Mum who nearly died after falling sick in Spain issues warning after anti-sickness pills left her ‘acting possessed'
A MUM is urging Brits to be careful buying medicine on holiday - after she nearly died when an over-the-counter anti-sickness tablet left her acting "possessed".
Keira Morrison had been unwell during her family holiday to Salou, Spain, and had been throwing up around 10 times a day.
4
4
When Dioralyte didn't improve the 29-year-old's symptoms, her partner Liam Bridgeman, 33, went to a nearby pharmacy and bought her some anti-sickness tablets for 1.90 euro.
Metoclopramide is an anti-sickness medication that is only available on prescription in the UK, however it's available over the counter in Spain.
After two days of taking the tablets, the former hairdresser's jaw suddenly "locked" as they sat in their hotel room - and she soon lost control of her body.
A panicked Keira and Liam went to their hotel manager for help and once they showed him the tablets he offered to drive the couple to a nearby medical centre.
Here the mum-of-two deteriorated quickly and began to act "possessed" - losing control of her arms and legs and her eyes rolling back in her head.
She admits it was so bad she "thought it was the end".
Staff put her on an IV drip while they ordered an ambulance to take her to hospital in Tarragona, where doctors manged to ease her symptoms with an injection.
It has since emerged that the recommended dosage is one 10mg tablet three times a day - but Keira claims the pharmacist had told her to take two of the tablets at once.
This meant she was taking twice the recommended dosage on each occasion.
She is now raising awareness about the terrifying experience online and about the potential risks of adverse reactions to common medications, particularly if more easily available with prescriptions when on holiday.
Beware 3 of the most dangerous medicines in the world - including one found in almost EVERY home
Keira, from Liverpool, Merseyside, said: "Liam said it was like I was possessed.
"I thought it was the end, I did. It was not a nice experience at all.
"It was like I wasn't in my body, it was like someone had control over my body. That's how I felt and I did feel like I was going to die.
"There were leaflets on the wall and when I was looking at the words, I couldn't see the words. They were going blurry.
"I was pleading with them [the doctors] like, 'please help me.'
"At the point before I had the injection my head was banging off the bed, my eyes were going to the back of my head and flickering. My legs and arms were flying everywhere.
It felt like I was having a seizure. I just wanted the feeling to stop
Keira Morrison
"It felt like I was having a seizure. I just wanted the feeling to stop, I've never experienced a feeling like that in my life. I was screaming, 'please help me, please help me!'
"If I didn't go to hospital when I did I probably would have thrown myself off the balcony because I wanted the feeling to stop that much. I was crying, screaming."
Keira said one of the doctors in the hospital explained that she had a reaction to the tablets.
After spending a night in hospital Keira left the following day because she was due to fly home and she said she thinks she experienced a side effect called tardive dyskinesia.
According to Mind, this is a condition where your face, body or both make sudden, irregular and uncontrollable movements.
This is a known potential side effect of the medication and a 2014 report by the European Medicines Agency's Committee on Medicinal Products for Human Use and recommended restricting the dose to "help minimise the risk of potentially serious neurological adverse effects".
4
Since returning to the UK, she has been to her doctor to have an allergy test and to have her heart checked as she had been experiencing palpitations.
Keira said: "My doctor did say in the UK you've got to have a prescription to get that medication.
"You can't get that over the counter here. You shouldn't be selling that over the counter.
"It has scared us. We have another holiday booked and we are in talks of cancelling. We're in shock and we can't believe it happened.
"I'll never ever buy anything over the counter again.
"If I ever do go away now I'll make sure I've got my own anti-sickness medication from the UK and it was something I'd had before.
"I can't describe the feeling, it was horrendous. I wouldn't wish it on my own enemy."
Accord, the manufacturer of the tablets, have been contacted for comment.
Safety measures when buying medicines abroad
IF medication needs to be acquired abroad, it's recommended to purchase from licensed pharmacies in large cities and to verify that the medication contains the same active ingredient as the one typically taken.
Also:
Whenever possible, obtain all required medications before travelling, as this avoids the risk of purchasing falsified medicines.
Do not purchase medicines from street markets or unregulated online sources, as these are high-risk areas for counterfeit products.
Discuss the need for medications abroad with your doctor or pharmacist, who can provide guidance on obtaining them safely and legally.
Be cautious of misspellings or incorrect packaging, as these can be indicators of falsified medications.
Some embassies can provide lists of reliable pharmacies in the country you are visiting.
