MPs offer support and warnings over steel measures
MPs from around the region were among those spoke in the House of Commons on Saturday during the debate on saving British Steel's Scunthorpe plant from closure.
The steelworks, where 2,700 workers face an uncertain future, have become a bit of a political football.
The speeches were made during a rare Saturday sitting in Parliament to debate the Steel Industry (Special Measures) Bill.
Reform UK's Richard Tice said he wanted British Steel to be privatised, Conservative MP Victoria Atkins said she was worried about the cost to the taxpayer, and Labour's Melanie Onn said the bill was just a "sticking plaster".
The government said the legislation would allow ministers to "take control" of the Lincolnshire site and stop its Chinese owner from closing the blast furnaces.
Tice, the MP for Boston and Skegness, told the Commons: "Given the secretary of state has inferred that actually the owners Jingye are not acting and have not acted in good faith, surely the right thing to do is to seize this great opportunity now this weekend and nationalise British Steel."
Sir David Davis, a Conservative former minister and MP for Goole and Pocklington, said MPs were debating a "nationalisation in all but name" bill, adding: "I would have voted for nationalisation. I will vote for this Bill for a simple reason - this buys us time.
"It's a reprieve, not a rescue. I think that's what people have to understand."
Atkins, shadow environment secretary and Conservative MP for Louth and Horncastle, accused the government of recalling Parliament in a panic.
Speaking outside the Commons after the debate, she said the legislation didn't contain the detail needed to "safeguard jobs and to protect the steel industry".
She argued that taxpayers had not been told what the cost would be, and questions remained around what the future liabilities would be.
"What are the prospects of the private sector becoming involved again?" she asked.
Onn, the Labour MP for Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes, warned that the legislation should not be just a temporary solution.
"The measures today are not without risk, and unless we set a course for steel in the UK that closely aligns with our industrial strategy, this will only be another sticking plaster for a site that has already been put through the wringer too many times over the years," she said.
She called for a carbon tariff to be introduced, as the EU has, to stop cheaper steel being dumped in the UK.
Martin Vickers, the Conservative MP for Brigg and Immingham, accused the government of acting slowly on the issue, and pointed out that he had first raised the issue last year.
"I appreciate that ministers cannot give away their negotiating position, but having made that point as long ago as September, surely the government were beginning to realise that the negotiations with Jingye were going nowhere," he said.
Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh called on the government to "get real" over the energy costs of running the Scunthorpe steelworks.
The Conservative MP for Gainsborough asked: "Why are we loading the most expensive energy costs on our own steel production?"
He later added: "We have to stop these green energy costs. We have to be realistic."
When the bill reached the House of Lords, the Bishop of Lincoln, the Right Reverend Stephen Conway, said: "I encourage the government to remember the pastoral issues alongside the practical measures it is outlining today.
"The two are linked and getting this right will require the government to engage with local partners on the ground... to ensure that we are able to respond together to the impact of what is happening to a resilient but fragile community.
"My prayers are with the many people who will feel uncertainty and anxiety about the present and the future, who will require from us a response that is pastoral as well as practical," he said.
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
We want our steel back, say Scunthorpe's workers
Why is British Steel in trouble and who owns it?
