US calls for Asia allies to boost defenses in face of China's ‘imminent' threat, Hegseth tells top defense forum
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday delivered a dire warning to the Asia-Pacific region and the world: China's designs on Taiwan pose a threat to global peace and stability that requires 'our allies and partners do their part on defense.'
'There is no reason to sugarcoat it. The threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent,' Hegseth said in a speech to the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier defense forum, in Singapore.
'Beijing is credibly preparing potentially to use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific,' with People's Liberation Army (PLA) forces training daily to take military action against Taiwan, Hegseth said.
He noted that Chinese leader Xi Jinping has ordered his military to be prepared by 2027 to invade Taiwan, the democratic island of 23 million people that the Chinese Communist Party claims as its sovereign territory despite having never ruled it.
'The PLA is building the military needed to do it, training for it every day and rehearsing for the real deal,' Hegseth said, delivering some of his strongest comments against China since he took office in January.
He said US President Donald Trump has pledged not to let Taiwan fall to China on his watch, and he called on US allies and partners in the region to band together to stand up to Beijing, both on the Taiwan issue and other regional disputes where China aggressively pursues its agenda, such as in the South China Sea.
'China's behavior towards its neighbors and the world is a wake-up call. And an urgent one,' the US defense chief said.
But he said the US cannot deter the Chinese threat alone, calling on other nations to be 'force multipliers' against Beijing.
'We ask – and indeed, we insist – that our allies and partners do their part on defense,' he said.
Hegseth urged Asian countries to increase their defense spending, pointing to NATO allies who have boosted it to 5% of gross domestic product.
'So it doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defense in the face of an even more formidable threat, not to mention North Korea,' he said.
While Hegseth made clear that Washington does not seek conflict with China, he stressed the Trump administration would not let aggression from Beijing stand.
'We will not be pushed out of this critical region, and we will not let our allies be subordinated and intimidated,' he said.
Hegseth's speech adds to heated tensions between Washington and Beijing.
China has railed against America's efforts in recent years to tighten its alliances and stiffen its defense posture in Asia, while economic frictions rose to historic levels earlier this year after Trump imposed tariffs on China, sparking a tit-for-tat between the two countries that saw duties rise to more than 100% on each other's goods.
The annual Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore has in the past been a place where defense leaders from the US and China can meet on the sidelines and foster at least a minimal dialogue between the two foes.
No such meeting is expected to take place this year. China announced on Thursday that it would send only a low-level delegation from its National Defense University to Shangri-La, rather than its defense minister, who has spoken at the past five forums.
When the International Institute for Strategic Studies, which sponsors the event, belatedly released a speakers list for the forum on Friday afternoon, the usual 8:30 a.m. time slot for a Chinese representative to speak was scrubbed from the agenda.
At a Chinese Defense Ministry press conference on Thursday, a spokesperson ducked a question on why Beijing was not sending its defense minister to the forum.
China was 'open to communication at all levels between the two sides,' a ministry spokesperson said, when asked about a potential sidelines meeting with the US delegation.
Hegseth's call for allied cooperation in deterring China is a carryover from the Biden administration, but the Trump administration seems more strident than its predecessor.
Ahead of the Singapore conference, there was broad consensus among analysts that unlike the turmoil Trump has caused in Europe – with threats to pull back from NATO and abandon Ukraine in its fight against Russia's invasion – the US role in Asia has largely been consistent, centered on a policy to counter Chinese influence and back Taiwan.
Analysts noted that US-led military exercises, especially those involving key allies Japan, Australia, the Philippines and South Korea, have continued or even been bolstered in 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
42 minutes ago
- New York Times
Ukraine Says Russian Strike on Military Base Killed 12 Soldiers
A Russian missile attack on a Ukrainian military training base killed at least 12 soldiers and wounded more than 60 others on Sunday, the Ukrainian military said, in a rare statement acknowledging casualties within its ranks. Ukraine's military did not disclose where the strike occurred, saying in a statement only that there was not a mass gathering at the time of the attack. 'At the time the air raid alert was announced, all personnel were in shelters, except for those who may not have had time to reach it,' Vitalii Sarantsev, a spokesman for Ukraine's Ground Forces, said in an interview with Ukrainian news media. Ukraine's military does not typically disclose official casualty figures, which are treated as a state secret and are a highly sensitive topic in the country. The strike on the training base came after what Ukrainian officials said was Russia's largest combined overnight aerial assault on the country since the start of the war. Russia launched 472 drones and seven missiles overnight, according to Ukraine's Air Force. It said that the vast majority of the drones and three of the incoming missiles were intercepted, but that at least 18 targets were struck. The air force did not provide further details on what was struck.
Bloomberg
44 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Do Democrats Understand the Manosphere Enough to Win It Over?
