Russia missile strike kills more than 20 in Ukraine's Sumy, mayor says
A Russian ballistic missile strike on the northeastern Ukrainian city of Sumy killed at least 21 people on Sunday morning, the city's acting mayor and local emergency services said, as many there celebrated Palm Sunday.
"The enemy struck the civilian population again," acting Mayor Artem Kobzar wrote on Telegram. At least 21 people were confirmed killed, Kobzar said. At least another 20 people were injured. The Sumy City Council said the strike hit multiple buildings, including residential ones.
"On this bright day of Palm Sunday, our community suffered a terrible tragedy," Kobzar wrote.
Andriy Yermak, the head of Ukraine's presidential office, wrote, "The Russians hit the city of Sumy with missiles, killing civilians."
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Telegram that the "terrible strike" hit "an ordinary city street, ordinary life: houses, educational institutions, cars on the street."
"And this is on a day when people go to church: Palm Sunday, the feast of the lord's entry into Jerusalem," he added. "Only a scoundrel can act like this. Taking the lives of ordinary people. My condolences to the relatives and friends. A rescue operation is underway now. All necessary services are working."
"A tough reaction from the world is needed," Zelenskyy wrote. "The United States, Europe, everyone in the world who wants an end to this war and murders. Russia wants exactly this kind of terror and is dragging out this war. Without pressure on the aggressor, peace is impossible."
"Talks have never stopped ballistic missiles and air bombs," Zelenskyy said. "We need the kind of attitude towards Russia that a terrorist deserves."
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
ABC News' Natalia Popova, Natalia Kushnir and Victoria Beaule contributed to this report.
Russia missile strike kills more than 20 in Ukraine's Sumy, mayor says originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Satellite images show damaged North Korean warship moved to a port for repair, report says
SEOUL (Reuters) -A North Korean stricken destroyer that partially capsized during a botched launching ceremony has arrived at a ship repair factory, a Washington think tank said. The destroyer that suffered a failed launch was moved to the graving dock at Rajin Dockyard, also known as Rajin Ship Repair Factory, by June 8, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said based on satellite imagery. State media reported on Friday that experts would examine the hull for the next stage of restorations, to be carried out at Rajin Dockyard for 7-10 days. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, who witnessed the failed launch of the destroyer, called the accident a "criminal act". Since the accident in May, North Korea has said it detained several officials, and Kim ordered the ship restored before a ruling party meeting this month. The Rajin shipyard, located near the Russian border, has produced many of North Korea's larger warships for decades, CSIS said. "Once any critical repairs or restoration work are completed, the vessel will likely be transferred to the shipyard's fitting out dock, where its weapons and other systems will be installed and subsequently commissioned," the think tank said in a report. The ship lay on its side in the water after the botched launch, but it was pulled upright, according to U.S. researchers and the South Korean military. The 5,000-ton destroyers launched by North Korea this year are the country's largest warships yet, part of leader Kim's push to upgrade its naval power with vessels capable of carrying and launching dozens of missiles.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why the damage Elon Musk faces from his Trump feud is just getting started
The spectacular breakup of Donald Trump and Elon Musk could soon get far worse for the Tesla CEO—while doing little good for the U.S. president. Some political pundits have portrayed last week's blowup as merely yet another exit by a disgruntled Trump ally. But the president's anger toward Musk seems worse than his temper tantrums following the departures of other hand-picked loyalists, such as Vice President Mike Pence, Attorneys General Jeff Sessions and Bill Barr, Secretaries of State Rex Tillerson and Mike Pompeo, or Secretaries of Defense James Mattis and Mark Esper. And it's not a faux morality play about business leaders facing punishment for straying outside their lane. Musk, given his stature, is different than other CEOs who have taken pro-Trump or anti-Trump stances, whether from Papa John's, Goya Foods, MyPillow, Coca-Cola, Delta, or Amazon. And this is not about Musk taking a principled stand on the soaring national debt or any other political issue. Instead, the blowup reflects two unrestrained top-down leaders fighting it out in a struggle for supremacy. Musk's biggest mistake was about the nature of his role—as an advisor to Trump, not the primary character he believed himself to be. Even now, he continues to overestimate his own importance and indispensability. Trump, who relies on a hub-and-spokes model of leadership—where all power is centralized in himself while he divides and conquers his warring subordinates—has always been deeply resentful of consiglieres who try to outmaneuver or constrain him. Trump will never tolerate business leaders who believe they are bigger than the big boss. Musk apparently believed that his money and largesse insulated him and entitled him to a greater role as 'first buddy.' But that was misguided if not delusional. Consider advisors with