Jesse Eisenberg Explained Why He Doesn't Want To Be "Associated" With Mark Zuckerberg Anymore
Jesse Eisenberg doesn't want to be "associated" with Mark Zuckerberg anymore.
In 2010, the Academy-Award-nominated actor played the Facebook founder in David Fincher's The Social Network, based on Ben Mezrich's book The Accidental Billionaires.
The Social Network was a huge success, earning eight Academy Award nominations and winning three. Aaron Sorkin's wordy award-winning screenplay made us believe that the Meta CEO was like his character on the silver screen.
On top of that, Jesse's unforgettable delivery virtually made him synonymous with the tech billionaire.
But, the writer/director and star of A Real Pain said in a new interview he doesn't "want to think of myself as associated with somebody like that."
On BBC Radio 4 's "Today," Jesse said he's no longer following Mark's "life trajectory" and doesn't want to be associated with the billionaire because of his "problematic" decisions.
"It's not like I played a great golfer or something, and now people think I'm a great golfer," Jesse continued. "It's like this guy that's doing things that are problematic — taking away fact-checking and safety concerns, making people who are already threatened in this world more threatened."
For context, on Jan. 7, Mark announced that Meta would replace its fact-checking systems on Instagram and Facebook with "community notes," similar to Elon Musk's X. Mark claimed that the original fact-checking system had led to "too many mistakes and too much censorship" and was "too politically biased."
Following Donald Trump's win in the 2024 presidential election, Mark donated $1 million to his inaugural fund alongside other tech giants, including Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, Apple CEO Tim Cook, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Companies such as Amazon, Meta, Google, Microsoft, Uber, and Toyota also donated $1 million.
"I'm concerned just as a person who reads a newspaper," Jesse continued. "I don't think about, 'Oh, I played the guy in the movie and therefore…' It's just, I'm a human being and you read these things and these people have billions upon billions of dollars, more money than any human person has ever amassed. And what are they doing with it? Oh, they're doing it to curry favor with somebody who's preaching hateful things."
But this isn't just about Jesse putting distance between himself and the film version of Mark. He said he thinks this way "not as a person who played [him] in a movie" but as "as just somebody who is married to a woman who teaches disability justice in New York and lives for her students are going to get a little harder this year."'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Smash' to close just over 2 months on Broadway
NEW YORK — 'Smash,' the Broadway show based on the NBC series of the same name, announced on the heels of a disappointing Tony Awards that it will be closing curtains later this month. The stage musical — which traces the roller coaster of making a Broadway hit centered on Marilyn Monroe's starry origin story — will end its brief tenure at the Imperial Theatre on June 22, Variety and Playbill report. News of the pending closure comes just two months after the Tony-nominated production opened on April 10, with a score from Marc Shaiman and Scott Witt. But, much like the Emmy-winning series that inspired it, the show had high aspirations but has hit many a low note. The New York Times reports that the show's weekly grosses peaked at $1 million for the week ending April 20 but ended this past week grossing a measly $656,161. For the latter period, Variety notes that the Imperial was at 66% capacity. Reviewing the stage rendition for the Daily News, Chris Jones recently bemoaned the new 'Smash' for lacking 'quality of surprise.' 'Especially given the level of talent involved here, the adaptation will be deeply disappointing even for die-hard fans of the source material,' which became a cult favorite and even netted six Emmy nominations, winning one for Outstanding Choreography. 'Smash' aired for two seasons on NBC from 2012 to 2013 and starred Debra Messing, Jack Davenport, Katharine McPhee and Anjelica Huston, as well as real-life Broadway stars Christian Borle and Megan Hilty. Though the Broadway iteration scored two Tony nominations — Best Choreography (Joshua Bergasse) and Best Performance by an Actor in a Featured Role in a Musical (Brooks Ashmanskas) — 'Smash' was snubbed for Best Musical consideration at Sunday's awards show. The show, directed by Susan Stroman, couldn't even perform during the broadcast, despite requesting to do so, per The Times.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
