
Editorial: Gov. Ron DeSantis goes on an execution spree
Gov. Ron DeSantis is on pace to set a record that no one should admire and that any Floridian of conscience should regret.
He will finish his second term having carried out 48 executions, the most in Florida since records have been kept, if he continues at his current accelerated rate.
Five executions have occurred since February, with two in May and two set this month — for a total of 14 as governor.
In the previous year and a half there were only two, which gives rise to wonder: Why the sudden rush?
Is it another sign that he's planning another run for president in 2028? Would he campaign as the governor who tried to empty his state's death row?
His press office hasn't answered questions about whether he intends to keep it up or how he selects which prisoners to execute. About 125 of the 271 inmates on death row are considered vulnerable, having exhausted their first rounds of appeals. But some of the longest-serving inmates still have lingering doubts about the integrity of their convictions.
DeSantis' predecessor, Rick Scott, put 28 inmates to death, the most by any governor since 1979 when Florida resumed executions after a nationwide hiatus imposed by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The most ever — 35 — occurred under Gov. Spessard Holland during World War II, but he also commuted some death sentences to life in prison, as did every other governor of his time. Bob Graham was the last to do so, in 1983.
During nearly half a century before 1972, Florida governors chose mercy 55 times while carrying out 195 executions, a clemency rate of 22%.
In 1992, Gov. Lawton Chiles considered a commutation for Danny Doyle, a mentally handicapped murderer from Broward, but he couldn't get enough elected Cabinet members to consent.
They agreed only to postpone the issue for 25 years. Doyle remained on death row that long and longer before the state attorney and a Broward judge quietly agreed in 2023 to resentence him to life with no prospect of parole.
Recent governors act as if they either consider the courts infallible or don't care about it. They no longer bother to explain why they reject clemency pleas. They don't hold public hearings, as their predecessors did.
Instead, applications are heard at the inmate's prison by a panel consisting of a governor's representative and two members of the Florida Commission on Offender Review. Their meetings and reports are secret. Humans should not be treated that way — no matter what they may have done. There should be nothing secret about it.
Since the Supreme Court allowed executions to resume, Florida has executed 111 death row inmates with only six commutations, all by Graham. He said two of the men he spared might be innocent, that one sentence was inappropriate for the crime and that three were sentenced more harshly than co-defendants who were at least as blameworthy.
Graham exercised clemency to compensate for how courts sometimes get it wrong and refuse to correct its mistakes.
A much wiser Florida Supreme Court once acknowledged the system's fallibility. In upholding the state's new death penalty law in 1973, the majority promised to review every death sentence so that 'only the most aggravated and unmitigated' crimes would result in executions.
That recognized a moral responsibility to try to balance the scales, but the court no longer tries.
A conservative court filled with DeSantis appointees renounced proportionality and culpability reviews that were benchmarks for fairness. The majority sees no problem in executing someone whose co-defendant might have been more culpable but was smart enough to cop a deal to elude the death penalty.
The court backtracked on requiring all 12 jurors to agree to a death sentence. That cleared the way for DeSantis and the Legislature to set the death sentence vote to as few as eight out of 12.
That's worse even than Alabama, the only other non-unanimous state, where the threshold is 10 votes. Alabama, however, has a governor, Kay Ivey, who hasn't forgotten clemency. In February, she commuted a man's death sentence to life in prison because of 'enough questions about guilt that I cannot move forward with executing him.'
The Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops responds to each DeSantis death warrant with a plea for commutation to life in prison without parole. His office acknowledges receiving the letters but does not reply.
Every murder is heinous, but only some draw the death penalty. No one who understands the process pretends that it's a deterrent anymore. It is irreparably capricious, arbitrary and error-prone, and that's a particular concern in Florida, where 30 former death row inmates have been exonerated — more than in any other state.
We hope Florida's next governor will know better than to assume the courts unfailingly get it right, because they don't, and an unflinching rush to execution assures that, eventually, an innocent person will die.
