&w=3840&q=100)
Latest crash shows how ships have been hitting Brooklyn Bridge for 150 yrs
A Mexican navy tall ship's fatal collision with the Brooklyn Bridge on Saturday highlighted a hazard that has worried seafarers for nearly 150 years.
Even before construction on the bridge was finished in the late 19th century, the topmast of a passing US Navy ship hit the span's wires and vessels continued to clip the iconic New York City structure for many years.
But historians say Saturday's crash appears to be the first boat collision with the bridge to take the lives of crew members. Two Mexican naval cadets died and more were injured after the training ship Cuauhtemoc's masts crashed into the bridge as dozens of sailors stood harnessed high up in rigging as part of a public display.
That's the first and possibly only time where there's been a fatality onboard of a ship that struck the Brooklyn Bridge, said Dominique Jean-Louis, chief historian at the Center for Brooklyn History, part of the Brooklyn Public Library.
Opened in 1883, the Brooklyn Bridge spans the East River, connecting its eponymous borough's downtown to Manhattan. The highest point of the bridge's underside is listed at 135 feet (41.1 metres) on average above the water, but it fluctuates with the tides.
During construction, a warehouse owner sued state officials first to stop the bridge and then for compensation arguing that some ships still had topmasts that exceeded the height. The case made it all the way up to the US Supreme Court, which dismissed the lawsuit, determining that the bridge did not unduly restrict ship navigation.
Before that decision, however, at least one ship had already tangled with the still-under-construction crossing.
According to an 1878 report in the New York Daily Tribune, the US Navy wooden steam training ship USS Minnesota was headed toward the high point of the bridge after planning ahead and lowering its topmast. But at the last minute, it had to change course to avoid an oncoming ship, sending it to an area with lower clearance and striking the bridge's wires. Nobody was reported injured.
By the time the bridge was complete, steam ships were transporting the lion's share of goods, and high-masted ships were waning in importance, said Richard Haw, professor of interdisciplinary studies at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and the author of two books about the Brooklyn Bridge.
They go from sail ships to steam ships, Haw said. You don't need a huge clearance.
Yet mast strikes continued, including at least two reported in the 1920s one of which was with the US Navy's flagship USS Seattle, which had a little wooden pole that was a little too high," Jean-Louis said.
In 1941, the SS Nyassa was bringing hundreds of refugees to New York City when the captain miscalculated the tide and part of its mast was bent into a right angle by the bridge's underspan, according to a New York Times article at the time that described a crunching sound.
Among the refugees on board was Hedwig Ehrlich, widow of the Nobel Prize-winning Jewish German scientist Paul Ehrlich, as she headed to live with daughters in San Francisco.
As the 20th century went on, ships got taller and wider. And they still required mast-like appendages for observation and communication.
A shipyard just north of the bridge, now known as the Brooklyn Navy Yard, churned out larger and larger ships during and after World War II, including aircraft carriers that could barely fit beneath the bridge.
One photo from 1961 shows the USS Constellation aircraft carrier leaving the navy yard and passing underneath the Brooklyn Bridge with a mast that folded down onto the ship's deck, specially designed to get out into the harbour.
In the past two decades, at least three minor strikes have been reported against the bridge's underside or base, including a crane being pulled via barge in 2012, which tore into temporary scaffolding mounted underneath the bridge.
A similar crane accident damaged peripheral bridge maintenance equipment in July of 2023, according to a Coast Guard incident report.
None of the modern accident reports document serious injuries.
But off the water, the bridge has been a site of tragedy long before Saturday's crash. More than 20 people were killed and countless crippled while building it, including workers injured by decompression sickness, a little-understood affect of working in underwater in boxes sunk to the riverbed.