Government aims to take control of British Steel
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom Just Absolutely Dragged Trump's Military Parade, And Trump's Really, Really Not Gonna Like It
Donald Trump's $45 million military parade is this weekend in DC. The tanks have arrived. The barricades are up. The soldiers have been rehearsing. Related: "Let Them Eat Teslas": People At The "No Kings" Protests This Weekend Brought Signs That Were So Clever I'm Still Laughing About Them The stage has been set. The show will go on (unless there is lightning, which is a possibility). Related: This Conservative Said He Wears A Fake ICE Uniform For A Really, Really, Really Gross Reason Gavin Newsom gave his thoughts about the parade on Thursday and they're going viral: MSNBC/atrupar/Twitter: @atrupar "It's a vulgar display. It's the kind of thing you see with Kim Jong-un, you see it with Putin, you see with dictators around the world that are weak and just want to demonstrate strength. Weakness masquerading as strength. To fete the dear leader on his birthday? What an embarrassment." he said. "Honestly, that's about as small as it gets." "How weak, how weak do you have to be to commandeer the military to fete you on your birthday in a vulgar display of weakness? That's Donald Trump." As with just about everything Newsom has said this week, people are loving it: "Absolutely 100% correct," this person commented. Another person said, "You have to give the man points for hitting Trump right where it hurts most." Another person wrote, "Gavin Newsom is showing other Democrats how it's done." And this person said, "Newsom has cracked the code." Also in In the News: "Honestly Speechless At How Evil This Is": 26 Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week Also in In the News: This Dem Lawmaker Is Going Viral For His Extremely Shady Question To Secretary Kristi Noem Also in In the News: Well, Well, Well, For The Second Time In 2 Weeks, People Are Letting JD Vance Know EXACTLY How They Feel About Him In Public


Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
Israel Fights Also for Us
When a society can no longer distinguish between good and evil, between victim and perpetrator, it gives up. This dynamic is one of the great constants of human history. It is a lesson people in free societies — and people in totalitarian societies who yearn to be free — should keep in mind during the climactic showdown underway in the Middle East. Israel has struck a blow to prevent Iran from developing nuclear bombs — weapons that it might credibly use toward its stated goal of removing Israel from the planet. Make no mistake: This is not simply a matter of regional security. Nor should it be a proxy for whether one supports or opposes the current Israeli government's policy on Gaza or other subjects. This conflict is a central front in a global contest in which the forces of tyranny and violence in recent years have been gaining ground against the forces of freedom, which too often are demoralized and divided. In a world full of bad actors, Iran is the most aggressive and dangerous totalitarian force of our time. Its leaders seek to weaken and destroy free society, democracy and human rights with Russian and Chinese support. In Iran, women are systematically oppressed and abused. Homosexuals are murdered. Those who think differently are imprisoned and tortured. In Tehran, the cynical abuse of the civilian population in Gaza as human shields is also cold-bloodedly conceived and financed. According to official state doctrine, the primary goal of the mullahs in Tehran is the annihilation of the State of Israel. Ayatollah Khamenei has described Israel as a 'cancerous tumor.' And clocks in the streets of Tehran celebrate countdowns to the 'destruction of Israel.' But Israel is only the first target. Once Israel falls, Europe and America will be the focus. Radical Sunni and Shiite Islamism has been preparing for this for decades. The fatwa against Salman Rushdie, 9/11, the attacks in Paris, the caliphate of ISIS — each event was a warning sign. Only those who did not want to see the signs are surprised today. The attacks are directed against our values, our way of life. It is therefore surprising that Israel is not being celebrated worldwide for its historic, extremely precise and necessary strike against Iranian nuclear weapons facilities and for the targeted killing of leading terrorists, but that the public response is dominated by anti-Israel propaganda. The intelligence and precision of Israel's actions are not admired but are instead used here and there to perpetuate blatantly antisemitic stereotypes. This attitude is characterized not only by racist undertones, but also by a strange self-forgetfulness. If the perpetrator-victim reversal that has been repeatedly observed since Oct. 7 applies even in the most obvious case — Iran — then this can only be interpreted to mean that we are in the process of losing the culture war, which in reality has long since become a war of civilizations. And we seem to have no problem with that. It is what Michel Houellebecq called 'submission' in his visionary novel 10 years ago. As someone who has 40 years' experience as a journalist and publishing executive, I believe every government should be questioned critically about all the details of its policies — above all on matters of war and its consequences. But those details should not be allowed to obscure larger historical truths. Perhaps a German of my generation has a useful vantage point. Born in 1963, I grew up in a country and continent still shadowed by World War II and its crimes, including an effort by Germany to eradicate Jews across Europe. The first half of my journalism career saw freedom