
Venezuelan family in US under curtailed humanitarian protections clings to faith amid uncertainty
Every Sunday, Johann Teran goes to worship at a Lutheran service in suburban Minneapolis, trying to find some hope that the future he was building isn't all slipping away.
Like hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans hit by political and economic crises, Teran, his wife and her mother applied for different kinds of humanitarian protections in the United States that the Trump administration has curtailed or is expected to end soon.
'I'm feeling like they're telling me, 'Go, just go back, we don't want you.' Even when they gave me the opportunity to be here,' Teran said. 'We are just hopeless, and trying to find hope, and that's why I'm going more to the church, to look for or get this hope that I need.'
The 27-year-old attorney came to Minnesota eight months ago on a humanitarian parole program the Biden administration created in 2022. It granted two-year visas to 500,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela – all countries deemed by the United States to have unstable or repressive governments – if they had a U.S. financial sponsor and passed background checks.
Teran's wife, Karelia, 29, hadn't received approval yet when the new administration ended the program, leaving her in Venezuela without a legal path to the U.S. Her mother, Marlenia Padron, was granted temporary protected status – TPS, another mechanism for people who fled countries in disarray – in 2023, but the government has ordered it to end in early April for several hundred thousand Venezuelans like her. Hundreds of thousands more Venezuelans and Haitians will lose TPS later this year. Lawsuits were filed Thursday to reverse the decision about Venezuelans.
Before cooking dinner in her small apartment decorated with photos of far-away relatives and statuettes of the Virgin Mary, Padron said she understands that President Donald Trump 'was fed up' with Venezuelans who have committed crimes in the United States and wants to deport them.
'But he eliminates the TPS and there we all fall,' Padron said in Spanish. 'I don't know what's going to happen, what will happen with a lot of people who are here hurting nobody. ... I'm working, I file my taxes. I wanted to buy a house. Those are the plans we had, but now I can't have those plans.'
Padron, 53, said threats against her began just as Venezuela's economic crisis escalated. Working as an attorney for a local government office in Puerto La Cruz, she said she was kidnapped for ransom, detained on trumped-up political accusations and surveilled – all the while watching her income disappear in the currency crisis, water and electricity rationed, and medicine for her elderly mother grow scarce.
'That time of the kidnapping was the trigger,' she said, describing how she was taken from a shopping center and held for three days, with beatings and accusations of being a 'traitor of the homeland' for raising questions about corruption.
'Nobody can say Venezuela is a place that has stability and respect for human rights. So people are going to continue to flee,' said Karen Musalo, an attorney and professor who leads the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies at University of California College of Law, San Francisco. 'The U.S., I would say under the Biden administration, with both humanitarian parole and temporary protected status, was recognizing that and responding to that.'
Musalo said most of roughly 8 million Venezuelans who fled in recent years went to other Latin American countries, triggering a regional crisis.
Padron went to Colombia first, crossing by canoe a river where gangs and guerrillas roamed. Worried she still might be targeted, she decided to travel on to Mexico, cross into the United States and turn herself into U.S. immigration authorities, asking for asylum – a process that can take many years.
When the special TPS program started, she applied, got a work permit and a job at a printing press, and finally felt safe in her new home in Minnesota – not always looking over her shoulders for threats or navigating shortages of necessities.
'I get home, make my meal for the next day, if I want to eat out, I go out – because there's quality of life, I earn what one earns to live peacefully,' she said. 'I don't have to go to a gas station to get gas and spend two days in line.'
Padron had never seen trees without leaves when she arrived in fall 2021, so adjusting to the frigid winters has been jarring. But she finds peacefulness in the snow.
'Sometimes when there's a lot of snow, I leave the shoes outside, and then I open the door and I think, 'My shoes, I left them outside!' And there they are. In Venezuela that wouldn't happen, they'd steal your shoes,' Padron said.
Now her daughter has no way to rejoin the family, and Padron is unsure of her own next steps. Even her father back in Venezuela has been asking 'When will they deport you?' But she says she can't go back in fear of her life.
Raised Catholic, she hopes that if she can stay in the United States, she will get a bigger home with an altar covered in flowers for the two statuettes – one honors her native city's Virgin Del Valle and the other an icon especially venerated by Cubans, La Virgen de la Caridad.
Meanwhile, she started attending Tapestry Church, a Lutheran congregation where old-timers as well as Latin American migrants worship in Spanish and English.
In 2023, the church had applied to sponsor humanitarian parole for 38 Venezuelans, but those cases were never processed. Now, it tries to reassure its congregants despite widespread fears.