Twelve people died in a panic-driven stampede among crowds visiting the bridge shortly after it opened to the public in 1883.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
6 days ago
- NDTV
Love Dosa? Here Are 6 Signs That Say You're A True Fan
Dosa is one dish that has fans across the world. Loved for its light and crispy texture, it is best enjoyed with piping hot sambar and chutney. While plain or masala dosa are timeless, there are now several other varieties - each unique in its own way. If you find yourself often thinking about dosa, then you're possibly already a fan. But how can you be sure if you qualify as a true enthusiast? Below, we'll be sharing six telltale signs of a dosa lover. If you relate to all of them, you certainly qualify as one. And if you're craving one by the end of the article, you are 100% a dosa fan! Here Are 6 Signs You're A True Dosa Lover: 1. You Can Eat Dosa For Any Meal Dosa is typically enjoyed for breakfast, but you're up for eating it for lunch and dinner as well. For you, there's no 'right' meal or time to enjoy this dish. If given an opportunity, you wouldn't mind eating it every day too. After all, dosa is better than anything else, right? Also Read: Love All Things Cheese? This Instant Chilli Cheese Dosa Will Be Your New Favourite 2. You've Tried Multiple Varieties You've possibly tried all the dosa varieties out there. Mysore dosa, masala dosa, cheese dosa, rava dosa - you name it, and you've tried it. Not just regular dosa varieties, but you've also tried fusion varieties such as schezwan dosa, spring roll dosa and Mexican dosa. 3. You Know The Best Dosa Spots In Your City Your friends and family often reach out to you for recommendations on the best dosa spots in town. Whether it's a roadside thela or a fancy restaurant, you have information on all of them. Apart from your own city, you also know of dosa places in other cities across the country. 4. Sambar And Chutney Are Equally Important Some people like eating sambar with dosa, while others prefer chutney. But for you, both sambar and chutney are equally important. If one of the two is missing, you're unable to enjoy your meal fully. You're one of those who constantly asks for a refill when dining at a restaurant. 5. You Judge South Indian Restaurants By Their Dosa South Indian restaurants offer a wide variety of dishes, but for you, the dosa is the deciding factor. If their dosa is good, you automatically develop a liking for the restaurant and find yourself visiting often. And if it's not, you start disliking everything else about the restaurant too. 6. The Word 'Crispy' Instantly Reminds You Of Dosa Whenever someone mentions the word 'crispy', dosa is what comes to your mind. You're unable to think of any other food item at that moment. What's more, you may also find yourself making it yourself or ordering it in right after. Also Read:
Hindustan Times
24-05-2025
- Hindustan Times
Book Box: Heart Lamp wins the Booker - Now what?
Dear Reader, A few days ago, I received a text message from my student Anisa. 'It's great that Heart Lamp has won a big literary prize. But now I have a problem. It's one more book everybody is talking about, one more book I feel compelled to read. Every month there seems to be a new literary prize in the news - the Booker prize, the International Booker, the Pulitzer, the Woman's prize, the Nobel Prize. Then there's the JCB prize, the Crossword prize - the list of prizes is as long as Hanuman's tail! Honestly, I am confused. There is all this talk of how we shouldn't just be swayed by prizes. And then when a book wins a prize, everyone lines up to read it. A few years ago, I picked up a book that had won this same prize. It was so slow, and hard to understand. Nothing happened - maybe it was too 'arty' for me. I stopped after 40 pages but I felt like a loser giving up, I felt there was something wrong with me that I didn't 'get' the book that a distinguished jury had given the prize to. And then there are so many prizewinning books that are emotionally triggering, like Shuggie Bain or Prophet's Song - reading them feels depressing. What is it about these prizewinning books, and why do they feel like a pressure for me? Is it wrong of me to want to enjoy my reading? And is it weird that I feel burdened by having to read these prize winning books ? And do you think I should read Heart Lamp ? Please help. Your (confused) student Anisa Dear Anisa, I get your dilemma. The list of literary prizes is long. What's interesting though is that each prize has its own personality - the Pulitzer for instance is purely American, the Nobel Prize is given for an author's body of work and not for a single book. The International Booker prize is special because it picks literature in translation. Also Read | Book Box | Reading without rules It's different - and not just because it has been won by Indian books twice already - Tomb of Sand (2022) and Heart Lamp (2025). Last year the prize went to a German novella, the year before to a Bulgarian novel. This year's win means that Heart Lamp, written by Banu Mushtaq and translated from Kannada by Deepa Bhasthi, will now be in the international spotlight. This means these slice-of-life stories, with the real life struggles of Muslim women in Karnataka will now find their way to bookstores around the world - the Strand in New York, Foyles and Waterstones in London, the large chains and small independent bookstores all over the world. This also means that India will be seen in