logo
Baroness Warsi endorses government pulling funding from Islamophobia monitor

Baroness Warsi endorses government pulling funding from Islamophobia monitor

Middle East Eye11-03-2025

Former Conservative chair Baroness Sayeeda Warsi has endorsed the Labour government's decision to pull funding from a maligned Islamophobia reporting service accused of severely under-reporting hate crimes.
Tell Mama, which is funded by the communities ministry, was founded in 2012. The Guardian reported on Saturday that no grant will be provided to the organisation from the end of March, leaving it facing closure.
"I support this decision by the government and its decision to re think how it funds the monitoring of anti Muslim hate," Warsi said on social media platform X on Tuesday.
Warsi, who is widely considered a leading figure on Islamophobia in Britain, was one of the early advocates for Tell Mama to be funded by the government as a minister in David Cameron's cabinet.
"I was there at the outset of Tell MAMA and despite opposition from my government colleagues at the time fought for it to be funded in government," she said, "however sadly over the years too many questions have arisen which in my view make the organization unfit for purpose."
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Last March, the previous Conservative government halted plans to appoint Tell Mama's founder, Fiyaz Mughal OBE, as its independent adviser on anti-Muslim hatred.
That decision came after it received notice of a Byline Times investigation which revealed Mughal had suppressed a Tell Mama-funded report on the Conservative Party's ties to Islamophobic and antisemitic political parties.
'Consistently lower' figures
In July 2024, Byline Times reported that Tell Mama under-reported anti-Muslim hate crimes by more than 90 percent between 2017 to 2022.
Its published figures were "consistently lower than anti-Muslim hate crime statistics published by the Home Office based on police data". Police data itself was found to systematically underestimate hate crimes.
In response, Tell Mama insisted "it is impossible to record all hate crimes and particularly difficult given the scale, nature, geographical location and nationality of British Muslims from over 50 Muslim-majority countries".
Warsi is now an independent peer after quitting the Conservatives last September, complaining that the party had moved too far right.
'My regular engagement with a hyper diverse British Muslim community has shown that large sections simply do not trust or chose [Tell Mama] to report their experiences of anti Muslim racism and attacks'
- Baroness Warsi
She said on Tuesday that "too often my regular engagement with a hyper diverse British Muslim community has shown that large sections simply do not trust or chose TM [Tell Mama] to report their experiences of anti Muslim racism and attacks.
"This at a time of rising anti Muslim hate is unacceptable," she added.
"The government SHOULD fund community reporting of anti Muslim racism and attacks as they do for British Jews via the Community Security Trust but sadly TM is not it."
Police sources told the Guardian that the information Tell Mama provided it had been "invaluable".
Tell Mama said it had received 10,700 reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes in 2024, showing a sharp increase.
Founder Mughal told the Guardian: "There are going to be more individuals targeted, we know that in the current environment, and where are they going to go?
"This is an injustice at a time where I have never seen anti-Muslim rhetoric become so mainstream."
A spokesperson for the communities ministry said on Saturday:
"Religious and racial hatred has absolutely no place in our society, and we will not tolerate Islamophobia in any form. This year we have made up to £1m of funding available to Tell Mama to provide support for victims of Islamophobia, and we will set out our approach to future funding in due course."
Exclusive: British Muslim Network backed by charity set up by former archbishop Welby Read More »
The announcement comes after the ministry announced the creation of a new working group last month to formulate a definition of Islamophobia and "support a wider stream of work to tackle the unacceptable incidents of anti-Muslim hatred".
The government has also backed a new British Muslim body, the British Muslim Network (BMN), which launched in late February with Warsi's involvement and aims to engage with the government.
Critics have suggested that the BMN lacks credibility, warning that the government could use the network to continue to avoid engaging with the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB).
Labour has adopted the previous government's policy of boycotting the MCB, the largest umbrella body claiming to represent British Muslims and with over 500 member organisations.
But the BMN's leadership has insisted that it does not aim to challenge the MCB's role, arguing that the government should engage with a "whole range" of Muslim groups, including both the MCB and BMN.
"For too long British Muslims have been made to feel their voices do not matter," Warsi said ahead of the BMN's launch.
"The British Muslim Network is part of a much-needed effort to change that."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel opens fire on Palestinians seeking aid, as UN warns of relief obstruction
Israel opens fire on Palestinians seeking aid, as UN warns of relief obstruction

