
I was struggling to make adult friends so I took a conversation class – here's what I learnt
We have forgotten how to talk to each other – and technology may be to blame. A new survey out today, conducted by The Week Junior, has found a quarter of families don't talk to each other over dinner, while an astonishing 77 per cent of us have our phones on the table while eating. And that's the families who do sit down to eat together – which only one in three actually do!
Of course, these habits have a knock on effect as we grow up. If children aren't learning to converse with their parents, they'll struggle at school and beyond.
Inevitably, if we're all glued to tech, then our conversation skills will fall by the wayside: we'll lose the ability to speak to each other and perhaps, even more importantly, listen.
I can already feel that happening in my own life. Having moved to Cheltenham from the North West last year, I'm keen to make more local friends but struggling to delve beyond small talk and dive into something deeper. Existing friendships, meanwhile, have begun to shrivel: limited to a series of half-hearted texts, or catch-ups that go little beyond life's latest happenings. In short, I feel isolated.
When I meet new people, I resort to the standard phrase much beloved by the Royals – 'And what do you do?'
So I decided to see if I could improve my chatting skills by taking a course. Transformational Conversations is a pioneering short course run by the organisation Trigger Conversations. As founder Georgie Nightingall reveals, Trigger 'began out of [her own] frustration and sadness with the question 'So, what do you do?''
It's available as an online version, or three days in-person followed by four Zoom coaching sessions. I chose the latter. The course is divided into six modules and even includes topics such as mindset and identity, with methods I recognised from cognitive behavioural therapy. Coupled with Georgie's infectious enthusiasm – 'let go of doing things right, the main thing is to have fun!' – I found it an engaging deep dive into what makes conversations tick. These are the six skills I learnt along the way.
How to improve your conversation skills
Build rapport (and never say this phrase)
Time spent in close proximity increases rapport but there are things you can do to accelerate it, from eye contact and smiling to having confidence and going first. Small talk is also great for building rapport, or maintaining it for existing relationships, and can act as a gateway to deeper conversation if used creatively, such as 'breaking the script', for example. This means trying to use a more imaginative and quirkier approach than 'What do you do' as an opener, or even answering this standard question by telling people what you do in your spare time, for example.
On the course, my American classmate Daniel does that impeccably, responding to me asking 'What do you do?' by telling me he's currently studying improvisation and contemporary dance in his spare time. My other classmates included Claire – an amiable Londoner who joked her Liverpudlian husband had better social skills than her – plus Susi and Uwe, an endearing couple from Bavaria.
Talk to strangers
Studies show that even brief social exchanges with strangers can improve our wellbeing – and they can be interesting too, despite a tendency for us to undervalue such interactions beforehand. 'Everyone has a bit of gold… at least one thing to say that will surprise you, amuse you, horrify you, edify you,' is how author Joe Keohane explains it in his book The Power of Strangers. We also tend to underestimate how interested and caring strangers are towards our own 'deeper' admissions, so don't be afraid to share. You never know, that stranger could even become a future friend or partner.
It's important to break out of our comfort zone and talk to people who may have different political views to us. In fact, such is our fractured society that, in 2023, the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared loneliness a global health concern. 'High rates of social isolation and loneliness around the world have serious consequences for health and wellbeing,' declared Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO director-general. 'People without enough strong social connections are at higher risk of stroke, anxiety, dementia, depression, suicide and more.'
Learn how to listen
One module that taught this especially resonated with me. Entitled 'Deep listening', the name itself suggests that the art of good conversation lies not in speaking, but listening. It's amazing what people share when you shut up for a little longer.
'There are three common levels of listening,' Georgie tells us, turning to write them on her trusty flip chart. The first is 'listening to respond', where a listener tries to find common ground but then takes over with their own story ('oh yeah you went to New York? It's been a while since I've been. I have friends there actually…').
The second is 'listening for facts' like who, what and where. This can be useful initially, as the speaker feels heard and you're gathering information, but can soon feel akin to an interrogation – particularly if you're sharing nothing yourself. A dead end quickly looms.
The holy grail is the third, listening for experience: what is the meaning for them? 'You pick up on elements like motivations, values, beliefs and emotions. Questions are often quite open,' explains Georgie. She writes down some examples – 'What was that like?, What does that mean for you?' – adding that statements like 'You seem to value beauty' also work well.