a more nuanced way, in terms of quietly courageous women and not just in terms of a caricatured version of a rich woman exploiting her poor driver, and sending him to jail for her own rash driving, as happens in the story of the The White Tiger, the 2008 Booker prizewinner. So here's my take - You don't have to read every prizewinner—prizes are just one more way of curating books, of bringing certain titles to your notice, titles you may not have come across otherwise. So read the description, and a review or two, and only if the prizewinning book speaks to you, give it a try. Maybe intersperse this book with lighter fun reads - because reading is above all a pleasure and we want it to stay that way. Heart Lamp offers a chance to see the world through a new lens—but only if you're ready for it. If you do pick it up, here's three things to consider 1. Maybe begin with reading just one story. You could start with Stones for Shaista Mahal. Or dip into the centre with Fire Rain, with the story of the maulvi and the discarded wife. Or with the title story. No life is too small to be worthy of notice, no story is too small to tell, say these selected short stories. 2. Read Heart Lamp to see how powerful fiction can be in giving voice to the powerless and how a story can bring small moments of quiet courage into the spotlight. 3. Be part of a global conversation with readers all over the world - we may be different but here's how we live and love. In a world that increasingly tries to divide us, here is where we can live inside each other's minds, if only for a few pages. (Sonya Dutta Choudhury is a Mumbai-based journalist and the founder of Sonya's Book Box, a bespoke book service. Each week, she brings you specially curated books to give you an immersive understanding of people and places. If you have any reading recommendations or reading dilemmas, write to her at sonyasbookbox@ The views expressed are personal)
Time of India
21-05-2025
- Time of India
Brooklyn bridge stands strong, despite 150 years of close calls and collisions
Mexican navy tall ship collided with Brooklyn Bridge The fatal collision of the Mexican Navy's tall ship with the Brooklyn Bridge on Saturday that resulted in the death of two is not an accident first of its kind. It has been a worry of seafarers even before the bridge was fully constructed. The Brooklyn Bridge, which was the first bridge in the world to use steel for cable wire, has been a witness to quite a few tragic incidents. 19th century: First instance One of the first instances of such a collision dates back to the 19th century, when the topmast of a passing US Navy ship hit the span's wires. Ever since then, vessels have continued to clip at the iconic New York structure. Completed in 1883, the Brooklyn Bridge connects the boroughs of Brooklyn and Manhattan by spanning the East River. Its underside reaches a maximum height of approximately 135 feet, varying with the tides. Bridge lawsuit reaches Supreme Court While the bridge was still under construction, a warehouse owner initially sued officials to stop the bridge and then later for compensation. He argued that the top masts of the ships collided with the bridge. The case made it to the US Supreme Court, with the court passing the judgment that the bridge did not restrict any kind of ship navigation. Even before this judgment was passed, at least one ship had collided with the still-under-construction bridge. 1878: USS Minnesota collides with Bridge According to a New York Daily Tribune dated back to 1878, a US Navy training ship called USS Minnesota had a collision with the bridge as it had to change course to avoid an oncoming ship. By the time the bridge was fully constructed, steam ships began to transport most goods and high-masted ships were not preferred as much, as per Richard Haw, professor of interdisciplinary studies at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. Richard has also published two books on the Brooklyn Bridge. 20th century: Strike continues Despite this, mast strikes continued with at least two reported in the 1920s. A New York Times article reported that in 1941, the SS Nyass, which was bringing hundreds of refugees, collided with the bridge with a 'crunching sound'. With the onset of the 20th century, ships got taller and wider, and they still required mast-like structures for navigation. During World War II, the Brooklyn Navy Yard manufactured larger ships that could barely fit beneath the bridge. A photo from 1961 shows the USS Constellation aircraft carrier shows its mast folded over so as to avoid any friction with the bridge. Over the past two decades, minor incidents have occurred, including a 2012 event where a crane transported by barge struck the temporary scaffolding beneath the bridge. 21st century: Fatal collision None of the modern accidents was fatal in nature till May 18, when a Mexican Navy ship collided with the bridge that causing the deaths of two and injuring another 19 on board. The ship was set to depart for a goodwill tour to Iceland when the tragedy happened. Dominique Jean-Louis, chief historian at the Center for Brooklyn History, commented, 'That's the first and possibly only time where there's been a fatality onboard a ship that struck the Brooklyn Bridge." Even if not in water, the Brooklyn Bridge has witnessed tragedies for a long time. More than 20 people were killed and countless were left crippled while constructing the bridge. A panic-driven stampede also killed 12 people in 1883.