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

Israel opens fire on Palestinians seeking aid, as UN warns of relief obstruction

Israeli attacks have killed at least 15 Palestinians and wounded many others waiting to receive aid in central Gaza in the latest assault on aid seekers in recent weeks. According to local sources, Israeli forces opened fire on Palestinians as they gathered around relief distribution points operated and organised by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The GHF was launched at the end of May after Israel imposed a total blockade on all supplies to Gaza for nearly three months, which the United Nations says pushed the enclave's 2.3 million people to the verge of famine. Since its operations began, more than 274 Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded while seeking food at distribution sites, which are guarded by US private military contractors and overseen by Israeli forces. The UN and aid organisations have accused the US and Israel-backed GHF, which employs private American security and logistics workers, of militarising humanitarian aid. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Jens Laerke, spokesperson for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha), told reporters on Friday that aid distribution and delivery have been stalled as a result of the organisation. 'GHF, I think it's fair to say, has been, from a principled humanitarian standpoint, a failure. "They are not doing what a humanitarian operation should do, which is providing aid to people where they are, in a safe and secure manner.' Meanwhile, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa) described the US-Israeli distribution model as a "recipe for chaos", noting that it is "also a distraction from the ongoing atrocities and a waste of resources". "It is weaponising aid and resulting in fear, discrimination, and growing desperation," it added in a post on X. Unrwa urged for the blockade on the Gaza Strip to be lifted and for the UN to resume operations, stressing that "aid must be delivered safely and at scale". Gaza foundation is a humanitarian face to mask Israel's genocide Read More » In another post, the agency warned that restrictions and hostilities continue to "obstruct humanitarian aid deliveries in #Gaza". Israeli forces have killed more than 55,297 Palestinians in Israel's ongoing war on Gaza, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now qualify as a genocide. Since the early hours of Saturday, Israeli shelling has killed more than 23 Palestinians across the Gaza Strip, with the Wafa news agency reporting the heaviest bombardment in the central region. In Gaza City, several were killed and wounded after a strike hit a tent sheltering displaced Palestinians near al-Khaldi Mosque. Meanwhile, artillery shelling was reported in al-Tuffah neighbourhood, in Gaza's Old City. Reports from the south of the enclave noted that at least three Palestinians were killed in a drone strike near the Islamic University in Khan Younis. In the same governorate, Israeli troops launched attacks targeting the Hamad City residential towers and the Asdaa area, with tanks opening fire on displaced Palestinians.

Israeli defence minister warns ‘Tehran will burn' if missile attacks continue
Israeli defence minister warns ‘Tehran will burn' if missile attacks continue

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Israeli defence minister warns ‘Tehran will burn' if missile attacks continue