'We have the conviction that we're stronger in community,' said the Rev. Melissa Melnick Gonzalez, Tapestry's pastor.
Teran, who works as a paralegal, has been volunteering with the congregation, helping fellow immigrants with paperwork.
'Everybody is worried and kind of anxious. People doesn't want to go out anymore,' he said. 'The Venezuelan community is just at home. We're all waiting, like we were criminals.'
He's trying to get a work visa that would prevent him from returning to Venezuela while allowing his wife, an orthodontist, to leave a country where young professionals like them can't make ends meet – and any protest risks violent repression.
He said he studied democracy in law school and would like to practice law in the United States, where 'there's no impunity.'
'So that dream is also being kind of canceled by Trump,' Teran said.
On a recent evening, as Padron fried arepas, Teran video-called his wife, and reached out to the phone screen when she turned it on their two snoozing Schnauzer dogs, Hoddy and Honey. Expecting Karelia's humanitarian parole would be approved any time, he had moved into a pet-friendly apartment before the program was terminated.
'I don't see any future right now for having her, in fact there's nothing that I can do right now for having her,' Teran said. 'I don't understand that, why you allow me to get in legally and now you're treating me like an illegal.'
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
Donald Trump's travel ban isn't actually about protecting Americans
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Donald Trump's latest travel ban isn't about making America safe. It's about making cruelty normal. The administration wants us to believe this is a sober, considered security measure. Twelve countries blacklisted. Seven more partially restricted. The justification? In Trump's words: 'We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States.' The accusation seems to be that these countries pose a threat to the United States based on historical precedent. Let's take that at face value for a moment. Myanmar, for example, is in a state of disarray. The UK Government advises against travel due to civil unrest, armed conflict, and arbitrary enforcement of local laws. So, it is possible that it has no functioning national vetting system. However, as far as I know, there has never been a single incident of a person from Myanmar carrying out a terrorist attack on US soil. Not one. The people fleeing from Myanmar are escaping widespread violence, not inciting it. So what exactly is Trump protecting against? The answer isn't found in intelligence briefings or airport protocols. It's found in a different kind of calculation – a political one. It's a message to Trump's base that the world – especially those with different faiths or colours – is dangerous. That only he can protect them and that empathy is a threat to be eliminated, not a value to be upheld. It comes after the Trump administration sought to end deportation protections for 350,000 Venezuelans in the US. They were (and some still are, after a federal judge blocked the move) allowed to remain under a scheme that permits people to work and live there if their home countries are deemed unsafe. The US Government's own assessment of Venezuela is that citizens and tourists are at risk of 'wrongful detention, torture in detention, terrorism, kidnapping, arbitrary enforcement of local laws, crime, civil unrest, and poor health infrastructure'. Cruelty isn't the side effect. It's the point. It will tear apart families mid-airport transfer and strand people who have already sold everything for the chance of safety or opportunity. Foreign students who want to study or take part in exchange programmes are on the chopping block – a move that, I'm sure, has nothing to do with the legal battle between Harvard and the Trump Administration who froze billions of dollars of federal funding after accusing it of failing to root out antisemitism on campus. And let's talk about who's not on the list. Egypt, for example, where the suspect in the recent Boulder attack came from. Not included. This is despite Trump specifically mentioning this terrorist attack as a justification for implementing the new travel ban. Saudi Arabia, whose nationals carried out 9/11? Also not included. Those banned are often fleeing conflict, violence or persecution for their gender, sexual orientation, or beliefs. All of which makes one thing clear: This isn't about risk, it's about optics. By design or naivety, women and girls, whose reproductive rights have already been weaponised and criminalised by Trump, and LGBTQ+ individuals, whose protections have also been stripped away, are now the targets of this performative and punitive ban. Even setting aside the moral argument, the legal case is clear. No one is advocating complete open borders, but if travellers have the proper documentation, how can you justify turning them away? When Trump introduced a similar order in 2017, targeting seven Muslim-majority countries, it was condemned as a 'Muslim ban' and tied up in endless legal challenges. President Joe Biden repealed it in 2021. This time, Trump says the rationale for the countries chosen is based on visa overstay rates or political instability. But, in my view, the evidence doesn't back this up. The White House wants you to believe this is a temporary measure, a pause until things can be properly assessed, but there's no transparency, no end date, and no consistent criteria. This is, as usual, theatre. Cruelty as a campaign tactic and the weaponisation of lives as a headline generator. More Trending Theatre has become the new normal for US politics, but we should still call it what it is. Punitive. Senseless. And above all, ineffective. A policy that punishes students, bans refugees, and abandons families is not national security. It's moral submission. This isn't border control; it's moral control in Trump's America, where kindness is weakness. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: The Virgin Island hate is atrocious – season 2 will prove me right MORE: In defence of Meghan Markle's twerking pregnancy video MORE: Double decker bus roof ripped off after crashing into railway bridge in South Norwood


Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Spain pays first arbitration award in long-running renewable subsidies dispute
MADRID, June 5 (Reuters) - The Spanish government has agreed to pay 32 million euros ($37 million) to a U.S. fund to end a legal dispute tied to renewable energy subsidies that were cut over a decade ago, an Energy Ministry spokesperson said on Thursday. Foreign investors, mostly investment funds, took legal action against Spain after the previous conservative government cut renewables subsidies in 2013 to reduce a power tariff deficit built up through years of artificially low prices. U.S. fund Blasket Renewable Investments had acquired the rights to the award from Japan's JGC Holdings Corporation, which won it under a 2021 ruling by the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. In 2024, the court shot down Spain's attempt to annul the decision. Since the arbitration proceeding was from a non-EU investor, the payment doesn't clash with a March decision by the European Commission that told Spain not to pay up in a similar case as it would be a breach of EU state aid rules - which prevent governments from giving unfair advantages to one firm over competitors. Cases from non-EU investors represent only 5% of the total, the spokesperson said, adding that Spain continued to pursue all legal avenues to defend its interests. So far, Spain has been ordered to pay around 1.5 billion euros in various cases and the country has been able to reduce by 85% the amount demanded by investors, the spokesperson said. ($1 = 0.8754 euros)


Daily Record
5 hours ago
- Daily Record
Young Scots groomed by gangsters to carry out crimes due to 'reduced risk' of being jailed
The SNP Government has been accused of failing to tackle organised crime after two notorious Scots gangsters were gunned down in Spain. Vulnerable young Scots are being groomed by gangsters to commit crimes as they face a "reduced risk" of being jailed, John Swinney has been warned. The First Minister was today told his Government was failing to take the threat of organised crime sufficiently seriously after two notorious criminals were gunned down in Spain last week. Eddie Lyons Jnr, 46, and Ross Monaghan, 43 - were shot dead in a Costa del Sol pub in front of horrified tourists. The deaths of the hoods followed a series of assaults, shootings and firebombings across Glasgow and Edinburgh since March. Police have arrested 41 people in relation to the gangland feud, with the probe being dubbed Operation Portaledge. MSP Russell Findlay said today Monaghan and Lyons - a scion of of the notorious Glaswegian crime family - had been "groomed for a life of crime". The Scottish Tory leader warned gangs were still actively recruiting teenage Scots by reassuring them their young age would help them dodge jail if caught. A sentencing guideline introduced in 2022 makes rehabilitation rather than punishment a primary consideration when sentencing young offenders. Findlay said: "We need to stop crime bosses exploiting vulnerable young people. The two men shot dead in Spain were groomed for a life of crime. Most of their gang associates are dead or in prison. "And now there's an official policy in place that makes young people even more vulnerable to exploitation. Senior Police Scotland officers state that under-25 sentencing guidelines are part of the problem. "Detective Superintendent Andy Patrick said: 'Organised crime groups are exploiting this policy. They are coercing young and vulnerable people to carry out some of these crimes because they are under reduced risk of imprisonment'. "Will John Swinney rethink his Government's support for these damaging guidelines?" Swinney fired back: "It is misleading to say to members of the public that there are no consequences for criminal activity under the age of 25, because there are. There are very serious consequences which involve imprisonment." The First Minister added: "Mr Findlay has made a number of remarks about the shootings that took place in Spain in recent days. These are live police investigations, so I am not able to comment on these particular issues. They are being pursued by the Spanish authorities. "But what I do say to Parliament is that any individual involved in criminal activity, no matter their age, must be aware of the severity of the punishments that exist." Findlay earlier said: "These parasites grow rich by preying on society's most vulnerable. These cowards cause terror and death with guns, knives and fire bombs. "These thugs go after journalists, politicians, businessmen, police and prison officers. Organised crime is out of control and communities are living in fear. "Does John Swinney accept that the Scottish Parliament has failed to tackle organised crime in Scotland?' The First Minister respondd: Organised crime is intolerable, it is unacceptable. It requires the forensic attention of our police and criminal justice authorities to tackle it, and that is being undertaken within Scotland on a relentless basis by Police Scotland and by the criminal justice authorities. "I would expect the authorities to pursue that level of scrutiny and activity, and that is what is happening."