Land dispute in Khanaqin district leads to tensions
Also in Iraq
Over 400 vehicles seized at Iraq ports in two months
Return of ISIS-linked nationals from Syria paused due to rehabilitation program
Iraq rejects displacement of Palestinians from Gaza
Over two tons of drugs seized in Iraq in two months
A+ A-
ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Dispute over the establishment of an industrial zone in the Kurdish town of Khanaqin in Diyala province led to tensions on Wednesday, with the mayor, councilor, and lawmaker accusing an investor of encroachment.
The project, which extends over an area of 2,170 dunams south of Khanaqin, includes 400 commercial shops, with 15% of it completed so far. Each shop is valued at $10,000.
Nevertheless, construction operations remain a subject of major controversy between government officials and the investor, leading to mutual legal actions between the two parties.
"The chaos you are witnessing is in support of encroachment," Sozan Mansour, a lawmaker, said at the site.
Meanwhile, Diyala Provincial Council member Aws Ibrahim reiterated the legality of the mayor's decision to remove the project.
"We are currently at the site and you can see the commotion. The removal decision is official according to Law 154, and the mayor has taken all proper legal procedures. We were surprised by the forceful opposition to removing the encroachment," he said.
For his part, investor Hazim al-Shakraji insisted that the land legally belongs to him, denying all charges against him, telling Rudaw "These brothers came to provoke me for money, I will not pay a single dinar. The government cannot claim that the land is encroached upon; I have an official title deed. They cannot do this, and the commissioner cannot claim this, as there are mutual complaints between us."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
13 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Fiery night: Israel, Iran trade massive strikes
Shafaq News/ Iran and Israel carried out sweeping overnight attacks on each other's territory, targeting strategic sites and population centers in a major escalation of hostilities. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched a new wave of Operation True Promise 3, deploying ballistic and hypersonic missiles toward Tel Aviv, Haifa, Jerusalem, and northern Israel. Iranian media claimed successful breaches of Israeli air defenses, with hits reported on residential areas and critical infrastructure. Additional missiles were reportedly launched from Iranian territory toward Haifa, while Israeli radar systems tracked drone and missile activity from Yemen. Iranian officials also accused Mossad-linked operatives of firing rockets from inside Tehran at an IRGC facility. Meanwhile, Israeli jets expanded Operation Rising Lion, striking Iranian nuclear, military, and energy facilities in Tehran, Isfahan, and Shahraan. Blasts at a fuel depot west of the capital ignited major fires, and Iran's Defense Ministry confirmed damage to a military research center and an administrative building. The latest exchange followed Israeli airstrikes that killed senior IRGC commanders and targeted nuclear infrastructure. Tehran characterized its retaliation as a sovereign act timed with Eid al-Ghadir, using missiles named after assassinated commander Qassem Soleimani. Soleimani served as the commander of the Quds Force, an IRGC elite branch. He was killed on January 3, 2020, in a targeted US drone strike near Baghdad International Airport in Iraq. By Sunday morning, Israeli authorities reported six killed and 240 injured in Bat Yam and Rehovot, while Iranian media said 78 people were killed—including 29 children—and over 320 wounded.
Iraqi News
a day ago
- Iraqi News
How much damage has Israel inflicted on Iran's nuclear programme?