grandiosity who threatened to undermine sovereign bosses, including the Russian mystic Grigori Rasputin, who engineered creeping control over Czar Nicholas II; Mark Hanna, portrayed in his time as the grand puppeteer controlling President William McKinley; and President Woodrow Wilson's close advisor Colonel Edward House, who undermined Wilson's Versailles negotiations after World War I. All these audacious advisors found their presumption punctured by icing out or even execution. A look at recent Russian history is illustrative here. Consider Yukos boss Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Wagner chief Yevgeny Prigozhin after they dared challenge the power of Vladimir Putin, a strongman Trump has expressed admiration for. We hosted Mikhail Khodorkovsky at our Yale CEO summits during the height of his power at Yukos in the early 2000s, when he controlled virtually all of Russia's oil and gas reserves. He didn't hesitate to criticize Putin at our events, openly presenting a different path for Russia's future. When he started bringing his show on the road within Russia—thinking that Putin needed his money and support too much to whack him—he learned his money didn't buy him the protection he thought it did. Putin quickly moved to nationalize Khodorkovsky's assets, forming an alliance with his business rivals to divvy up his once-great wealth. More recently, Wagner boss Prigozhin believed his mercenary group had become so indispensable—thanks to its battlefield triumphs, raw military might, and global wealth—that he could challenge the authority of Putin's top lieutenants, blasting them in videos posted on Telegram for mishandling the Urkaine invasion. When Prigozhin failed to sway them with this bullying, he thought he could get away with marching on Moscow with his forces and starting an insurrection within Russia against Putin's rule. The full delusion of this folly was revealed when little of the domestic support Prigozhin expected materialized. Not long after he died when his plane plunged out of the skies, the victim of sabotage—one wonders by who. Prigozhin was among at least 60 prominent Russians who have met suspicious deaths since the start of Putin's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. USA Today documented around 40 such cases prior to then as well, and the actual number is likely to be even higher. Musk and his defenders, emboldened by his status as the world's wealthiest person, apparently have either forgotten such lessons or don't think they apply to Musk. Last week, Musk taunted on X, 'Trump has 3.5 years left as president, but I will be around for 40+ years.' He also called for Trump's impeachment and accused him of being illicitly connected to the late pedophile and accused rapist Jeffrey Epstein. Musk did all this despite his companies depending on government support in one way or another. That includes Tesla via EV tax credits, SpaceX via contracts, and Neuralink and the Boring Company via regulatory clearances. Given that Trump held up regulatory clearances of the AT&T-TimeWarner deal—which involved less personal animus than his feud with Musk—one wonders how long he could gum up the works for Musk now. Musk might be well served to remember the lessons embodied by Khodorkovsky and Prigozhin, however different the contexts. Meanwhile, with Trump insinuating Musk's government interest is motivated by commercial self-gain and Musk accusing Trump of entanglement with Epstein—and having the resources to fund an anti-Trump counterrevolution—the news media might be a better investment than AI or cryptocurrency. Jeffrey Sonnenfeld is the Lester Crown Professor in Management Practice and president and founder of the Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute. Steven Tian is the director of research at the Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute. The opinions expressed in commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Russia Giving North Korea Shahed-136 Attack Drone Production Capability: Budanov
In a one-hour-long exclusive interview with The War Zone on June 7, Lt. Gen. Kyrylo Budanov offered his unique take on a wide range of topics, from the state of the war to the advancements in Ukraine's drone boat campaign against Russia to whether Kyiv will attempt to attack Russian nuclear submarines. In this installment, Budanov, commander of Ukraine's Defense Intelligence Directorate (GUR), told us how Russia is supplying technology and knowledge to help North Korea build long-range kamikaze drones and drastically improve the accuracy of its KN-23 short-range ballistic missiles. This is in addition to helping to develop Pyongyang's fledgling submarine-based nuclear deterrent. Russia has become a key supporter of Russia's war effort, providing millions of artillery rounds and even troops in exchange. Budanov says the ability to produce the Shahed family of drones, in particular, which has been the most prolific long-range aerial threat to Ukraine for years, is being given to North Korea. Originally provided by Iran, Russia is now building about 2,000 per month with plans to increase that to 5,000 per month. Russia is continually improving their range, payload, connectivity and attack patterns. Between Sunday night and Monday alone, Russia launched 479 Shaheds and decoys of various types across Ukraine, according to the Ukrainian Air Force. Having Shaheds will give North Korea the ability to hit targets anywhere in South Korea and potentially in huge volumes. They can overwhelm the South's air defenses, paving the way for attacks by other munitions. They could also be exported back to