Israeli navy attacks docks in Yemen port city of Hodeidah
The Israeli navy attacked docks in Yemen 's Houthi rebel-held port city of Hodeidah on Tuesday, striking sites that are crucial to handling aid shipments to the country.
It was the first time the Israeli navy has been involved in attacks against the Iran-backed Houthis. Israel launched two strikes on docks in Hodeidah, the Houthi-run Al Masirah TV channel reported.
The attacks come after the Israeli military on Monday called on people to leave the Houthi-controlled ports of Ras Isa, Hodeidah and Salif.
"Israeli navy missile ships struck terror targets belonging to the Houthi terrorist regime in the port of Hodeidah ... following the aggression of the Houthi terrorist regime towards the state of Israel, including the launch of surface-to-surface missiles and UAVs towards Israeli territory," the military said in a statement on Tuesday.
'The port is used to transfer weapons and is a further example of the Houthi terrorist regime's cynical exploitation of civilian infrastructure in order to advance terrorist activities.'
Hodeidah has been the main entry point for food and other humanitarian aid since Yemen 's civil war began in 2014, when the Houthis seized the capital Sanaa.
The Houthis have exchanged fire with Israel since the start of the Gaza war in October 2023. The rebels have also launched persistent missile and drone attacks against commercial shipping in the Red Sea, in what they describe as an effort to end Israel's offensive in Gaza. The crisis has greatly reduced the flow of trade through the maritime corridor, which typically handles $1 trillion of goods a year.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz threatened the Houthis with a naval and air blockade if their attacks continue. "We warned the Houthi terror organisation that if they continue to fire towards Israel, they will face a powerful response and will be subjected to a naval and aerial blockade," he said in a statement on X.
The US has also launched strikes on Houthi sites, but announced a ceasefire with the group early last month. President Donald Trump paused the attacks just before a trip to the Middle East, saying the rebels had 'capitulated' to US demands. Israel was not part of the ceasefire deal.
American navy ships travelled through the Red Sea and Bab Al Mandeb strait 'multiple times in recent days' without facing Houthi attacks, US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said in a post on X early on Tuesday.
'These transits occurred without challenge and demonstrate the success of both Operation Rough Rider and the President's peace through strength agenda,' he said, referring to an intense US bombing campaign against the Houthis between March and May.
In early May, Israel launched a devastating attack on Sanaa airport. Its general director, Khaled Al Shaief, said the strikes caused 'extensive damage'.
The attacks involved 50 bombs and dozens of aircraft, the Israeli military said, adding that the airport was "fully disabled".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
19 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
US ambassador to Israel says he does not think Palestinian state is US policy goal
Washington's ambassador to Israel said he did not think an independent Palestinian state remains a US foreign policy goal, prompting the State Department to say he spoke for himself while the White House referred to past comments from President Donald Trump expressing doubts about a two-state solution. "I don't think so," US Ambassador Mike Huckabee said in an interview with Bloomberg News published on Tuesday, when asked if a Palestinian state remains a goal of US policy. Asked about Huckabee's comments, the White House referred to remarks earlier this year by Trump when he proposed a US takeover of Gaza, which was condemned globally by rights groups, Arab states, Palestinians and the UN as a proposal of "ethnic cleansing." The White House also referred to remarks by Trump from last year before he won the 2024 election when he said: "I'm not sure a two-state solution anymore is going to work." . Asked whether Huckabee's remarks represented a change in US policy, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce declined to comment on Tuesday, saying policy-making was a matter for Trump and the White House. "I'm not going to explain them or really comment on them at all. I think he certainly speaks for himself," Bruce told reporters. Huckabee, an evangelical Christian, is a staunch pro-Israel conservative. "Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it," Huckabee was quoted as saying by Bloomberg. Those probably won't happen "in our lifetime," he said. Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of US Middle East policy. Trump has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term. Huckabee suggested a piece of land could be carved out of a Muslim country rather than asking Israel to make room. "Does it have to be in Judea and Samaria?" Huckabee said, using the biblical name the Israeli government favors for the Israeli-occupied West Bank, where some 3 million Palestinians live. Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor, has been a vocal supporter of Israel throughout his political career and a longtime defender of Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Trump has pursued strongly pro-Israel policies as president and his choice of Huckabee as ambassador signaled that they would continue. The United States has for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians that would create a state for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza alongside Israel. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023, when Palestinian Hamas militants attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, according to Israeli allies. US ally Israel's subsequent military assault on Gaza has killed nearly 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, while internally displacing nearly Gaza's entire population and causing a hunger crisis. The assault has also triggered accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations.
