Greta Thunberg and other activists on aid boat bound for Gaza intercepted by Israel
An aid boat carrying environmental campaigner Greta Thunberg, "Game of Thrones" actor Liam Cunningham and other activists was "safely making its way to the shores of Israel" late Sunday, Israel's Foreign Ministry said, after the defense minister vowed to prevent the ship from reaching the Gaza Strip.
As the boat was traveling in the Mediterranean, it appeared it was intercepted by Israeli forces.
"The passengers are expected to return to their home countries," the Israel Defense Ministry said on social media. The ministry said any aid on the ship would be sent to Gaza.
Defense Minister Israel Katz said earlier Sunday that Israel wouldn't allow anyone to break its naval blockade of the Palestinian territory, which he said was aimed at preventing Hamas from importing arms.
"I have instructed the IDF to act so that the 'Madeleine' flotilla does not reach Gaza," Katz said in a statement from his office."To the antisemitic Greta and her fellow Hamas propagandists — I will say this clearly: You should turn back, because you will not make it to Gaza."
He added: "Israel will act against any attempt to break the blockade or assist terrorist organizations – at sea, in the air and on land."
Climate activist Greta Thunberg stands near a Palestinian flag after boarding the Madleen boat and before setting sail for Gaza on June 1, 2025.
Salvatore Cavalli / AP
Thunberg and Cunningham are among 12 activists aboard the Madleen, which is operated by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, on its way to Gaza. The coalition says they are a grassroots movement working to end Israel's blockade of Gaza.
The vessel departed Sicily last Sunday and the group said they planned to reach Gaza's territorial waters as early as Sunday.
On Sunday, in a social media post, the coalition accused Israel of jamming their communication as they approached about 160 nautical miles from Gaza.
"Help us to break the siege," the post said.
Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament who is of Palestinian descent, is among the others onboard. She has been barred from entering Israel because of her opposition to Israeli policies toward the Palestinians.
"We have less than 24 hours left before we are illegally detained by Israeli authorities who want to prevent us from reaching the Gaza Strip," she wrote on an X post on Sunday. "When we are no longer able to communicate with you, I'm counting on you to continue the mobilization that has been so valuable to us throughout this journey."
After a three-month total blockade aimed at pressuring Hamas, Israel started allowing some basic aid into Gaza last month, but humanitarian workers have warned of famine unless the blockade and the war end.
An attempt last month by Freedom Flotilla to reach Gaza by sea failed after another of the group's vessels was attacked by two drones while sailing in international waters off Malta. The group blamed Israel for the attack, which damaged the front section of the ship. Israel has not commented on the attack.
Palestinians say 12 killed by Israeli fire near aid sites
The Hamas-run Palestinian Health Ministry and witnesses say at least 12 people were killed and others were wounded by Israeli fire as they headed toward two aid distribution points in the Gaza Strip run by an Israeli and U.S.-backed group Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Israel's military said it fired warning shots at people who approached its forces.
Palestinian witnesses in the southern city of Khan Younis said Israeli forces had fired on them at a roundabout that is around a kilometer (half-mile) from a site run by GHF in the nearby city of Rafah.
The Israeli military said it fired warning shots at people it said were advancing toward its forces and ignored warnings to turn away. It said the shooting occurred in an area in southern Gaza that is considered an active combat zone at night.
A GHF spokesperson said there was no violence in or around its distribution sites, all three of which delivered aid on Sunday. The group had closed them temporarily last week to discuss safety measures with the Israeli military and has warned people to stay on designated access routes. The spokesperson spoke on condition of anonymity in line with regulations.
Palestinians carry jerry cans filled with water distributed by a water tanker, in Khan Yunis, Gaza on June 8, 2025.
Abed Rahim Khatib/Anadolu via Getty Images
The hubs are set up inside Israeli military zones — where independent media have no access — and are run by GHF, a new group of mainly American contractors. Israel wants it to replace a system coordinated by the United Nations and international aid groups.