Tehran launched retaliatory strikes on Israel into Saturday morning, as the Israeli army declared Iran its primary war front a day after launching its biggest-ever air offensive against the Islamic Republic. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz warned Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei that "Tehran will burn" if it keeps firing missiles at Israeli civilians. Air raid sirens sounded across Israel, sending residents rushing into shelters as Iran launched five successive waves of missiles into the centre and north of the country. Israel said it had intercepted most of the missiles; however, the attacks caused extensive damage and killed at least three people. "The Iranian dictator is taking the citizens of Iran hostage, bringing about a reality in which they, and especially Tehran's residents, will pay a heavy price for the flagrant harm inflicted upon Israel's citizens. If Khamenei continues to fire missiles at the Israeli home front, Tehran will burn," Katz said in a statement. One woman was killed in the city of Ramat Gan, where nine buildings were also destroyed and hundreds of apartments in the area were damaged, according to Israeli media. Two other people were killed when an Iranian missile also struck near a home in the central Israeli city of Rishon Lezion. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In Tel Aviv, a 32-storey building was hit and caught fire, according to the Haaretz newspaper, while other areas suffered extensive damage. Israel's paramedic services said more than 70 people in total were wounded in the Iranian attack on central Israel, including 34 in the Tel Aviv area. Meanwhile, Israel targeted Iran's air defences and missile launchers on Saturday as it pressed ahead with its assault on Iran's military and nuclear capabilities. Iranian state TV reported that two senior Iranian generals - Gholamreza Mehrabi, deputy head of intelligence of the armed forces general staff, and Mehdi Rabbani, deputy head of operations - were killed in Israeli strikes. On Friday, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations said that 78 people had been killed and 320 wounded in the first wave of Israeli strikes. Iranian state TV reported on Saturday that an Israeli strike on a residential complex in Tehran killed at least 60 people, including 20 children. Exclusive: US quietly sent hundreds of Hellfire missiles to Israel before Iran attack Read More » Citing senior Iranian military officials, Iran's Fars News Agency reported that strikes against Israel will continue, with targets expected to expand to include US bases in the region in the coming days. "This confrontation will not end with last night's limited actions and Iran's strikes will continue, and this action will be very painful and regrettable for the aggressors," Fars reported. The Israeli army said on Saturday that Gaza has become a secondary front in the war and that the army's primary focus has now shifted to Iran. Israeli military sources, quoted by Haaretz, said that the Israeli air force has struck around 150 targets inside Iran. The military has admitted for the first time that it attacked, but did not destroy, the nuclear site in Fordow, south of Tehran, in Qom province. The Israeli army's chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, said Israel's overnight strikes took out Iran's air defence system, allowing its forces to now operate freely over Iranian airspace.

These questions are often ignored in the Israel-Iran story. We asked a panel of experts
These questions are often ignored in the Israel-Iran story. We asked a panel of experts

Middle East Eye

time14 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

These questions are often ignored in the Israel-Iran story. We asked a panel of experts