Khaleej Times
34 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Watch: UAE foreign minister meets US state secretary; discusses Gaza, regional issues
The UAE's foreign minister met with US' Secretary of State Marco Rubio on June 10 at the Department of State where they discussed regional issues. The visit comes sometime after US President Donald Trump's historic visit to the UAE on May 13, amid his Gulf tour that included Saudi Arabia and Qatar as well. This was the first international trip during his second term of presidency. UAE Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan discussed President Trump's visit and the importance of the US-UAE strategic partnership to promote security and prosperity. Watch the video of their meeting here: Rubio thanked Sheikh Abdullah for the UAE's provision of humanitarian assistance in the Gaza Strip and highlighted the imperative of ensuring that Hamas can never rule Gaza or threaten Israel again. They discussed other regional issues, which included the humanitarian crises in Syria and Sudan.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu faces biggest government crisis yet
In only a matter of days it has become clear that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's far-right government is the closest it has come to collapse. It is not because of the catastrophic security failure of the October 7 attacks; the Israeli hostages still languishing in Gaza; nor the unprecedented international isolation facing Israel as anger mounts over its war in the strip. Instead, Israel could be on the cusp of new elections because of an internal dispute tearing apart Mr Netanyahu's coalition, which turns on its failure to exempt ultra-Orthodox young men from being conscripted into the military. Passing such a law is a priority of certain parties, and a demand they made of Mr Netanyahu when joining his coalition. The army is viewed as a melting pot of secular and religious, men and women, in which young ultra-Orthodox men are highly likely to drift from the conservative ways. Many ultra-Orthodox people are ambivalent about nationalism and the state of Israel, some even anti-Zionist, viewing the state as a man-made enterprise and not the true Israel to be brought about only by God. The crisis is hardly a surprise. How ultra-Orthodox Israelis interact with wider national life is a question that has dogged the country for decades. The community's leaders try guard their people from anything that might interrupt their secluded, strict way of life. That mission is becoming harder to pull off as the group's numbers have grown by more than 500 per cent since 1979, according to a 2023 report by the Haredi Policy Research Institute. While the question of military service was always a part of the debate, it also extended to issues like participation (particularly by men) in the general workforce, how the community educates its children, and the subsidies it receives. But with the Israeli military suffering a manpower shortage during the Gaza war, new security problems on the horizon and major fatigue in reservist troops, the ultra-Orthodox absence from duty is enraging all other Israelis, from left to right. How did the crisis begin? Last week, United Torah Judaism, one of the two ultra-Orthodox parties in Mr Netanyahu's coalition, backed dissolving the Knesset to pave the way for elections. On Monday, the other party, Shas, announced that it backed the same. Shas's involvement means that Mr Netanyahu would no longer have a majority in the Knesset, a devastating blow as opposition parties would easily have the numbers to topple the government. A way out of the crisis could lie with the ultra-Orthodox parties and Yuli Edelstein, chairman of the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee, who have not been able to find a compromise, despite last-ditch talks. Mr Edelstein, a member of Mr Netanyahu's Likud party, previously vowed to find a solution that 'significantly increases [the military's] conscription base,' echoing frustration by many in the ultranationalist, hawkish coalition at the ultra-Orthodox refusal to serve. Last week a spiritual leader in the Shas party said Mr Edelstein's 'soul is an abomination'. Is there room for compromise? An enlistment bill being drafted by Mr Edelstein's committee reportedly includes major financial sanctions against ultra-Orthodox men who ignore draft orders, including the loss of tax benefits and subsidies. There are even reports that the sanctions would prevent dodgers from travelling abroad. While it is possible some of these sanctions could be negotiated on, the main disagreement about whether the community should be drafted at all appears insurmountable. 'I don't see that they'll find a compromise regarding the scope of sanctions,' said Aviv Bushinsky, a former spokesman for Mr Netanyahu. 'What they want to do is to find a way that the sanctions will be implemented not immediately but within a year from now … but again you hear the spiritual leaders say no way by all means,' he added. What could happen next? Opponents of Mr Netanyahu now have to decide how to best approach a possible bill to dissolve parliament. Such a bill would have to pass a preliminary vote and then three readings. If it does not compete these steps then there is a delay until the same bill can be voted on again, giving Mr Netanyahu months to continue negotiations with coalition partners for a solution. How likely are the ultra-Orthodox parties to topple the government? While the rage of the ultra-Orthodox parties is palpable, many commentators note that they are unlikely after new elections to find a government even close to as sympathetic as Mr Netanyahu's. Emphasising the unjustness of ultra-Orthodox exemptions while sympathising with the sacrifice of soldiers is a crucial tactic of opposition parties, whose voters are unlikely to tolerate supporting a government that gives the ultra-Orthodox leeway on the issue. Despite this, the anger and threats of the community's political and spiritual leaders have never been so strong. It is also uncertain the extent to which the leadership views triggering elections as a matter of worldly tactical politics or God's will. What does this mean for Mr Netanyahu? Mr Netanyahu is by far the most successful politician in Israeli history, serving several terms in office. He is viewed as a truly gifted political survivor and has so far weathered the scandal of the October 7 attacks, despite many believing he would not last six months after at first, and a continuing corruption trial. However, Mr Bushinsky said that his current position is very bad. 'As things are at the moment, Netanyahu is being dragged, not leading, not controlling the situation,' he said. 'His approach now is to hug his allies and say everyone is having good conversations. This is not customary to him. He is usually very aggressive and tries to keep control. 'Netanyahu wants to reach something more tangible – a flag he can wave, be it a strike on Iran, total victory in Gaza. At the moment to go to elections without such tangible successes would be devastating.'