'You're trying to join the dots,' adds Georgie, 'and this leads to a deeper level of conversation'. Reflecting on this, I realise that I often linger in the first two modes of listening. I don't necessarily hijack the conversation but it quickly fizzles out if I don't know where to go after we've established common ground. And I do a lot of 'fact collecting', sometimes at the expense of sharing things myself.
Craft a good question
Crafting questions during a group exercise later that afternoon, I realised just how much nuance – and how many potential openings – there can be in one sentence. Our practice statement, 'I loved running along the Thames yesterday', prompts questions from 'How does running fit in your life?' to 'If you could run anywhere, where would you go?'. If you know how to ask, a conversation can have endless possibilities.
Go beyond collecting facts and ask follow-up questions that explore someone's individual experience (for instance 'What was that like?'). You could also use empathetic techniques such as labelling ('It sounds like you feel/think/like/value…'). Plus, there is always mirroring (echoing back two or three key words, e.g. 'started volunteering') to encourage your conversation partner to delve deeper (a favourite technique, apparently, of the late Queen).
Avoid interrupting
Even looking like you're about to interrupt can be off-putting for the speaker, who might need time to find the right words. Exceptions apply, of course, for instance if you need to close the conversation or if you feel you aren't being given enough space to talk, in which case a pre-frame of 'sorry to interrupt' can be helpful before you jump in.
End on a high
If you liked a conversation and want to keep in touch, acknowledge what you enjoyed when saying goodbye, and see if there are ways to connect. For example, after a professional networking event, you might say 'I've really enjoyed our conversation, especially the part about X. Let's connect on LinkedIn and I'll see you at the event next month.'
I stay in touch with Georgie and the group with four follow-up weekly Zoom calls afterwards, and a WhatsApp 'accountability' group to inspire consistent action. As Georgie says, while it helps to use the methods intentionally at first, they eventually become second nature.
There's a real sense of kinship in the WhatsApp group, as we explore our struggles and celebrate our wins. Some days we feel unsociable, some conversations thrive as others fall flat, but that's OK, we all agree. To use a Strictly Come Dancing cliché, it's all part of the journey.
Have I made any good friends in Cheltenham yet? No. But I have much greater faith that I will. After all, I now know how to better connect – and that makes all the difference.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Edinburgh Live
12 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
American tourist in Edinburgh cannot believe their luck after 'spotting royalty'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info An American tourist in Edinburgh could not believe their luck as they spotted Princess Anne travelling down steps in the city centre. The royal family member was understood to be on her way to Princes Street Gardens alongside the council's Lord Provost Robert Aldridge on Saturday July 7. The tourist explained how they had missed their tram only to spot the princess as she awaited their next ride. Sharing their discovery on TikTok, account Thistle&Prairie, said: "Missed the Tram in Edinburgh but turned around and saw Princess Anne entering Princes Street Gardens. "Not everyday you see royalty as an American." Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sentstraight to your messages. The Princess Royal was in the capital to unveil a bronze medallion depicting Queen Elizabeth II in the Gardens. The unveiling was attended by many former Royal Scots and their families as well as members of The Royal Scots Club and representatives of the City of Edinburgh Council. A service of dedication was conducted by Reverend Dr Iain May, Chaplain to The Royal Scots Regimental Association. In 2007, Princess Anne unveiled an addition to the monument to mark the Regiment's amalgamation, the final chapter in its history, and to acknowledge and commemorate the Regiment's 373 years of service. Brigadier George Lowder, Chair of the Regimental Trustees, said: ' The Royal Scots have always been, and continue to be, very proud of their long service to Crown and country which is commemorated on this monument. Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox "Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, the last Sovereign under whom the Regiment served, appointed HRH The Princess Royal to be Colonel in Chief of The Royal Scots (The Royal Regiment) in 1983. "We have been greatly honoured, therefore, that The Princess Royal, whose long and continued connection with the Regiment we cherish, has unveiled this final addition to our monument today".


