One House Republican opposed Trump on key votes for years and survived. Can Thomas Massie do it again?
President Donald Trump often seems like the sun around which other Republicans orbit, setting their direction and movements — and, every so often, slingshotting one out of his solar system when they displease him.
But one GOP lawmaker has consistently found his own political gravity, surviving clash after clash against the party's standard bearer: Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky.
Massie was one of the few Republicans staunchly opposed to the Republican Party's sweeping bill to enact key pieces of Trump's agenda this year, such as extending the 2017 tax cuts and boosting spending for immigration enforcement. And he has not shied away from voicing his criticism what Trump has dubbed his 'one big beautiful bill,' which, in Massie's words, amounts to a 'ticking debt bomb,' represents 'Biden-level spending and increased deficits,' and contains a concession he said would 'primarily benefit limousine liberals in blue states.'
Trump, never shy with words, has blasted Massie as a 'grandstander' who 'should be voted out of office' — criticism Massie has pointed to in fundraising appeals for his own campaign. It's not a new dynamic for the Kentuckian, one of the rare Republicans who has found himself at odds with Trump on multiple occasions but has lived to tell the tale. The question is whether he can do it again in 2026, and whether the tension evaporates as it has before or if Trump actually takes the step of backing a primary challenger this time.
'That's a step up,' Massie said Tuesday, speaking about Trump's threats. 'In 2020, he wanted me thrown out of the GOP, so losing a seat wouldn't be as bad as being thrown out, would it?'
'I think that's hyperbole on his part. I'm not worried about it,' Massie continued.
Massie, a staunch libertarian who came to Washington as the tea party took over the House Republican conference in the early 2010s, has indeed found himself crosswise with Trump over the years.
He blasted early attempts by Republicans to repeal Obamacare in 2017. He sided with Democrats in an attempt to overturn Trump's emergency declaration on the southern border in 2019. And his opposition to the 2020 Covid relief package during the early days of the pandemic led to Trump labeling him a 'third rate Grandstander' on social media and encouraging a primary challenge against him.
Massie has long observed that he and Trump aren't coming from the same ideological roots. In 2017, he told the Washington Examiner that Trump's election had caused him to re-evaluate his assumptions about what motivated Republican voters during and after the tea party era.
'After some soul searching I realized when they voted for Rand [Paul] and Ron [Paul] and me in these primaries, they weren't voting for libertarian ideas — they were voting for the craziest son of a bitch in the race,' Massie said. 'And Donald Trump won best in class, as we had up until he came along.'
Massie revisited the quote in a brief interview with NBC News last year on the sidelines of a presidential campaign event for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in Iowa. Massie was one of the few members of Congress to endorse a Trump challenger in the 2024 primaries, and he withheld his endorsement of Trump in the general election until the race's final days.
'I used to think I wanted Congress to have more crazy candidates,' Massie said last year. 'And I have decided that is not the case. And I do think there's a backlash. People are looking for somebody that's just a solid conservative. I think we're tired of crazy, and the voters are too.'
'In the race for crazy, I used to be able to lead the lap sometimes,' Massie added with a smile. 'Now I can't even stay on the lead lap.'
Despite the high-profile dissents and social media confrontations, while Trump previously mused about finding a primary opponent to topple Massie, no serious one has materialized.
Massie cruised to victory in his primary months after Trump's 2020 threat, and he even won Trump's endorsement ahead of his 2022 primary.
To hear Massie describe it, he's weathered it fine. Other Republicans have lost primaries or decided to retire, sometimes amid tanking poll numbers, in the face of Trump's wrath. Not him.
'I've got the Trump antibodies,' Massie told Fox News in 2024 when asked if he'd face political retribution for not endorsing Trump's primary bid. He added, 'Trump came at me and I won my re-election, so I'm not worried about it.'
He currently faces only one Republican challenger, Nicole Lee Ethington, a nurse who has criticized Massie on social media for his 'no' vote on the recent legislation. But it remains to be seen how hard Trump or his allies might try to go after Massie in next year's GOP primary. The Kentucky Republican eclipsed 75% of the vote in each of his last three primaries.
Still, Massie's libertarian politics mean he's regularly found himself in the minority among congressional Republicans, particularly on the issues of spending, America's military involvement abroad and the government's use of surveillance at home.