‘Materialists' director Celine Song on the ‘miracle' of love and working with ‘passionate Bostonian' Chris Evans
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'I saw the way that, when someone is being asked to describe who they're looking for … it is, incredibly, so often in numbers,' Song tells the Globe. 'It's about height, income, job, and weight.' Advertisement Dakota Johnson and Pedro Pascal in "Materialists." Atsushi Nishijima Advertisement These metrics are often at the forefront when people 'play the game that is dating,' Song notes. But ask someone who loves you why they do, and you'll almost never see 'a single number come out of that person's mouth,' according to the Oscar-nominated filmmaker. 'I only did it for six months, but what I learned as a matchmaker is that the way that we talk about the person we're looking for, and then what it actually is to have found a person you're looking for, the language does not align,' Song said. 'I think that's what's really hard, playing this game in pursuit of love, but to know that none of this language … is ultimately going to lead to the miracle that is love.' Song is no stranger to telling intimate and intricate romance stories, with her 2023 debut, In 'Materialists,' Johnson's Lucy starts out a bit jaded toward love, coldly calculating the math for her clients who want to hear biometric and financial numbers before agreeing to a date. And while she's found a prince for herself in Pascal's Harry, the multimillion-dollar penthouse and nice smile may not be enough, as she still has a soft spot for Evans's John, a struggling actor who moonlights as a waiter. As for Song, the director admits she sometimes views the world through a more cynical lens (a little like Lucy at times). But when it comes to love, she's 'a complete romantic.' Advertisement 'I myself have such a cynical side and so much practicality. I'm a materialist,' Song said, which From left: Dakota Johnson, Celine Song, and Chris Evans attend A24's "Materialists" premiere at DGA Theater on June 7 in New York City. Arturo Holmes/Getty In addition to exploring how people weigh true love against money and other factors, 'Materialists' shines a light on the emotional and sometimes physical risks that come with dating, particularly for women (the movie includes a subplot about one of Lucy's female clients who is assaulted by a man during a date). Despite the many challenges, Song believes the pursuit of love is always a worthwhile journey. 'I can just tell you that when you feel love, it is going to be completely worth it,' Song said. 'It's because it is worth it, that's why all of us take a risk.' 'And I think that's what's so hard about it, the continuing to have hope in the face of so much adversity,' she added. 'To say, 'Actually, I want to say yes to this miracle. I want to be in pursuit of this miracle,' that itself requires so much self-love, and so much bravery and so much everyday heroism.' And if romance stories are also tales about heroes, having a trio of superhero movie veterans playing the love triangle definitely helps. Song revealed that she loved working with Evans, the 'My favorite thing is, when just before we're about to roll, he comes and stands on the mark, and he goes, 'All right, let's [expletive] act,'' Song said with a laugh. 'He's so sweet! And then I feel like when I give him notes sometimes … he says, 'Got it. Watch this.' And then he will do it, and it's perfect.' Advertisement 'I cast him because of the way that I saw him as a person,' she added. 'When you meet him, you're like, 'Oh, you're a John actually,' the vulnerability, the humbleness, the sweet chip on your shoulder, just like all of it.' Dakota Johnson and Chris Evans in "Materialists." Atsushi Nishijima Song also got a kick whenever Evans's Massachusetts accent would slip through, calling the former 'Captain America' actor 'such a passionate Bostonian.' 'I just loved it whenever sometimes his Boston accent would show up,' Song said. 'It's in the movie a little bit. Once in a while he'll say 'car' in a way that a Bostonian might.' The film also includes a musical moment that should delight locals. An early wedding scene features the partygoers grooving to Neil Diamond's 'Sweet Caroline,' which Song considers 'an amazing wedding song.' 'I feel like you play 'Sweet Caroline' at every wedding,' Song said. 'And I'm such a big fan of that song and Neil, so I feel like it's just such an obvious thing.' Aside from enjoying the inclusion of Fenway Park's eighth-inning singalong song, the 'Materialists' filmmaker hopes audiences walk into the movie ready 'to feel something.' 'Love is the great ancient mystery and when it happens, it's a miracle,' said Song. 'All you have to do is to say 'yes' when the miracle comes to you.' 'Materialists' opens in theaters June 13. Advertisement Matt Juul can be reached at
