U.S. attorney general challenges Illinois' new nonprofit diversity law
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WTVO) — U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi has moved to intervene in a lawsuit against Illinois that requires nonprofits to publicly disclose race and gender demographic information.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the intent of 'is to encourage nonprofits to discriminate under the guise of making nonprofit boards more 'diverse.''
A national equal rights organization, American Alliance for Equal Rights, filed suit last month, asking an Illinois federal judge to block the state from enforcing the statute it says unconstitutionally requires nonprofits to publicize their demographic data, and encouraging organizations to discriminate based on race.
The DOJ said Wednesday's intervention was a step toward 'eradicating illegal race and sex preferences across the government.'
'The United States cannot and will not sit idly while a state denies its citizens equal protection under the guise of diversity,' said Attorney General Bondi. 'Discrimination in all its forms is abhorrent and must be eliminated. The Department of Justice will continue to exercise its statutory right to intervene in cases whenever a state encourages DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) instead of merit.'
'This is a case of immense public importance because, as the Supreme Court recognized, ending 'discrimination means eliminating all of it,'' said Acting Associate Attorney General Chad Mizelle. 'This intervention seeks to eliminate discrimination via DEI and ensure the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection is enforced.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bondi Announces New Smuggling Charges For Kilmar Abrego Garcia
Attorney General Pamela Bondi delivered a strong message on the need to respect law and order at the border as she announced new charges against El Salvadorian illegal alien Kilmar Abrego Garcia for smuggling humans into America. Abrego Garcia had previously been touted by the left as a poster boy for unfair immigration rights under Trump's second term, regardless of his previous gang-ties in El Salvador, as previously reported by The Dallas Express. 'Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been brought to the United States to face justice,' Bondi said during a briefing on Friday, detailing a sealed indictment returned in May by a grand jury in Tennessee. The indictment charges Abrego Garcia with running a dangerous smuggling operation that spanned nearly 10 years, allegedly transporting not only illegal aliens but also MS-13 gang members, firearms, narcotics, and, most disturbingly, children. Bondi praised El Salvador's President Bukele for cooperating with Trump's orders to extradite Garcia to face his very 'serious charges.' She also spoke on the fact that the Biden administration previously failed to secure the border allowing criminals like Garcia to continue to impact America negatively. 'What has changed is Donald Trump is now President of the United States, and our borders are again secure, and thanks to the bright light that has been shined on Abrego Garcia, this investigation continued with actually amazing police work, and we were able to track this case and stop this international smuggling ring from continuing,' Bondi told reporters. The indictment outlines a chilling picture: Garcia allegedly made multiple trips smuggling high numbers of illegal aliens – including minors – across the border, treating children as commodities for profit, according to Bondi. Co-conspirators allege that Garcia also engaged in sexual exploitation of minors, human trafficking, and that his ring was connected to the tragic deaths of over 50 migrants in 2021- highlighted by a sad incident accounted for by American officials after a tractor trailer overturned in Mexico. Bondi also vowed that Garcia will be prosecuted in the U.S., imprisoned if convicted, and deported after serving his sentence. She thanked the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and local authorities for their tireless work to track down the man. 'This is what American justice looks like upon completion of his sentence. We anticipate he will be returned to his home country of El Salvador. The grand jury found that over the past nine years of Rigo Garcia has played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring. They found this was his full time job, not a contractor. He was a smuggler of humans and children and women. He made over 100 trips the grand jury found smuggling people throughout our country,' Bondi added. The Dallas Express will continue to follow this case against Abrego as Bondi stands firm in her commitment to charge the illegal alien and career criminal.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘I would': Trump calls for arrest of California's Newsom amid lawsuit over National Guard in LA
President Donald Trump said he'd support having his border czar, Tom Homan arrest California Gov. Gavin Newsom as tensions between the two leaders built beyond the boiling point on Monday, 'I would do it … I think it would be a great thing,' Trump said, according to USA TODAY, when he was asked whether Newsom, who's challenged the White House's decision to federalize National Guard personnel amid ongoing protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles. The Republican president also called Newsom 'grossly incompetent,' the newspaper reported. Newsom fired back on X: 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America.' Newsom filed suit against the White House on Monday over its decision to deploy the National Guard. California Attorney General Rob Bonta said the state's sovereignty was 'trampled' by President Donald Trump when he ordered National Guard troops to the immigration protests in Los Angeles, The Associated Press reported. Bonta announced plans Monday to sue the Trump administration. He said the lawsuit would ask the court 'to set aside the president's unlawful action federalizing the California National Guard.' In a post to X, Newsom asserted that 'this is a manufactured crisis,; and that Trump is ' creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. Constitution. 'The illegal order he signed could allow him to send the military into ANY STATE HE WISHES. Every governor -- red or blue -- should reject this outrageous overreach,' Newsom continued. 'There's a lot of hyperbole out there. This isn't that. This is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism that threatens the foundation of our republic. We cannot let it stand.' Associated Press reports are included in this story. Mass. AG Campbell sues Trump admin over plan to distribute machine gun conversion tech Here are 10 NASA missions that could be grounded under Trump's 2026 budget 'I don't know if I want to do this anymore': leaked audio highlights turmoil among Dems Graffiti on tank in Trump's parade calls for hanging 2 well-known Americans 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says Read the original article on MassLive.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump administration urges court not to dismiss case against Wisconsin judge