on the march. The Soviet Union collapsed, authoritarian governments across Eastern Europe were routed, Germany was reunited under democracy. The second half of my career, however, with authoritarianism on the rise in all directions — with governments hostile to the very idea of journalism, as well as democracy, pluralism, rule of law and basic standards of decency. These unwelcome developments highlighted how fragile the triumphs of the late 20th century may be in the 21st. The contest between free societies and murderous tyrants is enduring. That's why warnings of dangerous escalation that can be heard from politicians in the West are particularly misplaced. The argument is as stale as it is false. Those warning of escalation are to blame for Vladimir Putin being on the verge of winning his terrible war of conquest in Ukraine. And those warning of escalation are to blame for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. This could have been prevented with decisive resistance from the West in the first days of the attack. Dictators decide for themselves when to escalate. Usually when they do not encounter enough strength and resistance. This also applies to Iran. If Israel does not achieve its goals — destruction of the nuclear facilities, maximum weakening of the terrorist regime and, ideally, the removal of the mullahs — the world will quickly look very different. China will seize this historic opportunity to annex Taiwan sooner than expected. Largely without resistance. The moment is favorable. Because America and Europe cannot win a three-front war and therefore cannot fight it. But if the anti-democratic triangle — China, Russia, Iran — succeeds in this coup, a different, non-democratic world order will prevail. That is why America and Europe, in their own interests alone, must stand united with Israel and do everything in their power to ensure that this historic liberation is achieved. This morning, my son asked me a question: 'In the near future, will Israel become more like us, living in peace, or will we become more like Israel?' It depends. It depends on us.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
CBS News hammered on social media for promoting ‘No Kings Day' anti-Trump protest merchandise
CBS News is currently facing backlash on social media after they posted what appeared to be an advertisement for 'No Kings Day' protest merchandise to X on Friday, with users slamming the outlet for pushing the anti-Trump goods on the eve of a large-scale political protest. Thousands of people are expected to rally in hundreds of cities across America on Saturday to protest the Trump administration and counter the president's military parade in Washington, D.C. to mark the Army's 250th birthday. Today is also Flag Day, which commemorates the adoption of the U.S. flag on June 14, 1777. The counter-protesters are framing their demonstrations under the slogan 'No Kings,' describing it as a 'day of defiance' against President Donald Trump and his allies while others have been calling for the president to be 'dethroned.' Author and Senior Analyst for strategy at the Center for Security Policy, J. Michael Waller, slammed CBS news for marketing 'radical merchandise on eve of nationwide protest/riot.' Another X user, Bonchie, a writer for the conservative news outlet RedState, mocked the news outlet for 'doing free advertisements for Chinese-made, left-wing protest merch.' Mollie Hemingway, editor-in-chief of The Federalist and a Fox News contributor, criticized the liberal news outlet for 'no longer even remotely pretending to be news' and for embracing its role as 'Democrat propagandists.' 3 X users slammed the outlet for pushing the anti-Trump goods on the eve of a large-scale political protest. CBS News / X Another X user questioned whether CBS News 'advertising merch for a political event' violates any Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines, slamming the outlet's decision for being 'highly unethical.' 3 CBS News signage ahead of the first vice presidential debate across the street from the CBS Broadcast Center in New York, US, on Monday, Sept. 30, 2024. Bloomberg via Getty Images This is not the only controversy CBS News is currently embroiled in. In May, CBS News President and CEO Wendy McMahon announced she was stepping down in a stunning move for the embattled company. Her exit follows that of longtime '60 Minutes' producer Bill Owens, who quit the prior month because he felt he'd lost journalistic independence amid an ongoing legal battle with Trump. In another blow to the troubled company, '60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley spoke out about President Donald Trump's lawsuit against CBS and its parent company last Saturday, arguing that a settlement would be 'very damaging.' 3 Protesters march through the streets of downtown as part of a nation wide 'No Kings' demonstration on June 14, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois. Getty Images 'Well, it'd be very damaging to CBS, to Paramount, to the reputation of those companies,' Pelley said during a conversation with CNN's Anderson Cooper on Saturday, who asked how harmful a settlement and potential apology would be to the network. Trump filed a lawsuit against Paramount Global, CBS News' parent company, over a '60 Minutes' interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris in October 2024. Fox News Digital confirmed that Trump rejected a $15 million offer to settle his lawsuit, according to a source familiar with the matter, as the president's legal team is also demanding at least $25 million and an apology from CBS News. Fox News Digital has reached out to CBS News for comment regarding their article on 'No Kings Day' merchandise.