Elle
an hour ago
- Elle
Celine Song on 'Materialists,' Matchmaking, and the Price of True Love
Almost a decade before she made her filmmaking debut with the swooning, Oscar-nominated drama Past Lives in 2023, writer-director Celine Song found herself in an impossible quandary that many artists can relate to. She was a playwright in New York City, and like the rest of us, had bills to pay and rent to make. In other words, she needed a day job. But Song quickly realized that in a city of dreamers, all with various side hustles, most of the day jobs were exceedingly competitive and held by highly qualified people. 'I couldn't become a barista, as I didn't have 10 years of barista experience,' she recalls, during a recent conversation with ELLE. 'I couldn't be in retail, and I wasn't being hired for anything. So I was feeling a little desperate.' A chance encounter at a party eventually opened a door when Song found herself talking to someone with a day job in matchmaking. She made the connection, applied and interviewed for a spot, and ended up working as a matchmaker for six months. It was a life-defining experience that informed the heart of her latest romance, Materialists, and became a period of her life that taught her more about people than any other time. (The reason she quit? She was having almost too much fun: 'I could feel myself wanting to become lifelong matchmaker,' she laughs.) While she didn't stay there long enough to see any relationships go beyond a second date (and a second date was a huge deal), the wisdom she earned from matchmaking is all over Materialists, a sophisticated and brutally honest romantic drama anchored in Song's signature proficiencies as a storyteller: It boasts keenly observed moments, heart-swelling chemistry amid the cast, and a soul-nourishing parting note. The story follows high-profile matchmaker Lucy (Dakota Johnson) as she holds her clients' hands through the city's impossibly demanding dating scene. Her work introduces her to Pedro Pascal's eligible bachelor Harry, a tall, rich, charming, and handsome gentleman who is, in Lucy's words, 'a unicorn'—someone who has it all and checks every single one of her company's boxes. The problem is, Harry is more interested in dating Lucy, who is quick to say that he could do better than someone who is in debt, less educated, and makes $80,000 before taxes. Also in the picture is Lucy's ex John (Chris Evans), a catering employee and a penniless actor whose relationship with Lucy came to end amid the couple's financial struggles. That experience quickly defined one of Lucy's must-haves in men: They must be rich. Exceedingly, if possible. That's the way many of the film's characters think and talk, seeing potential matches as a collection of resumes and profile factoids, as opposed to multifaceted individuals with real lives and feelings. Portraying these harsh and unflattering realities is no easy task, and Song deserves all the credit for perceptively depicting them. She walks a very fine line between acknowledging these truths and holding onto timeless notions like love and romance for dear life. 'That was the dilemma of the movie,' she explains. 'And the dilemma of modern people, too. All I can really speak to is how this dilemma feels to me personally. What's amazing about New York City is, it's both a city of romantics—because all of us here are dreaming and hoping for something—and cynics. To survive in New York City, you have to be cynical, too. You have to be practical and materially smart.' Part of the reason why Materialists works so well is Song's dexterity in portraying how romance and cynicism pull against one another. 'While I was a matchmaker, I was asking my clients to describe their ideal partner and the answers were all numbers: height, weight, income, age… While I understood why they were asking for those things, I knew from being in love myself that that's just not at all what love is about or feels like. So [making this] movie was about [striking] the balance between the practical and the fantasy of true love.' Sure enough, Song succeeds and gives us complex characters whom she doesn't judge, even in their darkest and most shallow moments. 'I don't mean to say that the judgment is not there. Of course, all of us are judging each other at all times in some way,' she explains. 'But the thing that feels true to me is about recognizing where the character actually comes from. Why is that character going through that?' She is generous and insightful with supplying those reasons throughout Materialists. In one of the movie's best scenes, a flashback shows us how $25—a trivial sum to some, but a consequential amount to others—once started a fight between Lucy and John. Running late to their anniversary dinner in John's car, Lucy wants to just park in one of those overpriced NYC lots, whereas John insists on finding street parking. 