Nova Scotia's school capital plan lacks transparency and growth targets: Auditor General
Nova Scotia's school capital plan hasn't kept pace with population growth and the province hasn't provided strong evidence and rationale for where new and replacement schools and construction is happening said Auditor General Kim Adair Tuesday.
'With more than $1 billion in new growth and replacement schools announced in the past year, it's important the Department (of Education) support its recommendations for new growth school requests with a clear evidenced-based process,' said Adair.
Enrollment has surged over the past decade, including a 13 per cent increase in province-wide enrolment and a 24 per cent jump within Halifax Regional Centre for Education (HRCE) alone.
According to the AG's report, Halifax-area schools have grown from 48,000 students in 2015-16 to nearly 60,000 this year.
To meet the population growth the AG report indicated the province has spent $162 million on modular and portable classrooms across the HRCE to welcome the influx of students.
Adair says the province needs to adopt a new growth strategy to ensure new schools are going where they are needed most.
In 2023 the province announced four new schools, but Adair said she didn't get a clear explanation as to why those school communities were selected over other communities.
'Decisions of this magnitude should be supported by evidence that very clearly demonstrates which school capital projects are the highest priority and those should be approved first,' said Adair.
The audit includes six recommendations, including the call to update and develop a new school capital plan with a strong business case, that provides clear evidence for new schools and rational for advancing certain projects over others.
Adair said the province has agreed to start implementing the recommendations.
For more Nova Scotia news, visit our dedicated provincial page
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
43 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘It does affect us immensely': Road work in St. Vital driving away foot traffic
A pavement renewal project on St. Anne's Road is underway right outside Vanxai's Restaurant on June 24, 2025. (Jon Hendricks/CTV News Winnipeg) A massive pavement renewal project on St. Anne's Road is causing a headache for local businesses, who say construction is driving away foot traffic. Noy Chanthaphonh's family has been running Vanxai's Restaurant on St. Anne's for more than a decade. 'We love this area,' she said. But the road work just outside the restaurant's front door has led to a nearly empty dining room. 'A lot of our customers are a lot of older generations, and they have a harder time finding parking,' Chanthaphonh said. 'So it does affect us immensely.' The project stretches from Fermor Avenue to St. Mary's Road. It's expected to last 20 weeks, limiting traffic to a single lane in each direction. As a result, businesses along the thoroughfare have lost all on-street parking. 'Construction from all directions. It's really coming from every area right now,' said Elizabeth Giesbrecht, who works in the area. 'Pretty much daily, at least half of our clients and our practitioners on staff have to call in and say, 'I will be quite a bit late.'' Mandy Pepe, the executive director of the Old St. Vital BIZ, said the construction has caused a significant decline in foot traffic. 'It's hard times right now. Everybody's struggling, and the construction is not helping at all,' she said. According to Pepe, while most business owners agree the construction is needed, many would have liked to see the project done in smaller sections. Others are calling for some sort of compensation from the city or a break in taxes due to the construction. 'It's their livelihood, and if they can't make money, how can they survive?' In a written statement to CTV News, the city's public works department said the city does not provide compensation to businesses affected by construction. 'We plan work as best we can in advance, but are also very willing to troubleshoot once work is underway if businesses have issues we did not anticipate or underestimated the impact of,' the statement reads. The department said it does significant outreach and coordination with properties impacted by road construction. That includes sending a letter to area residents and businesses, asking them to contact the city with any concerns or special requests for access. For Vanxai's Restaurant, Chanthaphonh said the community has rallied. 'I find that even though we did decline in sales, there was an increase of new customers because they wanted to help out,' she said, noting take-out orders have increased as well. 'It was almost like the pandemic all over again. We survived that. Now I'm sure we could survive this.' The St. Anne's Road project is expected to wrap up in the fall.