Israel and the United States accuse the militant Hamas group of stealing aid, while the U.N. denies there is any systematic diversion. The U.N. says the new system is unable to meet mounting needs and allows Israel to use aid as a weapon by determining who can receive it and forcing people to relocate to where the aid sites are positioned.
Save the Children CEO: No aid from organization has reached Gaza since March 2
Janti Soeripto, the CEO of Save the Children, told "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on Sunday that her organization has not been able to distribute aid to Gaza since March 2 because they haven't received authorization from Israel.
"Even though the blockade is formally over, we haven't been able to get any of the 50 trucks that we have around Gaza on the border ready to go in, we haven't been able to get anything in," Soeripto said.
Additionally, Soeripto said there are dwindling supplies.
President Trump has urged the U.N. to work with GHF to distribute aid. Soeripto said Save the Children has "given a lot of input and shared our concerns."
"We and all the other operational agencies in Gaza have shared our concerns with this new mechanism," Soeripto said. "We thought the existing mechanism worked just fine when we had the pause in fighting from January till March, as you recall, we got trucks and trucks of supplies in at scale. We were able to deliver."
Dozens have been killed trying to reach GHF distribution sites, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry. Soeripto called their distribution a "militarization of aid."
"If you put men with guns near a distribution point and then you ask a desperate, starving population to come and walk for miles to get boxes of food, you're going to create crowd control issues and increased risk of harm to an already incredibly desperate population," Soeripto said.
Israeli officials have said they will continue the naval blockade until all the hostages are returned and Hamas is defeated or disarmed and sent into exile.
Hamas has said it will only release the remaining hostages in return for Palestinian prisoners, a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. Talks mediated by the U.S., Egypt and Qatar have been deadlocked for months.
Hamas started the war with its massive attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking another 251 people hostage. Fifty-five of them are still being held, with fewer than half believed to be alive. The rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals.
Israel has recovered dozens of bodies, including three in recent days, and rescued eight living hostages over the course of the war.
Israel's military campaign has killed over 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry. It has said women and children make up most of the dead but it does not say how many civilians or combatants were killed. Israel says it has killed over 20,000 militants, without providing evidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
27 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump's ‘peace through strength' message resonates with Russian neighbor
UNITED NATIONS - Latvia is ready to move quickly once it starts its first-ever United Nations Security Council term in January 2026. Of the 188 countries taking part in the vote, 178 cast their ballots in favor of the Eastern European nation. Latvian Foreign Affairs Minister Baiba Braže, who attended the vote at the U.N.'s New York City headquarters, told Fox News Digital that her country is ready to address the ongoing Ukraine-Russia and Israel-Hamas wars. Ahead of its term on the council, Riga has its eyes set on peace for all parties involved in both conflicts. "We shall work on the U.N. Security Council to help achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, the Middle East and other conflict regions, to strengthen global security, safeguard the international rules-based order in line with the U.N. Charter and make the work of the U.N. Security Council more effective," Braže said in her address to the U.N. last week. When it comes to Israel and Hamas, Braže emphasized the need to get aid to the people of Gaza but said that Latvia did not have a position on how it should be done, despite international criticism of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Braže expressed the need for the best solution to the aid issue in Gaza would be "whatever is more efficient" and that she believes both sides will be able to work on that. Overall, Braže was focused on one key point: getting aid to vulnerable people in Gaza. The war in Ukraine hits closer to home for Braže. Latvia, like Ukraine, was part of the Soviet Union and gained its independence in 1991 after the USSR dissolved. She