Be cautious when buying medicines online, as there is a high risk of purchasing counterfeit products.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Women who have weekly sex are happier in relationships, study finds
A new study has revealed that women who have sex at least once a week are the 'happiest' in their relationship. Scientists found 85 per cent of women who had sex once a week described themselves as 'sexually satisfied'. In contrast, only 66 per cent of women who had sex once a month reported the same level of relationship bliss, and the figure fell to 17 per cent among those who had intercourse less than this. Alexandra Janssen, author of the study and researcher at the University of Manchester, told 'While the study shows an association between frequency of sex and sexual relationship satisfaction, this is only a correlation.' Janssen added: We don't know whether women are happier because they are having more sex, if they are having more sex because they are happier, or if they are happier and having more sex because of other factors-perhaps they don't have kids. Also, the fact that women who have less sex are also less satisfied in their relationship isn't particularly surprising.' The data showed that satisfaction was also higher for women who reported more regular orgasms and rated sex as an important part of their life. Janssen went on: 'What I found interesting in the study was that, while women who orgasmed more frequently were generally happier in their sex lives, women who orgasmed 100 per cent of the time weren't the most satisfied. 'This contradicts the belief that women are most satisfied when they have an orgasm at every sexual encounter. It shows that women don't have to orgasm every time they have sex to be satisfied in their relationship. I hope that this takes the pressure off women who might struggle to achieve orgasm 100 per cent of the time.' Janssen's study also found that women who rated sex as 'very important' had happier love lives than those who did not. Other findings from the study, published in the International Journal Of Sexual Health, found that of the women surveyed those aged 18 to 24 were most likely to report being sexually satisfied. In contrast, women over the age of 45 were the least likely to report being happy with their intimate relationship. The study was based on a survey of 483 women from New Zealand who had been in a committed relationship within the past year. The authors noted their study did have some limitations. One was that being a survey, there was no way to verify if what the women reported was true. Another was that the group of predominantly heterosexual women surveyed was not very diverse, which could limit the scope of findings to other groups.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
NHS to offer women under 50 fewer cervical screenings
Millions of women will be offered NHS cervical screening less often under radical plans. Those below the age of 50 will be called forward every five years instead of three. The changes were announced on Tuesday by NHS England, who said they were backed by clinical evidence that just as many cancer cases would be detected. Health chiefs said the changes would enable 'millions of women and people with a cervix in England to benefit from more personalised cervical screening' from next month. Under the NHS screening system, which replaced smears, cells are tested for the presence of Human Papillomavirus (HPV), which causes almost all cervical cancer. Currently, women aged 25 to 49 in England are offered such checks every three years, with screening every five years for those aged 50 to 64. If HPV is detected, checks are repeatedly annually, with further investigations if any cell abnormalities are found. More regular screening is also offered to those with a recent history of HPV. Under the new system, checks on those with positive results will remain as regular. But the standard gap for those who test negative will extend from three years to five for women aged 25 to 49. This puts it in line with the gap for older women, in a similar approach to that adopted by Australia, the Netherlands and Sweden. Under the NHS plan, if a woman aged between 25 and 49 had a negative result, but previously had a positive test, they would still get a test three years later. Health chiefs said the new approach was more 'personalised' than previous approaches. Screening will also continue to be offered to trans men if they still have a cervix. The NHS has this week rolled-out digital invitations and reminders for cervical screening via the NHS App, as part of a new 'ping and book' service to boost uptake and help save thousands of lives. Eligible women will first receive a notification through the app to alert them to book a screening appointment, followed by a text message if the app notification is not opened. Letters will remain in place for those who need them. DIY tests It comes as the health service prepares to roll out DIY tests allowing women to 'self-sample' at home if the prefer. Health officials have said such tests could be rolled out as soon as January if the move is recommended by the UK National Screening Committee. The self-checks will allow those who do not attend appointments the option to do their own tests at home, ordering the kit on the app. The NHS said the rollout of testing, which is far more accurate than older methods, means women will be able to safely have longer gaps between screening. Studies have shown that if a patient tests negative for HPV they are extremely unlikely to go on to develop cervical cancer within the next decade. Research on a pilot scheme involving 1.3 million women, led by King's College London researchers and published in the BMJ in 2022, showed that five-yearly screening is as safe as three-yearly, that the same number of cancers are found and less frequent cervical screening tests are needed. It comes after they considered evidence, including a 2022 study of 1.3 million women in England. Some other countries, including Wales and Scotland, have already extended the gap to five years, after it was recommended by the UK National Screening Committee in 2019. Other countries have gone further. In Sweden, women aged 23 to 49 have checks every five years with seven year intervals for those aged 50 to 70. In the Netherlands, women are invited for screening every five years from the age of 30. If a woman tests HPV negative after the age of 40 the screening interval is extended to 10 years. Australia – which aims to become the first country in the world to eliminate cervical cancer – offers checks every 5 years for women aged 25 to 74. The NHS in England has urged women to come forward for cervical screening, with latest figures showing more than 5 million are not up to date with check-ups. Dr Sue Mann, the NHS's national clinical director for women's health, said: 'Taking a more personalised approach to cervical screening will help ensure everyone eligible can make the most of these life-saving services, while sparing them appointments that they don't need. 'The NHS is following robust evidence on how often women need to be safely screened, and by putting invitations and reminders straight in women's pockets on their phones, we're making it easier than ever to take up screening appointments. 'Make sure you come forward for your screening when you're invited, even if it was weeks, months or years ago. If you think you are due but have not yet had an invitation, speak to your GP practice.' For decades, the NHS offered smear tests, which checked cervical cells for abnormalities. If abnormalities were found samples were tested for HPV. But since 2019, the system has been changed so the tests check for HPV in the first instance. Cell abnormalities As HPV infection comes before cell abnormalities develop, the new system has been found to be more accurate and to detect more women who may be at risk. NHS officials have pledged to eliminate cervical cancer by 2040. Michelle Mitchell, the chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'We welcome this change to cervical screening in England, which is the result of years of vital research to make screening more effective and has shown it is safe to extend the time between tests. 'Screening, alongside the roll out of the HPV vaccine – which Cancer Research UK scientists helped develop – have seen cervical cancer rates drop by around a quarter since the early 1990s, and we look forward to even more progress.' Athena Lamnisos, the chief executive of The Eve Appeal, a cancer charity, said: 'Every single case of cancer that can be prevented, should be, and this new guidance is good news for those at low risk because they will no longer need to go for cervical screening as often.'