CBC
44 minutes ago
- CBC
Alberta government to launch sovereignty panel tour amid talk of new pipeline
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says a new panel will hit the road this summer with an eye on devising new measures for Alberta to assert autonomy and shield its economy from what she calls federal overreach. The "Alberta Next" panel, which was announced in May, will hold a series of in-person town halls over the summer, with exact locations to be announced in the coming weeks. It will also collect feedback through online surveys. Proposals that come out of those discussions could be put to a vote in a referendum next year. "The Alberta Next panel will put Albertans in the drivers' seat," Smith told reporters at a news conference in Heritage Park in Calgary on Tuesday. "It will give them the rightful opportunity to decide how Alberta can become stronger and more sovereign within a united Canada." Smith previously said she would chair the panel. In addition to Smith, the panel will include Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz, economist Trevor Tombe, and Adam Legge of the Business Council of Alberta, among others, with some still to be announced. The government said the panel would consult Albertans on subjects like the possibility of establishing an Alberta pension plan, switching to an Alberta provincial police service from the RCMP and considering potential immigration reform, among other issues. Some of the subjects echo the UCP's former Fair Deal Panel, which produced 25 recommendations, including developing a plan to withdraw from the Canada Pension Plan and creating a provincial police force. Asked by reporters Tuesday about how this effort would be different, Smith said that sometimes conversations that emerge out of the panel discussions lead to a "national dialogue." "We identified six issues that we know have come up in the previous round of the Fair Deal Panel that we think Albertans now may want to put to a referendum so that we can take some action on them," Smith said. "But there may be others, and that's what we want to be able to explore." Talk of new pipeline On Tuesday, Bloomberg News reported that Smith told the news agency in an interview that she expected a private company would bring forward a proposal to build a new oil pipeline to the British Columbia coast within weeks. Smith has not named the company and no firm has yet publicly committed to the idea. Asked by reporters at Tuesday's news conference about that report, Smith said she had been talking with all of the pipeline companies since she was elected. "I feel like we're pretty close to having, either one or a consortium come forward," she said. "I would hope that that would happen very soon, because we need to send a signal to Albertans very soon and test the new process the prime minister is putting forward." Last week, the Liberal government's major projects legislation passed in the House of Commons. It aims to reduce interprovincial trade barriers and speed up approvals for major projects in the national interest. Specific projects haven't yet been identified, however Prime Minister Mark Carney has said decarbonized oil pipelines are "absolutely" in the national interest and would support both trade diversification and new industry development. MPs push through Carney's major projects bill before summer break 4 days ago Duration 1:52 Liberal and Conservative MPs teamed up to ram through Prime Minister Mark Carney's contentious Bill C-5 before Parliament rose for the summer. The legislation allows the fast-tracking of major economic projects but limits the consultation process. Currently, the federally-owned Trans Mountain pipeline carries crude oil from Alberta to the West Coast. But Smith has been vocal about potentially revisiting a plan to ship oilsands crude to the northern B.C. coast, telling reporters at the Global Energy Show earlier this month that the province was working to entice a private-sector pipeline builder. Smith has suggested that Prince Rupert, B.C., could work as a potential end point for the pipeline. Plans for the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline to export crude oil near Kitimat, B.C., were scrapped in 2016 following a court ruling that determined Ottawa failed to properly consult First Nations affected by the pipeline. With talk of a revival of such plans on the radar, B.C. Premier David Eby said earlier this week that he opposed public funding for an oil pipeline to the north coast, but added he wasn't against a privately-backed option. "What I don't support is tens of billions of dollars in federal subsidy going to build this new pipeline when we already own a pipeline [Trans Mountain] that empties into British Columbia and has significant additional capacity — 200,000 barrels," Eby said on Sunday.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Bill C-5 reveals fault lines between Ottawa and Indigenous peoples over consultation, consent
Prime Minister Mark Carney's legislation to fast-track projects it deems in the national interest has revealed fault lines between the new Liberal government and Indigenous peoples, particularly around the issues of consultation and consent. The Assembly of First Nations, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and the Manitoba Métis Federation had urged Parliament to take more time on Bill C-5, though the MMF supports it. The concerns are effectively two-fold: how the legislation has been introduced and rushed through Parliament, and that the its contents could infringe on their rights. On Friday, when the bill was approved by the House of Commons, Mr. Carney announced there will be engagement sessions with Indigenous rights holders this summer, starting with First Nations on July 17. It is widely expected to be approved by the Senate this week. AFN National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said this week the organization and the government are working to jointly develop the agenda and approach, and that the AFN will hold a second virtual forum for