told Fox News Digital that Russian President Vladimir Putin is using "traditional Russian-Soviet tactics," such as delays in negotiations, but she believes there are ways to pressure the Kremlin into peace. Braže also said that Latvia "fully supports" President Donald Trump's vision of peace through strength to quash the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. "Currently we don't see a single indication that Russia wants peace. It's bluffing, it's asking impossible demands from the U.S., from Ukraine and others, and then blaming Ukraine for not accepting those impossible demands," she said. Braže told Fox News Digital that limiting Russia's income and its access to technology will be crucial to securing a stable and lasting peace. This would also mean intervening in potentially threatening partnerships, such as the one between China and Russia. "Making sure that the oil price stays low and that its oil and gas exports are affected and limited is very important," she said. The foreign minister accused China of being the "main enabler" of Russia through its exports to the country. She said that Russia is able to "cannibalize" parts of the exports it gets from China and put them toward its missile program. Beyond how the world handles Russia, Braže sees strengthening Ukraine's ability to defend itself as a crucial part of ending the war. She noted that Ukraine is acting in accordance with Article 51 of the U.N. Charter. Braže also called Ukraine the "strongest deterrent of Russia's aggression." "So, military aid, humanitarian aid, political support, moral support, everything is needed. So that is the strength, and that will lead to peace," she told Fox News Digital. When asked about what a victory for Ukraine, as well as long-lasting security, would look like, Braže left it up to Kyiv. "Ukraine will define what it sees both as peace and victory. We believe that Ukraine's sovereignty, Ukraine's ability to control its territory, Ukraine not accepting the occupied territories as Russian—because that's against international law—that all are elements that will be required for both peace but also for Ukraine, considering that it has not lost the war."
The Intercept
34 minutes ago
- The Intercept
As 75 Democrats Vote to Praise ICE, Ilhan Omar Wants to Hold Police Accountable for Protest Abuses
Seventy-five House Democrats voted on Monday in support of a resolution that praised President Donald Trump's deportation regime. The vote came as Trump deployed more than 1,700 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to crush protests against increased U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and mass arrests. Sponsored by Rep. Gabe Evans, R-Colo., a pro-Israel Republican, the bulk of the resolution was dedicated to condemning the attack last month in Boulder, Colorado, against pro-Israel demonstrators calling for the release of hostages in Israel. Tucked into the text was a line praising ICE, expressing 'gratitude to law enforcement officers, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel, for protecting the homeland.' While some Democrats are busy joining Republican colleagues to praise ICE, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., is seeking to pass a law that holds police accountable for violence against protesters. Her bill, introduced in late May, would apply penalties to law enforcement for using force in response to a demonstration. 'Now, more than ever, it's important that we're doing everything we can to protect Americans' right to free speech and peaceful protest,' Omar said. 'That's why I introduced legislation to make law enforcement violence against protesters a federal crime.' The military response to the protests is not just about immigration, said Omar, but represents another step in Trump's efforts to crush dissent. 'In my district and across the country, we're seeing the Trump Administration use militarized force to silence, intimidate, and brutalize, not just protestors for exercising their First Amendment right, but also members of the press,' Omar said in a statement to The Intercept. 