
Mural mayhem: Business owners, artists clash over graffiti-style artwork in Wilkes-Barre
Jun. 11—WILKES-BARRE — Business owners in the Rolling Mill Hill section of the city are upset by a mural at 93 Blackman St. depicting scenes and imagery from the "Terminator" film franchise. Meanwhile, a representative for the artists who painted the mural is firing back, defending their freedom of expression in the face of criticism.
The building — and, in turn, the mural — is on the corner of Blackman and Arch streets.
Much of the stir on social media and among the business owners surrounds the painted image of the villainous T-1000 filled with bullet holes on the building's Blackman Street side. The image depicts a famous scene from "Terminator 2: Judgment Day." In the film and the mural, the T-1000 wears a uniform that is reminiscent of a typical police uniform.
Laura Mudlock, funeral director and owner of Mamary-Durkin Funeral Home, was shocked when she saw the mural first being painted. She compared the finished product to something one might see in "the ghetto" or in the "not nice sections of New York."
"I do appreciate the talent of that artwork," Mudlock conceded, before adding, "It obviously is not something that I would choose to represent this area — this neighborhood. I see it as violent."
Mixed interpretations
The "ghetto" descriptor was also used by Amanda Crich, owner of neighboring business Crich Realty. She was critical of the piece in general, referring to it as an "eyesore," and questioned its artistic merit.
"I can't even say that I could appreciate the kind of work because it doesn't look like a finished job," Crich said.
Mudlock referenced her connections to local law enforcement as the reason for her disappointment in the mural's images.
In addition, Mudlock said that the children of the area — and even some adults — might not understand the "Terminator" imagery, and may therefore interpret the mural as something unrelated to the movie. Crich agreed, and said that others might use the graffiti-style mural as ill-conceived inspiration for other local buildings to be painted, but without the owner's consent.
According to Marie Cecile Flageul in a letter written on behalf of the more than a dozen artists who worked on the mural, the "Terminator" theme was approved by the owner of 93 Blackman Street in advance. The owner, according to Luzerne County's GIS mapping tool, is KBA Realty. The phone number on the building's exterior is no longer in service.
Amy Basham, a teacher of 30 years and real estate agent at Crich Realty, concurred that the mural is ripe for misinterpretation and said that the failure to commission a local artist or student to paint the mural was a missed opportunity. Furthermore, Basham is concerned that prospective property buyers might find the area less attractive because of the mural's style.
"[Businesses are] taking a look at — sometimes it's just a snapshot — and if they see anything like that [mural as] their first impression, that's it," said Basham. "You lose their interest, because they see graffiti. They don't see art. They see graffiti, and graffiti is an artwork. I'm not taking that away from it, but there are people — investors — they see an area like that, that particular corner, and they're walking away."
Crich said that the mural's imagery can also send the wrong messages to those looking to buy property in the nearby area, and that it is hard for a potential buyer to change their first impression of a building based on its exterior.
"For a family that's moving into a new home and a new neighborhood, that's not having their children look up to the right things," Crich said of the mural. "It's bringing violence. It's showing them that violence is okay."
Responding to the city
Though Wilkes-Barre Mayor George Brown stated to WBRE/ WYOU, the Times Leader's media partner, that the city cannot mandate the mural's removal, Crich suggested that the exact placement within the city's borders is a factor in the mayor's decision-making.
"If this was Downtown Wilkes-Barre, [Mayor Brown] would make sure something was done about it," Crich asserted.
Though the mural is located just blocks away from the Hanover Township border, Brown was just in saying that the city could not mandate the mural's creation or current form.
Flageul said in her letter that the building is not located in a historic district and is not a landmarked structure, meaning that the building owner's approval was all that was needed.
In response, Mudlock suggested that Wilkes-Barre could enact stricter mural ordinances, which she said should be aligned to those enacted in her hometown of Pittston. Mudlock said she will bring the specifics of Pittston's mural ordinances to the attention of Wilkes-Barre's city council at its meeting on Thursday night.
As far as the creative elements of local murals are concerned, Mudlock and Crich pointed to pieces in the area that explore and incorporate local history. By contrast, not even the building owner who commissioned the mural is a local, according to Mudlock.
"The owner lives in New York, so it's not like he even looks at it," said Mudlock. "They left; we have to look at it."
"Yeah, they don't care," Crich added.