chiefs before the session. House approves Bill C-5 to fast-track projects, Carney pledges summer consultations with Indigenous leaders Carney responds to Indigenous criticism of Bill C-5, says consultation is 'at the heart' of legislation Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty, a former grand chief, said the sessions send an important signal because rights holders will be at the table discussing aspects such as consultation, consent and economic reconciliation. Both Fort McKay First Nation Chief Raymond Powder and Mohawk Council of Kahnawà:ke Grand Chief Cody Diabo said they intend to participate. Fort McKay First Nation is about 60 kilometres north of Fort McMurray, Alta., while Kahnawà:ke is just south of Montreal. Speaking before the engagement sessions were announced, Ms. Woodhouse Nepinak said that ideally, the federal government would have worked with Indigenous groups to draft Bill C-5. 'You avoid court challenges later by talking to First Nations right off the bat, rather than try to ram a bill through that you could have co-developed with First Nations people,' she said. Government officials said in a briefing that they sent letters to 66 Indigenous groups outlining the bill's framework on May 23, and held meetings with 40 others between then and June 6, when it was tabled. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in 2018 that Parliament does not have to consult on legislation before it is passed. First Nations in particular have been vocal about their opposition to Bill C-5, with the Chiefs of Ontario holding a protest on Parliament Hill last week. There, speakers warned of actions such as court challenges and protests. 'If you pass this Bill C-5, it will be a long, hot summer,' said Nishnawbe Aski Nation Grand Chief Alvin Fiddler at the protest. 'We will not sit idly by and watch any government, whether it's Ontario or Canada, to come into our territory and take whatever or whenever they wanted, because it is ours.' Bill C-5 would allow the federal cabinet to put projects on a national-interest list, and then exempt them from various legal requirements to speed up approvals. In deciding to add a project to the list, the legislation says that the cabinet can use any factor it considers relevant, including five it specifically lists. One of those criteria is 'advance the interests of Indigenous Peoples.' Before a project can be added to or deleted from the list, the bill says there must be consultation with any Indigenous peoples whose rights are recognized and affirmed under Section 35 of the Constitution and who could be adversely affected. They also need to be consulted on the conditions a project will have to meet. 'This requirement is not optional,' Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Rebecca Alty told senators last week. 'It is protected under the Canadian Constitution and is embedded throughout the legislation.' 'Projects will only be designated following full consultation with affected Indigenous rights holders,' she said. There is no definition of consultation within the bill because it can be difficult to have a single one, Ms. Alty said, but the government is committed to meeting its constitutional obligations. The duty to consult and accommodate is very specific, and has been upheld in a series of Supreme Court decisions. It stems from Section 35 of the Constitution, which recognizes and affirms Aboriginal and treaty rights. It says that if a government, known as the Crown, is making a decision that will affect Indigenous peoples, it needs to consult with them, says Sharon Singh, who is co-head of McMillan LLP's Indigenous and Environment practices. If the Crown is aware that decision will affect Indigenous peoples' rights, then they must be accommodated, she said, which could include financial compensation or conditions on the decision. Indigenous peoples and parts of Canada also have title, known as Aboriginal title in the Constitution, said Ms. Singh, where the bar is that consent must be obtained from Indigenous peoples or their governing bodies. There are exceptions, but the bar is high for them, she said. Errol Mendes, a law professor at the University of Ottawa, said that the duty to consult depends on how much a project affects an Indigenous group. 'You can't just harvest [their opinion] if there is a critical issue at stake,' he said. 'Does that mean, however, if there are critical issues at stake, that it requires their consent? This is where it gets very potentially controversial' he said, referencing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. While UNDRIP, which came into force in Canada in 2021, talks about the need for free, prior and informed consent, the Supreme Court ruled in March that this does not amount to a veto but a right to a robust process. Consultation requirements become even more complex when considering Bill C-5 aims to reduce approval timelines, Prof. Mendes added. Mr. Diabo said he wants consultation to be meaningful, rather than a checked box. 'Consultation is actually engaging, hearing from us, [and] altering either plans or projects that suit our perspectives,' he said, adding that a First Nation should have to consent to see a project move forward. Overall, he said he wants to see more boundaries in the bill on what can be deemed in the national interest, rather than just relying on what ministers are saying. Mr. Powder said that robust consultation as defined through constitutional rights is essential, as is true engagement. That 'means working with First Nations communities as equal partners, starting from the initial stages of the project development and design process, to align on scoping, project location, and economic opportunities including equity,' he said in a statement. He said he sees the potential for Bill C-5 to create economic opportunity, but wants to ensure rights are protected. 'We want a better life for our First Nations,' he said in an interview. 'We don't want to manage poverty, we want to manage prosperity, and we want to create an opportunity for our people.'