Israel's attacks on Iran on Friday and the killing of several high-level figures in its military and science sectors have roiled the region. Tensions between the two nations are well-documented and longstanding, and both the US and Israel have carried out attacks like this, albeit on a smaller scale, on other prominent Iranian figures in the past. But why does this keep happening, and how is the US trying to distance itself from it? Can Israel go this far without expecting its own officials to be targeted? And exactly how dangerous is it to strike nuclear facilities on either side? Middle East Eye put the lesser-asked questions to five experts on international relations, conflict, nuclear proliferation, and the region at large. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Here is what they said, edited for length and clarity. If the US was informed ahead of time and also supplied weapons to Israel, how can Secretary of State Marco Rubio say the US was not involved? Jamal Abdi, President, National Iranian American Council: "This is about creating a narrative of plausible deniability to potentially give Iran a face-saving way to continue talking to the United States [towards a new nuclear deal]. I don't think it's going to work, and I think Trump has already stepped all over that by now, basically taking credit, after seeming to distance the US." Anthony Wanis-St John, conflict resolution specialist, American University: "It's a verbal obfuscation. It means that operationally, we didn't support it." Miles Pomper, Senior Fellow, James Martin Center for Nonproliferation: "Because the Russians and the Chinese are affiliated with the Iranians, [the US will] try not to elevate the level to something beyond a regional conflict, to some global conflict." What is the difference between a 'preemptive strike' and a 'preventive strike'. Are they not both acts of war? Wanis-St. John: "These are certainly acts of war. There's no question about it, the Israelis like to call attention and use "preemptive" and "preventive" doctrines in their military strikes, since every country under international laws and norms is allowed to defend itself against aggression, but no country is supposed to lawfully commit aggressions against another country." Sam Ratner, policy director, Win Without War: "'Preemptive strike' does seem to be, from a definitional standpoint, a misnomer from Israel... this is a war of choice from [Israeli Prime Minister] Benjamin Netanyahu." Pomper: "It's not a preemptive strike, because that would be [like] the Six Day War, where the planes are on the tarmac and about to attack you, and then you hit them. 'Preventive' is a stop to a long-term threat to Israel. And you know the Iranians aren't shy about threatening." Negar Mortazavi, host of the Iran Podcast: "If it's not [couched as] preemptive, then it will be seen differently both from the public opinion and the global opinion... and we know that Israel cares a lot about its image, about its standing in the international community, and that has deteriorated very fast [since its war on Gaza]." The international community has long tolerated, and sometimes cheered on, Israel's string of extra-judicial assassinations. Why? Abdi: "Israel has a lot of political power and very important friends, most importantly, the United States." Mortazavi: "Powerful western countries have provided not just financial and armed support, but also diplomatic support and cover to Israel in the UN Security Council... the contradiction - or in a way, that oxymoron - that Israel is dealing with, is that they're a country that came out of the United Nations [in 1948]." Ratner: "In the post-9/11 era in particular, we've seen not just from the Israeli government, but from Iranian governments, including our own, in fact, and in particular our own, a real sort of generational change of attitude toward the use of assassination. We see it in our drone programme. The erosion of the norm against assassination is bad for diplomacy, bad for international relations, and bad for peace." Looking at the nature of Israel's attacks, can Iran retaliate in the same way? Wanis-St John: "I'm not sure that they can, operationally. I've never seen Iran do that against Israel.... you really need a lot of information about where [targets] are and where they're moving and how they're protected at night. That requires a lot of infrastructure. I'm not sure that the Iranians have that." Abdi: "If we're saying there are no laws, there is no accountability, you can conduct extra-judicial killings with impunity, then it would seem that would no longer restrain any actor from engaging in the same types of activities. But we know that that's not how the world works, and that certain countries have been given a carte blanche to do whatever they want." Mortazavi: "The condemnation would be so different... imagine if the same was done by Iran. Israeli officials also have homes and families." Why can't Iran have a nuclear bomb if Israel does? Mortazavi: "Iran is a signatory to the NPT, the Non-Proliferation Treaty. They have committed to not building nuclear weapons [and] they have a civilian programme. According to US intelligence, they don't have a weapons programme. At the same time, Israel has an undeclared weapons programme [and] many nuclear warheads. They're not a signatory to any international monitoring and safeguards." Ratner: "Our position on this is that we are opposed to nuclear proliferation and [in favour of] nuclear disarmament. Nuclear weapons are unimaginably destructive forces, and the more hands those weapons are in, the more likely that nuclear warfare becomes. If we add another country to the nuclear club, how many more countries will join?" Abdi: "Iran has threatened before that if something like [Friday's attacks] happened, they would abandon the NPT, and then there would be no international law saying they're not allowed to build nuclear weapons. They could do what Israel did, and develop a clandestine programme, and not be held accountable to any treaties or agreements or anything, and it's just the law of the jungle, and everybody gets a nuke." Israel has always said it wants to take out Iran's nuclear facilities. Isn't that dangerous? Pomper: "I think, as opposed to attacking a nuclear power plant that's got actual radioactive material, like Zaporizhzhia in Ukraine, it's different... You don't have that kind of concentration. And so you may have environmental and other damages, but you're not likely to get a widespread radiation danger from it." Wanis-St John: "They shouldn't really be targeted if they're not military programmes. No one has said that the Iranians are building a nuclear weapon at this time. They don't claim to be making one, and nobody on the outside claims that they are making one... The Israeli attack is really meant to send them a signal that any progress towards weapons-grade enrichment is not going to be tolerated by Israel." Ratner: "The bigger concern... is that Iran has made clear statements and threats that if the Israeli government strikes its nuclear facilities, that it will respond by striking US targets in the region. And what we see from Benjamin Netanyahu is a desire for exactly that to happen. His interest is in starting a chain of events that drags the US into war on his side, because the Israeli military would have a very difficult time pursuing regime change in Iran on its own."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store