President Donald Trump ran on a slogan of Make America Great Again and central to his project is to make men great again. But it's only certain kind of men and a certain kind of masculinity. Think Hulk Hogan, who spoke at Trump's nominating convention as did Dana White, the CEO of UFC. This 'masculinist' approach now steers not only Trump's bombastic, in-your-face political brand, but his personnel and policy choices. At its core, it's an ideology rooted in nostalgia and restoration and the belief that 'real' men, the kind who work with their hands and lead with aggression and brawn, have been left behind and now need a hand up — and room to say and do whatever they want, without any consequences. It means Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and his talk of restoring power to the 'war fighter.' It means promising to restore the US as a place where men make things again, even if it means threatening to wreck the global economy in the process (and even if most Americans don't want to work in factories).
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's threat to FEMA couldn't come at a worse time
As this year's hurricane season begins, states and local governments are bracing for what climate scientists warn could be another record-breaking year of storms, wildfires and floods. As the representative for Louisiana's 2nd Congressional District — which includes New Orleans and surrounding parishes — I know what it means to live in the bull's-eye of weather disasters. In addition to countless unnamed storms, in recent memory, we've weathered hurricanes Katrina and Ida, which upended lives, decimated neighborhoods and tested every seam of our emergency safety net. In those moments, FEMA — imperfect as it may be — was a lifeline. But now, that lifeline is under threat. With Executive Order 14180, President Donald Trump has initiated a dangerous restructuring of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which millions of Americans rely on in their most desperate moments. The president's plan shifts the responsibility for emergency preparedness and disaster recovery from the federal government to already overburdened state and local governments. That's not reform. It's federal abandonment. It's like closing fire stations and telling people to buy their own hoses. A FEMA Review Council, chaired by political loyalists including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, is tasked with evaluating whether FEMA has become too 'bureaucratic.' But let's call this what it really is: a plan to downsize or altogether dismantle FEMA's role, cloaked in the language of efficiency and decentralization. In fact, the president has suggested eliminating FEMA, and he fired his acting FEMA director the day after he told a House Appropriations Committee panel, 'I do not believe it is in the best interests of the American people to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency.' I represent a state that knows devastation. In 2021, nearly 500,000 Louisiana households were approved for assistance in the 30 days after Hurricane Ida. But we are not alone. FEMA responded to more than 100 declared disasters in 2024, including back-to-back hurricanes Helene and Milton that battered Florida and Georgia. In North Carolina, communities are still recovering from Helene's catastrophic flooding. Disaster recovery is incredibly difficult even with federal coordination and resources. Without it, we are setting communities up for failure. These actions have consequences — and they will cost lives. The idea that state and local governments — many of which are already underfunded and understaffed — can assume the full logistical and financial burden carried by FEMA is not only unrealistic, it's reckless. Louisiana knows what it means to be left behind. Katrina showed us what happens when FEMA fails. Louisianans couldn't get back on their feet because the very programs created to help them were insufficient, stalling recovery efforts for years. But Ida showed us what's possible when the federal response is swift, coordinated and sustained. We benefited when FEMA learned from past disasters and provided a more robust, effective response through partnerships with state and local governments on the ground. Weakening FEMA is not just bad policy, it's a moral outrage. And the timing couldn't be worse. In 2023, the U.S. experienced 28 weather disasters — hurricanes, floods, wildfires, tornadoes — that cost at least a billion dollars in property losses. That was the highest on record, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Climate change isn't theoretical. It isn't a prediction for what will happen in the future. It's here, now, reshaping our landscape and threatening lives from the Gulf Coast to the Great Lakes. Not only is Trump gutting FEMA, but he's also proposing massive cuts to NOAA and its subsidiary, the National Weather Service — agencies responsible for storm tracking, forecasting and early warnings. These are the tools emergency managers rely on to know when to evacuate, how to deploy resources and how to save lives. In fact, the National Weather Service office in Lake Charles, Louisiana — ground zero for multiple hurricanes over the last five years — is down a director and two senior meteorologists. The administration is systematically dismantling the architecture of public safety. This is not how you protect a nation. This is how you manufacture chaos. If FEMA's role is weakened or decentralized, response times will slow — when every second matters. Poorer communities, particularly communities of color, will be disproportionately harmed. And the national safety net we rely on to manage crises will fray. And let's not be fooled into thinking disasters only strike red states or only strike blue states. Hurricanes don't ask your party affiliation. Floodwaters don't care who you voted for. They destroy everything in their path — indiscriminately. That's why FEMA must remain a federal responsibility: coordinated, professional and responsive to every American. Aug. 29 will mark 20 years since Hurricane Katrina. As we approach that anniversary, it's devastating to watch this administration dismantle the very federal systems that helped my city rebuild, even if they weren't perfect. We should be honoring the lives lost, not putting future lives at risk. Yes, FEMA needs improvement. It must be more efficient, more equitable and more transparent. But dismantling it is not the solution. Gutting FEMA in the middle of the climate crisis is like grounding rescue helicopters in the middle of a flood. We need to invest in FEMA. Strengthen NOAA. Restore staffing and leadership at the National Weather Service. Give state and local governments the tools they need, but do not make them do it alone. Because when the next disaster hits — and it will — we won't have time to debate funding formulas or organizational charts. We will need help. Fast. Fair. And federal. That's the America our people deserve. And that's the FEMA we must defend. This article was originally published on