Vienna – Israel's strikes on Iran have taken aim at its nuclear facilities, amid fears that the Islamic republic is seeking to develop nuclear weapons — an accusation Tehran denies. Experts told AFP that while the attacks might have caused some damage to Iran's nuclear programme, they are unlikely to have delivered a fatal blow. – What is the extent of the damage? – Israel's operation included strikes on Iran's underground uranium enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, and a uranium conversion facility at Isfahan, according to the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), citing information from Iranian officials. IAEA said on Friday that a key, above-ground component of Iran's Natanz nuclear site had been destroyed, also citing Iranian officials. There was 'extensive' damage to the site's power supply, according to a report from the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), a US-based organisation specialising in nuclear proliferation, which analysed satellite images. A loss of electricity to underground facilities can significantly damage the site's centrifuges, the machines used to enrich uranium, the ISIS institute said. If backup power is lost, 'at the least, the enrichment plant is rendered inoperable for the time being', it said. Iran has said the damage to Fordow, south of Tehran, was minor. But experts said it is impossible at this stage to determine the impact the strikes might have had on uranium stockpiles believed to be stored around the Isfahan site. Ali Vaez, International Crisis Group's Iran project director, told AFP that if Iran managed to transfer significant quantities to 'secret facilities,' then 'the game is lost for Israel'. – Can the programme be destroyed? – While 'Israel can damage Iran's nuclear programme… it is unlikely to be able to destroy it', Vaez said, arguing that Israel does not have the massively powerful bombs needed 'to destroy the fortified, bunkered facilities in Natanz and Fordow'. Destroying those would require US military assistance, added Kelsey Davenport, an expert with the Arms Control Association. She also stressed that Israel's unprecedented attack cannot erase the expertise Iran had built up on nuclear weapons, despite killing nine Iranian nuclear scientists. – What are the risks to the Iranian population? – The IAEA has not detected any increase in radiation levels at the affected sites. 'There is very little risk that attacks on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities would result in a harmful radiation release,' said Davenport. But an attack on Bushehr, Iran's only nuclear power plant, could 'have a serious impact on health and the environment', she added. After Israel launched its strikes, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that nuclear facilities 'must never be attacked' and that targeting Iranian sites could have 'grave consequences for the people of Iran, the region, and beyond'. – Is Iran close to developing a nuclear bomb? – After the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018 from a landmark deal that sought to curb Tehran's nuclear activities, Iran has gradually retreated from some of its obligations, particularly on uranium enrichment. As of mid-May, the country had an estimated 408.6 kilogrammes enriched to up to 60 percent — just a short step from the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran theoretically has enough near-weapons-grade material, if further refined, for about 10 nuclear bombs, according to the definition by the Vienna-based IAEA. Iran is the only non nuclear-armed state producing uranium to this level of enrichment, according to the UN nuclear watchdog. While the IAEA has been critical of Iran's lack of cooperation with the UN body, it says that there is 'no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear programme'. Tehran has consistently denied ambitions to develop nuclear warheads. But Davenport warned the strikes could strengthen factions in Iran advocating for an atomic arsenal. 'Israel's strikes set Iran back technically, but politically the strikes are pushing Iran closer to nuclear weapons,' she said.
Iraqi News
a day ago
- Iraqi News
US judge extends detention of pro-Palestinian protest leader
New York – Pro-Palestinian student protest leader Mahmoud Khalil remained in US detention Friday despite an expected release, his lawyer said, following reported accusations of inaccuracies in his permanent residency application. US District Judge Michael Fabiarz had issued an order Wednesday that the government could not detain or deport Khalil, a legal permanent resident, based on Secretary of State Marco Rubio's assertions that his presence on US soil posed a national security threat. The order gave the government until Friday to release Khalil. But by Friday afternoon, the Trump administration 'represented that the Petitioner is being detained on another, second charge,' the judge wrote. The Department of Homeland Security has provided the court with press clippings from various American tabloids suggesting Khalil, who is married to a US citizen, had failed to disclose certain information about his work or involvement in a campaign to boycott Israel when applying for his permanent resident green card, ABC News reported. 'The government is now using cruel, transparent delay tactics to keep him away from his wife and newborn son ahead of their first Father's Day as a family,' Khalil attorney Amy Greer said in a statement, referring to the US holiday observed on Sunday. 'Instead of celebrating together, he is languishing in ICE detention as punishment for his advocacy on behalf of his fellow Palestinians. It is unjust, it is shocking, and it is disgraceful.' Since his March 8 arrest by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, Khalil has become a symbol of President Donald Trump's willingness to stifle pro-Palestinian student activism against the Gaza war, in the name of curbing anti-Semitism. At the time a graduate student at New York's Columbia University, Khalil was one of the most visible leaders of nationwide campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza. Authorities transferred Khalil, who was born in Syria to Palestinian parents, nearly 2,000 kilometers (1,242 miles) from his home in New York to a detention center in Louisiana, pending deportation. His wife Noor Abdalla, a Michigan-born dentist, gave birth to their son while Khalil was in detention.