'This appears to be part of a broader more sinister and deeply un-American agenda to surveil and criminalize individuals for their political views.' While the bill praising ICE got 75 votes from Democrats and 205 Republicans, with seven co-sponsors, Omar's bill has only garnered three co-sponsors. Another resolution Omar introduced late last month that condemns police brutality, especially in response to protests, has no cosponsors. Of the handful of bills related to protests introduced in Congress this session, the vast majority are aimed at increasing penalties for protesters; restricting people convicted of federal or state crimes in relation to protests from receiving federal student aid; and designating some forms of protest as domestic terrorism. Few bills, on the other hand, seek to introduce new protections. There are currently only two Democratic bills this session related to protecting protesters — both have been introduced by Omar. Read our complete coverage Even when bills seek to shore up protesters' rights, some are aimed at defending Trump supporters, not protesters in general. One from a far-right member of Congress seeks to bar detention for nonviolent political protesters in the name of a man who participated in the January 6 attacks on the Capitol and, following his conviction, died by suicide in custody. Omar is one of several progressive members of Congress who denounced Trump's use of state force to quash dissent and affirmed the rights of protesters. On Monday, Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, called Trump's actions a distraction and described them as illegal and authoritarian. 'Trump's threats have nothing to do with keeping people safe — it's about political theater. He's scapegoating immigrants to distract from the GOP's real agenda: ripping health care away from millions to pay for tax cuts for the ultra-rich,' Casar said in a statement. 'We stand with Angelenos, and we stand with immigrant families everywhere. The President must return command of the National Guard to Governor Newsom.' Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., said the arrival of the military in Los Angeles was 'evidence of our country's descent into fascism.' 'It's an abuse of power and a dangerous escalation that will only destabilize our communities,' Tlaib wrote. 'I stand with those defending our immigrant neighbors and our fundamental rights.' Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., called on protesters to remain nonviolent. 'Dr. King defeated racist government officials & ended segregation through disciplined non-violent resistance,' Sanders tweeted. 'Defeating Trumpism, oligarchy & authoritarianism requires that same level of discipline. Violent protests are counterproductive and play right into Trump's playbook.' Comments like Sanders's that blame protesters for violence justify Trump's response, said California attorney Thomas Harvey, who has worked with student protesters demonstrating against Israel's war on Gaza. Trump has 'falsely characterized resistance to these ICE abductions as insurrection and rebellion to justify federalizing the National Guard in CA and authorized Secretary of Defense Pete Hesgeth to use the military on U.S. soil anywhere he decides,' Harvey said. 'To make matters worse, the armchair quarterbacks in the Democratic Party and punditry, most of whom have never organized a protest or dealt with the kind of state violence we're seeing today, dare to admonish protesters for engaging in what they call violence.' Sanders's comments were 'incorrect and completely ahistorical,' Harvey added. 'King himself changed his views on violence, especially riots, as the Civil Rights Movement went on and the U.S. government resisted meaningful change. But any serious person knows that civil rights protesters fought the police in the streets in the 1960s, just as anti-ICE kidnapping protesters are willing to do today,' he said. People protesting in Los Angeles responded to an already violent situation, said Ricci Sergienko, an attorney and organizer in Los Angeles. 'Is our current situation 'peace'? Why would anyone be shocked at this response by the people?' 'Our current situation is a complete provocation by the state — tearing families apart and throwing people into concentration camps is violence,' Sergienko said. 'They are kidnapping people and locking them in the LA federal detention center basement without food or water. This, on top of the violence already faced against every day Angelenos. From seven unhoused people dying on the streets every day to rent and evictions to continuous police harassment. How do you expect people to act? Is our current situation 'peace'? Why would anyone be shocked at this response by the people?' The protests in Los Angeles should come as no surprise given its history of mass action, Sergienko said. Riots broke out in 1992 after police brutally beat Rodney King. In 1965, the Watts Rebellion came in response to widespread racist police abuse. Protests in 2020 against police brutality and in 2024 against Israel's genocide in Gaza are part of that same thread, he said. 'There is a long history of this kind of action in Los Angeles,' he said. 'Politicians don't dictate how people in this city are going to respond.'
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump-Harvard clash heats up. Here's what to know.