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
I'm a nanny & the NHS advice is right – I would NEVER feed a kid an Aldi pouch & here's the exact reason why…
A PROFESSIONAL nanny has revealed the Aldi kids' food she would never give her clients' children. Emily, who works with families all over the world, claimed that she would personally avoid 'pouches and meal trays' that you can pick up in supermarkets. 4 4 Over recent years, numerous companies have found success in convincing parents that feeding a baby with a quick and convenient processed pouch is easier and also nutritious. However, there have been growing concerns over whether they are nutritionally sufficient and if they hinder a varied diet. On her @thenosugarcoatnanny account, Emily, who is trained as a prestigious Norland nanny, held up two items from Aldi's Organia Mamia range, which are designed for children. Speaking of their 'super cheap' 65p apples, parsnips and carrots pouch (intended for ages four months and above) and their 95p chicken and vegetable cous cous (designed for 12 months and older), she said: 'These are products that I do not recommend to parents." PANORAMA INVESTIGATION Emily cited an investigation by BBC Panorama, which found that six leading UK brands did not meet their key nutritional needs for baby food pouches. The NHS website has published advice on commercial baby food, and said parents should not rely on shop-bought pouches as everyday meals. Some popular baby food pouches are labelled as being "perfectly balanced for growing babies" or "packed with goodness". Emily added: 'Lots of you know about the Panorama documentary that came out about pouches and food. 'I think if you haven't watched it as a parent, definitely go and watch it.' The study followed the World Health Organisation stating that it is "critical" that infants and toddlers get good nutrition in the first three years of life. Disgusted mom shares warning after finding mold inside her baby's food pouch and it was still in date Babies need food that is "pure, varied, minimally seasoned and nutrient-dense." Despite this, by the age of two to five, the average UK toddler has been found to get 61 per cent of their energy from ultra-processed foods, according to a 2022 study. IRON LEVELS Emily's next gripe was with the iron levels in baby meals, and claimed that 'a baby needs 7.8 mg a day.' In the Panorama documentary, Ella's Kitchen spag bol had just 0.7mg of iron, while Aldi's Bangers and Mash contained 0.5mg of iron and a Lidl meal had about 0.4mg. Emily claimed: 'Aldi's products were tested, and their iron levels in them were around 0.5 mg. 'So, if you give your child, let's say, this for breakfast, this for lunch, and a similar one for dinner, your child's, getting 1.5 milligrams of iron a day? 'That's so incredibly low. 'And obviously, children need iron to grow their blood cells. 'It's obviously to help with their oxygen and the flow around their body. 'So, that's something to really, really consider when thinking of these.' 4 Emily shared how she wasn't advising parents to avoid them completely, and said they are 'absolutely fine' for days out if you've not made anything or forgotten a snack. She explained: 'But what I don't want parents to be doing is stocking their cupboards full of these sorts of things, and then that's your go-to.' A spokesperson for Aldi said: 'Our range of products can help parents and carers to support a child's weaning journey by introducing a wide variety of food and flavours as part of a varied diet. "Any sugar in them is naturally occurring and would be the same in a fruit puree made at home.' NHS GUIDANCE The NHS Start For Life website states that parents should wait until their baby is around six months old before feeding them solid foods, even if labels on pouches say the products are suitable from four months. Experts say the products should only be used sparingly, and not as replacements for homemade meals. They also advised they can cause children health problems if used as their main source of nutrition. The six brands involved in the investigation were Ella's Kitchen, Heinz, Piccolo, Little Freddie, Aldi and Lidl, who all said their products were intended to be used as a complementary part of a child's varied weaning diet.