The Orlando Sentinel Editorial Board includes Executive Editor Roger Simmons, Opinion Editor Krys Fluker and Viewpoints Editor Jay Reddick. The Sun Sentinel Editorial Board consists of Executive Editor Gretchen Day-Bryant, Editorial Page Editor Steve Bousquet, Deputy Editorial Page Editor Dan Sweeney and editorial writers Pat Beall and Martin Dyckman. Send letters to insight@orlandosentinel.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
11 investigates: Ten communities in SWPA prepare for ‘No Kings' protest
11 Investigates has learned that 13 protests in 10 different communities are set for this Saturday in Southwestern Pennsylvania. Organizers said these are all peaceful protests to voice opposition to some of President Trump's policies. 'What we're seeing is there are people who are frustrated that this isn't what they voted for, and this isn't what they want for our country,' said Abby Graham-Pardus. Graham-Pardus is organizing the No Kings rally at the Westmoreland County Courthouse in Greensburg Saturday afternoon. This will be the third rally she's held at the courthouse to protest President Trump. PREVIOUS COVERAGE >>> Protesters gather in local counties to participate in nationwide 'Hands Off' rallies One of the previous rallies attracted 800 people. While voters in Westmoreland County overwhelmingly supported President Trump in the last election, Graham-Pardus is expecting a thousand people to attend Saturday. She said there will be Democrats, independents and even Republicans who are concerned about Trump's actions, including possible cuts to healthcare benefits, immigration raids, and a military parade in Washington D.C. this weekend. The parade is June 14th, which marks the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army as well as Trump's 79th birthday. 'We respect the military and everything they do and they shouldn't be used for a birthday parade. Essentially, there's been this slow slide to authoritarianism,' said Graham-Pardus, who said she's worked with Greensburg Police to ensure the safety of protesters. No Kings protests are scheduled for this Saturday in ten communities in southwestern Pennsylvania, including Cranberry, Beaver, Mars, Greensburg, Uniontown, Washington, Pittsburgh, Indiana, Coraopolis, and Mt. Lebanon. Two No Kings protests are set for Pittsburgh. One will start at the City-County building on Grant Street and the other will begin at Freedom Corner in the Hill District. There's also a vigil for science and academic freedom at Carnegie Mellon University on Saturday evening. 'At this time, we have no indication that there will be any civil unrest in the city,' said Lee Schmidt, Pittsburgh Public Safety Director. But Schmidt said extra police officers and medics will be on hand just as a precaution. 'We're here to make sure everyone's rights are protected and maintain safety,' said Schmidt. 'We found some online threats, a guy literally put on social media, that he's going to be like Kyle Rittenhouse, with his feet on the ground. We don't want that,' said Mayor JoJo Burgess of Washington Pa. Rittenhouse was acquitted of killing two men during a protest over a fatal police shooting in Wisconsin six years ago. Mayor Burgess said in light of the threat, there's a heightened sense of alert and security for No Kings rally in his community Saturday. Burgess said police will be on hand and plan to shut down roads around the courthouse to keep the protestors safe. Burgess said he doesn't expect any issues. 'I know the organizers. They've held protests in the city before. They've always been peaceful. There's never been any kind of problem with it, but when you see these kinds of threats in this climate that we live in, you've got to take that seriously,' said Burgess. It will be a busy day for Mayor Burgess as his city is also holding a Juneteenth celebration on the same day. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro also weighed in on the planned protest. He said his administration will be working around the clock to ensure both the rights of demonstrators and the well-being of cities and towns are protected. Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Johnson, heckled by Democrats, backs censure for Padilla
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) on Thursday said Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) should be censured after he tried to approach and question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a press conference in Los Angeles, prompting federal agents to forcibly remove him from the room and handcuff him. Video of the altercation — captured by reporters on the scene — sent shock waves through the Capitol, with Democrats slamming the way law enforcement personnel handled Padilla, and Republicans condemning the senator's conduct at the media availability. Pressed on whether Padilla should face consequences, Johnson initially demurred — 'it's not my decision to make, I'm not in that chamber' — before endorsing censure for the California Democrat. 'I think that that behavior at a minimum rises to the level of a censure,' Johnson told reporters. 'I think there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that that is not what we're going to do, that's not what we're going to act.' 'We're not going to have branches fighting physically and having senators charging Cabinet secretaries,' he added. 'We got to do better and I hope that we will.' Just eight senators have been censured in history, the most recent being former Sen. David Durenberger (R-Minn.), who was penalized for financial wrongdoing. The punishment requires a simple majority in the Senate. The comments came during a press availability in the Capitol after House Republicans narrowly passed a bill to claw back $9.4 billion in federal spending for public broadcasting and foreign aid. Johnson staged the gaggle to discuss the legislation but was swarmed with questions about the altercation in Los Angeles. 