Once again, he's found himself in a familiar place in Trump's Republican Party.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AOC's 6-Word Response To The Donald Trump And Elon Musk Breakup Is Going Viral
We're on day two post-breakup. At this point, we need to remember the "good times." Six months is quite the accomplishment, and honestly, waaay longer than we all thought it would last. One person who had some thoughts about it was AOC. Related: This Senator's Clap Back Fully Gagged An MSNBC Anchor, And The Clip Is Going Viral Here six-word response about it is going viral: 'The girls are fighting, aren't they?' — George Conway 👊🇺🇸🔥 (@gtconway3d) June 6, 2025 Spectrum News/gtconway3d/Twitter: @gtconway3d "The girls are fighting, aren't they?" Related: This Republican Lawmaker's Embarrassing Lack Of Knowledge Of The Term "Intersex" Went Viral After He Proposed An Amendment To Cut LGBTQ+ Funding People in the replies are loving it. "I generally don't care for it when pols do snide, but AOC's charm is so through the roof that she gets away with it," this person commented. "Gonna lib out for a second and say I love her a lot," another person wrote. And this person joked, "Men are too emotional to lead." I'd ALSO like to point out what this person said: "I like how this meme originated with azealia banks chiming in on nicki vs cardi beef in 2018 lol." IYKYK. Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share Also in In the News: "We Don't Import Food": 31 Americans Who Are Just So, So Confused About Tariffs And US Trade


CNN
30 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: What exactly is Trump's new travel ban about? Not national security
Any reasonable American could objectively ask what exactly President Donald Trump's new travel ban, which affects a dozen countries, is about. Is it about protecting Americans from 'murderers,' as Trump said Thursday, or punishing small countries for a modest number of students who overstayed their visas? The drive for Trump's first-term travel ban in 2017 and 2018 was clear. He was seeking to deliver on an ugly campaign promise to ban all Muslims from entering the US. That morphed, over the course of years as the administration adapted to court cases, into a ban on travel to the US by people from certain countries, most of which were majority-Muslim. It was only by agreeing to ignore Trump's anti-Muslim 2016 campaign statements and focus solely on the security-related language in his third attempt at a travel ban that the US Supreme Court ultimately gave its blessing to that ban. '… We must consider not only the statements of a particular President, but also the authority of the Presidency itself,' wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority opinion. Trump is using that authority again in his second term. But this time, as he said Thursday in the Oval Office, the ban is about removing 'horrendous' people who are in the country now and about keeping murderers out. The data suggest the travel ban will primarily affect students and businesspeople from countries in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean as well as the Middle East. It was an attack on Jewish community members in Colorado by an Egyptian national that convinced Trump to speed up plans to ban people from a dozen countries from entering the US, restarting the travel ban policy he pioneered during his first term. But Egypt is not on the travel ban list. Neither is Kuwait, the country where Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the suspect in the Boulder attack, lived before coming to the US. 'Egypt has been a country we deal with very closely. They have things under control,' Trump told reporters Thursday. Instead, the travel ban includes countries that Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who assembled the list, feel don't have things under control. That includes places like Equatorial Guinea in Africa and Burma, also known as Myanmar, in Asia. Neither is a nexus of terror threatening the American homeland. Trump's order announcing the travel ban explains that these countries have high rates of students and other travelers overstaying their visas in the US. It points to a report of DHS 'overstay' data from 2023 to argue that for more than 70% of people from Equatorial Guinea with US student visas, there is no record of them leaving the US when their visa ended. In real numbers, that equals 233 people with student visas. The numbers are similarly small for other African countries. 'They're just throwing things at the wall,' said David Bier, an immigration expert at the libertarian-leaning Cato institute and a Trump immigration policy critic. 'There's not really a coherent philosophy behind any of this,' Bier added. The reinstated travel ban does include countries associated with terrorism, including Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, all of which were also included in Trump's first-term travel ban. But it's worth noting that no immigrant or traveler from one of these countries has launched a terror attack on the US in recent years, according to a review by the Washington Post during Trump's first term. A man from Sudan killed one person at a Tennessee church in 2017. 'The president claims that there is no way to vet these nationals, yet that is exactly what his consular officers and border officials have successfully done for decades,' Bier said. The man responsible for the ISIS-inspired truck bomb in New Orleans in January, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, was a Texas-born Army veteran and US citizen. The new travel ban also includes Afghanistan, which could jeopardize many Afghans related to those who aided the US during its war there, as Shawn VanDiver, president of the aid organization #AfghanEvac, told CNN's Jim Sciutto on Thursday. 'There are 12,000 people who have been separated through the actions of our government, who have been waiting for more than three and a half years,' he said. The Trump administration recently paused the processing of student visas, interrupting the plans of thousands of people to study in the US. In the Oval Office, Trump said he was not interested in banning students from China. 'It's our honor to have them, frankly, we want to have foreign students, but we want them to be checked,' Trump said, suggesting there will be even more strenuous background checks in the future. The existence of the travel ban list could also factor into tariff negotiations the Trump administration has taken on with nations across the world, as well as its effort to countries nations to take back migrants it wants to deport. 'It's about power and control and manipulating both the US population to suppress dissent as well as trying to manipulate foreign relations with these countries by getting them to do whatever he wants in order to get off the disfavored nation list,' Bier said.


Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump, Musk's Public Feud
The Pulse with Francine Lacqua Elon Musk signaled he would move to cool tensions with US President Donald Trump, after differences between the two exploded Thursday into an all-out public feud. Earlier in the day, Musk called for Trump's impeachment and insinuated he was withholding the release of files related to disgraced New York financier Jeffrey Epstein because of his own presence in them. Trump, in turn, proposed cutting off the billionaire's government contracts, following his onetime adviser's repeated exhortations for Republicans to vote against the president's signature tax legislation. Musk's olive branch came after Tesla Inc. shares tanked 14% and his personal wealth dropped by $34 billion. Today's guests: Emmanuel Cau, Barclays European Equity Strategy Head, Gregory Peters, PGIM Fixed Income Co-CIO, Maria Demertzis, The Conference Board Economy, Strategy & Finance Center Europe Lead. (Source: Bloomberg)