Letter on behalf of the artists
In her letter on behalf of the mural's artists, Flageul claimed that the artists were the subject of "hostile verbal attacks" from the public, including "expletives and dismissive remarks." Flageul additionally took issue with comments made by business owners to the local media, including those made by Mudlock to WBRE/WYOU, in which she stated, "I feel like I live in the ghetto."
"These are not only unfounded interpretations but also border on profiling and classist overreach," Flageul said in her letter.
Basham denied the notion of the business owners' criticisms being "classist," though she understands the social dynamics in this case are complicated.
"I'm a white female, and I have that privilege. But I'm also a white female who has had a life that has exposed me to all manner of different types of people. So I would have a conversation with that person," said Basham, referring to Flageul.
Near the end of her letter, Flageul said she would be willing to travel to a future city council meeting to testify on behalf of the artists.
"Despite the controversy, many community members have expressed gratitude and enthusiasm for the mural," Flageul wrote. "Others may disagree with its style or message, but that diversity of opinion is precisely what art exists to provoke — ideally through respectful dialogue."
Featured Local Savings
Featured Local Savings
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Major data breach exposes 86M AT&T customer records, including social security numbers — here's how to know if you were affected
AT&T has experienced a massive personal data breach, so if you're one of the more than 100 million people who use the company, you'll want to be on guard. According to a report from Hack Read, more than 86 million customers have been affected with leaked details ranging from full names to dates of birth, phone numbers, email addresses and physical addresses. It's reported that more than 44 million Social Security Numbers were also included in the data leak. Advertisement While each of these data sets poses privacy risks on their own, together they could create full identity profiles that could be exploited for fraud or identity theft. The stolen data is reportedly fully decrypted and was first posted to a Russian cybercrime forum on May 15 before being re-uploaded on the same forum on June 3. Hackers reportedly accessed data by getting into accounts that lacked multi-factor authentication, and this leak appears to be linked to an original hack by the ShinyHunters group in April 2024. Advertisement 'It is not uncommon for cybercriminals to re-package previously disclosed data for financial gain,' an AT&T spokesperson told Hack Read in a statement. 'We just learned about claims that AT&T data is being made available for sale on dark web forums, and we are conducting a full investigation.' The original seller of the exposed data claimed that this leak is 'originally one of the databases from the Snowflake breach' — but according to Hack Reads analysis, there are about 16 million more records in this breach than the previous one. The leak reportedly included full names, dates of birth, phone numbers, email addresses, physical addresses and social security numbers. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement AT&T also acknowledged the security researchers' doubts that this breach was linked to the original 2024 breach. 'After analysis by our internal teams as well as external data consultants, we are confident this is repackaged data previously released on the dark web in March 2024,' the company said in a statement. 'Affected customers were notified at that time. We have notified law enforcement of this latest development.' If you're an AT&T customer, it's possible your personal and private data could be part of the leak. Though if your data was leaked in this hack, it's likely because it was already unprotected in the August 2024 National Public Data breach, which exposed 'three decades' worth of Social Security numbers on the online black market.' Advertisement 'After analysis by our internal teams as well as external data consultants, we are confident this is repackaged data previously released on the dark web in March 2024,' AT&T said in a statement. LightRocket via Getty Images To check if your information was leaked in that breach, you can check through Pentester, a cybersecurity firm, by going to and entering your information, which will allow you to see a list of your breached accounts. Security experts are also urging customers to keep an eye on their credit reports. AT&T said it 'offered credit monitoring and identity theft protection to those customers whose sensitive personal information was compromised as part of the notice in 2024.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Experts Issue Urgent Warning After Massive AT&T Data Leak Resurfaces
AT&T customers are being warned to act fast after a trove of stolen data, containing up to 86 million customer records, resurfaced on cybercrime forums this week. According to McAfee security experts, the leak includes personal details that could easily lead to identity theft. The database was originally stolen in a 2024 breach but had not been widely published until now. Researchers say Russian hackers appear to be selling the data on underground forums, and cybercriminals now have access to email addresses, phone numbers, and, most alarmingly, nearly 44 million Social Security numbers. 'If you're an AT&T customer, now's the time to take action,' warned Jasdev Dhaliwal of McAfee. 'This data is already circulating, and it contains everything criminals need to impersonate you—your SSN, name, phone number, and more.' Newsweek reported that cybersecurity expert Steve Weisman echoed that concern, adding that once your Social Security number is out, the best defense is to get an IRS-issued PIN to prevent fraudulent tax filings. AT&T responded by saying this is not a new breach. "After analysis by our internal teams as well as external data consultants, we are confident this is repackaged data previously released on the dark web in March 2024," the company said in a statement. AT&T added that all affected customers had already been notified last year and that law enforcement is involved in the latest development. But with the data making headlines again, and being actively sold, experts urge customers not to assume they're safe. They recommend checking your credit reports, freezing your credit if needed, and updating your AT&T account password. The exposed data could be used in phishing scams, loan fraud, or even to file false tax returns. Bottom line: even if this isn't a brand-new breach, the damage is far from over. And if your identity is part of the leak, ignoring it now could cost you Issue Urgent Warning After Massive AT&T Data Leak Resurfaces first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 12, 2025
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - How deep does loyalty run in Washington?