'I saw the same video, a very brief video, that I think many people did — I think the senator's actions, my view, is it was wildly inappropriate,' he said. 'You don't charge a sitting Cabinet secretary, and everybody can draw their own conclusions, you can see it's a heated debate here.' As he delivered those remarks, a long line of House Democrats — including many in the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and from the California delegation — walked behind the Speaker and heckled him as he spoke. Rep. Sam Liccardo (D-Calif), who represents the San Francisco Bay area, shouted 'Mike, that's absurd.' Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) yelled 'why don't you stand up for Congress?' Another House Democrat exclaimed 'that's a lie.' Asked if he would respond to some of the comments, Johnson declined. 'I'm not going to respond to that,' the Speaker said. 'I think the American people can draw their own conclusions. They saw a senator acting like a, wildly inappropriate, I'll leave it at that.' 'What I saw was agents asking him to quiet down so that the secretary could continue her press conference. He refused to do so. What were they supposed to do? They have to restrain someone who is engaging in that kind of behavior. They moved him out of the room,' Johnson later added. 'A sitting member of Congress should not act like that, it is beneath a member of Congress, it is beneath a U.S. senator. They are supposed to lead by example, and that is not a good example.' Earlier on Thursday, Padilla interrupted a press conference Noem was holding in Los Angeles amid widespread protests against the Trump administration's deportation efforts and against President Trump's mobilizing the National Guard and Marines to protect agents. Multiple men forcibly removed him from the room and handcuffed him. 'I'm Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla is heard saying as he struggled with officers holding him back. As he was aggressively moved out two double doors the senator can be heard saying 'Hands off!' 'Senator Padilla is currently in Los Angeles exercising his duty to perform Congressional oversight of the federal government's operations in Los Angeles and across California,' Padilla's office said in a statement immediately after the altercation. 'He was in the federal building to receive a briefing with General Guillot and was listening to Secretary Noem's press conference. He tried to ask the Secretary a question, and was forcibly removed by federal agents, forced to the ground and handcuffed. He is not currently detained, and we are working to get additional information. Updated at 6:21 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
Why Won't the Pentagon Own Up to Trump's Latest Move?
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Donald Trump is focused this week on cracking down on the people he calls 'insurrectionists' —but not so much on the ones who fought an actual armed rebellion against the U.S. government in the 1860s. On Tuesday, Trump traveled to Fort Bragg, in North Carolina. When the base was established in 1918, it was named for Braxton Bragg, sometimes described as the worst Confederate general to serve in the Civil War. In 2023, the Defense Department renamed several facilities that had honored Confederates, giving Fort Bragg the admittedly uncreative name of Fort Liberty. In February, the Trump administration reverted to the old name—but with a twist. The base would instead honor Private First Class Roland L. Bragg, a World War II veteran awarded a Silver Star and a Purple Heart. Georgia's Fort Benning had a similar rechristening. At Fort Bragg, Trump announced that he was changing back the names of another new round of bases. 'We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A. P. Hill, and Fort Robert E. Lee,' the president said. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts.' (The government began naming southern facilities for Confederate commanders during World War I, when the government wanted to encourage southern enlistment.) Yet when the Pentagon released an official announcement, it said something subtly but significantly different: that actually the forts would, like Bragg and Benning, be named for other veterans with the same surnames. Instead of Robert E. Lee, the top Confederate commander, Fort Lee will honor Private Fitz Lee, a Black soldier who served in the Spanish-American War. The discrepancy between Trump's claim that the names of generals including Lee and A. P. Hill were returning and the official announcement reveals the puerile wink-and-a-nod trolling behind the re-renaming. The original names were replaced after a careful process had identified military figures who deserved recognition. The Pete Hegseth–led Pentagon, by contrast, appears to have found its new honorees by poring over lists of veterans in a superficial search to find any decorated veteran with the right surname. (This has apparently been a higher priority than finding a chief of staff for Hegseth's tumultuous office or briefing the secretary on the legal justification for deploying Marines to Los Angeles.) Reverting is an insult to the families of those people whose names were added and then removed. But refusing to own up to the goal here is a laughable equivocation from guys who like to talk about how strong they are. Trump clearly wants to bring back the Confederate names. Why won't the Pentagon go along with it, or