'I've had that argument with my husband,' Song confesses with a laugh. 'We were both broke playwrights and we never had a car. But we had a rental or something. I don't think it's possible for you to drive in New York City, be broke, and not have a great argument about parking.' On a different end of the spectrum, we also witness the myriad ways people, who've had and want to avoid these struggles, are consequently commodified in the modern dating scene—a truth that one of Lucy's significant clients, Sophie (Zoë Winters), voices in protest after a horrific and dangerous date: 'I'm not a merchandise. I'm a person.' It's a line that Song describes as the key to the whole film. 'You're playing a fun game until one day something becomes totally dehumanizing. It makes all of us less of a person, less of humans.' Doing justice to the film's title meant portraying materialism not only thematically, but also visually and through design choices based on the characters' carefully considered income levels. On the page, Song knew exactly how much someone's wardrobe or apartment cost—there were hard numbers attached to items and locations, some of which are spelled out in the film. (For instance, we know that Harry's ultra-chic Tribeca apartment costs $12 million.) And she had fun collaborating with her department heads in bringing them to life. In styling Lucy, someone who was born and raised poor but is now making a decent living and trying to project luxury, she and costume designer Katina Danabassis had discussions around what that might look like. Perhaps some pieces from Aritzia, the semi-affordable yet stylish brand that evokes 'everyday luxury,' as well as splurges she stretched her means for, like a special occasion bag. 'We were like, 'Well, Lucy probably bought that dress from a discount store. I bet it was pre-owned.' Then of course it informs what something like that costs when it's used. And then [we aged] some clothing so that they felt used.' For John's apartment, the challenge was finding a New York neighborhood where one could get an $850 rent-stabilized unit. Song originally wrote it to be in Bushwick, but…well, that changed. 'My location manager was like, 'Bushwick is too nice now. It's too expensive,'' she laughs. So the production went with Sunset Park and shot the exteriors of John's place on location. The interiors were built and coated in what Song calls 'a very recognizable wall color of a bad New York City rental.' Differentiating John and Harry's financial means also meant using distinctive camera movements, which she and cinematographer Shabier Kirchner deliberated on. In addition to the warm, velvety way Harry's apartment is lit (in contrast to the starkness of John's place), the duo decided that when Harry moves, it needed to be captured smoothly via a dolly. For the determined Lucy, she often went with Steadicam. And a handheld style was paired with John, in step with the shaky chaos of his financially unstable life. To Song, none of these choices were meant to imply that having more money makes a person more materialistic. In fact, it's quite the opposite. 'The truth is, the less you have, the more materialistically you have to think, because every dollar counts. If you're very wealthy, money is almost like a fictional thing. But for somebody who needs five more dollars to eat, money is real.' Throughout Materialists, there is this notion of a non-negotiable—the thing you aren't willing to compromise on while choosing your significant other. For Song, that thing is simple: 'That they love me,' the self-professed romantic says. 'Love is meaningless unless it's unconditional. And that, to me, is non-negotiable.' This answer isn't going to surprise anyone who's already seen Materialists and shed some happy tears in front of the film's proudly non-cynical ending. 'What can Lucy do when she's offered love other than saying, 'Deal'? She is given an offer that she can't refuse. [And that idea] is in the lyrics of the song that John and Lucy dance to, ['That's All']. I love that song. My husband played it for me,' she shares. In the end, this is the idea and feeling that Song wants everyone to take away from the film. 'You can see the movie as a looking glass, or you can see it as a mirror. It's personal, and the dream of this movie is for the audiences to take it personally, to let it get under their skin,' the director says. 'You can refuse a $12 million apartment. But [it is] a crime against yourself is to say no to love.'