Russia to support the war in Ukraine. Overnight, Ukraine successfully intercepted almost 500 Russian drones and missiles in what officials described as one of the largest and most intense attacks since the start of the full-scale invasion. The barrage included hundreds of Shahed-type drones, cruise missiles, and… — TVP World (@TVPWorld_com) June 9, 2025 The first batch of KN-23s North Korea provided to Russia were woefully inadequate. According to a report from Ukrainian state prosecutors, around half of them — also known as Hwasong-11 — not only deviated from their trajectory but also exploded in midair. Since then, they have been dramatically improved thanks to Russian help, Budanov told us, now striking with deadly accuracy. This has given Russia a badly needed source of SRBMs. These improvements could extend beyond the KN-23s. While Budanov did not specify what was changed, this is likely to boost the capabilities of its many other ballistic missiles, extending the dangers beyond the peninsula. Russian aid to North Korea, Budanov suggests, will alter the balance of power on the peninsula. With that background out of the way, here are the questions and answers pertaining to these issues from our interview, which have been lightly edited for clarity: Q: What are the latest developments about North Korea and its assistance to Russia? A: [There are] agreements on the beginning of the creation of capabilities to produce UAVs of the Garpiya and Geran [the Russian version of Iranian Shahed-136 drones] types on the territory of North Korea. It will for sure bring changes in the military balance in the region between North Korea and South Korea. Q: How many of these drones will Russia help North Korea develop? A: So they just agreed to start the organization of this production on the territory of North Korea. Q: What else is Russia giving North Korea in turn for supplying troops and weapons? A: It's more about technology transfer. Q: What kind of technology? A: One example is the technology for the production of UAVs. The other technological solution is, I told you before about the KN-23 ballistic missiles. Initially, with the beginning of the transfer to Russia, they were flying with a deviation of a few kilometers, but now they are exactly hitting the target. This is the result of the common work of Russian and North Korean specialists. Also, there is the modernization of the aviation means of engagement — long-range air-to-air missiles. Particular technologies on submarines. Unfortunately, ballistic missiles which are carriers of nuclear payloads. Q: So Russia is helping North Korea improve its nuclear weapon system as well? A: So let's say they had huge problems with the carriers of these missiles and the firing from their sea component. And Russians are helping them with this. And the great demonstration of this for everybody is, as I mentioned before, this famous KN-23 ballistic missile. The KN-23 missiles that were delivered in the very beginning, now it's an absolutely different missile in [terms] of their technical characteristics. The accuracy is increased many times. Q: What's the latest on North Korean troops, weapons and equipment being delivered to Russia, and what is Russia giving in return? How many North Korean troops are in Russia, and is any new equipment going there? A: The range of armaments provided by North Korea to Russia is quite wide, starting with [122mm] D-74 [howitzers] and 107mm infantry variant [multiple launch rocket systems] MLRS systems to 240mm MLRS and the 170mn M1989 [Koksan self-propelled artillery guns]. Unfortunately, this gun is demonstrating itself quite well in battle. It's firing from quite a long range, and it's quite good in terms of accuracy. I was able to geolocate and thus confirm that the photo of North Korean M-1978/1989 Koksan 170mm SPGs was taken in Russia. 56.069386, 92.920244Krasnoyarsk, central Russiahttps:// — Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (BlueSky too) (@Archer83Able) November 14, 2024 Q: How many Koksans have they gotten and how many will they get? A: We have data that the Russian Federation was provided 120 pieces. But I think that supply will continue because these guns are demonstrating themselves quite well. This is unfortunate for us because this is artillery for long-range firing. Q: How many North Korean troops are there in Russia now? A: There are about 11,000 North Korean troops in Kursk Oblast. But there is also the problem of the visit of [Sergei Shoigu], the Secretary of the National Security Council of the Russian Federation, to North Korea. And there he, among other things, agreed on the beginning of work of so-called labor migrants on the territory of Russia in order to partially replace the labor migrants from Central Asia that they consider as not stable for their state and vulnerable to recruitment by our special services and Western ones. But there is a big probability that people among this labor migrant, they will start to sign contracts with the Ministry of Defense of Russia. And it wouldn't be the warriors from North Korea. It would be Russian warriors, but of North Korean nationality. Q: How many of those migrant workers from North Korea do you anticipate will go? A: So this agreement just happened recently. That's why we [are] just working on the specific numbers. And we would like to answer this question. We need to confirm the exact number that will come to Russia. Stay tuned for our second installment from our most recent interview with Budanov that includes discussions about recent aid provided to Russia by China and Iran. Contact the author: howard@