why can't officials admit it? Isn't this the 'wokeness and weakness' that Hegseth has promised to eliminate? Even under this same-last-name strategy, everyone can see that these names are intended as a nod to the Confederates. It's not a dog whistle if everyone can hear it. The president doesn't know much about history, according to a top former aide, or care that much for heritage. (I'd be curious to hear how many of the original Confederate honorees he could identify, beyond Lee and perhaps Pickett, whose charge made him infamous.) But Trump knows that much of his political support is in what we might call the cultural American South: the swaths of the United States not necessarily in the old Confederacy where Confederate symbols are popular. One January 6 rioter carried a Confederate flag into the U.S. Capitol. Trump also previously resisted the idea of dropping the Confederate names in 2020, when Congress passed a bipartisan law to do so after the murder of George Floyd. He even vetoed the bill, but Congress overrode him. Reverting to the old names now is an emblem of Trump's broad campaign against anything that can be construed as woke. He is capitalizing on public dissatisfaction over some manifestations of DEI to attack any governmental gestures toward racial equity and reconciliation—whether symbolic and bipartisan, such as the fort names, or bedrock elements of the nation's civil-rights enforcement. The clumsy approach has led to some embarrassments, such as flagging for deletion a photo of the Enola Gay, the airplane that dropped the first atomic bomb, apparently because gay was in the name. Lionizing Lee ought to be nearly as embarrassing. After the surrender at Appomattox, Confederate apologists worked to cultivate a dignified impression of Lee as a tormented patriot reluctantly defending his home state and a brilliant general fighting a lost cause. But as my colleague Adam Serwer wrote in 2017, Lee, despite his reputation as a military tactician, botched the rebel strategy in the Civil War. More important, he was—despite the successful efforts of revisionists who have depicted him as a kindly, conciliatory man—a committed white supremacist and a cruel slaveholder, even by the standards of the time. Where Trump distanced himself from Lee in 2018, his administration is more willing to embrace Confederate ideas today. Citing the writer Michael Lind, future Vice President J. D. Vance said on a podcast in 2021 that 'American history is a constant war between Northern Yankees and Southern Bourbons, where whichever side the hillbillies are on wins,' positioning himself on the side of the southerners: 'And that's kind of how I think about American politics today, is like, the Northern Yankees are now the hyper-woke, coastal elites.' This weekend, he appeared on the podcast of Theo Von, the comedian who memorably told Trump what it's like to use cocaine. Von asked Vance, a Marine veteran, which side he'd have fought on during the Civil War, and the good news is that Vance said the Union. But he added: 'I feel like something … happened like 10 years ago,' where 'you have to think that every single person who fought for the Confederate side was an evil person, and I just think that's so stupid.' I've heard versions of this argument when I have written critically about Confederate commemorations in the past, but it's a straw man. With Vance, the question is always whether he really believes this or if he's just saying it cynically. But I don't know who is arguing that every Confederate soldier was an evil person. I know of relatives of mine who fought on both sides of the war, though, I'm proud to say, more who fought for the Union. The point is not that all Confederate soldiers were bad people or personally committed to slavery, nor that anyone necessarily needs to be ashamed of each individual. It is that the Confederacy seceded to defend slavery and fought a treasonous war over it. The U.S. government has no reason to celebrate the rebels or their leaders for their part in the war. To paraphrase a certain president: I prefer the war heroes who fought for the United States. Today's News An Air India plane crashed into a college hostel in Ahmedabad, India, killing at least 241 people on board. Senator Alex Padilla of California was pushed to the ground and handcuffed after he attempted to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem questions at a press conference. The Democratic governors of Illinois, Minnesota, and New York were questioned about their states' sanctuary policies for migrants during a contentious Republican-led House hearing. Dispatches Work in Progress: A big change in New York is warping the calculus of the city's mayoral campaign, Annie Lowrey writes. 'If this is democracy, it's a funny form of it.' Time-Travel Thursdays: The best wellness advice has always been free—just take a 19th-century writer's word for it, Valerie Trapp writes. Evening Read Dare to Act Differently and Be Happier By Arthur C. Brooks In financial circles, the investment strategy many people pursue during chaotic times is known as the 'flight to safety.' That means dumping risky assets such as stocks and buying safer ones such as government bonds. This is not just a financial strategy, but a human one. When things get chaotic, eliminate your exposure to risk and hunker down. That's the safe bet. Or is it? Read the full article. More From The Atlantic Spend time with a loved one. 'In my household, Saturday is 'Dad-urday,'' Jordan Michelman writes. It's a father-daughter routine that has transformed his family life. Celebrate. Music wouldn't be the same without Brian Wilson. That's not an overstatement, Spencer Kornhaber writes.