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Trump administration argued Monday that charges should not be dropped against a Wisconsin judge who was indicted for allegedly helping a man who is in the country evade U.S. immigration agents seeking to arrest him in her courthouse. Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Justice urged a federal judge to reject a motion filed by Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan seeking to dismiss the charges against her, saying doing so would be 'unprecedented' and allow judges to be above the law. Dugan faces a July 21 trial in the case that escalated a clash between Trump's administration and opponents over the Republican president's sweeping immigration crackdown. Trump critics contend that Dugan's arrest went too far and that the administration is trying to make an example out of her to discourage judicial opposition to the crackdown. The accusations against Dugan Dugan is charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Prosecutors say she escorted Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, 31, and his lawyer out of her courtroom through a back door on April 18 after learning that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were in the courthouse seeking to arrest him for being in the country illegally. She could face up to six years in prison and a $350,000 fine if convicted on both counts. Her attorneys say she's innocent. They filed a motion last month to dismiss the case, saying she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore is immune to prosecution. They also maintain that the federal government violated Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge. Trump administration response Justice Department attorneys responded in a court filing Monday, saying dismissing the charges against the judge on the grounds that she is immune would be unprecedented and would ignore 'well-established law that has long permitted judges to be prosecuted for crimes they commit.' 'Such a ruling would give state court judges carte blanche to interfere with valid law enforcement actions by federal agents in public hallways of a courthouse, and perhaps even beyond,' Justice Department attorneys argued. 'Dugan's desired ruling would, in essence, say that judges are 'above the law,' and uniquely entitled to interfere with federal law enforcement.' Dugan's attorney, Craig Mastantuono, did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. In her motion to dismiss, Dugan argued that her conduct amounted to directing people's movement in and around her courtroom, and that she enjoys legal immunity for official acts she performs as a judge. She also accused the federal government of violating Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge. Dugan's case is similar to one brought during the first Trump administration against a Massachusetts judge , who was accused of helping a man sneak out a courthouse back door to evade a waiting immigration enforcement agent. That case was eventually dismissed. The case background According to prosecutors, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz illegally reentered the U.S. after being deported in 2013. He was charged in March with misdemeanor domestic violence in Milwaukee County and was in Dugan's courtroom for a hearing in that case on April 18. Dugan's clerk alerted her that immigration agents were in the courthouse looking to arrest Flores-Ruiz, prosecutors allege in court documents. According to an affidavit, Dugan became visibly angry at the agents' arrival and called the situation 'absurd.' After discussing the warrant for Flores-Ruiz's arrest with the agents, Dugan demanded that they speak with the chief judge and led them away from the courtroom. She then returned to the courtroom, was heard saying something to the effect of 'wait, come with me,' and then showed Flores-Ruiz and his attorney out a back door, the affidavit says. The immigration agents eventually detained Flores-Ruiz outside the building following a foot chase. Dugan, 66, was arrested by the FBI on April 25 at the courthouse. A grand jury indicted Dugan on May 13 and she pleaded not guilty on May 15. Dugan defense fund A legal defense fund created by Dugan supporters to help pay for her high-profile defense attorneys has raised more than $137,000 in three weeks from more than 2,800 donors. Her legal team includes former U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic and former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement. Both were appointed by Republican presidents. She has also hired prominent attorneys in Milwaukee and Madison. 'This is an impressive show of support for the defense fund, highlighting that the public believes in protecting a fair and independent judiciary,' former Supreme Court Justice Janine Geske, the fund's trustee, said Monday. 'The fund will continue to raise grassroots donations and uphold strict guidelines to ensure transparency and accountability.' Dugan is not required to list the donor names until she submits her annual financial disclosure form, which is due in April. Numerous people are prohibited from donating, including Milwaukee County residents; attorneys who practice in the county; lobbyists; judges; parties with pending matters before any Milwaukee County judge; and county employees. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