Daily Record
17 hours ago
- Daily Record
Mum left upset after in-laws call her daughters' names 'disgusting'
A mum has taken to the internet to ask for advice after her in-laws said that the names she had chosen for her daughters were 'disgusting' – but she thinks they're normal Choosing a baby name can be a daunting task given the plethora of options available. Parents often strive to select a name that not only appeals to them but will also suit their child as they grow older. The process becomes even more challenging when family members voice their opinions on your chosen names, particularly if they're negative. This was the predicament faced by one mum who took to Reddit to share her in-laws' harsh criticism of her daughters' "normal" names, which they labelled as "disgusting". Posting on the r/namenerds forum, the woman titled her thread 'Have I messed up?' She then shared: "I (29F) have two daughters and my third (which is a baby girl) is due in a week or so, my in-laws are so disapproving of their names. "I believe my daughters have normal names. My MIL said they are disgusting names. My kids are called Natasha and Julia, normal names right? Not according to my family." She continued: "Me and my husband have agreed on Anastasia for our baby girl. And my in-laws hate it. My side of the family is Russian, I grew up in Russia, my name is Melaniya but I go by Melissa since I live in the US. "My husband and I adore Russian names for our children, hence why they all have Russian names. My husband's side of the family says that it is a selfish decision to just be thinking of my own nationality." Seeking opinions, she asked: "What are your thoughts? I genuinely love my children's names but my husband said it is unusual for children in the US to have these names." Many Reddit users rallied around her, affirming that the names were perfectly acceptable and criticising her in-laws' behaviour. One user responded: "These names are not unusual in the US at all. I think the behaviour of your in-laws is what's disgusting here. I'm not sure where your husband grew up that regular names are unusual to him. I wish you didn't have to deal with such awful people." Another chimed in: "Natasha and Julia are both incredibly common American names. Your in laws just hate you." A third agreed: "Don't waste any more energy trying to appease them. There have been two First Ladies of the USA named Julia: Julia Tyler and Julia Grant and the current first lady is Melania. In-laws are just looking for something to be upset about and this is the best they could come up with." While a fourth added: "'Disgusting?' That's so rude no matter what the name is. But honestly I don't understand the fuss at all, these are extremely 'normal' and common names in the US."


Daily Mirror
19 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'I picked normal names for my daughters but in-laws say they're disgusting'
Choosing a baby name is hard thing to do and it doesn't make it any easier when you have family chiming in with their views, especially if they're negative. This was the case for one mum Picking a baby name is hard thing to do with so many choices out there. Parents often want to pick a moniker that they like, but will also suit their child and will be suitable for them in years to come. It doesn't make it any easier when you have family chiming in with their views on your baby names, especially if they're negative. This was the case for one mum, who has taken to Reddit to share how her in-laws have branded her daughter's names "disgusting", even though she says they're "normal" names. Writing on the r/namenerds forum, the woman titled her post, 'Have I messed up?'. She then wrote: "I (29F)have two daughters and my third (which is a baby girl) is due in a week or so, my in-laws are so disapproving of their names. "I think my daughters have normal names. My MIL said they are disgusting names. My kids are called Natasha and Julia, normal names right? Not to my family." She added: "Me and my husband have agreed on Anastasia for our baby girl. And my in-laws hate it. My side of the family is Russian, I grew up in Russia, my name is Melaniya but I go by Melissa since I live in the US. "My husband and I love Russian names for our children, hence why they all have Russian names. My husbands side of the family says that it is a selfish decision to just be thinking of my own nationality." Asking people for their views, she concluded: What are your thoughts? I genuinely love my children's names but my husband said it is unusual for children in the US to have these names." Many fellow Reddit users assured the woman that the names were fine and slammed the behaviour of her in-laws. One person wrote: "These names are not unusual in the US at all. I think the behaviour of your in-laws is what's disgusting here. I'm not sure where your husband grew up that regular names are unusual to him. I wish you didn't have to deal with such awful people." While another added: "Natasha and Julia are both incredibly common American names. Your in laws just hate you." A third echoed: Agree. Don't waste any more energy trying to appease them. There have been two First Ladies of the USA named Julia: Julia Tyler and Julia Grant and the current first lady is Melania. In-laws are just looking for something to be upset about and this is the best they could come up with." While a fourth added: "'Disgusting?' That's so rude no matter what the name is. But honestly I don't understand the fuss at all, these are extremely 'normal' and common names in the US."