex parking lot leaves man injured in Decatur Authorities pointed out that the Alabama Department of Vehicles does not exist, as Alabama does not operate a DMV. 'In Alabama, driver licensing services are administered by the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency's (ALEA) Driver License Division, and vehicle registration is handled by the Alabama Department of Revenue (ALDOR),' ALEA said. 'Additionally, license plate issuance is handledthrough local county probate offices.' Officials said ALEA and the Driver's License Division do not send unsolicited messages threatening prosecution or requesting personal information and payment. ALEA said any messages doing those things should be deleted immediately. ALDOR also said it does not contact taxpayers through text messages. The agency gave the following tips: What to Watch For: Text messages claiming to be from the 'Alabama DMV' Warnings about immediate license suspension or vehicle registration cancellation Links prompting users to enter personal or financial information What to Do: Do not click on links in suspicious text messages Do not provide any personal information Report phishing attempts to the Federal Trade Commission and/or the IC3 'Scammers are trying to create a false sense of urgency by threatening you and your drivingprivileges,' said ALEA Secretary Hal Taylor. 'We urge all Alabamians to be cautious andremember that our Agency will never contact you this way.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Brazil charges man with killings of UK journalist, activist
Brazilian prosecutors on Thursday charged the suspected mastermind of the 2022 murders of Indigenous rights activist Bruno Pereira and British journalist Dom Phillips over the killings, which caused international outcry. Pereira and Phillips, who freelanced for outlets including The Guardian and The Washington Post, were shot dead in the Amazon rainforest on June 5, 2022. A Brazilian federal police probe concluded they were killed because of Pereira's monitoring of poaching and other illegal activities going on in the vast Amazon. Three years to the day after the murders, a prosecutor from Amazonas state indicted the suspected mastermind, the state prosecutor's office said in a statement. The suspect was not named, but the police had previously said they believed Ruben Dario da Silva Villar, a Colombian suspected drug trafficker who has been in custody since late 2022, of ordering the hits. Pereira was a senior official with Brazil's indigenous affairs agency, and disappeared along with Phillips while they were traveling through a remote Indigenous reserve in the Amazon, close to the borders of Colombia and Peru. Their hacked-up bodies were found and identified days later, after an alleged accomplice confessed to burying them. Autopsies showed they had been shot with shells used for hunting. Phillips, 57, was shot in the chest, while Pereira, 41, sustained three gunshot wounds, one of them to the head. The killings became a symbol in Brazil and abroad of the corruption and lawlessness fueling the destruction of the Amazon and the dangers faced by journalists and Indigenous experts who probe the issues. So far, eight suspects have been charged over their role in the murders and/or concealment of the victims' remains. In its final report into the killings in November 2024, the police said that mastermind "supplied the cartridges for the crime, financially sponsored its organization, and intervened to coordinate the concealment of the bodies." ffb/app/cb/sla
