
UK universities are at risk of training torturers
Across the UK, pro-Palestinian protests in reaction to the war in Gaza have placed universities' response to human rights concerns under the spotlight. But concerns about links between Britain's higher education institutions and human rights abuses are not limited to one area.
A new investigation by Freedom from Torture has found that UK universities are offering postgraduate security and counterterrorism education to members of foreign security forces, including those serving some of the world's most repressive regimes. These institutions are offering training to state agents without scrutinising their human rights records, or pausing to consider how British expertise might end up being exploited to silence, surveil or torture.
The investigation reveals that British universities may not just be turning a blind eye to human rights abuses, but could also be at risk of training some of the abusers. Some universities have even partnered directly with overseas police forces known for widespread abuses to deliver in-country teaching. Others have welcomed individuals on to courses designed for serving security professionals from countries where torture is a standard tool of state control. All of this is happening with virtually no oversight of the risks to human rights.
These are not abstract concerns. They raise serious, immediate questions. What happens when the covert surveillance techniques taught in British classrooms are later used to hunt down dissidents? Why are universities not investigating the backgrounds of applicants from regimes where 'counterterrorism' is a common pretext for torture and arbitrary detention?
Freedom from Torture's investigation found that universities across the UK are accepting applicants for security education from some of the world's most repressive states. Yet just one university in the study said they are screening out applicants who they believed have either engaged in human rights violations or 'intend to'.
Torture survivors in the UK have spoken out about their shock that members of the security forces from countries they have fled can access UK security education without meaningful human rights checks. British universities, long considered beacons of liberal values and intellectual freedom, appear to be overlooking the fact that the knowledge they produce may be used to further oppression and state violence.
Meanwhile, student activists across the country are staunchly positioning themselves as stakeholders in their university's human rights records. The recent Gaza protests indicate that that when students believe universities' conduct does not align with their values, they won't hesitate to hold them accountable.
Across the world, the global student body has a rich history of activism. From anti-apartheid solidarity campaigns to the student protests that sparked Myanmar's 1988 uprising, young people have long stood at the front lines of struggles against repression. Today's generation – often described as the most socially conscious and globally connected in history – is no different. It shouldn't come as a surprise to universities that their human rights performance is a hot topic for the young people they serve.
In the corporate world, businesses are now routinely judged on their human rights records. Terms like 'ethical sourcing,' 'responsible investment,' and 'human rights due diligence' are standard parts of doing business. Universities, which pride themselves on being forward-thinking and socially responsible, should be held to no lower standard. The fact that many have no policy at all on overseas human rights risks is indefensible.
It's time for that to change.
Torture survivors seeking safety in the UK should not have to worry that the nation's educational institutions are offering training to the security forces of the very regimes they fled. Universities should be able to provide reassurance to anyone expressing real concern, whether that is those with lived experience of the most terrible abuses of power, or their own students.
In order to do this the university sector must get its house in order. This starts with adopting transparent human rights policies across the sector and undertaking effective due diligence to manage risks to human rights. Failure to take these necessary steps leaves the sector at risk of contributing, however unintentionally, to global human rights violations.
Universities must ask themselves: Who is sitting in our classrooms? Who benefits from our training? And what consequences might flow from what we teach? These are amongst the many urgent questions, but not ones the sector appears to be asking.
UK universities must take meaningful steps to ensure they avoid inadvertently sharpening the tools of global repression and move towards building a human rights record they can be proud of. Not only will it appeal to a new generation of activist students, but it's the right thing to do.
*Full details of FfT's investigation, including responses from universities, can be found here.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Aid ship aiming to break Israel's siege of Gaza sets sail from Italy
International nonprofit organisation Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) says one of its vessels has left Sicily to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza, after a previous attempt failed due to a drone attack on a different ship in the Mediterranean. The 12-person crew, which includes Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg, Irish actor Liam Cunningham and Franco-Palestinian MEP Rima Hassan, set sail on the Madleen from the port of Catania on Sunday, carrying barrels of relief supplies that the group called 'limited amounts, though symbolic'. The voyage comes after another vessel operated by the group, the Conscience, was hit by two drones just outside Maltese territorial waters in early May. While FFC said Israel was to blame for the incident, it has not responded to requests for comment. 'We are doing this because no matter what odds we are against, we have to keep trying, because the moment we stop trying is when we lose our humanity,' Thunberg told reporters at a news conference before the departure. The Swedish climate activist had been due to board the Conscience. She added that 'no matter how dangerous this mission is, it is nowhere near as dangerous as the silence of the entire world in the face of the lives being genocised'.The activists expect to take seven days to reach their destination, if they are not stopped. The FCC, launched in 2010, is a non-violent international movement supporting Palestinians, combining humanitarian aid with political protest against the blockade on Gaza. It said the trip 'is not charity. This is a non-violent, direct action to challenge Israel's illegal siege and escalating war crimes'. United Nations agencies and major aid groups say Israeli restrictions, the breakdown of law and order, and widespread looting make it extremely difficult to deliver aid to Gaza's roughly two million inhabitants. The situation in Gaza is at its worst since the war between Israel and Hamas began 19 months ago, the UN said on Friday, despite a resumption of limited aid deliveries in the Palestinian enclave. Under growing global pressure, Israel ended an 11-week blockade on Gaza on May 19, allowing extremely limited UN-led operations to resume. On Monday, a new avenue for aid distribution was also launched: the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, backed by the United States and Israel, but with the UN and international aid groups refusing to work with it, saying it is not neutral and has a distribution model that forces the displacement of Palestinians. The FCC is the latest among a growing number of critics to accuse Israel of genocidal acts in its war in Gaza, allegations Israel vehemently denies. 'We are breaking the siege of Gaza by sea, but that's part of a broader strategy of mobilisations that will also attempt to break the siege by land,' said activist Thiago Avila. Avila also mentioned the upcoming Global March to Gaza – an international initiative also open to doctors, lawyers and members of the media – which is set to leave Egypt and reach the Rafah crossing in mid-June to stage a protest there, calling on Israel to stop the Gaza offensive and reopen the border.


Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Anne Frank's relative criticises Netanyahu as 'fanatical'
Quotable Anne Frank's relative criticises Netanyahu as 'fanatical' Oliver Elias, the great cousin of Anne Frank, calls on Jews, Germans and the international community to condemn Israel and its leader, Benjamin Netanyahu, for its war on Gaza.


Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Why Hamas is seeking to change the US-proposed Gaza ceasefire deal
Palestinian group Hamas claims a recent ceasefire proposal passed to them by United States special envoy Steve Witkoff is different from one they had agreed to a week earlier. Basem Naim, a leading Hamas official, told Al Jazeera on Saturday that the group 'responded positively' to the latest proposal relayed by Witkoff, even though it offered 'no guarantees to end the war', according to Naim. Israel has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians since October 2023, and its total aid blockade since March has caused starvation and a famine-like situation in Gaza, home to 2.3 million people, most of whom were displaced by 19 months of relentless bombardment. Amid international pressure, Israel has allowed a trickle of aid into Gaza, which has been described as a 'drop in an ocean' by humanitarian groups. Here's what you need to know about the ceasefire proposal. According to the group, no. It says it responded positively but added a few key provisions. There are a few. Hamas has responded to the latest US-proposed ceasefire with demands for a pathway to a permanent ceasefire, instead of a temporary one where the Israeli government could unilaterally restart hostilities as they did in March. They have also called for a full withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip and the resumption of aid and assistance to the besieged area. Witkoff proposed a 60-day pause in hostilities. After that, the parties (Israel and Hamas) would work to agree to extend the pause. The issue with this is that the last time it happened, Israel unilaterally decided to cut aid to Gaza and started bombing it. To avoid a similar scenario, Hamas has tried to negotiate on the timeline for releasing the captives, 10 of them alive and 18 bodies of those killed during the war. Witkoff's proposal called for the release to take place within a week of the 60-day pause. However, Hamas fears Israel will resume its bombing campaign upon the release of the captives, so it has called for staggering their release throughout the pause. It has called for a set list of negotiation topics to avoid what has happened in past negotiations with Israel, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu added provisions in what critics say was an attempt to derail talks and prolong the war. According to the website Drop Site News, Hamas also reinserted a provision from the May 25 agreement that Israel had withdrawn. That provision would be for Hamas to hand over the governing of Gaza to 'an independent technocratic committee'. Witkoff called Hamas's response 'totally unacceptable' and said it 'only takes us backward'. 'Hamas should accept the framework proposal we put forward as the basis for proximity talks, which we can begin immediately this coming week,' he wrote on X, formerly Twitter. 'That is the only way we can close a 60-day ceasefire deal in the coming days in which half of the living hostages and half of those who are deceased will come home to their families and in which we can have at the proximity talks substantive negotiations in good-faith to try to reach a permanent ceasefire.' I received the Hamas response to the United States' proposal. It is totally unacceptable and only takes us backward. Hamas should accept the framework proposal we put forward as the basis for proximity talks, which we can begin immediately this coming week. That is the only… — Office of the Special Envoy to the Middle East (@SE_MiddleEast) May 31, 2025US President Donald Trump previously said the two sides were nearing a deal. The US and Israel seem to be in agreement on the terms. Israel claims its officials agreed with the US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Israel 'backed and supported' the new proposal. Netanyahu criticised the Hamas response, parroting Witkoff and laying the blame on the Palestinian group for failing to accept the proposal. 'As Witkoff said, Hamas's response is unacceptable and sets the situation back. Israel will continue its action for the return of our hostages and the defeat of Hamas,' Netanyahu said. Hamas is wary of past instances where Israel chose to unilaterally break the ceasefire. That happened in March, when Netanyahu decided to block all aid from entering Gaza and restart the war. Tamer Qarmout, an associate professor at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, described the negotiations between Hamas and Israel as taking place with 'no good faith whatsoever'. 'They [Israel] are fixated on one key goal, which is Hamas's capitulation and surrender, and disappearing from the scene,' Qarmout told Al Jazeera. 'Hamas is engaged in these negotiations just to try to reduce the horrors of the war, to allow some humanitarian aid to enter and to also look for a dignified exit. No one in Hamas wants to see themselves surrendering this way.' In the interim, Israel is continuing to attack Gaza. On Sunday, Israeli forces opened fire on Palestinians who had gathered at aid distribution sites run by a US-backed group, Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in southern and central Gaza. At least 31 people were killed in Rafah and another near the Netzarim Corridor. Meanwhile, residential homes across Gaza are still being bombed relentlessly.