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's feud with Harvard University has reached a fever pitch – and it's only getting more heated. Days after he attempted to ban the Ivy League school from enrolling international students – a move that a federal judge immediately blocked – the General Services Administration directed all federal agencies on May 27 to explore ways to cut remaining contracts with the university, according to a senior administration official. The order is the latest in a series of direct swipes the White House has taken in recent weeks with the aim of punishing the Harvard community. The feud has escalated on a near-daily basis, halting major research trials, freezing billions of dollars in federal funding and prompting multiple high-stakes lawsuits. Trump's motives for targeting Harvard are complicated. He and members of his administration have roundly criticized the school and its Jewish president for creating a campus environment that the White House has characterized as rife with antisemitism, since protests broke out in response to the Israel-Hamas war. However, the Ivy League institution has long been a punching bag for conservatives, many of whom view it as a ground zero for liberal ideology and activism. More recently, Trump has complained in an increasingly forceful way about Harvard enrolling too many students from other countries. Read more: A new phase begins in Trump's battle with higher education Here's where things stand in Trump's crusade against Harvard. Harvard's foreign students spent the final days of their spring semester mired in fear and uncertainty. The Trump administration told them a week ago they'd need to transfer to another institution or risk losing their ability to remain in the United States. The only thing keeping that threat at bay is a federal court order. On May 22, the Department of Homeland Security revoked Harvard's certification to participate in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program, functionally barring the university from enrolling any international students. The change went into effect immediately, just a week before many foreign students would graduate, leaving them scrambling to determine whether their degrees would be jeopardized. Read more: International college students bring billions to the US. Here's why that may change. Harvard sued the following morning, accusing federal officials of violating multiple laws. Hours after the university filed its lawsuit, a federal judge in Massachusetts issued a temporary restraining order. The president also ordered Harvard on May 25 to turn over the "names and countries" of every international student enrolled at the university. The federal government already has access to that information through a database called the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System. Read more: Trump has been defunding university research. Does China benefit from it? The other major front in the Trump administration's battle with Harvard is over federal funding. Since mid-April, the White House has frozen billions of dollars in federal research grants for the school while characterizing the punitive actions as a response to Trump's concerns about campus antisemitism. Pausing that money has upended the university's research apparatus. Nearly every direct federal grant for Harvard's school of public health was terminated in May, according to the university. Among the dozens of defunded research projects were studies related to cancer screenings and lung disease. The first major threat to Harvard's funding came on March 31, when a task force of multiple federal agencies announced a review of roughly $9 billion in contracts and grants to the school. Harvard's leaders refused to comply with what they saw as a list of unprecedented demands by the task force to overhaul hiring and teaching. In response, the Trump administration froze $2.2 billion of the school's federal funding on April 14. Despite multiple requests, the administration still has not clarified to USA TODAY how that money breaks down. The university filed an initial suit against the White House on April 21 to restore its federal funding. In the weeks since, federal agencies have deemed Harvard ineligible for new federal research grants, yanked an additional $450 million in funding and considered cutting off even more government support for the school. In an interview with NPR on May 27, Harvard's president, Alan Garber, said his university isn't the only one whose scholars' scientific research has been hamstrung. "Everybody benefits from the research work of universities like ours. And it is not only about Harvard," he said. "The kinds of changes that the administration has begun and is contemplating, which include deep cuts to the National Institutes of Health and to the National Science Foundation, will affect all research universities and will have a real impact on the ability of the United States to remain at the forefront of science and technology." On May 2, Trump said the Internal Revenue Service was "going to be taking away" Harvard's tax-exempt status. That unprecedented threat has become a major area of concern for the school and a point of contention in one of its lawsuits against the White House. Unless a judge deems the effort unlawful, the university could lose hundreds of millions of dollars, according to some estimates. Typically, there's an apolitical process the IRS follows to strip nonprofits of their tax-exempt status. The executive branch is prohibited, by federal law, from influencing IRS audits and investigations. "There is no legal basis to rescind Harvard's tax-exempt status," Harvard spokesman Jason Newton said in a statement on May 2. 'Such an unprecedented action would endanger our ability to carry out our educational mission." While many of Harvard's students and faculty are on break this summer, the school's lawyers will still be battling the White House in court. The next major court hearing is set for May 29, when a judge will consider extending her hold on Trump's attempt to ban Harvard from enrolling foreign students. Court proceedings in Harvard's other lawsuit, challenging the funding freezes and review of its tax-exempt status, are scheduled throughout June. The judge in that case is the same. She was appointed by President Barack Obama. Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump-Harvard clash heats up. Here's what to know.