President Harry S. Truman is often credited for saying: 'If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog.' He never said that, though. And he was once given a dog (Feller), but his wife, Bess, would not let him keep it at the White House. His physician became its keeper. There is a popular notion abroad in the land that politicians have few real friends, and that what friendships there are in the nation's capital are fleeting and unreliable. The very noisy, nasty feud that broke out last week between Elon Musk and President Trump only reinforced that stereotype. Musk may have once referred to his relationship with Trump as 'first buddy,' but it became clear with the breakup that this was no Butch and Sundance buddy flick. It was more like an Incredible Hulk-Terminator faceoff. What purportedly set Musk off was his belated discovery that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act didn't actually reduce the deficit, it increases it by $2.5 trillion over the next decade. His new mantra became, 'Kill the bill,' and he vowed to defeat anyone who voted for it, to form a new independent party, hinted at Trump's impeachment, and suggested that Trump appears in the files on convicted sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein. The first set of government files were partially released by Attorney General Pam Bondi on Feb. 27. Musk has subsequently deleted his X-posts on impeachment and Epstein, perhaps signaling a thaw. Trump responded in their exchange of vicious social media blasts by threatening to defund Musk's lucrative government space contracts and suggesting Musk had 'lost his mind.' He said what really set Musk off was the loss of government subsidies for electric vehicles like Tesla. Is their swift falling-out proof that there are no real friendships or loyalty forged in Washington? Probably not. Their case is atypical. It is more an example of two very rich, powerful, and highly competitive egos thrashing it out for attention and primacy. That's hardly sound grounding for the growth of genuine friendships, let alone lasting loyalty, whether in Washington or anywhere else. The Trump-Musk fissure does raise the issue of whether loyalty is less possible and more volatile in a political environment where winning is often described as everything. Think of the parade of officials who fell-out with the White House in Trump's first administration, like Michael Flynn, Rex Tillerson, John Kelly, James Mattis, H.R. McMaster, John Bolton, Nikki Haley and others. Or take former President Biden's crowd that either kept mum, covered-up, or remained in denial over his decline in mental acuity. Biden's former press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre is the most recent example, declaring her party switch to Independent with the publication of her book, 'Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines.' No party or president has a monopoly on the disillusioned who either resign or are fired. It happens frequently to those whose first loyalty is to the Constitution and not their president. This phenomenon is most visible at the White House or Cabinet levels where the stakes are the highest and the struggles for power are often the most vicious. Members of Congress come and go with election defeats, retirements and aspirations for higher office. But their former top staffers usually stay on and move to work for other members. When Hill staff wear out, they sometimes move on to jobs as lobbyists, with think tanks, or in academia, again, all the time widening their circle of close friends. Those who want to exploit their past glories and positions of power for fame and fortune as media stars or sensational book authors have very short half-lives, and their circle of former friends often shrinks. What does all this have to do with the Trump-Musk super feud? Not a whole lot. They go their separate ways, continuing to amass power, with any allusions to past friendships and loyalty losing any relevance. There's not much there that average citizens can identify with or even care about, other than for its pure entertainment value. Trump is the only president in a century who has not had a dog while in office. An August 2018 Newsweek story, 'Trump doesn't like dogs and dogs don't like him,' quotes his first ex-wife Ivana from her memoir, 'Donald was not a dog fan.' He certainly didn't take to her pet poodle, Chappie, and vice versa. We don't know how many actual friends he has, but one thing that remains constant over time is that the presidency is probably still the loneliest job in town. Don Wolfensberger is a 28-year congressional staff veteran culminating as chief-of-staff of the House Rules Committee in 1995. He is author of, 'Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial' (2000), and, 'Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays' (2018). Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.